Large carnivore distribution in relationship to environmental and anthropogenic factors in a multiple‐use landscape of Northern Tanzania
Effective management of threatened wildlife, particularly large carnivores, depends on a sound understanding of their spatial distribution and status in relationship to environmental or anthropogenic impacts. Here, we analyse data from spoor surveys to investigate occurrence across a multiple‐use la...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | African journal of ecology 2018-12, Vol.56 (4), p.972-983 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 983 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 972 |
container_title | African journal of ecology |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Mkonyi, Felix J. Estes, Anna B. Lichtenfeld, Laly L. Durant, Sarah M. |
description | Effective management of threatened wildlife, particularly large carnivores, depends on a sound understanding of their spatial distribution and status in relationship to environmental or anthropogenic impacts. Here, we analyse data from spoor surveys to investigate occurrence across a multiple‐use landscape in the Tarangire–Simanjiro ecosystem in northern Tanzania for four taxa of African large carnivores: lions (Panthera leo), hyaenas (spotted hyaenas (Crocuta crocuta) and striped hyaenas (Hyaena hyaena) combined), cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) and leopards (P. pardus). We analysed our data using occupancy modelling, explicitly accounting for detectability, to identify associations with environmental and anthropogenic variables. Overall occurrence was estimated at 0.85 (SE = 0.06) for hyaena, 0.82 (SE = 0.15) for cheetah, 0.55 (SE = 0.10) for lion and 0.61 (SE = 0.21) for leopard. Lion occurrence was negatively associated with distance to park boundary. Hyaena occurrence was positively associated with human population density and negatively associated with bushland, while cheetah and leopard occurrences were positively associated with grassland. These results suggest that lions may be more vulnerable to human impacts than other species, while hyaenas may benefit from vicinity to humans. Our study demonstrates the value of spoor‐based occupancy surveys for understanding distribution and habitat use of secretive large carnivores.
La gestion efficace de la faune menacée, et en particulier des grands carnivores, dépend d'une bonne appréhension de leur distribution spatiale et de leur statut en fonction des impacts environnementaux et anthropogènes. Nous analysons ici les données provenant d’études de traces pour étudier la présence, à travers un paysage à usages multiples dans l’écosystème Tarangire‐Simanjiro dans le nord de la Tanzanie, de quatre taxons de grands carnivores africains, les lions (Panthera leo), les hyènes tachetées (Crocuta crocuta) et rayées (Hyaena hyaena) prises ensemble, les guépards (Acinonyx jubatus) et les léopards (Panthera pardus). Nous avons analysé nos données en employant une modélisation de l'occupation, comptant clairement pour la détectabilité, pour identifier des associations avec des variables environnementales et anthropogènes. L'occurrence générale fut estimée à 0,85 (ES = 0.06) pour les hyènes, 0,82 (ES = 0.15) pour les guépards, 0,55 (ES = 0.10) pour les lions et 0.61 (ES = 0.21) pour les léopards. L'occurrence des lions éta |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/aje.12528 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2139046663</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2139046663</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3328-5b47d5b275b0a4dc7eab423a8a3a2a9de244da2c8b77b48e43629963e71a565f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A8sMTGk-CtOOqKqfKmCBeboklyoq9QOtgMqEzMTv5FfQkpZOel0NzzvnfQQcsrZhA91ASuccJGKfI-MuNRpIpjI98mIccUTnbHskByFsGKM5UqrEflcgH9GWoG35tV5pLUJ0Zuyj8ZZaiz12MJ2D0vT0ego2lfjnV2jjdBSsPXQceld557Rmoo2UEXnwzYKdN230XQtfn989QFpO-Chgg6pa-i983GJ3tJHsO9gDRyTgwbagCd_c0yeruaPs5tk8XB9O7tcJJWUIk_SUmV1WoosLRmousoQSiUk5CBBwLRGoVQNosrLLCtVjkpqMZ1qiRmHVKeNHJOz3d3Ou5ceQyxWrvd2eFkILqdMaa3lQJ3vqMq7EDw2RefNGvym4KzYqi4G1cWv6oG92LFvpsXN_2BxeTffJX4AoSKEEg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2139046663</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Large carnivore distribution in relationship to environmental and anthropogenic factors in a multiple‐use landscape of Northern Tanzania</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Mkonyi, Felix J. ; Estes, Anna B. ; Lichtenfeld, Laly L. ; Durant, Sarah M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mkonyi, Felix J. ; Estes, Anna B. ; Lichtenfeld, Laly L. ; Durant, Sarah M.</creatorcontrib><description>Effective management of threatened wildlife, particularly large carnivores, depends on a sound understanding of their spatial distribution and status in relationship to environmental or anthropogenic impacts. Here, we analyse data from spoor surveys to investigate occurrence across a multiple‐use landscape in the Tarangire–Simanjiro ecosystem in northern Tanzania for four taxa of African large carnivores: lions (Panthera leo), hyaenas (spotted hyaenas (Crocuta crocuta) and striped hyaenas (Hyaena hyaena) combined), cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) and leopards (P. pardus). We analysed our data using occupancy modelling, explicitly accounting for detectability, to identify associations with environmental and anthropogenic variables. Overall occurrence was estimated at 0.85 (SE = 0.06) for hyaena, 0.82 (SE = 0.15) for cheetah, 0.55 (SE = 0.10) for lion and 0.61 (SE = 0.21) for leopard. Lion occurrence was negatively associated with distance to park boundary. Hyaena occurrence was positively associated with human population density and negatively associated with bushland, while cheetah and leopard occurrences were positively associated with grassland. These results suggest that lions may be more vulnerable to human impacts than other species, while hyaenas may benefit from vicinity to humans. Our study demonstrates the value of spoor‐based occupancy surveys for understanding distribution and habitat use of secretive large carnivores.
La gestion efficace de la faune menacée, et en particulier des grands carnivores, dépend d'une bonne appréhension de leur distribution spatiale et de leur statut en fonction des impacts environnementaux et anthropogènes. Nous analysons ici les données provenant d’études de traces pour étudier la présence, à travers un paysage à usages multiples dans l’écosystème Tarangire‐Simanjiro dans le nord de la Tanzanie, de quatre taxons de grands carnivores africains, les lions (Panthera leo), les hyènes tachetées (Crocuta crocuta) et rayées (Hyaena hyaena) prises ensemble, les guépards (Acinonyx jubatus) et les léopards (Panthera pardus). Nous avons analysé nos données en employant une modélisation de l'occupation, comptant clairement pour la détectabilité, pour identifier des associations avec des variables environnementales et anthropogènes. L'occurrence générale fut estimée à 0,85 (ES = 0.06) pour les hyènes, 0,82 (ES = 0.15) pour les guépards, 0,55 (ES = 0.10) pour les lions et 0.61 (ES = 0.21) pour les léopards. L'occurrence des lions était négativement liée à la distance par rapport aux limites du parc. Celle des hyènes était positivement liée à la densité de la population humaine et négativement liée à la brousse, tandis que la présence des guépards et des léopards était positivement liée à la prairie. Ces résultats suggèrent que les lions pourraient être plus vulnérables aux impacts humains que les autres espèces et que les hyènes pourraient tirer profit de la proximité des hommes. Nos résultats montrent l'importance des études d'occupation basées sur les traces pour bien comprendre la distribution et la fréquentation de l'habitat par des grands carnivores discrets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-6707</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2028</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aje.12528</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Nairobi: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Acinonyx jubatus ; African large carnivores ; Anthropogenic factors ; Carnivores ; Crocuta crocuta ; Data analysis ; Data processing ; Ecosystems ; Environmental impact ; Grasslands ; Habitat utilization ; Human influences ; Human population density ; Human populations ; human–wildlife coexistence ; Hyaena hyaena ; Landscape ; multiple‐use landscape ; occupancy modelling ; Occupations ; Panthera leo ; Polls & surveys ; Population density ; Spatial distribution ; spoor surveys ; Wildlife ; Wildlife habitats ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>African journal of ecology, 2018-12, Vol.56 (4), p.972-983</ispartof><rights>2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3328-5b47d5b275b0a4dc7eab423a8a3a2a9de244da2c8b77b48e43629963e71a565f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3328-5b47d5b275b0a4dc7eab423a8a3a2a9de244da2c8b77b48e43629963e71a565f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0724-0878 ; 0000-0003-4395-9775 ; 0000-0002-8257-2920</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Faje.12528$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Faje.12528$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mkonyi, Felix J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estes, Anna B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lichtenfeld, Laly L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durant, Sarah M.</creatorcontrib><title>Large carnivore distribution in relationship to environmental and anthropogenic factors in a multiple‐use landscape of Northern Tanzania</title><title>African journal of ecology</title><description>Effective management of threatened wildlife, particularly large carnivores, depends on a sound understanding of their spatial distribution and status in relationship to environmental or anthropogenic impacts. Here, we analyse data from spoor surveys to investigate occurrence across a multiple‐use landscape in the Tarangire–Simanjiro ecosystem in northern Tanzania for four taxa of African large carnivores: lions (Panthera leo), hyaenas (spotted hyaenas (Crocuta crocuta) and striped hyaenas (Hyaena hyaena) combined), cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) and leopards (P. pardus). We analysed our data using occupancy modelling, explicitly accounting for detectability, to identify associations with environmental and anthropogenic variables. Overall occurrence was estimated at 0.85 (SE = 0.06) for hyaena, 0.82 (SE = 0.15) for cheetah, 0.55 (SE = 0.10) for lion and 0.61 (SE = 0.21) for leopard. Lion occurrence was negatively associated with distance to park boundary. Hyaena occurrence was positively associated with human population density and negatively associated with bushland, while cheetah and leopard occurrences were positively associated with grassland. These results suggest that lions may be more vulnerable to human impacts than other species, while hyaenas may benefit from vicinity to humans. Our study demonstrates the value of spoor‐based occupancy surveys for understanding distribution and habitat use of secretive large carnivores.
La gestion efficace de la faune menacée, et en particulier des grands carnivores, dépend d'une bonne appréhension de leur distribution spatiale et de leur statut en fonction des impacts environnementaux et anthropogènes. Nous analysons ici les données provenant d’études de traces pour étudier la présence, à travers un paysage à usages multiples dans l’écosystème Tarangire‐Simanjiro dans le nord de la Tanzanie, de quatre taxons de grands carnivores africains, les lions (Panthera leo), les hyènes tachetées (Crocuta crocuta) et rayées (Hyaena hyaena) prises ensemble, les guépards (Acinonyx jubatus) et les léopards (Panthera pardus). Nous avons analysé nos données en employant une modélisation de l'occupation, comptant clairement pour la détectabilité, pour identifier des associations avec des variables environnementales et anthropogènes. L'occurrence générale fut estimée à 0,85 (ES = 0.06) pour les hyènes, 0,82 (ES = 0.15) pour les guépards, 0,55 (ES = 0.10) pour les lions et 0.61 (ES = 0.21) pour les léopards. L'occurrence des lions était négativement liée à la distance par rapport aux limites du parc. Celle des hyènes était positivement liée à la densité de la population humaine et négativement liée à la brousse, tandis que la présence des guépards et des léopards était positivement liée à la prairie. Ces résultats suggèrent que les lions pourraient être plus vulnérables aux impacts humains que les autres espèces et que les hyènes pourraient tirer profit de la proximité des hommes. Nos résultats montrent l'importance des études d'occupation basées sur les traces pour bien comprendre la distribution et la fréquentation de l'habitat par des grands carnivores discrets.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Acinonyx jubatus</subject><subject>African large carnivores</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Carnivores</subject><subject>Crocuta crocuta</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Habitat utilization</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Human population density</subject><subject>Human populations</subject><subject>human–wildlife coexistence</subject><subject>Hyaena hyaena</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>multiple‐use landscape</subject><subject>occupancy modelling</subject><subject>Occupations</subject><subject>Panthera leo</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>spoor surveys</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0141-6707</issn><issn>1365-2028</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A8sMTGk-CtOOqKqfKmCBeboklyoq9QOtgMqEzMTv5FfQkpZOel0NzzvnfQQcsrZhA91ASuccJGKfI-MuNRpIpjI98mIccUTnbHskByFsGKM5UqrEflcgH9GWoG35tV5pLUJ0Zuyj8ZZaiz12MJ2D0vT0ego2lfjnV2jjdBSsPXQceld557Rmoo2UEXnwzYKdN230XQtfn989QFpO-Chgg6pa-i983GJ3tJHsO9gDRyTgwbagCd_c0yeruaPs5tk8XB9O7tcJJWUIk_SUmV1WoosLRmousoQSiUk5CBBwLRGoVQNosrLLCtVjkpqMZ1qiRmHVKeNHJOz3d3Ou5ceQyxWrvd2eFkILqdMaa3lQJ3vqMq7EDw2RefNGvym4KzYqi4G1cWv6oG92LFvpsXN_2BxeTffJX4AoSKEEg</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Mkonyi, Felix J.</creator><creator>Estes, Anna B.</creator><creator>Lichtenfeld, Laly L.</creator><creator>Durant, Sarah M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0724-0878</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4395-9775</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8257-2920</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>Large carnivore distribution in relationship to environmental and anthropogenic factors in a multiple‐use landscape of Northern Tanzania</title><author>Mkonyi, Felix J. ; Estes, Anna B. ; Lichtenfeld, Laly L. ; Durant, Sarah M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3328-5b47d5b275b0a4dc7eab423a8a3a2a9de244da2c8b77b48e43629963e71a565f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Acinonyx jubatus</topic><topic>African large carnivores</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Carnivores</topic><topic>Crocuta crocuta</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Habitat utilization</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Human population density</topic><topic>Human populations</topic><topic>human–wildlife coexistence</topic><topic>Hyaena hyaena</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>multiple‐use landscape</topic><topic>occupancy modelling</topic><topic>Occupations</topic><topic>Panthera leo</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>spoor surveys</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mkonyi, Felix J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estes, Anna B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lichtenfeld, Laly L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durant, Sarah M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>African journal of ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mkonyi, Felix J.</au><au>Estes, Anna B.</au><au>Lichtenfeld, Laly L.</au><au>Durant, Sarah M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Large carnivore distribution in relationship to environmental and anthropogenic factors in a multiple‐use landscape of Northern Tanzania</atitle><jtitle>African journal of ecology</jtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>972</spage><epage>983</epage><pages>972-983</pages><issn>0141-6707</issn><eissn>1365-2028</eissn><abstract>Effective management of threatened wildlife, particularly large carnivores, depends on a sound understanding of their spatial distribution and status in relationship to environmental or anthropogenic impacts. Here, we analyse data from spoor surveys to investigate occurrence across a multiple‐use landscape in the Tarangire–Simanjiro ecosystem in northern Tanzania for four taxa of African large carnivores: lions (Panthera leo), hyaenas (spotted hyaenas (Crocuta crocuta) and striped hyaenas (Hyaena hyaena) combined), cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) and leopards (P. pardus). We analysed our data using occupancy modelling, explicitly accounting for detectability, to identify associations with environmental and anthropogenic variables. Overall occurrence was estimated at 0.85 (SE = 0.06) for hyaena, 0.82 (SE = 0.15) for cheetah, 0.55 (SE = 0.10) for lion and 0.61 (SE = 0.21) for leopard. Lion occurrence was negatively associated with distance to park boundary. Hyaena occurrence was positively associated with human population density and negatively associated with bushland, while cheetah and leopard occurrences were positively associated with grassland. These results suggest that lions may be more vulnerable to human impacts than other species, while hyaenas may benefit from vicinity to humans. Our study demonstrates the value of spoor‐based occupancy surveys for understanding distribution and habitat use of secretive large carnivores.
La gestion efficace de la faune menacée, et en particulier des grands carnivores, dépend d'une bonne appréhension de leur distribution spatiale et de leur statut en fonction des impacts environnementaux et anthropogènes. Nous analysons ici les données provenant d’études de traces pour étudier la présence, à travers un paysage à usages multiples dans l’écosystème Tarangire‐Simanjiro dans le nord de la Tanzanie, de quatre taxons de grands carnivores africains, les lions (Panthera leo), les hyènes tachetées (Crocuta crocuta) et rayées (Hyaena hyaena) prises ensemble, les guépards (Acinonyx jubatus) et les léopards (Panthera pardus). Nous avons analysé nos données en employant une modélisation de l'occupation, comptant clairement pour la détectabilité, pour identifier des associations avec des variables environnementales et anthropogènes. L'occurrence générale fut estimée à 0,85 (ES = 0.06) pour les hyènes, 0,82 (ES = 0.15) pour les guépards, 0,55 (ES = 0.10) pour les lions et 0.61 (ES = 0.21) pour les léopards. L'occurrence des lions était négativement liée à la distance par rapport aux limites du parc. Celle des hyènes était positivement liée à la densité de la population humaine et négativement liée à la brousse, tandis que la présence des guépards et des léopards était positivement liée à la prairie. Ces résultats suggèrent que les lions pourraient être plus vulnérables aux impacts humains que les autres espèces et que les hyènes pourraient tirer profit de la proximité des hommes. Nos résultats montrent l'importance des études d'occupation basées sur les traces pour bien comprendre la distribution et la fréquentation de l'habitat par des grands carnivores discrets.</abstract><cop>Nairobi</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/aje.12528</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0724-0878</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4395-9775</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8257-2920</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0141-6707 |
ispartof | African journal of ecology, 2018-12, Vol.56 (4), p.972-983 |
issn | 0141-6707 1365-2028 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2139046663 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Accounting Acinonyx jubatus African large carnivores Anthropogenic factors Carnivores Crocuta crocuta Data analysis Data processing Ecosystems Environmental impact Grasslands Habitat utilization Human influences Human population density Human populations human–wildlife coexistence Hyaena hyaena Landscape multiple‐use landscape occupancy modelling Occupations Panthera leo Polls & surveys Population density Spatial distribution spoor surveys Wildlife Wildlife habitats Wildlife management |
title | Large carnivore distribution in relationship to environmental and anthropogenic factors in a multiple‐use landscape of Northern Tanzania |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T03%3A32%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Large%20carnivore%20distribution%20in%20relationship%20to%20environmental%20and%20anthropogenic%20factors%20in%20a%20multiple%E2%80%90use%20landscape%20of%20Northern%20Tanzania&rft.jtitle=African%20journal%20of%20ecology&rft.au=Mkonyi,%20Felix%20J.&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=972&rft.epage=983&rft.pages=972-983&rft.issn=0141-6707&rft.eissn=1365-2028&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aje.12528&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2139046663%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2139046663&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |