Empirical evaluation of the stringency and design of renewable portfolio standards

In two decades of experience with state renewable portfolio standards (RPSs), the United States has observed immense growth in renewable energy markets, initially in wind energy and more recently in solar power. During this time, RPSs have experienced considerable policy reinvention and increased di...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nature energy 2018-09, Vol.3 (9), p.754-763
Hauptverfasser: Carley, Sanya, Davies, Lincoln L., Spence, David B., Zirogiannis, Nikolaos
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 763
container_issue 9
container_start_page 754
container_title Nature energy
container_volume 3
creator Carley, Sanya
Davies, Lincoln L.
Spence, David B.
Zirogiannis, Nikolaos
description In two decades of experience with state renewable portfolio standards (RPSs), the United States has observed immense growth in renewable energy markets, initially in wind energy and more recently in solar power. During this time, RPSs have experienced considerable policy reinvention and increased diversity. Here, we explain how changes in RPS policy design features relate to different market outcomes. We develop a score for measuring RPS stringency and show that a one-point increase in RPS stringency leads to increases of 0.2%, 1% and 0.3% in renewable energy, solar generation and renewable energy capacity, respectively. Other important design features include resource eligibility, planning processes, cost recovery and geographical restrictions. These findings are then reaffirmed through 42 semi-structured phone interviews with experts in the field of RPS implementation from government agencies, including public utility commissions and state energy offices, electric utilities and various renewable energy firms and associations. Renewable policy standards have been instrumental in the growth of renewable energy in US states. Through a ranking of policy stringency and interviews with industry stakeholders, researchers show the significance of stringency and other policy design features towards a standard’s effectiveness.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41560-018-0202-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2137522520</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2137522520</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-f974d6a727f917ed4f68e280b235e044cc0855d36701de77657ddd1f77d61fb53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWGp_gLeA5-gkm68epdQPKAii55Bukpqy3azJVum_d-0KevE0A_O8M8yD0CWFawqVvimcCgkEqCbAgBF-giYMhCZKcHn6pz9Hs1K2AMDmjAlNJ-h5uetijrVtsP-wzd72MbU4Bdy_eVz6HNuNb-sDtq3Dzpe4OQ6zb_2nXTcedyn3ITUxDfDA2OzKBToLtil-9lOn6PVu-bJ4IKun-8fF7YrUFZU9CXPFnbSKqTCnyjsepPZMw5pVwgPndQ1aCFdJBdR5paRQzjkalHKShrWopuhq3Nvl9L73pTfbtM_tcNIwWikxfMhgoOhI1TmVkn0wXY47mw-Ggvm2Z0Z7ZrBnvu0ZPmTYmCndUUD-3fx_6AtB5XHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2137522520</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Empirical evaluation of the stringency and design of renewable portfolio standards</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Carley, Sanya ; Davies, Lincoln L. ; Spence, David B. ; Zirogiannis, Nikolaos</creator><creatorcontrib>Carley, Sanya ; Davies, Lincoln L. ; Spence, David B. ; Zirogiannis, Nikolaos</creatorcontrib><description>In two decades of experience with state renewable portfolio standards (RPSs), the United States has observed immense growth in renewable energy markets, initially in wind energy and more recently in solar power. During this time, RPSs have experienced considerable policy reinvention and increased diversity. Here, we explain how changes in RPS policy design features relate to different market outcomes. We develop a score for measuring RPS stringency and show that a one-point increase in RPS stringency leads to increases of 0.2%, 1% and 0.3% in renewable energy, solar generation and renewable energy capacity, respectively. Other important design features include resource eligibility, planning processes, cost recovery and geographical restrictions. These findings are then reaffirmed through 42 semi-structured phone interviews with experts in the field of RPS implementation from government agencies, including public utility commissions and state energy offices, electric utilities and various renewable energy firms and associations. Renewable policy standards have been instrumental in the growth of renewable energy in US states. Through a ranking of policy stringency and interviews with industry stakeholders, researchers show the significance of stringency and other policy design features towards a standard’s effectiveness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2058-7546</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2058-7546</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41560-018-0202-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>706/4066 ; 706/4066/4068 ; 706/4066/4076 ; Cost recovery ; Design ; Design standards ; Economics and Management ; Electric utilities ; Energy ; Energy industry ; Energy Policy ; Energy Storage ; Energy Systems ; Government agencies ; Public utility districts ; Renewable and Green Energy ; Renewable energy ; Renewable resources ; Solar energy ; Solar power ; Wind power</subject><ispartof>Nature energy, 2018-09, Vol.3 (9), p.754-763</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Sep 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-f974d6a727f917ed4f68e280b235e044cc0855d36701de77657ddd1f77d61fb53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-f974d6a727f917ed4f68e280b235e044cc0855d36701de77657ddd1f77d61fb53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4903-8897 ; 0000-0001-9599-4519</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carley, Sanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Lincoln L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spence, David B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zirogiannis, Nikolaos</creatorcontrib><title>Empirical evaluation of the stringency and design of renewable portfolio standards</title><title>Nature energy</title><addtitle>Nat Energy</addtitle><description>In two decades of experience with state renewable portfolio standards (RPSs), the United States has observed immense growth in renewable energy markets, initially in wind energy and more recently in solar power. During this time, RPSs have experienced considerable policy reinvention and increased diversity. Here, we explain how changes in RPS policy design features relate to different market outcomes. We develop a score for measuring RPS stringency and show that a one-point increase in RPS stringency leads to increases of 0.2%, 1% and 0.3% in renewable energy, solar generation and renewable energy capacity, respectively. Other important design features include resource eligibility, planning processes, cost recovery and geographical restrictions. These findings are then reaffirmed through 42 semi-structured phone interviews with experts in the field of RPS implementation from government agencies, including public utility commissions and state energy offices, electric utilities and various renewable energy firms and associations. Renewable policy standards have been instrumental in the growth of renewable energy in US states. Through a ranking of policy stringency and interviews with industry stakeholders, researchers show the significance of stringency and other policy design features towards a standard’s effectiveness.</description><subject>706/4066</subject><subject>706/4066/4068</subject><subject>706/4066/4076</subject><subject>Cost recovery</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Design standards</subject><subject>Economics and Management</subject><subject>Electric utilities</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>Energy Policy</subject><subject>Energy Storage</subject><subject>Energy Systems</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Public utility districts</subject><subject>Renewable and Green Energy</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><subject>Renewable resources</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><subject>Solar power</subject><subject>Wind power</subject><issn>2058-7546</issn><issn>2058-7546</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWGp_gLeA5-gkm68epdQPKAii55Bukpqy3azJVum_d-0KevE0A_O8M8yD0CWFawqVvimcCgkEqCbAgBF-giYMhCZKcHn6pz9Hs1K2AMDmjAlNJ-h5uetijrVtsP-wzd72MbU4Bdy_eVz6HNuNb-sDtq3Dzpe4OQ6zb_2nXTcedyn3ITUxDfDA2OzKBToLtil-9lOn6PVu-bJ4IKun-8fF7YrUFZU9CXPFnbSKqTCnyjsepPZMw5pVwgPndQ1aCFdJBdR5paRQzjkalHKShrWopuhq3Nvl9L73pTfbtM_tcNIwWikxfMhgoOhI1TmVkn0wXY47mw-Ggvm2Z0Z7ZrBnvu0ZPmTYmCndUUD-3fx_6AtB5XHg</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Carley, Sanya</creator><creator>Davies, Lincoln L.</creator><creator>Spence, David B.</creator><creator>Zirogiannis, Nikolaos</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4903-8897</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9599-4519</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Empirical evaluation of the stringency and design of renewable portfolio standards</title><author>Carley, Sanya ; Davies, Lincoln L. ; Spence, David B. ; Zirogiannis, Nikolaos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-f974d6a727f917ed4f68e280b235e044cc0855d36701de77657ddd1f77d61fb53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>706/4066</topic><topic>706/4066/4068</topic><topic>706/4066/4076</topic><topic>Cost recovery</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Design standards</topic><topic>Economics and Management</topic><topic>Electric utilities</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>Energy Policy</topic><topic>Energy Storage</topic><topic>Energy Systems</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Public utility districts</topic><topic>Renewable and Green Energy</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><topic>Renewable resources</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><topic>Solar power</topic><topic>Wind power</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carley, Sanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Lincoln L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spence, David B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zirogiannis, Nikolaos</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Nature energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carley, Sanya</au><au>Davies, Lincoln L.</au><au>Spence, David B.</au><au>Zirogiannis, Nikolaos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Empirical evaluation of the stringency and design of renewable portfolio standards</atitle><jtitle>Nature energy</jtitle><stitle>Nat Energy</stitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>754</spage><epage>763</epage><pages>754-763</pages><issn>2058-7546</issn><eissn>2058-7546</eissn><abstract>In two decades of experience with state renewable portfolio standards (RPSs), the United States has observed immense growth in renewable energy markets, initially in wind energy and more recently in solar power. During this time, RPSs have experienced considerable policy reinvention and increased diversity. Here, we explain how changes in RPS policy design features relate to different market outcomes. We develop a score for measuring RPS stringency and show that a one-point increase in RPS stringency leads to increases of 0.2%, 1% and 0.3% in renewable energy, solar generation and renewable energy capacity, respectively. Other important design features include resource eligibility, planning processes, cost recovery and geographical restrictions. These findings are then reaffirmed through 42 semi-structured phone interviews with experts in the field of RPS implementation from government agencies, including public utility commissions and state energy offices, electric utilities and various renewable energy firms and associations. Renewable policy standards have been instrumental in the growth of renewable energy in US states. Through a ranking of policy stringency and interviews with industry stakeholders, researchers show the significance of stringency and other policy design features towards a standard’s effectiveness.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><doi>10.1038/s41560-018-0202-4</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4903-8897</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9599-4519</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2058-7546
ispartof Nature energy, 2018-09, Vol.3 (9), p.754-763
issn 2058-7546
2058-7546
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2137522520
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects 706/4066
706/4066/4068
706/4066/4076
Cost recovery
Design
Design standards
Economics and Management
Electric utilities
Energy
Energy industry
Energy Policy
Energy Storage
Energy Systems
Government agencies
Public utility districts
Renewable and Green Energy
Renewable energy
Renewable resources
Solar energy
Solar power
Wind power
title Empirical evaluation of the stringency and design of renewable portfolio standards
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T02%3A35%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Empirical%20evaluation%20of%20the%20stringency%20and%20design%20of%20renewable%20portfolio%20standards&rft.jtitle=Nature%20energy&rft.au=Carley,%20Sanya&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=754&rft.epage=763&rft.pages=754-763&rft.issn=2058-7546&rft.eissn=2058-7546&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41560-018-0202-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2137522520%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2137522520&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true