Website traffic measurement and rankings: competitive intelligence tools examination
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine and verify the competitive intelligence tools Alexa and SimilarWeb, which are broadly used for website traffic data estimation. Tested tools belong to the state of the art in this area.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use quantitative approach. Re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of Web information systems 2018-12, Vol.14 (4), p.423-437 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 437 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 423 |
container_title | International journal of Web information systems |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Prantl, David Prantl, Martin |
description | PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine and verify the competitive intelligence tools Alexa and SimilarWeb, which are broadly used for website traffic data estimation. Tested tools belong to the state of the art in this area.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use quantitative approach. Research was conducted on a sample of Czech websites for which there are accurate traffic data values, against which the other data sets (less accurate) provided by Alexa and SimilarWeb will be compared.FindingsThe results show that neither tool can accurately determine the ranking of websites on the internet. However, it is possible to approximately determine the significance of a particular website. These results are useful for another research studies which use data from Alexa or SimilarWeb. Moreover, the results show that it is still not possible to accurately estimate website traffic of any website in the world.Research limitations/implicationsThe limitation of the research lies in the fact that it was conducted solely in the Czech market.Originality/valueSignificant amount of research studies use data sets provided by Alexa and SimilarWeb. However, none of these research studies focus on the quality of the website traffic data acquired by Alexa or SimilarWeb, nor do any of them refer to other studies that would deal with this issue. Furthermore, authors describe approaches to measuring website traffic and based on the analysis, the possible usability of these methods is discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/IJWIS-01-2018-0001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2140823207</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2140823207</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-6ce3dbf966f042e785f5402fc7173b32c66973324ab63d45e410063caba0dd333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwBzhF4hxYPxIn3FDFo6gSB4p6tBxnXbkkTrFdBP-elCJOM4eZ3dFHyCWFa0qhupk_r-avOdCcAa1yAKBHZEKlEKOv2fG_r8QpOYtxA1BWnNYTslxhE13CLAVtrTNZjzruAvboU6Z9mwXt351fx9vMDP0Wk0vuEzPnE3adW6M3Y3UYupjhl-6d18kN_pycWN1FvPjTKXl7uF_OnvLFy-N8drfIDacy5aVB3ja2LksLgqGsClsIYNZIKnnDmSnLWnLOhG5K3ooCBR13c6MbDW3LOZ-Sq8PdbRg-dhiT2gy74MeXilEBFeMM5Jhih5QJQ4wBrdoG1-vwrSioPT31S08BVXt6ak-P_wCkU2OJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2140823207</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Website traffic measurement and rankings: competitive intelligence tools examination</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Prantl, David ; Prantl, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Prantl, David ; Prantl, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine and verify the competitive intelligence tools Alexa and SimilarWeb, which are broadly used for website traffic data estimation. Tested tools belong to the state of the art in this area.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use quantitative approach. Research was conducted on a sample of Czech websites for which there are accurate traffic data values, against which the other data sets (less accurate) provided by Alexa and SimilarWeb will be compared.FindingsThe results show that neither tool can accurately determine the ranking of websites on the internet. However, it is possible to approximately determine the significance of a particular website. These results are useful for another research studies which use data from Alexa or SimilarWeb. Moreover, the results show that it is still not possible to accurately estimate website traffic of any website in the world.Research limitations/implicationsThe limitation of the research lies in the fact that it was conducted solely in the Czech market.Originality/valueSignificant amount of research studies use data sets provided by Alexa and SimilarWeb. However, none of these research studies focus on the quality of the website traffic data acquired by Alexa or SimilarWeb, nor do any of them refer to other studies that would deal with this issue. Furthermore, authors describe approaches to measuring website traffic and based on the analysis, the possible usability of these methods is discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1744-0084</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-0092</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/IJWIS-01-2018-0001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Competitive intelligence ; Data acquisition ; Datasets ; Information management ; Intelligence (information) ; Internet ; State of the art ; Traffic flow ; Traffic information ; Trends ; Webometrics ; Websites</subject><ispartof>International journal of Web information systems, 2018-12, Vol.14 (4), p.423-437</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-6ce3dbf966f042e785f5402fc7173b32c66973324ab63d45e410063caba0dd333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-6ce3dbf966f042e785f5402fc7173b32c66973324ab63d45e410063caba0dd333</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,21674,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prantl, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prantl, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>Website traffic measurement and rankings: competitive intelligence tools examination</title><title>International journal of Web information systems</title><description>PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine and verify the competitive intelligence tools Alexa and SimilarWeb, which are broadly used for website traffic data estimation. Tested tools belong to the state of the art in this area.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use quantitative approach. Research was conducted on a sample of Czech websites for which there are accurate traffic data values, against which the other data sets (less accurate) provided by Alexa and SimilarWeb will be compared.FindingsThe results show that neither tool can accurately determine the ranking of websites on the internet. However, it is possible to approximately determine the significance of a particular website. These results are useful for another research studies which use data from Alexa or SimilarWeb. Moreover, the results show that it is still not possible to accurately estimate website traffic of any website in the world.Research limitations/implicationsThe limitation of the research lies in the fact that it was conducted solely in the Czech market.Originality/valueSignificant amount of research studies use data sets provided by Alexa and SimilarWeb. However, none of these research studies focus on the quality of the website traffic data acquired by Alexa or SimilarWeb, nor do any of them refer to other studies that would deal with this issue. Furthermore, authors describe approaches to measuring website traffic and based on the analysis, the possible usability of these methods is discussed.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Competitive intelligence</subject><subject>Data acquisition</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Information management</subject><subject>Intelligence (information)</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>State of the art</subject><subject>Traffic flow</subject><subject>Traffic information</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Webometrics</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>1744-0084</issn><issn>1744-0092</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwBzhF4hxYPxIn3FDFo6gSB4p6tBxnXbkkTrFdBP-elCJOM4eZ3dFHyCWFa0qhupk_r-avOdCcAa1yAKBHZEKlEKOv2fG_r8QpOYtxA1BWnNYTslxhE13CLAVtrTNZjzruAvboU6Z9mwXt351fx9vMDP0Wk0vuEzPnE3adW6M3Y3UYupjhl-6d18kN_pycWN1FvPjTKXl7uF_OnvLFy-N8drfIDacy5aVB3ja2LksLgqGsClsIYNZIKnnDmSnLWnLOhG5K3ooCBR13c6MbDW3LOZ-Sq8PdbRg-dhiT2gy74MeXilEBFeMM5Jhih5QJQ4wBrdoG1-vwrSioPT31S08BVXt6ak-P_wCkU2OJ</recordid><startdate>20181203</startdate><enddate>20181203</enddate><creator>Prantl, David</creator><creator>Prantl, Martin</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181203</creationdate><title>Website traffic measurement and rankings: competitive intelligence tools examination</title><author>Prantl, David ; Prantl, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-6ce3dbf966f042e785f5402fc7173b32c66973324ab63d45e410063caba0dd333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Competitive intelligence</topic><topic>Data acquisition</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Information management</topic><topic>Intelligence (information)</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>State of the art</topic><topic>Traffic flow</topic><topic>Traffic information</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Webometrics</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prantl, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prantl, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of Web information systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prantl, David</au><au>Prantl, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Website traffic measurement and rankings: competitive intelligence tools examination</atitle><jtitle>International journal of Web information systems</jtitle><date>2018-12-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>423</spage><epage>437</epage><pages>423-437</pages><issn>1744-0084</issn><eissn>1744-0092</eissn><abstract>PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine and verify the competitive intelligence tools Alexa and SimilarWeb, which are broadly used for website traffic data estimation. Tested tools belong to the state of the art in this area.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use quantitative approach. Research was conducted on a sample of Czech websites for which there are accurate traffic data values, against which the other data sets (less accurate) provided by Alexa and SimilarWeb will be compared.FindingsThe results show that neither tool can accurately determine the ranking of websites on the internet. However, it is possible to approximately determine the significance of a particular website. These results are useful for another research studies which use data from Alexa or SimilarWeb. Moreover, the results show that it is still not possible to accurately estimate website traffic of any website in the world.Research limitations/implicationsThe limitation of the research lies in the fact that it was conducted solely in the Czech market.Originality/valueSignificant amount of research studies use data sets provided by Alexa and SimilarWeb. However, none of these research studies focus on the quality of the website traffic data acquired by Alexa or SimilarWeb, nor do any of them refer to other studies that would deal with this issue. Furthermore, authors describe approaches to measuring website traffic and based on the analysis, the possible usability of these methods is discussed.</abstract><cop>Bingley</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/IJWIS-01-2018-0001</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1744-0084 |
ispartof | International journal of Web information systems, 2018-12, Vol.14 (4), p.423-437 |
issn | 1744-0084 1744-0092 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2140823207 |
source | Emerald Journals; Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection |
subjects | Algorithms Competitive intelligence Data acquisition Datasets Information management Intelligence (information) Internet State of the art Traffic flow Traffic information Trends Webometrics Websites |
title | Website traffic measurement and rankings: competitive intelligence tools examination |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T01%3A07%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Website%20traffic%20measurement%20and%20rankings:%20competitive%20intelligence%20tools%20examination&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20Web%20information%20systems&rft.au=Prantl,%20David&rft.date=2018-12-03&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=423&rft.epage=437&rft.pages=423-437&rft.issn=1744-0084&rft.eissn=1744-0092&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/IJWIS-01-2018-0001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2140823207%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2140823207&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |