Organizational Linkages for Surviving Technological Change: Complementary Assets, Middle Management, and Ambidexterity
Technological innovation sometimes requires industry incumbents to shift to a completely new core technology. To successfully navigate a technological transition, firms often face the ambidextrous challenge of "exploiting" existing complementary assets to support the new "exploratory&...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Organization science (Providence, R.I.) R.I.), 2009-07, Vol.20 (4), p.718-739 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 739 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 718 |
container_title | Organization science (Providence, R.I.) |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Taylor, Alva Helfat, Constance E |
description | Technological innovation sometimes requires industry incumbents to shift to a completely new core technology. To successfully navigate a technological transition, firms often face the ambidextrous challenge of "exploiting" existing complementary assets to support the new "exploratory" core technology. We argue that an industry incumbent attempting to make a transition to a new technology requires linkages between organizational units responsible for developing the new technology and units in charge of complementary assets needed to commercialize the innovation. These linkages are critical but overlooked elements of organizational ambidexterity. This paper develops a conceptual framework in which the ability to build and leverage organizational linkages involving the new technology and its complementary assets is essential for a successful technological transition. The framework also highlights the importance of middle management in creating and maintaining these linkages, which are critical to dynamic capabilities in technological transitions. We identify four critical influences—economic, structural, social, and cognitive—on managerial linking activity that enable firms to transition to a new technology while utilizing valuable preexisting capabilities. The technological transitions of IBM and NCR illustrate the importance of organizational linkages and managerial linking activity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1287/orsc.1090.0429 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_213831701</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A205506619</galeid><jstor_id>25614689</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A205506619</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6f0bdb52713b258d7f9a447e172cb118e2e0bb033e217233d0ddfc04a96b79ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks-L1DAUx4souK5evQnFg3uZjvnRNK23YVB3YZY9uJ5Dmr52MrbJmNeOrn-9KRUVGZBAEpLP98t7yTdJXlKypqyUb31As6akImuSs-pRckEFKzKRC_E47kkuM0l49TR5hngghORcVBfJ6S502tkferTe6T7dWfdFd4Bp60P6aQone7KuS-_B7J3vfWdNhLZ77Tp4l279cOxhADfq8JBuEGHEVXprm6aH9Fa7aDRfrlLtmnQz1LaB7yMEOz48T560ukd48Wu9TD5_eH-_vc52dx9vtptdZgTPx6xoSd3UgknKaybKRraVznMJVDJTU1oCA1LXhHNg8YjzhjRNa0iuq6KWldH8Mnmz-B6D_zoBjmqwaKDvtQM_oeKSSi4KHsHX_4AHP4X4IqgY5SWnktAIZQvU6R6Uda0fgzYdOAi69w5aG483jAhBioJWkV-f4eNoYLDmrGD1l6Ce0DrAOKHt9iN2ekI862-CRwzQqmOwQ_wLRYmaM6HmTKg5E2rORBS8WgQHHH34TTNR0Lwoqz8NzrWGAf_vd7Xw-1jgNxuWJmehDx0aqxhRuZK05D8B1p_RDg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>213831701</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Organizational Linkages for Surviving Technological Change: Complementary Assets, Middle Management, and Ambidexterity</title><source>INFORMS PubsOnLine</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Taylor, Alva ; Helfat, Constance E</creator><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Alva ; Helfat, Constance E</creatorcontrib><description>Technological innovation sometimes requires industry incumbents to shift to a completely new core technology. To successfully navigate a technological transition, firms often face the ambidextrous challenge of "exploiting" existing complementary assets to support the new "exploratory" core technology. We argue that an industry incumbent attempting to make a transition to a new technology requires linkages between organizational units responsible for developing the new technology and units in charge of complementary assets needed to commercialize the innovation. These linkages are critical but overlooked elements of organizational ambidexterity. This paper develops a conceptual framework in which the ability to build and leverage organizational linkages involving the new technology and its complementary assets is essential for a successful technological transition. The framework also highlights the importance of middle management in creating and maintaining these linkages, which are critical to dynamic capabilities in technological transitions. We identify four critical influences—economic, structural, social, and cognitive—on managerial linking activity that enable firms to transition to a new technology while utilizing valuable preexisting capabilities. The technological transitions of IBM and NCR illustrate the importance of organizational linkages and managerial linking activity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1047-7039</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-5455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0429</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ORSCEZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Linthicum: INFORMS</publisher><subject>ambidexterity ; Analysis ; Assets ; Business enterprises ; Business management ; Business structures ; Cognition ; Competitiveness ; complementary assets ; Consumer goods industries ; Corporate management ; Emerging technology ; exploration and exploitation ; Functional laterality ; Incumbency ; Information and communication technologies ; Innovation ; Innovations ; Machinery ; Management ; Middle management ; Organization development ; Organization theory ; Organizational behavior ; Organizational change ; Sales management ; Social networks ; Studies ; Success ; Technological change ; Technology ; Technology application ; Transitions</subject><ispartof>Organization science (Providence, R.I.), 2009-07, Vol.20 (4), p.718-739</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2009 INFORMS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2009 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Jul/Aug 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6f0bdb52713b258d7f9a447e172cb118e2e0bb033e217233d0ddfc04a96b79ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6f0bdb52713b258d7f9a447e172cb118e2e0bb033e217233d0ddfc04a96b79ca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/epdf/10.1287/orsc.1090.0429$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginforms$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/full/10.1287/orsc.1090.0429$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginforms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,3692,27924,27925,58017,58250,62616,62618</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Alva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helfat, Constance E</creatorcontrib><title>Organizational Linkages for Surviving Technological Change: Complementary Assets, Middle Management, and Ambidexterity</title><title>Organization science (Providence, R.I.)</title><description>Technological innovation sometimes requires industry incumbents to shift to a completely new core technology. To successfully navigate a technological transition, firms often face the ambidextrous challenge of "exploiting" existing complementary assets to support the new "exploratory" core technology. We argue that an industry incumbent attempting to make a transition to a new technology requires linkages between organizational units responsible for developing the new technology and units in charge of complementary assets needed to commercialize the innovation. These linkages are critical but overlooked elements of organizational ambidexterity. This paper develops a conceptual framework in which the ability to build and leverage organizational linkages involving the new technology and its complementary assets is essential for a successful technological transition. The framework also highlights the importance of middle management in creating and maintaining these linkages, which are critical to dynamic capabilities in technological transitions. We identify four critical influences—economic, structural, social, and cognitive—on managerial linking activity that enable firms to transition to a new technology while utilizing valuable preexisting capabilities. The technological transitions of IBM and NCR illustrate the importance of organizational linkages and managerial linking activity.</description><subject>ambidexterity</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Assets</subject><subject>Business enterprises</subject><subject>Business management</subject><subject>Business structures</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Competitiveness</subject><subject>complementary assets</subject><subject>Consumer goods industries</subject><subject>Corporate management</subject><subject>Emerging technology</subject><subject>exploration and exploitation</subject><subject>Functional laterality</subject><subject>Incumbency</subject><subject>Information and communication technologies</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Machinery</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Middle management</subject><subject>Organization development</subject><subject>Organization theory</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Organizational change</subject><subject>Sales management</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Technology application</subject><subject>Transitions</subject><issn>1047-7039</issn><issn>1526-5455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks-L1DAUx4souK5evQnFg3uZjvnRNK23YVB3YZY9uJ5Dmr52MrbJmNeOrn-9KRUVGZBAEpLP98t7yTdJXlKypqyUb31As6akImuSs-pRckEFKzKRC_E47kkuM0l49TR5hngghORcVBfJ6S502tkferTe6T7dWfdFd4Bp60P6aQone7KuS-_B7J3vfWdNhLZ77Tp4l279cOxhADfq8JBuEGHEVXprm6aH9Fa7aDRfrlLtmnQz1LaB7yMEOz48T560ukd48Wu9TD5_eH-_vc52dx9vtptdZgTPx6xoSd3UgknKaybKRraVznMJVDJTU1oCA1LXhHNg8YjzhjRNa0iuq6KWldH8Mnmz-B6D_zoBjmqwaKDvtQM_oeKSSi4KHsHX_4AHP4X4IqgY5SWnktAIZQvU6R6Uda0fgzYdOAi69w5aG483jAhBioJWkV-f4eNoYLDmrGD1l6Ce0DrAOKHt9iN2ekI862-CRwzQqmOwQ_wLRYmaM6HmTKg5E2rORBS8WgQHHH34TTNR0Lwoqz8NzrWGAf_vd7Xw-1jgNxuWJmehDx0aqxhRuZK05D8B1p_RDg</recordid><startdate>20090701</startdate><enddate>20090701</enddate><creator>Taylor, Alva</creator><creator>Helfat, Constance E</creator><general>INFORMS</general><general>Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090701</creationdate><title>Organizational Linkages for Surviving Technological Change: Complementary Assets, Middle Management, and Ambidexterity</title><author>Taylor, Alva ; Helfat, Constance E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6f0bdb52713b258d7f9a447e172cb118e2e0bb033e217233d0ddfc04a96b79ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>ambidexterity</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Assets</topic><topic>Business enterprises</topic><topic>Business management</topic><topic>Business structures</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Competitiveness</topic><topic>complementary assets</topic><topic>Consumer goods industries</topic><topic>Corporate management</topic><topic>Emerging technology</topic><topic>exploration and exploitation</topic><topic>Functional laterality</topic><topic>Incumbency</topic><topic>Information and communication technologies</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Machinery</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Middle management</topic><topic>Organization development</topic><topic>Organization theory</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Organizational change</topic><topic>Sales management</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Technology application</topic><topic>Transitions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Alva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helfat, Constance E</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Organization science (Providence, R.I.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taylor, Alva</au><au>Helfat, Constance E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Organizational Linkages for Surviving Technological Change: Complementary Assets, Middle Management, and Ambidexterity</atitle><jtitle>Organization science (Providence, R.I.)</jtitle><date>2009-07-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>718</spage><epage>739</epage><pages>718-739</pages><issn>1047-7039</issn><eissn>1526-5455</eissn><coden>ORSCEZ</coden><abstract>Technological innovation sometimes requires industry incumbents to shift to a completely new core technology. To successfully navigate a technological transition, firms often face the ambidextrous challenge of "exploiting" existing complementary assets to support the new "exploratory" core technology. We argue that an industry incumbent attempting to make a transition to a new technology requires linkages between organizational units responsible for developing the new technology and units in charge of complementary assets needed to commercialize the innovation. These linkages are critical but overlooked elements of organizational ambidexterity. This paper develops a conceptual framework in which the ability to build and leverage organizational linkages involving the new technology and its complementary assets is essential for a successful technological transition. The framework also highlights the importance of middle management in creating and maintaining these linkages, which are critical to dynamic capabilities in technological transitions. We identify four critical influences—economic, structural, social, and cognitive—on managerial linking activity that enable firms to transition to a new technology while utilizing valuable preexisting capabilities. The technological transitions of IBM and NCR illustrate the importance of organizational linkages and managerial linking activity.</abstract><cop>Linthicum</cop><pub>INFORMS</pub><doi>10.1287/orsc.1090.0429</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1047-7039 |
ispartof | Organization science (Providence, R.I.), 2009-07, Vol.20 (4), p.718-739 |
issn | 1047-7039 1526-5455 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_213831701 |
source | INFORMS PubsOnLine; Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Education Source |
subjects | ambidexterity Analysis Assets Business enterprises Business management Business structures Cognition Competitiveness complementary assets Consumer goods industries Corporate management Emerging technology exploration and exploitation Functional laterality Incumbency Information and communication technologies Innovation Innovations Machinery Management Middle management Organization development Organization theory Organizational behavior Organizational change Sales management Social networks Studies Success Technological change Technology Technology application Transitions |
title | Organizational Linkages for Surviving Technological Change: Complementary Assets, Middle Management, and Ambidexterity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T00%3A59%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Organizational%20Linkages%20for%20Surviving%20Technological%20Change:%20Complementary%20Assets,%20Middle%20Management,%20and%20Ambidexterity&rft.jtitle=Organization%20science%20(Providence,%20R.I.)&rft.au=Taylor,%20Alva&rft.date=2009-07-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=718&rft.epage=739&rft.pages=718-739&rft.issn=1047-7039&rft.eissn=1526-5455&rft.coden=ORSCEZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287/orsc.1090.0429&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA205506619%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=213831701&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A205506619&rft_jstor_id=25614689&rfr_iscdi=true |