Sexual Behavior of the Desert Locust During Intra- and Inter-Phase Interactions

Mating and reproduction behaviors and strategies are fundamental aspects of an organism’s evolutionary and ecological success. In locusts, intra- as well as inter-phase reproductive interactions among gregarious and solitarious locust populations have a major impact on the locust population dynamics...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of insect behavior 2018-11, Vol.31 (6), p.629-641
Hauptverfasser: Golov, Y., Rillich, J., Douek, M., Harari, A. R., Ayali, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 641
container_issue 6
container_start_page 629
container_title Journal of insect behavior
container_volume 31
creator Golov, Y.
Rillich, J.
Douek, M.
Harari, A. R.
Ayali, A.
description Mating and reproduction behaviors and strategies are fundamental aspects of an organism’s evolutionary and ecological success. In locusts, intra- as well as inter-phase reproductive interactions among gregarious and solitarious locust populations have a major impact on the locust population dynamics. However, practically all previous work on locust sexual behavior has been limited to the gregarious phase. Here we provide a first detailed description of pre-copulatory behavior of solitarious desert locusts. We compare our findings with those of previous reports of pre-copulatory behavior of gregarious locusts, focusing on the behavioral elements that serve in inter-sex signaling and communication. We also studied inter-phase (mixed pairs) reproductive interactions. Solitarious males were found to invest more in pre-copulatory courtship and signaling compared to their gregarious counterparts; and solitarious females played a more dominant role in the inter-sex communication than gregarious females. The solitarious females were also less likely to demonstrate rejection-related behavioral patterns than gregarious females. As a consequence of the particular characteristic behavior of each phase, the most successful among intra- and inter-phase pairs were gregarious males with solitary females. Least successful were solitary males paired with gregarious females, indicating a strong asymmetry in inter-phase reproductive interactions.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10905-018-9703-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2136320557</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2136320557</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-918205366fcef6cf985312d44150a6cd2f117422b5a34938b8bbdc9399a2bfa33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANwscTb4J47tI7QUKlUqEnC2HMemqUpcbAdBn55EQeLEaecwM7v7AXBJ8DXBWNwkghXmCBOJlMAMHY7AhHBBkZRSHYMJlooiwTk7BWcpbTHGSnIxAetn99WZHbxzG_PZhAiDh3nj4NwlFzNcBdulDOddbNo3uGxzNAiath6ki-hpY5IbtbG5CW06Byfe7JK7-J1T8Lq4f5k9otX6YTm7XSFbUJ6RIpJizsrSW-dL6_tjGKF1URCOTWlr6gkRBaUVN6xQTFayqmqrmFKGVt4wNgVXY-8-ho_Opay3oYttv1JTwkrWt3PRu8josjGkFJ3X-9i8m_itCdYDNz1y0z03PXDThz5Dx0zaD0-7-Nf8f-gHnW9vng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2136320557</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sexual Behavior of the Desert Locust During Intra- and Inter-Phase Interactions</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Golov, Y. ; Rillich, J. ; Douek, M. ; Harari, A. R. ; Ayali, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Golov, Y. ; Rillich, J. ; Douek, M. ; Harari, A. R. ; Ayali, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Mating and reproduction behaviors and strategies are fundamental aspects of an organism’s evolutionary and ecological success. In locusts, intra- as well as inter-phase reproductive interactions among gregarious and solitarious locust populations have a major impact on the locust population dynamics. However, practically all previous work on locust sexual behavior has been limited to the gregarious phase. Here we provide a first detailed description of pre-copulatory behavior of solitarious desert locusts. We compare our findings with those of previous reports of pre-copulatory behavior of gregarious locusts, focusing on the behavioral elements that serve in inter-sex signaling and communication. We also studied inter-phase (mixed pairs) reproductive interactions. Solitarious males were found to invest more in pre-copulatory courtship and signaling compared to their gregarious counterparts; and solitarious females played a more dominant role in the inter-sex communication than gregarious females. The solitarious females were also less likely to demonstrate rejection-related behavioral patterns than gregarious females. As a consequence of the particular characteristic behavior of each phase, the most successful among intra- and inter-phase pairs were gregarious males with solitary females. Least successful were solitary males paired with gregarious females, indicating a strong asymmetry in inter-phase reproductive interactions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0892-7553</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8889</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10905-018-9703-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Animal behavior ; Animal Ecology ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Copulation ; Courtship ; Desert environments ; Entomology ; Evolutionary Biology ; Females ; Life Sciences ; Locusts ; Males ; Neurobiology ; Orthoptera ; Sex ; Sexual behavior ; Signaling</subject><ispartof>Journal of insect behavior, 2018-11, Vol.31 (6), p.629-641</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Journal of Insect Behavior is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-918205366fcef6cf985312d44150a6cd2f117422b5a34938b8bbdc9399a2bfa33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-918205366fcef6cf985312d44150a6cd2f117422b5a34938b8bbdc9399a2bfa33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6152-2927</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10905-018-9703-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10905-018-9703-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Golov, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rillich, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douek, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harari, A. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayali, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Sexual Behavior of the Desert Locust During Intra- and Inter-Phase Interactions</title><title>Journal of insect behavior</title><addtitle>J Insect Behav</addtitle><description>Mating and reproduction behaviors and strategies are fundamental aspects of an organism’s evolutionary and ecological success. In locusts, intra- as well as inter-phase reproductive interactions among gregarious and solitarious locust populations have a major impact on the locust population dynamics. However, practically all previous work on locust sexual behavior has been limited to the gregarious phase. Here we provide a first detailed description of pre-copulatory behavior of solitarious desert locusts. We compare our findings with those of previous reports of pre-copulatory behavior of gregarious locusts, focusing on the behavioral elements that serve in inter-sex signaling and communication. We also studied inter-phase (mixed pairs) reproductive interactions. Solitarious males were found to invest more in pre-copulatory courtship and signaling compared to their gregarious counterparts; and solitarious females played a more dominant role in the inter-sex communication than gregarious females. The solitarious females were also less likely to demonstrate rejection-related behavioral patterns than gregarious females. As a consequence of the particular characteristic behavior of each phase, the most successful among intra- and inter-phase pairs were gregarious males with solitary females. Least successful were solitary males paired with gregarious females, indicating a strong asymmetry in inter-phase reproductive interactions.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Copulation</subject><subject>Courtship</subject><subject>Desert environments</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Locusts</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Neurobiology</subject><subject>Orthoptera</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sexual behavior</subject><subject>Signaling</subject><issn>0892-7553</issn><issn>1572-8889</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANwscTb4J47tI7QUKlUqEnC2HMemqUpcbAdBn55EQeLEaecwM7v7AXBJ8DXBWNwkghXmCBOJlMAMHY7AhHBBkZRSHYMJlooiwTk7BWcpbTHGSnIxAetn99WZHbxzG_PZhAiDh3nj4NwlFzNcBdulDOddbNo3uGxzNAiath6ki-hpY5IbtbG5CW06Byfe7JK7-J1T8Lq4f5k9otX6YTm7XSFbUJ6RIpJizsrSW-dL6_tjGKF1URCOTWlr6gkRBaUVN6xQTFayqmqrmFKGVt4wNgVXY-8-ho_Opay3oYttv1JTwkrWt3PRu8josjGkFJ3X-9i8m_itCdYDNz1y0z03PXDThz5Dx0zaD0-7-Nf8f-gHnW9vng</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Golov, Y.</creator><creator>Rillich, J.</creator><creator>Douek, M.</creator><creator>Harari, A. R.</creator><creator>Ayali, A.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6152-2927</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Sexual Behavior of the Desert Locust During Intra- and Inter-Phase Interactions</title><author>Golov, Y. ; Rillich, J. ; Douek, M. ; Harari, A. R. ; Ayali, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-918205366fcef6cf985312d44150a6cd2f117422b5a34938b8bbdc9399a2bfa33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Copulation</topic><topic>Courtship</topic><topic>Desert environments</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Locusts</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Neurobiology</topic><topic>Orthoptera</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sexual behavior</topic><topic>Signaling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Golov, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rillich, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douek, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harari, A. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayali, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Journal of insect behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Golov, Y.</au><au>Rillich, J.</au><au>Douek, M.</au><au>Harari, A. R.</au><au>Ayali, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sexual Behavior of the Desert Locust During Intra- and Inter-Phase Interactions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of insect behavior</jtitle><stitle>J Insect Behav</stitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>629</spage><epage>641</epage><pages>629-641</pages><issn>0892-7553</issn><eissn>1572-8889</eissn><abstract>Mating and reproduction behaviors and strategies are fundamental aspects of an organism’s evolutionary and ecological success. In locusts, intra- as well as inter-phase reproductive interactions among gregarious and solitarious locust populations have a major impact on the locust population dynamics. However, practically all previous work on locust sexual behavior has been limited to the gregarious phase. Here we provide a first detailed description of pre-copulatory behavior of solitarious desert locusts. We compare our findings with those of previous reports of pre-copulatory behavior of gregarious locusts, focusing on the behavioral elements that serve in inter-sex signaling and communication. We also studied inter-phase (mixed pairs) reproductive interactions. Solitarious males were found to invest more in pre-copulatory courtship and signaling compared to their gregarious counterparts; and solitarious females played a more dominant role in the inter-sex communication than gregarious females. The solitarious females were also less likely to demonstrate rejection-related behavioral patterns than gregarious females. As a consequence of the particular characteristic behavior of each phase, the most successful among intra- and inter-phase pairs were gregarious males with solitary females. Least successful were solitary males paired with gregarious females, indicating a strong asymmetry in inter-phase reproductive interactions.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10905-018-9703-z</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6152-2927</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0892-7553
ispartof Journal of insect behavior, 2018-11, Vol.31 (6), p.629-641
issn 0892-7553
1572-8889
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2136320557
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Agriculture
Animal behavior
Animal Ecology
Behavioral Sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Copulation
Courtship
Desert environments
Entomology
Evolutionary Biology
Females
Life Sciences
Locusts
Males
Neurobiology
Orthoptera
Sex
Sexual behavior
Signaling
title Sexual Behavior of the Desert Locust During Intra- and Inter-Phase Interactions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T18%3A47%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sexual%20Behavior%20of%20the%20Desert%20Locust%20During%20Intra-%20and%20Inter-Phase%20Interactions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20insect%20behavior&rft.au=Golov,%20Y.&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=629&rft.epage=641&rft.pages=629-641&rft.issn=0892-7553&rft.eissn=1572-8889&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10905-018-9703-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2136320557%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2136320557&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true