Unwelcome Change: Coming to Terms with Democratic Backsliding
Scholars have paid increasing attention to democratic backsliding, yet efforts to explain this phenomenon remain inchoate. This article seeks to place the study of democratic backsliding on sturdier conceptual, operational, and theoretical foundations. Conceptually, the challenge of backsliding is t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annual review of political science 2018-05, Vol.21 (1), p.93-113 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 113 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 93 |
container_title | Annual review of political science |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Waldner, David Lust, Ellen |
description | Scholars have paid increasing attention to democratic backsliding, yet efforts to explain this phenomenon remain inchoate. This article seeks to place the study of democratic backsliding on sturdier conceptual, operational, and theoretical foundations. Conceptually, the challenge of backsliding is to define changes that take place within a political regime. Methodologically, the challenge involves measurement of intraregime changes, as alternative coding schemes change the population of units that have experienced democratic backsliding. Theoretical challenges are dual: First, despite a rich and diverse literature, we lack readily available theories to explain backsliding, and second, the theoretical debates that do exist-centered on the causes of democratic transitions, democratic breakdowns, authoritarian resilience, and democratic consolidation-remain unresolved. We consider how these theories might be called into service to explain backsliding. By doing so, the article aims to set the terms of the debate to create a common focal point around which research can coalesce. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-114628 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_annua</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2136902409</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2136902409</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a449t-f2d235e0bce6288532b5714c7fd36b39d4143a92c10fcfd5cbc7d3d5aac5b1943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE1LxDAQhosouK7-h4J4jOazbYQ9aP2EBS-755CmaTdr29SktfjvzdLFu6cZZp55GZ4oukHwFiGa3MmuG53-Br1tjFcGQAYZSsFhh7OTaIEYZQCxND0NPeQUYE74eXTh_R5CmGCcLaLVtpt0o2yr43wnu1rfx7ltTVfHg4032rU-nsywi590a5WTg1Hxo1SfvjFlgC6js0o2Xl8d6zLavjxv8jew_nh9zx_WQFLKB1DhEhOmYaF0-CxjBBcsRVSlVUmSgvCSIkokxwrBSlUlU4VKS1IyKRUrEKdkGYE510-6HwvRO9NK9yOsNKIeexFG9Si8FjjJsgQG_nrme2e_Ru0Hsbej68KLAiOScIgp5IFazZRy1nunq79cBMXBojgaFkfDYjYsZsPh_nG-P2CyCaDRk_9nyC-txIt_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2136902409</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unwelcome Change: Coming to Terms with Democratic Backsliding</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Waldner, David ; Lust, Ellen</creator><creatorcontrib>Waldner, David ; Lust, Ellen</creatorcontrib><description>Scholars have paid increasing attention to democratic backsliding, yet efforts to explain this phenomenon remain inchoate. This article seeks to place the study of democratic backsliding on sturdier conceptual, operational, and theoretical foundations. Conceptually, the challenge of backsliding is to define changes that take place within a political regime. Methodologically, the challenge involves measurement of intraregime changes, as alternative coding schemes change the population of units that have experienced democratic backsliding. Theoretical challenges are dual: First, despite a rich and diverse literature, we lack readily available theories to explain backsliding, and second, the theoretical debates that do exist-centered on the causes of democratic transitions, democratic breakdowns, authoritarian resilience, and democratic consolidation-remain unresolved. We consider how these theories might be called into service to explain backsliding. By doing so, the article aims to set the terms of the debate to create a common focal point around which research can coalesce.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1094-2939</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1545-1577</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-1577</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-114628</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Palo Alto: Annual Reviews</publisher><subject>Authoritarianism ; autocratization ; backsliding ; breakdown ; Change agents ; Democratization ; Intellectuals ; Measurement ; Political Science ; Resilience ; Statsvetenskap ; transition</subject><ispartof>Annual review of political science, 2018-05, Vol.21 (1), p.93-113</ispartof><rights>Copyright Annual Reviews, Inc. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a449t-f2d235e0bce6288532b5714c7fd36b39d4143a92c10fcfd5cbc7d3d5aac5b1943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a449t-f2d235e0bce6288532b5714c7fd36b39d4143a92c10fcfd5cbc7d3d5aac5b1943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/268860$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Waldner, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lust, Ellen</creatorcontrib><title>Unwelcome Change: Coming to Terms with Democratic Backsliding</title><title>Annual review of political science</title><description>Scholars have paid increasing attention to democratic backsliding, yet efforts to explain this phenomenon remain inchoate. This article seeks to place the study of democratic backsliding on sturdier conceptual, operational, and theoretical foundations. Conceptually, the challenge of backsliding is to define changes that take place within a political regime. Methodologically, the challenge involves measurement of intraregime changes, as alternative coding schemes change the population of units that have experienced democratic backsliding. Theoretical challenges are dual: First, despite a rich and diverse literature, we lack readily available theories to explain backsliding, and second, the theoretical debates that do exist-centered on the causes of democratic transitions, democratic breakdowns, authoritarian resilience, and democratic consolidation-remain unresolved. We consider how these theories might be called into service to explain backsliding. By doing so, the article aims to set the terms of the debate to create a common focal point around which research can coalesce.</description><subject>Authoritarianism</subject><subject>autocratization</subject><subject>backsliding</subject><subject>breakdown</subject><subject>Change agents</subject><subject>Democratization</subject><subject>Intellectuals</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Statsvetenskap</subject><subject>transition</subject><issn>1094-2939</issn><issn>1545-1577</issn><issn>1545-1577</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkE1LxDAQhosouK7-h4J4jOazbYQ9aP2EBS-755CmaTdr29SktfjvzdLFu6cZZp55GZ4oukHwFiGa3MmuG53-Br1tjFcGQAYZSsFhh7OTaIEYZQCxND0NPeQUYE74eXTh_R5CmGCcLaLVtpt0o2yr43wnu1rfx7ltTVfHg4032rU-nsywi590a5WTg1Hxo1SfvjFlgC6js0o2Xl8d6zLavjxv8jew_nh9zx_WQFLKB1DhEhOmYaF0-CxjBBcsRVSlVUmSgvCSIkokxwrBSlUlU4VKS1IyKRUrEKdkGYE510-6HwvRO9NK9yOsNKIeexFG9Si8FjjJsgQG_nrme2e_Ru0Hsbej68KLAiOScIgp5IFazZRy1nunq79cBMXBojgaFkfDYjYsZsPh_nG-P2CyCaDRk_9nyC-txIt_</recordid><startdate>20180511</startdate><enddate>20180511</enddate><creator>Waldner, David</creator><creator>Lust, Ellen</creator><general>Annual Reviews</general><general>Annual Reviews, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>F1U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180511</creationdate><title>Unwelcome Change: Coming to Terms with Democratic Backsliding</title><author>Waldner, David ; Lust, Ellen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a449t-f2d235e0bce6288532b5714c7fd36b39d4143a92c10fcfd5cbc7d3d5aac5b1943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Authoritarianism</topic><topic>autocratization</topic><topic>backsliding</topic><topic>breakdown</topic><topic>Change agents</topic><topic>Democratization</topic><topic>Intellectuals</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Statsvetenskap</topic><topic>transition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Waldner, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lust, Ellen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Göteborgs universitet</collection><jtitle>Annual review of political science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Waldner, David</au><au>Lust, Ellen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unwelcome Change: Coming to Terms with Democratic Backsliding</atitle><jtitle>Annual review of political science</jtitle><date>2018-05-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>93</spage><epage>113</epage><pages>93-113</pages><issn>1094-2939</issn><issn>1545-1577</issn><eissn>1545-1577</eissn><abstract>Scholars have paid increasing attention to democratic backsliding, yet efforts to explain this phenomenon remain inchoate. This article seeks to place the study of democratic backsliding on sturdier conceptual, operational, and theoretical foundations. Conceptually, the challenge of backsliding is to define changes that take place within a political regime. Methodologically, the challenge involves measurement of intraregime changes, as alternative coding schemes change the population of units that have experienced democratic backsliding. Theoretical challenges are dual: First, despite a rich and diverse literature, we lack readily available theories to explain backsliding, and second, the theoretical debates that do exist-centered on the causes of democratic transitions, democratic breakdowns, authoritarian resilience, and democratic consolidation-remain unresolved. We consider how these theories might be called into service to explain backsliding. By doing so, the article aims to set the terms of the debate to create a common focal point around which research can coalesce.</abstract><cop>Palo Alto</cop><pub>Annual Reviews</pub><doi>10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-114628</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1094-2939 |
ispartof | Annual review of political science, 2018-05, Vol.21 (1), p.93-113 |
issn | 1094-2939 1545-1577 1545-1577 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2136902409 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Authoritarianism autocratization backsliding breakdown Change agents Democratization Intellectuals Measurement Political Science Resilience Statsvetenskap transition |
title | Unwelcome Change: Coming to Terms with Democratic Backsliding |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T11%3A25%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_annua&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unwelcome%20Change:%20Coming%20to%20Terms%20with%20Democratic%20Backsliding&rft.jtitle=Annual%20review%20of%20political%20science&rft.au=Waldner,%20David&rft.date=2018-05-11&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=113&rft.pages=93-113&rft.issn=1094-2939&rft.eissn=1545-1577&rft_id=info:doi/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-114628&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_annua%3E2136902409%3C/proquest_annua%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2136902409&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |