The Effective Dates of No-Fault Divorce Laws in the 50 States
We use prior research and state legislative histories to develop a set of decision rules for determining the dates for adoption of no-fault divorce laws in the 50 states. Social scientists have attempted to gauge the impact of no-fault divorce laws on the stability of the family and on the rate of d...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Family relations 2002-10, Vol.51 (4), p.317-324 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 324 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 317 |
| container_title | Family relations |
| container_volume | 51 |
| creator | Vlosky, Denese Ashbaugh Monroe, Pamela A. |
| description | We use prior research and state legislative histories to develop a set of decision rules for determining the dates for adoption of no-fault divorce laws in the 50 states. Social scientists have attempted to gauge the impact of no-fault divorce laws on the stability of the family and on the rate of divorce, but the adoption dates used by these researchers varied widely. Such divergences yield conflicting findings on issues related to the impact of no-fault divorce laws on family outcomes. We examine in detail the varying methods used in prior studies for determining no-fault dates, then suggest a method for resolving the conflicts. Precision in and standardization of the dates of no-fault divorce laws used in this body of research will minimize measurement error and improve confidence in the research. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2002.00317.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_213934769</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3700329</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3700329</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3977-7d48369dbf97088a1f0eabe0508d197daa75fdec60dec6df1cc16e1e3500b6363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwByws9gl2nNjJoouqbcqjKqItYjlyE1sklKbY6evvcQjqmlnMWLr3jEcXIUyJT13dlz4VIfWYCBI_ICTwCWFU-Icz1DkJ56hDaCI8znl4ia6sLYkrGoYd1Ft8KDzSWmV1sVN4KGtlcaXxtPJSuV3VeFjsKpMpPJF7i4s1rp0_InheN85rdKHlyqqbv9lFb-loMXjwJi_jx0F_4mUsEcITeRgznuRLnQgSx5JqouRSkYjEubsrl1JEOlcZJ03LNc0yyhVVLCJkyRlnXXTX7t2Y6nurbA1ltTVr9yUElCUsFDxxprg1Zaay1igNG1N8SXMESqDJCkpoIoEmEmiygt-s4ODQXovui5U6_puDtD8buZfjb1u-tHVlTjwTzhg0l3mtXNhaHU6yNJ_ABRMRvE_H8PSazsRwMIdn9gNYDoYB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>213934769</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effective Dates of No-Fault Divorce Laws in the 50 States</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Vlosky, Denese Ashbaugh ; Monroe, Pamela A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vlosky, Denese Ashbaugh ; Monroe, Pamela A.</creatorcontrib><description>We use prior research and state legislative histories to develop a set of decision rules for determining the dates for adoption of no-fault divorce laws in the 50 states. Social scientists have attempted to gauge the impact of no-fault divorce laws on the stability of the family and on the rate of divorce, but the adoption dates used by these researchers varied widely. Such divergences yield conflicting findings on issues related to the impact of no-fault divorce laws on family outcomes. We examine in detail the varying methods used in prior studies for determining no-fault dates, then suggest a method for resolving the conflicts. Precision in and standardization of the dates of no-fault divorce laws used in this body of research will minimize measurement error and improve confidence in the research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-6664</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-3729</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0197-6664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2002.00317.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FAREDL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing</publisher><subject>Divorce ; Divorce law ; Divorce rates ; Error of Measurement ; family ; Family (Sociological Unit) ; Family law ; law ; Legislation ; Marriage law ; No fault divorces ; no-fault divorce ; Political parties ; Predictor Variables ; Reference Materials ; Researchers ; Rule of law ; Social Scientists ; Spouses ; State laws ; State legislation ; Statutory law</subject><ispartof>Family relations, 2002-10, Vol.51 (4), p.317-324</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2002 National Council on Family Relations</rights><rights>Copyright National Council on Family Relations Oct 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3977-7d48369dbf97088a1f0eabe0508d197daa75fdec60dec6df1cc16e1e3500b6363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3977-7d48369dbf97088a1f0eabe0508d197daa75fdec60dec6df1cc16e1e3500b6363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3700329$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3700329$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27344,27924,27925,33774,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vlosky, Denese Ashbaugh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monroe, Pamela A.</creatorcontrib><title>The Effective Dates of No-Fault Divorce Laws in the 50 States</title><title>Family relations</title><description>We use prior research and state legislative histories to develop a set of decision rules for determining the dates for adoption of no-fault divorce laws in the 50 states. Social scientists have attempted to gauge the impact of no-fault divorce laws on the stability of the family and on the rate of divorce, but the adoption dates used by these researchers varied widely. Such divergences yield conflicting findings on issues related to the impact of no-fault divorce laws on family outcomes. We examine in detail the varying methods used in prior studies for determining no-fault dates, then suggest a method for resolving the conflicts. Precision in and standardization of the dates of no-fault divorce laws used in this body of research will minimize measurement error and improve confidence in the research.</description><subject>Divorce</subject><subject>Divorce law</subject><subject>Divorce rates</subject><subject>Error of Measurement</subject><subject>family</subject><subject>Family (Sociological Unit)</subject><subject>Family law</subject><subject>law</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Marriage law</subject><subject>No fault divorces</subject><subject>no-fault divorce</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Predictor Variables</subject><subject>Reference Materials</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Rule of law</subject><subject>Social Scientists</subject><subject>Spouses</subject><subject>State laws</subject><subject>State legislation</subject><subject>Statutory law</subject><issn>0197-6664</issn><issn>1741-3729</issn><issn>0197-6664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwByws9gl2nNjJoouqbcqjKqItYjlyE1sklKbY6evvcQjqmlnMWLr3jEcXIUyJT13dlz4VIfWYCBI_ICTwCWFU-Icz1DkJ56hDaCI8znl4ia6sLYkrGoYd1Ft8KDzSWmV1sVN4KGtlcaXxtPJSuV3VeFjsKpMpPJF7i4s1rp0_InheN85rdKHlyqqbv9lFb-loMXjwJi_jx0F_4mUsEcITeRgznuRLnQgSx5JqouRSkYjEubsrl1JEOlcZJ03LNc0yyhVVLCJkyRlnXXTX7t2Y6nurbA1ltTVr9yUElCUsFDxxprg1Zaay1igNG1N8SXMESqDJCkpoIoEmEmiygt-s4ODQXovui5U6_puDtD8buZfjb1u-tHVlTjwTzhg0l3mtXNhaHU6yNJ_ABRMRvE_H8PSazsRwMIdn9gNYDoYB</recordid><startdate>200210</startdate><enddate>200210</enddate><creator>Vlosky, Denese Ashbaugh</creator><creator>Monroe, Pamela A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>National Council on Family Relations</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200210</creationdate><title>The Effective Dates of No-Fault Divorce Laws in the 50 States</title><author>Vlosky, Denese Ashbaugh ; Monroe, Pamela A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3977-7d48369dbf97088a1f0eabe0508d197daa75fdec60dec6df1cc16e1e3500b6363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Divorce</topic><topic>Divorce law</topic><topic>Divorce rates</topic><topic>Error of Measurement</topic><topic>family</topic><topic>Family (Sociological Unit)</topic><topic>Family law</topic><topic>law</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Marriage law</topic><topic>No fault divorces</topic><topic>no-fault divorce</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Predictor Variables</topic><topic>Reference Materials</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Rule of law</topic><topic>Social Scientists</topic><topic>Spouses</topic><topic>State laws</topic><topic>State legislation</topic><topic>Statutory law</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vlosky, Denese Ashbaugh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monroe, Pamela A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Family relations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vlosky, Denese Ashbaugh</au><au>Monroe, Pamela A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effective Dates of No-Fault Divorce Laws in the 50 States</atitle><jtitle>Family relations</jtitle><date>2002-10</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>317</spage><epage>324</epage><pages>317-324</pages><issn>0197-6664</issn><eissn>1741-3729</eissn><eissn>0197-6664</eissn><coden>FAREDL</coden><abstract>We use prior research and state legislative histories to develop a set of decision rules for determining the dates for adoption of no-fault divorce laws in the 50 states. Social scientists have attempted to gauge the impact of no-fault divorce laws on the stability of the family and on the rate of divorce, but the adoption dates used by these researchers varied widely. Such divergences yield conflicting findings on issues related to the impact of no-fault divorce laws on family outcomes. We examine in detail the varying methods used in prior studies for determining no-fault dates, then suggest a method for resolving the conflicts. Precision in and standardization of the dates of no-fault divorce laws used in this body of research will minimize measurement error and improve confidence in the research.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1741-3729.2002.00317.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0197-6664 |
| ispartof | Family relations, 2002-10, Vol.51 (4), p.317-324 |
| issn | 0197-6664 1741-3729 0197-6664 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_213934769 |
| source | Sociological Abstracts; Access via Wiley Online Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Education Source |
| subjects | Divorce Divorce law Divorce rates Error of Measurement family Family (Sociological Unit) Family law law Legislation Marriage law No fault divorces no-fault divorce Political parties Predictor Variables Reference Materials Researchers Rule of law Social Scientists Spouses State laws State legislation Statutory law |
| title | The Effective Dates of No-Fault Divorce Laws in the 50 States |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T07%3A50%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effective%20Dates%20of%20No-Fault%20Divorce%20Laws%20in%20the%2050%20States&rft.jtitle=Family%20relations&rft.au=Vlosky,%20Denese%20Ashbaugh&rft.date=2002-10&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=317&rft.epage=324&rft.pages=317-324&rft.issn=0197-6664&rft.eissn=1741-3729&rft.coden=FAREDL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2002.00317.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3700329%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=213934769&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3700329&rfr_iscdi=true |