PO-0555 Predictive Value Of Admission Surface Swabs In Early-onset Neonatal Sepsis In Extremely Low Birth Weight (elbw) Infants In A Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (nicu)

IntroductionEarly Onset Neonatal Sepsis (EONS) is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in ELBW infants. Admission surface swab cultures (SSC) form part of admission surveillance cultures, however its place in the management of EONS is questionable.ObjectiveTo determine:Sensitivity, specifi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of disease in childhood 2014-10, Vol.99 (Suppl 2), p.A432-A433
Hauptverfasser: Mustapa, M, Egyepong, J, Abdul-Rahman, AK
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page A433
container_issue Suppl 2
container_start_page A432
container_title Archives of disease in childhood
container_volume 99
creator Mustapa, M
Egyepong, J
Abdul-Rahman, AK
description IntroductionEarly Onset Neonatal Sepsis (EONS) is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in ELBW infants. Admission surface swab cultures (SSC) form part of admission surveillance cultures, however its place in the management of EONS is questionable.ObjectiveTo determine:Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of SSC.If culture result would reflect on mean CRP value in first 72 hrs.If maternal swabs and mode of delivery correlated with microbiological result in the baby.MethodRetrospective cohort study.All inborn ELBW infants admitted into a Level 3 NICU from January 2010–December 2013.Maternal swabs; mode of delivery; infants SSC, blood cultures and mean CRP (within 72 h) were reviewed.Result161 ELBW infants were admitted and all had admission SSC, CRPs and blood cultures.25 of 161 (15.5%) had positive SSC (Figure 1) of which 5 were mixed culture results.11 of 161 (6.8%) had EONS (positive blood cultures) (Table 1).4 of 25 (16%) of positive SSC had correlating blood culture – all of which were E coli; 1 subject had positive SSC and blood culture but did not correlate.There was a statistically significant association between mode of delivery and positive culture result, χ2(1) = 10.263, p = 0.001 (Figure 2).Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value for skin swab were 36.3%, 86.7% and 16% respectively.Abstract PO-0555 Figure 1Bacteria grown from skinj swab[Figure omitted. See PDF]Abstract PO-0555 Figure 2Percentage of positive microbiological result for different mode of delivery[Figure omitted. See PDF]Abstract PO-0555 Table 1Bacteria grown from initial blood culturesMicroorganismn (%) E coli4 (36.3)S aureus1 (9.1)Gram positive cocci1 (9.1)Group B streptococcus1 (9.1)Peptostreptococcus asaccharolyticus1 (9.1)Coagulase negative staphyloccus3 (27.2)Abstract PO-0555 Table 2Mean CRP for different microbiological resultMicrobiological result Mean CRPSkin negative;Blood negative5.8Skin negative;Blood positive9.3Skin positive;Blood negative17.2Skin positive;Blood positive15.0F(3,10.164)=2.026, p = 0.173ConclusionsRoutine SSC is inefficient in predicting the pathogen responsible for sepsis among premature neonates.E coli was the predominant organism in the study and 37% of babies with positive SSC had E. coli sepsis (blood culture).Mean CRP was higher in positive skin ± blood culture cases. However this was statistically not significant.There was increased risk of EONS with Vaginal delivery.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307384.1197
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2138072078</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2138072078</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1977-9f4c92a96d85af329a847e73ee3aa105dfb94f13c885f24ecee6daa8201ef7c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkc9qGzEQxkVooG6adxCEQnLYVlppvdpDDq5JU4OpA07SoxhrR7XCWutK2jq-9dKXyWP1SbpbB5LTwMw33_z5EfKBs4-ci_EnCGZdu2jWrqmznHGZCVYKJftqVR6REZdj1eelfENGjDGRVUqpt-RdjA-M8VwpMSJPN4uMFUXx9_efm4C1M8n9QnoPTYd0Yemk3rgYXevpsgsWDNLlDlaRzjy9gtDss9ZHTPQbth4SNHSJ2-gO5ccUcIPNns7bHf3sQlrT7-h-rBM9x2a1u-hFFnz6L568OMx8Qh-HJaYQkN551zd4Z7qL9-TYQhPx9DmekLsvV7fTr9l8cT2bTuaZ6c8us8pKU-VQjWtVgBV5BUqWWApEAcBZUdtVJS0XRqnC5hIN4rgGUP0D0ZZGiRNydvDdhvZnhzHph7YLvh-pcy4UK3NWDqrLg8qENsaAVm-D20DYa870gEe_xqMHPPqARw94xD_uN4ki</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2138072078</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PO-0555 Predictive Value Of Admission Surface Swabs In Early-onset Neonatal Sepsis In Extremely Low Birth Weight (elbw) Infants In A Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (nicu)</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Mustapa, M ; Egyepong, J ; Abdul-Rahman, AK</creator><creatorcontrib>Mustapa, M ; Egyepong, J ; Abdul-Rahman, AK</creatorcontrib><description>IntroductionEarly Onset Neonatal Sepsis (EONS) is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in ELBW infants. Admission surface swab cultures (SSC) form part of admission surveillance cultures, however its place in the management of EONS is questionable.ObjectiveTo determine:Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of SSC.If culture result would reflect on mean CRP value in first 72 hrs.If maternal swabs and mode of delivery correlated with microbiological result in the baby.MethodRetrospective cohort study.All inborn ELBW infants admitted into a Level 3 NICU from January 2010–December 2013.Maternal swabs; mode of delivery; infants SSC, blood cultures and mean CRP (within 72 h) were reviewed.Result161 ELBW infants were admitted and all had admission SSC, CRPs and blood cultures.25 of 161 (15.5%) had positive SSC (Figure 1) of which 5 were mixed culture results.11 of 161 (6.8%) had EONS (positive blood cultures) (Table 1).4 of 25 (16%) of positive SSC had correlating blood culture – all of which were E coli; 1 subject had positive SSC and blood culture but did not correlate.There was a statistically significant association between mode of delivery and positive culture result, χ2(1) = 10.263, p = 0.001 (Figure 2).Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value for skin swab were 36.3%, 86.7% and 16% respectively.Abstract PO-0555 Figure 1Bacteria grown from skinj swab[Figure omitted. See PDF]Abstract PO-0555 Figure 2Percentage of positive microbiological result for different mode of delivery[Figure omitted. See PDF]Abstract PO-0555 Table 1Bacteria grown from initial blood culturesMicroorganismn (%) E coli4 (36.3)S aureus1 (9.1)Gram positive cocci1 (9.1)Group B streptococcus1 (9.1)Peptostreptococcus asaccharolyticus1 (9.1)Coagulase negative staphyloccus3 (27.2)Abstract PO-0555 Table 2Mean CRP for different microbiological resultMicrobiological result Mean CRPSkin negative;Blood negative5.8Skin negative;Blood positive9.3Skin positive;Blood negative17.2Skin positive;Blood positive15.0F(3,10.164)=2.026, p = 0.173ConclusionsRoutine SSC is inefficient in predicting the pathogen responsible for sepsis among premature neonates.E coli was the predominant organism in the study and 37% of babies with positive SSC had E. coli sepsis (blood culture).Mean CRP was higher in positive skin ± blood culture cases. However this was statistically not significant.There was increased risk of EONS with Vaginal delivery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9888</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307384.1197</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Age ; Bacteria ; Blood ; Blood culture ; Body Weight ; Coagulase ; Cocci ; E coli ; Infants ; Intensive care ; Low birth weight ; Mixed culture ; Morbidity ; Neonatal care ; Neonates ; Newborn babies ; Sepsis ; Skin ; Staphylococcus aureus ; Statistical analysis ; Vagina ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Archives of disease in childhood, 2014-10, Vol.99 (Suppl 2), p.A432-A433</ispartof><rights>2014 2014, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1977-9f4c92a96d85af329a847e73ee3aa105dfb94f13c885f24ecee6daa8201ef7c83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3196,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mustapa, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egyepong, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdul-Rahman, AK</creatorcontrib><title>PO-0555 Predictive Value Of Admission Surface Swabs In Early-onset Neonatal Sepsis In Extremely Low Birth Weight (elbw) Infants In A Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (nicu)</title><title>Archives of disease in childhood</title><description>IntroductionEarly Onset Neonatal Sepsis (EONS) is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in ELBW infants. Admission surface swab cultures (SSC) form part of admission surveillance cultures, however its place in the management of EONS is questionable.ObjectiveTo determine:Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of SSC.If culture result would reflect on mean CRP value in first 72 hrs.If maternal swabs and mode of delivery correlated with microbiological result in the baby.MethodRetrospective cohort study.All inborn ELBW infants admitted into a Level 3 NICU from January 2010–December 2013.Maternal swabs; mode of delivery; infants SSC, blood cultures and mean CRP (within 72 h) were reviewed.Result161 ELBW infants were admitted and all had admission SSC, CRPs and blood cultures.25 of 161 (15.5%) had positive SSC (Figure 1) of which 5 were mixed culture results.11 of 161 (6.8%) had EONS (positive blood cultures) (Table 1).4 of 25 (16%) of positive SSC had correlating blood culture – all of which were E coli; 1 subject had positive SSC and blood culture but did not correlate.There was a statistically significant association between mode of delivery and positive culture result, χ2(1) = 10.263, p = 0.001 (Figure 2).Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value for skin swab were 36.3%, 86.7% and 16% respectively.Abstract PO-0555 Figure 1Bacteria grown from skinj swab[Figure omitted. See PDF]Abstract PO-0555 Figure 2Percentage of positive microbiological result for different mode of delivery[Figure omitted. See PDF]Abstract PO-0555 Table 1Bacteria grown from initial blood culturesMicroorganismn (%) E coli4 (36.3)S aureus1 (9.1)Gram positive cocci1 (9.1)Group B streptococcus1 (9.1)Peptostreptococcus asaccharolyticus1 (9.1)Coagulase negative staphyloccus3 (27.2)Abstract PO-0555 Table 2Mean CRP for different microbiological resultMicrobiological result Mean CRPSkin negative;Blood negative5.8Skin negative;Blood positive9.3Skin positive;Blood negative17.2Skin positive;Blood positive15.0F(3,10.164)=2.026, p = 0.173ConclusionsRoutine SSC is inefficient in predicting the pathogen responsible for sepsis among premature neonates.E coli was the predominant organism in the study and 37% of babies with positive SSC had E. coli sepsis (blood culture).Mean CRP was higher in positive skin ± blood culture cases. However this was statistically not significant.There was increased risk of EONS with Vaginal delivery.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Blood culture</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Coagulase</subject><subject>Cocci</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Low birth weight</subject><subject>Mixed culture</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Neonatal care</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Newborn babies</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>0003-9888</issn><issn>1468-2044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkc9qGzEQxkVooG6adxCEQnLYVlppvdpDDq5JU4OpA07SoxhrR7XCWutK2jq-9dKXyWP1SbpbB5LTwMw33_z5EfKBs4-ci_EnCGZdu2jWrqmznHGZCVYKJftqVR6REZdj1eelfENGjDGRVUqpt-RdjA-M8VwpMSJPN4uMFUXx9_efm4C1M8n9QnoPTYd0Yemk3rgYXevpsgsWDNLlDlaRzjy9gtDss9ZHTPQbth4SNHSJ2-gO5ccUcIPNns7bHf3sQlrT7-h-rBM9x2a1u-hFFnz6L568OMx8Qh-HJaYQkN551zd4Z7qL9-TYQhPx9DmekLsvV7fTr9l8cT2bTuaZ6c8us8pKU-VQjWtVgBV5BUqWWApEAcBZUdtVJS0XRqnC5hIN4rgGUP0D0ZZGiRNydvDdhvZnhzHph7YLvh-pcy4UK3NWDqrLg8qENsaAVm-D20DYa870gEe_xqMHPPqARw94xD_uN4ki</recordid><startdate>201410</startdate><enddate>201410</enddate><creator>Mustapa, M</creator><creator>Egyepong, J</creator><creator>Abdul-Rahman, AK</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201410</creationdate><title>PO-0555 Predictive Value Of Admission Surface Swabs In Early-onset Neonatal Sepsis In Extremely Low Birth Weight (elbw) Infants In A Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (nicu)</title><author>Mustapa, M ; Egyepong, J ; Abdul-Rahman, AK</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1977-9f4c92a96d85af329a847e73ee3aa105dfb94f13c885f24ecee6daa8201ef7c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Blood culture</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Coagulase</topic><topic>Cocci</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Low birth weight</topic><topic>Mixed culture</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Neonatal care</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Newborn babies</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mustapa, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egyepong, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdul-Rahman, AK</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mustapa, M</au><au>Egyepong, J</au><au>Abdul-Rahman, AK</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PO-0555 Predictive Value Of Admission Surface Swabs In Early-onset Neonatal Sepsis In Extremely Low Birth Weight (elbw) Infants In A Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (nicu)</atitle><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood</jtitle><date>2014-10</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>Suppl 2</issue><spage>A432</spage><epage>A433</epage><pages>A432-A433</pages><issn>0003-9888</issn><eissn>1468-2044</eissn><abstract>IntroductionEarly Onset Neonatal Sepsis (EONS) is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in ELBW infants. Admission surface swab cultures (SSC) form part of admission surveillance cultures, however its place in the management of EONS is questionable.ObjectiveTo determine:Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of SSC.If culture result would reflect on mean CRP value in first 72 hrs.If maternal swabs and mode of delivery correlated with microbiological result in the baby.MethodRetrospective cohort study.All inborn ELBW infants admitted into a Level 3 NICU from January 2010–December 2013.Maternal swabs; mode of delivery; infants SSC, blood cultures and mean CRP (within 72 h) were reviewed.Result161 ELBW infants were admitted and all had admission SSC, CRPs and blood cultures.25 of 161 (15.5%) had positive SSC (Figure 1) of which 5 were mixed culture results.11 of 161 (6.8%) had EONS (positive blood cultures) (Table 1).4 of 25 (16%) of positive SSC had correlating blood culture – all of which were E coli; 1 subject had positive SSC and blood culture but did not correlate.There was a statistically significant association between mode of delivery and positive culture result, χ2(1) = 10.263, p = 0.001 (Figure 2).Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value for skin swab were 36.3%, 86.7% and 16% respectively.Abstract PO-0555 Figure 1Bacteria grown from skinj swab[Figure omitted. See PDF]Abstract PO-0555 Figure 2Percentage of positive microbiological result for different mode of delivery[Figure omitted. See PDF]Abstract PO-0555 Table 1Bacteria grown from initial blood culturesMicroorganismn (%) E coli4 (36.3)S aureus1 (9.1)Gram positive cocci1 (9.1)Group B streptococcus1 (9.1)Peptostreptococcus asaccharolyticus1 (9.1)Coagulase negative staphyloccus3 (27.2)Abstract PO-0555 Table 2Mean CRP for different microbiological resultMicrobiological result Mean CRPSkin negative;Blood negative5.8Skin negative;Blood positive9.3Skin positive;Blood negative17.2Skin positive;Blood positive15.0F(3,10.164)=2.026, p = 0.173ConclusionsRoutine SSC is inefficient in predicting the pathogen responsible for sepsis among premature neonates.E coli was the predominant organism in the study and 37% of babies with positive SSC had E. coli sepsis (blood culture).Mean CRP was higher in positive skin ± blood culture cases. However this was statistically not significant.There was increased risk of EONS with Vaginal delivery.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/archdischild-2014-307384.1197</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-9888
ispartof Archives of disease in childhood, 2014-10, Vol.99 (Suppl 2), p.A432-A433
issn 0003-9888
1468-2044
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2138072078
source BMJ Journals - NESLi2
subjects Age
Bacteria
Blood
Blood culture
Body Weight
Coagulase
Cocci
E coli
Infants
Intensive care
Low birth weight
Mixed culture
Morbidity
Neonatal care
Neonates
Newborn babies
Sepsis
Skin
Staphylococcus aureus
Statistical analysis
Vagina
Young Children
title PO-0555 Predictive Value Of Admission Surface Swabs In Early-onset Neonatal Sepsis In Extremely Low Birth Weight (elbw) Infants In A Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (nicu)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T03%3A48%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PO-0555%E2%80%85Predictive%20Value%20Of%20Admission%20Surface%20Swabs%20In%20Early-onset%20Neonatal%20Sepsis%20In%20Extremely%20Low%20Birth%20Weight%20(elbw)%20Infants%20In%20A%20Neonatal%20Intensive%20Care%20Unit%20(nicu)&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20disease%20in%20childhood&rft.au=Mustapa,%20M&rft.date=2014-10&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=Suppl%202&rft.spage=A432&rft.epage=A433&rft.pages=A432-A433&rft.issn=0003-9888&rft.eissn=1468-2044&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2014-307384.1197&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2138072078%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2138072078&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true