Effectiveness of Lesson Planning: Factor Analysis
The paper presents the conceptual framework that guided the development of the Lesson Plan Evaluation Rubric (LPER) instrument derived from the Four Stages of Lesson Planning (FSLP) strategy and the empirical results that provide the insight into the elements of lesson planning. Teachers from urban...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of instructional psychology 2005-09, Vol.32 (3), p.215 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 215 |
| container_title | Journal of instructional psychology |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Panasuk, Regina M Todd, Jeffrey |
| description | The paper presents the conceptual framework that guided the development of the Lesson Plan Evaluation Rubric (LPER) instrument derived from the Four Stages of Lesson Planning (FSLP) strategy and the empirical results that provide the insight into the elements of lesson planning. Teachers from urban low-performing middle schools in one of the New England states received training and ongoing coaching in the FSLP strategy. Two hundred sixty one lesson plans from 39 teachers were collected during one school year of the two-year study to conduct factor analysis of the Rubric's 17 items. The resulting four factors are discussed in this paper. The research shows that the lessons plans developed with the reference to the FSLP strategy revealed a higher degree of lesson coherence. (Contains 2 figures and 1 table.) |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_213907728</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A137791002</galeid><ericid>EJ738300</ericid><sourcerecordid>A137791002</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e1538-84e6dae39cd736ab64f51b8c2d26d7664798720eb4827f35a79352b49d980fe23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxfegYK1-Aw-LnleSzG7-eCultUpBD3pestlJSdkmNdkK_fZG6rEyhwfD7828mYtiQoiqK6oaflVcp7QlhACAmhR0YS2a0X2jx5TKYMt11uDL90F77_zmqVxqM4ZYzrwejsmlm-LS6iHh7Z9Oi8_l4mO-qtZvzy_z2bpC2oCsZI281wjK9AK47nhtG9pJw3rGe8F5LZQUjGBXSyYsNFooaFhXq15JYpHBtLg_zd3H8HXANLbbcIg5RGoZBUWEYDJDD_9BtKYceI5CM1WdqI0esHXehjFqs8knRz0Ej9bl9oyCEIoS8rv68Qyfq8edM2cNdycDRmfafXQ7HY_t4lWAhPzpHxSdcbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1416365381</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of Lesson Planning: Factor Analysis</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Panasuk, Regina M ; Todd, Jeffrey</creator><creatorcontrib>Panasuk, Regina M ; Todd, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><description>The paper presents the conceptual framework that guided the development of the Lesson Plan Evaluation Rubric (LPER) instrument derived from the Four Stages of Lesson Planning (FSLP) strategy and the empirical results that provide the insight into the elements of lesson planning. Teachers from urban low-performing middle schools in one of the New England states received training and ongoing coaching in the FSLP strategy. Two hundred sixty one lesson plans from 39 teachers were collected during one school year of the two-year study to conduct factor analysis of the Rubric's 17 items. The resulting four factors are discussed in this paper. The research shows that the lessons plans developed with the reference to the FSLP strategy revealed a higher degree of lesson coherence. (Contains 2 figures and 1 table.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-1956</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JIPSBF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Milwaukee, Wis: Project Innovation, Inc</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Behavioral Objectives ; Factor Analysis ; Learning Processes ; Lesson planning ; Lesson Plans ; Low Achievement ; Methods ; Middle School Teachers ; Middle Schools ; New England ; Professional Development ; Teaching ; Urban Schools</subject><ispartof>Journal of instructional psychology, 2005-09, Vol.32 (3), p.215</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2005 George Uhlig Publisher</rights><rights>Copyright Journal of Instructional Psychology Sep 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27848</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ738300$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Panasuk, Regina M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todd, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of Lesson Planning: Factor Analysis</title><title>Journal of instructional psychology</title><description>The paper presents the conceptual framework that guided the development of the Lesson Plan Evaluation Rubric (LPER) instrument derived from the Four Stages of Lesson Planning (FSLP) strategy and the empirical results that provide the insight into the elements of lesson planning. Teachers from urban low-performing middle schools in one of the New England states received training and ongoing coaching in the FSLP strategy. Two hundred sixty one lesson plans from 39 teachers were collected during one school year of the two-year study to conduct factor analysis of the Rubric's 17 items. The resulting four factors are discussed in this paper. The research shows that the lessons plans developed with the reference to the FSLP strategy revealed a higher degree of lesson coherence. (Contains 2 figures and 1 table.)</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Behavioral Objectives</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Lesson planning</subject><subject>Lesson Plans</subject><subject>Low Achievement</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle School Teachers</subject><subject>Middle Schools</subject><subject>New England</subject><subject>Professional Development</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Urban Schools</subject><issn>0094-1956</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxfegYK1-Aw-LnleSzG7-eCultUpBD3pestlJSdkmNdkK_fZG6rEyhwfD7828mYtiQoiqK6oaflVcp7QlhACAmhR0YS2a0X2jx5TKYMt11uDL90F77_zmqVxqM4ZYzrwejsmlm-LS6iHh7Z9Oi8_l4mO-qtZvzy_z2bpC2oCsZI281wjK9AK47nhtG9pJw3rGe8F5LZQUjGBXSyYsNFooaFhXq15JYpHBtLg_zd3H8HXANLbbcIg5RGoZBUWEYDJDD_9BtKYceI5CM1WdqI0esHXehjFqs8knRz0Ej9bl9oyCEIoS8rv68Qyfq8edM2cNdycDRmfafXQ7HY_t4lWAhPzpHxSdcbQ</recordid><startdate>20050901</startdate><enddate>20050901</enddate><creator>Panasuk, Regina M</creator><creator>Todd, Jeffrey</creator><general>Project Innovation, Inc</general><general>George Uhlig Publisher</general><general>V-U Pub. Co</general><general>Journal of Instructional Psychology</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>ADABO</scope><scope>BEAJS</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PEXHY</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SFNNT</scope><scope>~OS</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050901</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of Lesson Planning: Factor Analysis</title><author>Panasuk, Regina M ; Todd, Jeffrey</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e1538-84e6dae39cd736ab64f51b8c2d26d7664798720eb4827f35a79352b49d980fe23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Behavioral Objectives</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Lesson planning</topic><topic>Lesson Plans</topic><topic>Low Achievement</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle School Teachers</topic><topic>Middle Schools</topic><topic>New England</topic><topic>Professional Development</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Urban Schools</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Panasuk, Regina M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todd, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 3 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 3</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 3.2</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 44</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 10</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of instructional psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Panasuk, Regina M</au><au>Todd, Jeffrey</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ738300</ericid><atitle>Effectiveness of Lesson Planning: Factor Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of instructional psychology</jtitle><date>2005-09-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>215</spage><pages>215-</pages><issn>0094-1956</issn><coden>JIPSBF</coden><abstract>The paper presents the conceptual framework that guided the development of the Lesson Plan Evaluation Rubric (LPER) instrument derived from the Four Stages of Lesson Planning (FSLP) strategy and the empirical results that provide the insight into the elements of lesson planning. Teachers from urban low-performing middle schools in one of the New England states received training and ongoing coaching in the FSLP strategy. Two hundred sixty one lesson plans from 39 teachers were collected during one school year of the two-year study to conduct factor analysis of the Rubric's 17 items. The resulting four factors are discussed in this paper. The research shows that the lessons plans developed with the reference to the FSLP strategy revealed a higher degree of lesson coherence. (Contains 2 figures and 1 table.)</abstract><cop>Milwaukee, Wis</cop><pub>Project Innovation, Inc</pub><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0094-1956 |
| ispartof | Journal of instructional psychology, 2005-09, Vol.32 (3), p.215 |
| issn | 0094-1956 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_213907728 |
| source | Periodicals Index Online; Education Source |
| subjects | Analysis Behavioral Objectives Factor Analysis Learning Processes Lesson planning Lesson Plans Low Achievement Methods Middle School Teachers Middle Schools New England Professional Development Teaching Urban Schools |
| title | Effectiveness of Lesson Planning: Factor Analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T10%3A48%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20Lesson%20Planning:%20Factor%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20instructional%20psychology&rft.au=Panasuk,%20Regina%20M&rft.date=2005-09-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=215&rft.pages=215-&rft.issn=0094-1956&rft.coden=JIPSBF&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA137791002%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1416365381&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A137791002&rft_ericid=EJ738300&rfr_iscdi=true |