Website traffic measurement and rankings: competitive intelligence tools examination

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine and verify the competitive intelligence tools Alexa and SimilarWeb, which are broadly used for website traffic data estimation. Tested tools belong to the state of the art in this area.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use quantitative approach. Re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of Web information systems 2018-12, Vol.14 (4), p.423-437
Hauptverfasser: Prantl, David, Prantl, Martin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 437
container_issue 4
container_start_page 423
container_title International journal of Web information systems
container_volume 14
creator Prantl, David
Prantl, Martin
description PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine and verify the competitive intelligence tools Alexa and SimilarWeb, which are broadly used for website traffic data estimation. Tested tools belong to the state of the art in this area.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use quantitative approach. Research was conducted on a sample of Czech websites for which there are accurate traffic data values, against which the other data sets (less accurate) provided by Alexa and SimilarWeb will be compared.FindingsThe results show that neither tool can accurately determine the ranking of websites on the internet. However, it is possible to approximately determine the significance of a particular website. These results are useful for another research studies which use data from Alexa or SimilarWeb. Moreover, the results show that it is still not possible to accurately estimate website traffic of any website in the world.Research limitations/implicationsThe limitation of the research lies in the fact that it was conducted solely in the Czech market.Originality/valueSignificant amount of research studies use data sets provided by Alexa and SimilarWeb. However, none of these research studies focus on the quality of the website traffic data acquired by Alexa or SimilarWeb, nor do any of them refer to other studies that would deal with this issue. Furthermore, authors describe approaches to measuring website traffic and based on the analysis, the possible usability of these methods is discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/IJWIS-01-2018-0001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2140823207</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2140823207</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-6ce3dbf966f042e785f5402fc7173b32c66973324ab63d45e410063caba0dd333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwBzhF4hxYPxIn3FDFo6gSB4p6tBxnXbkkTrFdBP-elCJOM4eZ3dFHyCWFa0qhupk_r-avOdCcAa1yAKBHZEKlEKOv2fG_r8QpOYtxA1BWnNYTslxhE13CLAVtrTNZjzruAvboU6Z9mwXt351fx9vMDP0Wk0vuEzPnE3adW6M3Y3UYupjhl-6d18kN_pycWN1FvPjTKXl7uF_OnvLFy-N8drfIDacy5aVB3ja2LksLgqGsClsIYNZIKnnDmSnLWnLOhG5K3ooCBR13c6MbDW3LOZ-Sq8PdbRg-dhiT2gy74MeXilEBFeMM5Jhih5QJQ4wBrdoG1-vwrSioPT31S08BVXt6ak-P_wCkU2OJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2140823207</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Website traffic measurement and rankings: competitive intelligence tools examination</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Prantl, David ; Prantl, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Prantl, David ; Prantl, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine and verify the competitive intelligence tools Alexa and SimilarWeb, which are broadly used for website traffic data estimation. Tested tools belong to the state of the art in this area.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use quantitative approach. Research was conducted on a sample of Czech websites for which there are accurate traffic data values, against which the other data sets (less accurate) provided by Alexa and SimilarWeb will be compared.FindingsThe results show that neither tool can accurately determine the ranking of websites on the internet. However, it is possible to approximately determine the significance of a particular website. These results are useful for another research studies which use data from Alexa or SimilarWeb. Moreover, the results show that it is still not possible to accurately estimate website traffic of any website in the world.Research limitations/implicationsThe limitation of the research lies in the fact that it was conducted solely in the Czech market.Originality/valueSignificant amount of research studies use data sets provided by Alexa and SimilarWeb. However, none of these research studies focus on the quality of the website traffic data acquired by Alexa or SimilarWeb, nor do any of them refer to other studies that would deal with this issue. Furthermore, authors describe approaches to measuring website traffic and based on the analysis, the possible usability of these methods is discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1744-0084</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-0092</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/IJWIS-01-2018-0001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Competitive intelligence ; Data acquisition ; Datasets ; Information management ; Intelligence (information) ; Internet ; State of the art ; Traffic flow ; Traffic information ; Trends ; Webometrics ; Websites</subject><ispartof>International journal of Web information systems, 2018-12, Vol.14 (4), p.423-437</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-6ce3dbf966f042e785f5402fc7173b32c66973324ab63d45e410063caba0dd333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-6ce3dbf966f042e785f5402fc7173b32c66973324ab63d45e410063caba0dd333</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,21674,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prantl, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prantl, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>Website traffic measurement and rankings: competitive intelligence tools examination</title><title>International journal of Web information systems</title><description>PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine and verify the competitive intelligence tools Alexa and SimilarWeb, which are broadly used for website traffic data estimation. Tested tools belong to the state of the art in this area.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use quantitative approach. Research was conducted on a sample of Czech websites for which there are accurate traffic data values, against which the other data sets (less accurate) provided by Alexa and SimilarWeb will be compared.FindingsThe results show that neither tool can accurately determine the ranking of websites on the internet. However, it is possible to approximately determine the significance of a particular website. These results are useful for another research studies which use data from Alexa or SimilarWeb. Moreover, the results show that it is still not possible to accurately estimate website traffic of any website in the world.Research limitations/implicationsThe limitation of the research lies in the fact that it was conducted solely in the Czech market.Originality/valueSignificant amount of research studies use data sets provided by Alexa and SimilarWeb. However, none of these research studies focus on the quality of the website traffic data acquired by Alexa or SimilarWeb, nor do any of them refer to other studies that would deal with this issue. Furthermore, authors describe approaches to measuring website traffic and based on the analysis, the possible usability of these methods is discussed.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Competitive intelligence</subject><subject>Data acquisition</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Information management</subject><subject>Intelligence (information)</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>State of the art</subject><subject>Traffic flow</subject><subject>Traffic information</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Webometrics</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>1744-0084</issn><issn>1744-0092</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwBzhF4hxYPxIn3FDFo6gSB4p6tBxnXbkkTrFdBP-elCJOM4eZ3dFHyCWFa0qhupk_r-avOdCcAa1yAKBHZEKlEKOv2fG_r8QpOYtxA1BWnNYTslxhE13CLAVtrTNZjzruAvboU6Z9mwXt351fx9vMDP0Wk0vuEzPnE3adW6M3Y3UYupjhl-6d18kN_pycWN1FvPjTKXl7uF_OnvLFy-N8drfIDacy5aVB3ja2LksLgqGsClsIYNZIKnnDmSnLWnLOhG5K3ooCBR13c6MbDW3LOZ-Sq8PdbRg-dhiT2gy74MeXilEBFeMM5Jhih5QJQ4wBrdoG1-vwrSioPT31S08BVXt6ak-P_wCkU2OJ</recordid><startdate>20181203</startdate><enddate>20181203</enddate><creator>Prantl, David</creator><creator>Prantl, Martin</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181203</creationdate><title>Website traffic measurement and rankings: competitive intelligence tools examination</title><author>Prantl, David ; Prantl, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-6ce3dbf966f042e785f5402fc7173b32c66973324ab63d45e410063caba0dd333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Competitive intelligence</topic><topic>Data acquisition</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Information management</topic><topic>Intelligence (information)</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>State of the art</topic><topic>Traffic flow</topic><topic>Traffic information</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Webometrics</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prantl, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prantl, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of Web information systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prantl, David</au><au>Prantl, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Website traffic measurement and rankings: competitive intelligence tools examination</atitle><jtitle>International journal of Web information systems</jtitle><date>2018-12-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>423</spage><epage>437</epage><pages>423-437</pages><issn>1744-0084</issn><eissn>1744-0092</eissn><abstract>PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine and verify the competitive intelligence tools Alexa and SimilarWeb, which are broadly used for website traffic data estimation. Tested tools belong to the state of the art in this area.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use quantitative approach. Research was conducted on a sample of Czech websites for which there are accurate traffic data values, against which the other data sets (less accurate) provided by Alexa and SimilarWeb will be compared.FindingsThe results show that neither tool can accurately determine the ranking of websites on the internet. However, it is possible to approximately determine the significance of a particular website. These results are useful for another research studies which use data from Alexa or SimilarWeb. Moreover, the results show that it is still not possible to accurately estimate website traffic of any website in the world.Research limitations/implicationsThe limitation of the research lies in the fact that it was conducted solely in the Czech market.Originality/valueSignificant amount of research studies use data sets provided by Alexa and SimilarWeb. However, none of these research studies focus on the quality of the website traffic data acquired by Alexa or SimilarWeb, nor do any of them refer to other studies that would deal with this issue. Furthermore, authors describe approaches to measuring website traffic and based on the analysis, the possible usability of these methods is discussed.</abstract><cop>Bingley</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/IJWIS-01-2018-0001</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1744-0084
ispartof International journal of Web information systems, 2018-12, Vol.14 (4), p.423-437
issn 1744-0084
1744-0092
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2140823207
source Emerald Journals; Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection
subjects Algorithms
Competitive intelligence
Data acquisition
Datasets
Information management
Intelligence (information)
Internet
State of the art
Traffic flow
Traffic information
Trends
Webometrics
Websites
title Website traffic measurement and rankings: competitive intelligence tools examination
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T01%3A07%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Website%20traffic%20measurement%20and%20rankings:%20competitive%20intelligence%20tools%20examination&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20Web%20information%20systems&rft.au=Prantl,%20David&rft.date=2018-12-03&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=423&rft.epage=437&rft.pages=423-437&rft.issn=1744-0084&rft.eissn=1744-0092&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/IJWIS-01-2018-0001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2140823207%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2140823207&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true