EXPECTANCY EFFECTS IN FORENSIC EVIDENCE HANDLING: SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES
Expectancy effects in forensic evidence handling pose a serious threat to the validity of analyses conducted by forensic examiners. This questionable validity creates an impasse regarding key assumptions of law involving the admissibility of scientific and expert testimony. The history of specific r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the Institute of Justice and International Studies 2007-01 (7), p.308 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 308 |
container_title | Journal of the Institute of Justice and International Studies |
container_volume | |
creator | Springer, Victoria |
description | Expectancy effects in forensic evidence handling pose a serious threat to the validity of analyses conducted by forensic examiners. This questionable validity creates an impasse regarding key assumptions of law involving the admissibility of scientific and expert testimony. The history of specific rules of law governing the use of scientific evidence in the courtroom is detailed, followed by a review of social psychological concepts that provide a foundation for understanding how expectancy effects occur. The following review of theories of self and identity, and group theory will address the phenomena of expectancy effects from a social psychological perspective. This discussion emphasizes the need for review of forensic practices due to the human influence that examiners impart on the evidence, and the impact outside social forces exert on the examiners themselves. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_213961852</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1621658651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2139618523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjEsLgkAYRYcoyB7_YWgvOA6-2sn4jQ7IjDgiuZIWtpDIcvL_pxCtW91zOZe7QhbxaGgHEQnWP3aiLdoZ0zsOJcSnFtJwKYBVsWQNBs5n1FhIzFUJUguGoRYJSAY4i2WSC5mesVZMxDkudMMylatUsKVBqZcjUYM-oM3tejfd8Zt7dOJQscx-jsNr6sy77YdpfMyqdQmNfBJ6Lv1r9AGW8jjg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>213961852</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>EXPECTANCY EFFECTS IN FORENSIC EVIDENCE HANDLING: SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Springer, Victoria</creator><creatorcontrib>Springer, Victoria</creatorcontrib><description>Expectancy effects in forensic evidence handling pose a serious threat to the validity of analyses conducted by forensic examiners. This questionable validity creates an impasse regarding key assumptions of law involving the admissibility of scientific and expert testimony. The history of specific rules of law governing the use of scientific evidence in the courtroom is detailed, followed by a review of social psychological concepts that provide a foundation for understanding how expectancy effects occur. The following review of theories of self and identity, and group theory will address the phenomena of expectancy effects from a social psychological perspective. This discussion emphasizes the need for review of forensic practices due to the human influence that examiners impart on the evidence, and the impact outside social forces exert on the examiners themselves. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1538-7909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-7917</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Warrensburg: University of Central Missouri</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Criminal investigations ; Expectancy theories ; Human influences ; Judicial reviews ; Science ; Social psychology</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Institute of Justice and International Studies, 2007-01 (7), p.308</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of Central Missouri 2007</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Springer, Victoria</creatorcontrib><title>EXPECTANCY EFFECTS IN FORENSIC EVIDENCE HANDLING: SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES</title><title>Journal of the Institute of Justice and International Studies</title><description>Expectancy effects in forensic evidence handling pose a serious threat to the validity of analyses conducted by forensic examiners. This questionable validity creates an impasse regarding key assumptions of law involving the admissibility of scientific and expert testimony. The history of specific rules of law governing the use of scientific evidence in the courtroom is detailed, followed by a review of social psychological concepts that provide a foundation for understanding how expectancy effects occur. The following review of theories of self and identity, and group theory will address the phenomena of expectancy effects from a social psychological perspective. This discussion emphasizes the need for review of forensic practices due to the human influence that examiners impart on the evidence, and the impact outside social forces exert on the examiners themselves. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Criminal investigations</subject><subject>Expectancy theories</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Judicial reviews</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><issn>1538-7909</issn><issn>1538-7917</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjEsLgkAYRYcoyB7_YWgvOA6-2sn4jQ7IjDgiuZIWtpDIcvL_pxCtW91zOZe7QhbxaGgHEQnWP3aiLdoZ0zsOJcSnFtJwKYBVsWQNBs5n1FhIzFUJUguGoRYJSAY4i2WSC5mesVZMxDkudMMylatUsKVBqZcjUYM-oM3tejfd8Zt7dOJQscx-jsNr6sy77YdpfMyqdQmNfBJ6Lv1r9AGW8jjg</recordid><startdate>20070101</startdate><enddate>20070101</enddate><creator>Springer, Victoria</creator><general>University of Central Missouri</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070101</creationdate><title>EXPECTANCY EFFECTS IN FORENSIC EVIDENCE HANDLING: SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES</title><author>Springer, Victoria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2139618523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Criminal investigations</topic><topic>Expectancy theories</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Judicial reviews</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Springer, Victoria</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Institute of Justice and International Studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Springer, Victoria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EXPECTANCY EFFECTS IN FORENSIC EVIDENCE HANDLING: SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Institute of Justice and International Studies</jtitle><date>2007-01-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><issue>7</issue><spage>308</spage><pages>308-</pages><issn>1538-7909</issn><eissn>1538-7917</eissn><abstract>Expectancy effects in forensic evidence handling pose a serious threat to the validity of analyses conducted by forensic examiners. This questionable validity creates an impasse regarding key assumptions of law involving the admissibility of scientific and expert testimony. The history of specific rules of law governing the use of scientific evidence in the courtroom is detailed, followed by a review of social psychological concepts that provide a foundation for understanding how expectancy effects occur. The following review of theories of self and identity, and group theory will address the phenomena of expectancy effects from a social psychological perspective. This discussion emphasizes the need for review of forensic practices due to the human influence that examiners impart on the evidence, and the impact outside social forces exert on the examiners themselves. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Warrensburg</cop><pub>University of Central Missouri</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1538-7909 |
ispartof | Journal of the Institute of Justice and International Studies, 2007-01 (7), p.308 |
issn | 1538-7909 1538-7917 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_213961852 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Behavior Criminal investigations Expectancy theories Human influences Judicial reviews Science Social psychology |
title | EXPECTANCY EFFECTS IN FORENSIC EVIDENCE HANDLING: SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T05%3A18%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EXPECTANCY%20EFFECTS%20IN%20FORENSIC%20EVIDENCE%20HANDLING:%20SOCIAL%20PSYCHOLOGICAL%20PERSPECTIVES&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Institute%20of%20Justice%20and%20International%20Studies&rft.au=Springer,%20Victoria&rft.date=2007-01-01&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=308&rft.pages=308-&rft.issn=1538-7909&rft.eissn=1538-7917&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1621658651%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=213961852&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |