New Zealand forest dynamics: a review of past and present vegetation responses to disturbance, and development of conceptual forest models
New Zealand forests have been and are shaped by a suite of disturbance types that vary in both their spatial extent and frequency of recurrence. Post-disturbance forest dynamics can be complex, non-linear, and involve multiple potential pathways depending on the nature of a perturbation, site condit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | New Zealand Journal of Ecology 2018-01, Vol.42 (2), p.87-106 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 106 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 87 |
container_title | New Zealand Journal of Ecology |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Wyse, Sarah V. Wilmshurst, Janet M. Burns, Bruce R. Perry, George L.W. |
description | New Zealand forests have been and are shaped by a suite of disturbance types that vary in both their spatial extent and frequency of recurrence. Post-disturbance forest dynamics can be complex, non-linear, and involve multiple potential pathways depending on the nature of a perturbation, site conditions, and history. To capture the full range of spatial and temporal dynamics that shape forest ecosystems in a given area, we need to use and synthesise data sources that collectively capture all the relevant space-time scales. Here we integrate palaeoecological data with contemporary ecological evidence to build conceptual models describing post-disturbance dynamics in New Zealand (NZ) forests, encompassing large temporal and spatial scales. We review NZ forest disturbance regimes, focussing primarily on geological and geomorphic disturbances and weather-related disturbances but also considering the role of anthropogenic disturbance in shaping present-day NZ forests. Combining information from 58 studies of post-disturbance forest succession, we derive conceptual models and describe forest communities and forest change for conifer-angiosperm (including kauri forest), and beech forests (pure and mixed). The methods used in these studies included chronosequences, assessments of stand dynamics, longitudinal studies, palaeoecological reconstructions, and comparisons with historical observations; the temporal range of the studies extended from 15 years to millennia (c. 14 000 years BP). Our models capture the generalities of NZ forest dynamics, and can be used to support modelling and help guide decision-making in areas such as ecosystem restoration. However, this generality limits model resolution, meaning the models do not always portray the specific features of individual sites and successional pathways. There is, therefore, scope for more detailed, site-specific development and refinement of these frameworks. Finally, our models capture successional pathways and native plant communities from the past and present; invasive species, climate change, and exotic plant pathogens are likely to alter future forest dynamics in novel and unpredictable ways. These models, however, provide us with baselines against which to interpret and assess the impacts of such effects on forest composition and processes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.20417/nzjecol.42.18 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2139457825</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26538101</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26538101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-f135a902970283097759631d334004fdc6378e6e2bbe4b2a4a1103217e4af7073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEFLw0AQhRdRMFavXkQIeE6c2dlkNkcpVoWiF714WTbJBhrSpO6mSP31BlM8vcv3Zt57QlwjpBIU8n3_07pq6FIlU9QnIkJkTpi1PhURIEKSqzw7FxchtACkkSgSN6_uO_50trN9HTeDd2GM60Nvt5sqXIqzxnbBXR11IT5Wj-_L52T99vSyfFgnFcliTBqkzBYgCwapCQrmrMgJayIFoJq6yom1y50sS6dKaZWdspBEdso2DEwLcTff3fnhaz8lMO2w9_300kikQmWsZTZR6UxVfgjBu8bs_GZr_cEgmL8BzHEAo6RBPRluZ0MbxsH_0zLPpu6A9Auq8lYX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2139457825</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>New Zealand forest dynamics: a review of past and present vegetation responses to disturbance, and development of conceptual forest models</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>JSTOR</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Wyse, Sarah V. ; Wilmshurst, Janet M. ; Burns, Bruce R. ; Perry, George L.W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wyse, Sarah V. ; Wilmshurst, Janet M. ; Burns, Bruce R. ; Perry, George L.W. ; School of Environment, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand</creatorcontrib><description>New Zealand forests have been and are shaped by a suite of disturbance types that vary in both their spatial extent and frequency of recurrence. Post-disturbance forest dynamics can be complex, non-linear, and involve multiple potential pathways depending on the nature of a perturbation, site conditions, and history. To capture the full range of spatial and temporal dynamics that shape forest ecosystems in a given area, we need to use and synthesise data sources that collectively capture all the relevant space-time scales. Here we integrate palaeoecological data with contemporary ecological evidence to build conceptual models describing post-disturbance dynamics in New Zealand (NZ) forests, encompassing large temporal and spatial scales. We review NZ forest disturbance regimes, focussing primarily on geological and geomorphic disturbances and weather-related disturbances but also considering the role of anthropogenic disturbance in shaping present-day NZ forests. Combining information from 58 studies of post-disturbance forest succession, we derive conceptual models and describe forest communities and forest change for conifer-angiosperm (including kauri forest), and beech forests (pure and mixed). The methods used in these studies included chronosequences, assessments of stand dynamics, longitudinal studies, palaeoecological reconstructions, and comparisons with historical observations; the temporal range of the studies extended from 15 years to millennia (c. 14 000 years BP). Our models capture the generalities of NZ forest dynamics, and can be used to support modelling and help guide decision-making in areas such as ecosystem restoration. However, this generality limits model resolution, meaning the models do not always portray the specific features of individual sites and successional pathways. There is, therefore, scope for more detailed, site-specific development and refinement of these frameworks. Finally, our models capture successional pathways and native plant communities from the past and present; invasive species, climate change, and exotic plant pathogens are likely to alter future forest dynamics in novel and unpredictable ways. These models, however, provide us with baselines against which to interpret and assess the impacts of such effects on forest composition and processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0110-6465</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1177-7788</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.20417/nzjecol.42.18</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Christchurch: New Zealand Ecological Society</publisher><subject>Anthropogenic factors ; Beech ; Climate change ; Composition effects ; Correlation analysis ; Decision making ; Disturbances ; Drought ; Ecological succession ; Ecology ; Ecosystem restoration ; Environmental restoration ; Flowers & plants ; Forest communities ; Forest ecosystems ; Forest management ; Forests ; Frequency dependence ; Geology ; Geomorphology ; Human influences ; Indigenous plants ; Introduced plants ; Introduced species ; Invasive species ; Longitudinal studies ; Nonnative species ; Plant communities ; REVIEW ARTICLE ; Spatial analysis ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Trees ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 2018-01, Vol.42 (2), p.87-106</ispartof><rights>New Zealand Ecological Society</rights><rights>Copyright New Zealand Ecological Society 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-f135a902970283097759631d334004fdc6378e6e2bbe4b2a4a1103217e4af7073</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26538101$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26538101$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wyse, Sarah V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilmshurst, Janet M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burns, Bruce R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, George L.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>School of Environment, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand</creatorcontrib><title>New Zealand forest dynamics: a review of past and present vegetation responses to disturbance, and development of conceptual forest models</title><title>New Zealand Journal of Ecology</title><description>New Zealand forests have been and are shaped by a suite of disturbance types that vary in both their spatial extent and frequency of recurrence. Post-disturbance forest dynamics can be complex, non-linear, and involve multiple potential pathways depending on the nature of a perturbation, site conditions, and history. To capture the full range of spatial and temporal dynamics that shape forest ecosystems in a given area, we need to use and synthesise data sources that collectively capture all the relevant space-time scales. Here we integrate palaeoecological data with contemporary ecological evidence to build conceptual models describing post-disturbance dynamics in New Zealand (NZ) forests, encompassing large temporal and spatial scales. We review NZ forest disturbance regimes, focussing primarily on geological and geomorphic disturbances and weather-related disturbances but also considering the role of anthropogenic disturbance in shaping present-day NZ forests. Combining information from 58 studies of post-disturbance forest succession, we derive conceptual models and describe forest communities and forest change for conifer-angiosperm (including kauri forest), and beech forests (pure and mixed). The methods used in these studies included chronosequences, assessments of stand dynamics, longitudinal studies, palaeoecological reconstructions, and comparisons with historical observations; the temporal range of the studies extended from 15 years to millennia (c. 14 000 years BP). Our models capture the generalities of NZ forest dynamics, and can be used to support modelling and help guide decision-making in areas such as ecosystem restoration. However, this generality limits model resolution, meaning the models do not always portray the specific features of individual sites and successional pathways. There is, therefore, scope for more detailed, site-specific development and refinement of these frameworks. Finally, our models capture successional pathways and native plant communities from the past and present; invasive species, climate change, and exotic plant pathogens are likely to alter future forest dynamics in novel and unpredictable ways. These models, however, provide us with baselines against which to interpret and assess the impacts of such effects on forest composition and processes.</description><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Beech</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Composition effects</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Disturbances</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Ecological succession</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem restoration</subject><subject>Environmental restoration</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Forest communities</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Frequency dependence</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Geomorphology</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Indigenous plants</subject><subject>Introduced plants</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Longitudinal studies</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Plant communities</subject><subject>REVIEW ARTICLE</subject><subject>Spatial analysis</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>0110-6465</issn><issn>1177-7788</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEFLw0AQhRdRMFavXkQIeE6c2dlkNkcpVoWiF714WTbJBhrSpO6mSP31BlM8vcv3Zt57QlwjpBIU8n3_07pq6FIlU9QnIkJkTpi1PhURIEKSqzw7FxchtACkkSgSN6_uO_50trN9HTeDd2GM60Nvt5sqXIqzxnbBXR11IT5Wj-_L52T99vSyfFgnFcliTBqkzBYgCwapCQrmrMgJayIFoJq6yom1y50sS6dKaZWdspBEdso2DEwLcTff3fnhaz8lMO2w9_300kikQmWsZTZR6UxVfgjBu8bs_GZr_cEgmL8BzHEAo6RBPRluZ0MbxsH_0zLPpu6A9Auq8lYX</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Wyse, Sarah V.</creator><creator>Wilmshurst, Janet M.</creator><creator>Burns, Bruce R.</creator><creator>Perry, George L.W.</creator><general>New Zealand Ecological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AYAGU</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>New Zealand forest dynamics</title><author>Wyse, Sarah V. ; Wilmshurst, Janet M. ; Burns, Bruce R. ; Perry, George L.W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-f135a902970283097759631d334004fdc6378e6e2bbe4b2a4a1103217e4af7073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Beech</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Composition effects</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Disturbances</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Ecological succession</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem restoration</topic><topic>Environmental restoration</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Forest communities</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Frequency dependence</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Geomorphology</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Indigenous plants</topic><topic>Introduced plants</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Longitudinal studies</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Plant communities</topic><topic>REVIEW ARTICLE</topic><topic>Spatial analysis</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wyse, Sarah V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilmshurst, Janet M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burns, Bruce R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, George L.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>School of Environment, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture & Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Australia & New Zealand Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>New Zealand Journal of Ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wyse, Sarah V.</au><au>Wilmshurst, Janet M.</au><au>Burns, Bruce R.</au><au>Perry, George L.W.</au><aucorp>School of Environment, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>New Zealand forest dynamics: a review of past and present vegetation responses to disturbance, and development of conceptual forest models</atitle><jtitle>New Zealand Journal of Ecology</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>87</spage><epage>106</epage><pages>87-106</pages><issn>0110-6465</issn><eissn>1177-7788</eissn><abstract>New Zealand forests have been and are shaped by a suite of disturbance types that vary in both their spatial extent and frequency of recurrence. Post-disturbance forest dynamics can be complex, non-linear, and involve multiple potential pathways depending on the nature of a perturbation, site conditions, and history. To capture the full range of spatial and temporal dynamics that shape forest ecosystems in a given area, we need to use and synthesise data sources that collectively capture all the relevant space-time scales. Here we integrate palaeoecological data with contemporary ecological evidence to build conceptual models describing post-disturbance dynamics in New Zealand (NZ) forests, encompassing large temporal and spatial scales. We review NZ forest disturbance regimes, focussing primarily on geological and geomorphic disturbances and weather-related disturbances but also considering the role of anthropogenic disturbance in shaping present-day NZ forests. Combining information from 58 studies of post-disturbance forest succession, we derive conceptual models and describe forest communities and forest change for conifer-angiosperm (including kauri forest), and beech forests (pure and mixed). The methods used in these studies included chronosequences, assessments of stand dynamics, longitudinal studies, palaeoecological reconstructions, and comparisons with historical observations; the temporal range of the studies extended from 15 years to millennia (c. 14 000 years BP). Our models capture the generalities of NZ forest dynamics, and can be used to support modelling and help guide decision-making in areas such as ecosystem restoration. However, this generality limits model resolution, meaning the models do not always portray the specific features of individual sites and successional pathways. There is, therefore, scope for more detailed, site-specific development and refinement of these frameworks. Finally, our models capture successional pathways and native plant communities from the past and present; invasive species, climate change, and exotic plant pathogens are likely to alter future forest dynamics in novel and unpredictable ways. These models, however, provide us with baselines against which to interpret and assess the impacts of such effects on forest composition and processes.</abstract><cop>Christchurch</cop><pub>New Zealand Ecological Society</pub><doi>10.20417/nzjecol.42.18</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0110-6465 |
ispartof | New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 2018-01, Vol.42 (2), p.87-106 |
issn | 0110-6465 1177-7788 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2139457825 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection; JSTOR; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Anthropogenic factors Beech Climate change Composition effects Correlation analysis Decision making Disturbances Drought Ecological succession Ecology Ecosystem restoration Environmental restoration Flowers & plants Forest communities Forest ecosystems Forest management Forests Frequency dependence Geology Geomorphology Human influences Indigenous plants Introduced plants Introduced species Invasive species Longitudinal studies Nonnative species Plant communities REVIEW ARTICLE Spatial analysis Terrestrial ecosystems Trees Vegetation |
title | New Zealand forest dynamics: a review of past and present vegetation responses to disturbance, and development of conceptual forest models |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T19%3A07%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New%20Zealand%20forest%20dynamics:%20a%20review%20of%20past%20and%20present%20vegetation%20responses%20to%20disturbance,%20and%20development%20of%20conceptual%20forest%20models&rft.jtitle=New%20Zealand%20Journal%20of%20Ecology&rft.au=Wyse,%20Sarah%20V.&rft.aucorp=School%20of%20Environment,%20University%20of%20Auckland,%20Private%20Bag%2092019,%20Auckland%201142,%20New%20Zealand&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=87&rft.epage=106&rft.pages=87-106&rft.issn=0110-6465&rft.eissn=1177-7788&rft_id=info:doi/10.20417/nzjecol.42.18&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26538101%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2139457825&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26538101&rfr_iscdi=true |