Unwelcome Change: Coming to Terms with Democratic Backsliding

Scholars have paid increasing attention to democratic backsliding, yet efforts to explain this phenomenon remain inchoate. This article seeks to place the study of democratic backsliding on sturdier conceptual, operational, and theoretical foundations. Conceptually, the challenge of backsliding is t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annual review of political science 2018-05, Vol.21 (1), p.93-113
Hauptverfasser: Waldner, David, Lust, Ellen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 113
container_issue 1
container_start_page 93
container_title Annual review of political science
container_volume 21
creator Waldner, David
Lust, Ellen
description Scholars have paid increasing attention to democratic backsliding, yet efforts to explain this phenomenon remain inchoate. This article seeks to place the study of democratic backsliding on sturdier conceptual, operational, and theoretical foundations. Conceptually, the challenge of backsliding is to define changes that take place within a political regime. Methodologically, the challenge involves measurement of intraregime changes, as alternative coding schemes change the population of units that have experienced democratic backsliding. Theoretical challenges are dual: First, despite a rich and diverse literature, we lack readily available theories to explain backsliding, and second, the theoretical debates that do exist-centered on the causes of democratic transitions, democratic breakdowns, authoritarian resilience, and democratic consolidation-remain unresolved. We consider how these theories might be called into service to explain backsliding. By doing so, the article aims to set the terms of the debate to create a common focal point around which research can coalesce.
doi_str_mv 10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-114628
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_annua</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2136902409</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2136902409</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a449t-f2d235e0bce6288532b5714c7fd36b39d4143a92c10fcfd5cbc7d3d5aac5b1943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE1LxDAQhosouK7-h4J4jOazbYQ9aP2EBS-755CmaTdr29SktfjvzdLFu6cZZp55GZ4oukHwFiGa3MmuG53-Br1tjFcGQAYZSsFhh7OTaIEYZQCxND0NPeQUYE74eXTh_R5CmGCcLaLVtpt0o2yr43wnu1rfx7ltTVfHg4032rU-nsywi590a5WTg1Hxo1SfvjFlgC6js0o2Xl8d6zLavjxv8jew_nh9zx_WQFLKB1DhEhOmYaF0-CxjBBcsRVSlVUmSgvCSIkokxwrBSlUlU4VKS1IyKRUrEKdkGYE510-6HwvRO9NK9yOsNKIeexFG9Si8FjjJsgQG_nrme2e_Ru0Hsbej68KLAiOScIgp5IFazZRy1nunq79cBMXBojgaFkfDYjYsZsPh_nG-P2CyCaDRk_9nyC-txIt_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2136902409</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unwelcome Change: Coming to Terms with Democratic Backsliding</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Waldner, David ; Lust, Ellen</creator><creatorcontrib>Waldner, David ; Lust, Ellen</creatorcontrib><description>Scholars have paid increasing attention to democratic backsliding, yet efforts to explain this phenomenon remain inchoate. This article seeks to place the study of democratic backsliding on sturdier conceptual, operational, and theoretical foundations. Conceptually, the challenge of backsliding is to define changes that take place within a political regime. Methodologically, the challenge involves measurement of intraregime changes, as alternative coding schemes change the population of units that have experienced democratic backsliding. Theoretical challenges are dual: First, despite a rich and diverse literature, we lack readily available theories to explain backsliding, and second, the theoretical debates that do exist-centered on the causes of democratic transitions, democratic breakdowns, authoritarian resilience, and democratic consolidation-remain unresolved. We consider how these theories might be called into service to explain backsliding. By doing so, the article aims to set the terms of the debate to create a common focal point around which research can coalesce.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1094-2939</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1545-1577</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-1577</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-114628</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Palo Alto: Annual Reviews</publisher><subject>Authoritarianism ; autocratization ; backsliding ; breakdown ; Change agents ; Democratization ; Intellectuals ; Measurement ; Political Science ; Resilience ; Statsvetenskap ; transition</subject><ispartof>Annual review of political science, 2018-05, Vol.21 (1), p.93-113</ispartof><rights>Copyright Annual Reviews, Inc. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a449t-f2d235e0bce6288532b5714c7fd36b39d4143a92c10fcfd5cbc7d3d5aac5b1943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a449t-f2d235e0bce6288532b5714c7fd36b39d4143a92c10fcfd5cbc7d3d5aac5b1943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/268860$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Waldner, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lust, Ellen</creatorcontrib><title>Unwelcome Change: Coming to Terms with Democratic Backsliding</title><title>Annual review of political science</title><description>Scholars have paid increasing attention to democratic backsliding, yet efforts to explain this phenomenon remain inchoate. This article seeks to place the study of democratic backsliding on sturdier conceptual, operational, and theoretical foundations. Conceptually, the challenge of backsliding is to define changes that take place within a political regime. Methodologically, the challenge involves measurement of intraregime changes, as alternative coding schemes change the population of units that have experienced democratic backsliding. Theoretical challenges are dual: First, despite a rich and diverse literature, we lack readily available theories to explain backsliding, and second, the theoretical debates that do exist-centered on the causes of democratic transitions, democratic breakdowns, authoritarian resilience, and democratic consolidation-remain unresolved. We consider how these theories might be called into service to explain backsliding. By doing so, the article aims to set the terms of the debate to create a common focal point around which research can coalesce.</description><subject>Authoritarianism</subject><subject>autocratization</subject><subject>backsliding</subject><subject>breakdown</subject><subject>Change agents</subject><subject>Democratization</subject><subject>Intellectuals</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Statsvetenskap</subject><subject>transition</subject><issn>1094-2939</issn><issn>1545-1577</issn><issn>1545-1577</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkE1LxDAQhosouK7-h4J4jOazbYQ9aP2EBS-755CmaTdr29SktfjvzdLFu6cZZp55GZ4oukHwFiGa3MmuG53-Br1tjFcGQAYZSsFhh7OTaIEYZQCxND0NPeQUYE74eXTh_R5CmGCcLaLVtpt0o2yr43wnu1rfx7ltTVfHg4032rU-nsywi590a5WTg1Hxo1SfvjFlgC6js0o2Xl8d6zLavjxv8jew_nh9zx_WQFLKB1DhEhOmYaF0-CxjBBcsRVSlVUmSgvCSIkokxwrBSlUlU4VKS1IyKRUrEKdkGYE510-6HwvRO9NK9yOsNKIeexFG9Si8FjjJsgQG_nrme2e_Ru0Hsbej68KLAiOScIgp5IFazZRy1nunq79cBMXBojgaFkfDYjYsZsPh_nG-P2CyCaDRk_9nyC-txIt_</recordid><startdate>20180511</startdate><enddate>20180511</enddate><creator>Waldner, David</creator><creator>Lust, Ellen</creator><general>Annual Reviews</general><general>Annual Reviews, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>F1U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180511</creationdate><title>Unwelcome Change: Coming to Terms with Democratic Backsliding</title><author>Waldner, David ; Lust, Ellen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a449t-f2d235e0bce6288532b5714c7fd36b39d4143a92c10fcfd5cbc7d3d5aac5b1943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Authoritarianism</topic><topic>autocratization</topic><topic>backsliding</topic><topic>breakdown</topic><topic>Change agents</topic><topic>Democratization</topic><topic>Intellectuals</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Statsvetenskap</topic><topic>transition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Waldner, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lust, Ellen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Göteborgs universitet</collection><jtitle>Annual review of political science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Waldner, David</au><au>Lust, Ellen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unwelcome Change: Coming to Terms with Democratic Backsliding</atitle><jtitle>Annual review of political science</jtitle><date>2018-05-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>93</spage><epage>113</epage><pages>93-113</pages><issn>1094-2939</issn><issn>1545-1577</issn><eissn>1545-1577</eissn><abstract>Scholars have paid increasing attention to democratic backsliding, yet efforts to explain this phenomenon remain inchoate. This article seeks to place the study of democratic backsliding on sturdier conceptual, operational, and theoretical foundations. Conceptually, the challenge of backsliding is to define changes that take place within a political regime. Methodologically, the challenge involves measurement of intraregime changes, as alternative coding schemes change the population of units that have experienced democratic backsliding. Theoretical challenges are dual: First, despite a rich and diverse literature, we lack readily available theories to explain backsliding, and second, the theoretical debates that do exist-centered on the causes of democratic transitions, democratic breakdowns, authoritarian resilience, and democratic consolidation-remain unresolved. We consider how these theories might be called into service to explain backsliding. By doing so, the article aims to set the terms of the debate to create a common focal point around which research can coalesce.</abstract><cop>Palo Alto</cop><pub>Annual Reviews</pub><doi>10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-114628</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1094-2939
ispartof Annual review of political science, 2018-05, Vol.21 (1), p.93-113
issn 1094-2939
1545-1577
1545-1577
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2136902409
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Authoritarianism
autocratization
backsliding
breakdown
Change agents
Democratization
Intellectuals
Measurement
Political Science
Resilience
Statsvetenskap
transition
title Unwelcome Change: Coming to Terms with Democratic Backsliding
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T11%3A25%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_annua&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unwelcome%20Change:%20Coming%20to%20Terms%20with%20Democratic%20Backsliding&rft.jtitle=Annual%20review%20of%20political%20science&rft.au=Waldner,%20David&rft.date=2018-05-11&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=113&rft.pages=93-113&rft.issn=1094-2939&rft.eissn=1545-1577&rft_id=info:doi/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-114628&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_annua%3E2136902409%3C/proquest_annua%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2136902409&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true