Estimating Soil Respiration in a Subalpine Landscape Using Point, Terrain, Climate, and Greenness Data

Landscape carbon (C) flux estimates help assess the ability of terrestrial ecosystems to buffer further increases in anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Advances in remote sensing have led to coarse‐scale estimates of gross primary productivity (GPP; e.g., MODIS 17), yet efforts to develop...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences 2018-10, Vol.123 (10), p.3231-3249
Hauptverfasser: Berryman, Erin M., Vanderhoof, Melanie K., Bradford, John B., Hawbaker, Todd J., Henne, Paul D., Burns, Sean P., Frank, John M., Birdsey, Richard A., Ryan, Michael G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3249
container_issue 10
container_start_page 3231
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences
container_volume 123
creator Berryman, Erin M.
Vanderhoof, Melanie K.
Bradford, John B.
Hawbaker, Todd J.
Henne, Paul D.
Burns, Sean P.
Frank, John M.
Birdsey, Richard A.
Ryan, Michael G.
description Landscape carbon (C) flux estimates help assess the ability of terrestrial ecosystems to buffer further increases in anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Advances in remote sensing have led to coarse‐scale estimates of gross primary productivity (GPP; e.g., MODIS 17), yet efforts to develop spatial respiration products are lacking. Here we demonstrate a method to predict growing season soil respiration at a regional scale in a mixed subalpine ecosystem. We related field measurements (n = 396) of growing season soil respiration mostly from subalpine forests in the Southern Rocky Mountains ecoregion to a suite of biophysical predictors using a Random Forest model (30‐m pixel size). We found that Landsat Enhanced Vegetation Index, growing season aridity index, temperature, precipitation, elevation, and slope aspect explained spatiotemporal variability in soil respiration. Our model had a psuedo‐r2 of 0.45 and root‐mean‐square error of roughly one quarter of the mean value of respiration. Predicted growing season soil respiration across the region was remarkably consistent across 2004, 2005, and 2006 (150‐day sums of 542.8, 544.3, and 536.5 g C/m2, respectively). Yet we observed substantial variability in spatial patterns of soil respiration predictions that varied among years, suggesting that our method is sensitive to changes in respiration drivers. Mean predicted growing season soil respiration was 73% of MODIS GPP, while predicted soil respiration was generally within 20% of nocturnal net ecosystem exchange from nearby eddy covariance towers. Thus, geospatial and remotely sensed data sets can be used to estimate soil respiration at landscape scales. Plain Language Summary Soil respiration returns carbon dioxide back to the atmosphere and is an important part of the carbon cycle, but estimates of soil respiration across large landscapes are difficult to come by. Soil respiration is sensitive to changes in climate and vegetation, which are available as mapped data products, thanks to remote sensing and geospatial technology. We developed a statistical model that mapped soil respiration across three forests and an entire region based on climate and vegetation spatial data. While this work was limited to subalpine forests in the Southern Rocky Mountains, our method can be used in other ecosystems to better understand how ecosystems interact with atmospheric carbon dioxide. Key Points Subalpine soil respiration was estimated across the Southern Rocky M
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2018JG004613
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2135922108</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2135922108</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3074-8ac9a1a369633463af7a206d922b39e2d039be2c27b11aa6506d64fcac9286423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEEtPYjR8QiWsLcdJlzRGNUZgmgfZxjtwuRZlKWpJOaP9-mYYQJ3yx9frxa8uE3AK7B8bVA2eQzwvGMgniggw4SJXmSsLlbz0W12QUwo7FyKMEMCD1LPT2E3vrPuiqtQ1dmtBZH4XWUeso0tW-xKazztAFum2osDN0E078e2tdn9C18R6tS-i0OTmZhEaOFt4Y50wI9Al7vCFXNTbBjH7ykGyeZ-vpS7p4K16nj4u0EmySpTlWCgGFVFKITAqsJ8iZ3CrOS6EM3zKhSsMrPikBEOU49mRWV3GM5zLjYkjuzr6db7_2JvR61-69iys1BzGOPsDySCVnqvJtCN7UuvPxdH_QwPTpmfrvMyMuzvi3bczhX1bPi2XBgYtMHAE2o3Oz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2135922108</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimating Soil Respiration in a Subalpine Landscape Using Point, Terrain, Climate, and Greenness Data</title><source>Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Berryman, Erin M. ; Vanderhoof, Melanie K. ; Bradford, John B. ; Hawbaker, Todd J. ; Henne, Paul D. ; Burns, Sean P. ; Frank, John M. ; Birdsey, Richard A. ; Ryan, Michael G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Berryman, Erin M. ; Vanderhoof, Melanie K. ; Bradford, John B. ; Hawbaker, Todd J. ; Henne, Paul D. ; Burns, Sean P. ; Frank, John M. ; Birdsey, Richard A. ; Ryan, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><description>Landscape carbon (C) flux estimates help assess the ability of terrestrial ecosystems to buffer further increases in anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Advances in remote sensing have led to coarse‐scale estimates of gross primary productivity (GPP; e.g., MODIS 17), yet efforts to develop spatial respiration products are lacking. Here we demonstrate a method to predict growing season soil respiration at a regional scale in a mixed subalpine ecosystem. We related field measurements (n = 396) of growing season soil respiration mostly from subalpine forests in the Southern Rocky Mountains ecoregion to a suite of biophysical predictors using a Random Forest model (30‐m pixel size). We found that Landsat Enhanced Vegetation Index, growing season aridity index, temperature, precipitation, elevation, and slope aspect explained spatiotemporal variability in soil respiration. Our model had a psuedo‐r2 of 0.45 and root‐mean‐square error of roughly one quarter of the mean value of respiration. Predicted growing season soil respiration across the region was remarkably consistent across 2004, 2005, and 2006 (150‐day sums of 542.8, 544.3, and 536.5 g C/m2, respectively). Yet we observed substantial variability in spatial patterns of soil respiration predictions that varied among years, suggesting that our method is sensitive to changes in respiration drivers. Mean predicted growing season soil respiration was 73% of MODIS GPP, while predicted soil respiration was generally within 20% of nocturnal net ecosystem exchange from nearby eddy covariance towers. Thus, geospatial and remotely sensed data sets can be used to estimate soil respiration at landscape scales. Plain Language Summary Soil respiration returns carbon dioxide back to the atmosphere and is an important part of the carbon cycle, but estimates of soil respiration across large landscapes are difficult to come by. Soil respiration is sensitive to changes in climate and vegetation, which are available as mapped data products, thanks to remote sensing and geospatial technology. We developed a statistical model that mapped soil respiration across three forests and an entire region based on climate and vegetation spatial data. While this work was limited to subalpine forests in the Southern Rocky Mountains, our method can be used in other ecosystems to better understand how ecosystems interact with atmospheric carbon dioxide. Key Points Subalpine soil respiration was estimated across the Southern Rocky Mountains using 396 point measurements, Landsat Enhanced Vegetation Index, climate, and terrain Predicted soil respiration compared reasonably well to eddy covariance nocturnal respiration and MODIS GPP This method shows promise for large‐scale estimates of soil respiration, a large component of the terrestrial carbon cycle</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-8953</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8961</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2018JG004613</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Anthropogenic factors ; Aridity ; Carbon cycle ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide emissions ; Climate ; Climate change ; Covariance ; Data ; Ecosystems ; Estimates ; Forests ; Growing season ; Landsat ; Landsat satellites ; Landscape ; Mathematical models ; Methods ; MODIS ; Mountains ; Precipitation ; Predictions ; Primary production ; Remote sensing ; Respiration ; Seasons ; Soil ; Soil mapping ; Soil temperature ; Soils ; Spatial data ; Statistical models ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Variability ; Vegetation ; Vegetation index</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences, 2018-10, Vol.123 (10), p.3231-3249</ispartof><rights>2018. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3074-8ac9a1a369633463af7a206d922b39e2d039be2c27b11aa6506d64fcac9286423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3074-8ac9a1a369633463af7a206d922b39e2d039be2c27b11aa6506d64fcac9286423</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3595-1100 ; 0000-0001-8699-2474 ; 0000-0002-2500-6738 ; 0000-0002-0101-5533 ; 0000-0001-9257-6303 ; 0000-0003-1211-5545 ; 0000-0002-6258-1838 ; 0000-0001-6543-0333 ; 0000-0003-0930-9154</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2018JG004613$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2018JG004613$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berryman, Erin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanderhoof, Melanie K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradford, John B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawbaker, Todd J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henne, Paul D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burns, Sean P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frank, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birdsey, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><title>Estimating Soil Respiration in a Subalpine Landscape Using Point, Terrain, Climate, and Greenness Data</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</title><description>Landscape carbon (C) flux estimates help assess the ability of terrestrial ecosystems to buffer further increases in anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Advances in remote sensing have led to coarse‐scale estimates of gross primary productivity (GPP; e.g., MODIS 17), yet efforts to develop spatial respiration products are lacking. Here we demonstrate a method to predict growing season soil respiration at a regional scale in a mixed subalpine ecosystem. We related field measurements (n = 396) of growing season soil respiration mostly from subalpine forests in the Southern Rocky Mountains ecoregion to a suite of biophysical predictors using a Random Forest model (30‐m pixel size). We found that Landsat Enhanced Vegetation Index, growing season aridity index, temperature, precipitation, elevation, and slope aspect explained spatiotemporal variability in soil respiration. Our model had a psuedo‐r2 of 0.45 and root‐mean‐square error of roughly one quarter of the mean value of respiration. Predicted growing season soil respiration across the region was remarkably consistent across 2004, 2005, and 2006 (150‐day sums of 542.8, 544.3, and 536.5 g C/m2, respectively). Yet we observed substantial variability in spatial patterns of soil respiration predictions that varied among years, suggesting that our method is sensitive to changes in respiration drivers. Mean predicted growing season soil respiration was 73% of MODIS GPP, while predicted soil respiration was generally within 20% of nocturnal net ecosystem exchange from nearby eddy covariance towers. Thus, geospatial and remotely sensed data sets can be used to estimate soil respiration at landscape scales. Plain Language Summary Soil respiration returns carbon dioxide back to the atmosphere and is an important part of the carbon cycle, but estimates of soil respiration across large landscapes are difficult to come by. Soil respiration is sensitive to changes in climate and vegetation, which are available as mapped data products, thanks to remote sensing and geospatial technology. We developed a statistical model that mapped soil respiration across three forests and an entire region based on climate and vegetation spatial data. While this work was limited to subalpine forests in the Southern Rocky Mountains, our method can be used in other ecosystems to better understand how ecosystems interact with atmospheric carbon dioxide. Key Points Subalpine soil respiration was estimated across the Southern Rocky Mountains using 396 point measurements, Landsat Enhanced Vegetation Index, climate, and terrain Predicted soil respiration compared reasonably well to eddy covariance nocturnal respiration and MODIS GPP This method shows promise for large‐scale estimates of soil respiration, a large component of the terrestrial carbon cycle</description><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Aridity</subject><subject>Carbon cycle</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emissions</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Covariance</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Growing season</subject><subject>Landsat</subject><subject>Landsat satellites</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>MODIS</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Primary production</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil mapping</subject><subject>Soil temperature</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Spatial data</subject><subject>Statistical models</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Variability</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Vegetation index</subject><issn>2169-8953</issn><issn>2169-8961</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEEtPYjR8QiWsLcdJlzRGNUZgmgfZxjtwuRZlKWpJOaP9-mYYQJ3yx9frxa8uE3AK7B8bVA2eQzwvGMgniggw4SJXmSsLlbz0W12QUwo7FyKMEMCD1LPT2E3vrPuiqtQ1dmtBZH4XWUeso0tW-xKazztAFum2osDN0E078e2tdn9C18R6tS-i0OTmZhEaOFt4Y50wI9Al7vCFXNTbBjH7ykGyeZ-vpS7p4K16nj4u0EmySpTlWCgGFVFKITAqsJ8iZ3CrOS6EM3zKhSsMrPikBEOU49mRWV3GM5zLjYkjuzr6db7_2JvR61-69iys1BzGOPsDySCVnqvJtCN7UuvPxdH_QwPTpmfrvMyMuzvi3bczhX1bPi2XBgYtMHAE2o3Oz</recordid><startdate>201810</startdate><enddate>201810</enddate><creator>Berryman, Erin M.</creator><creator>Vanderhoof, Melanie K.</creator><creator>Bradford, John B.</creator><creator>Hawbaker, Todd J.</creator><creator>Henne, Paul D.</creator><creator>Burns, Sean P.</creator><creator>Frank, John M.</creator><creator>Birdsey, Richard A.</creator><creator>Ryan, Michael G.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3595-1100</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8699-2474</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2500-6738</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0101-5533</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9257-6303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1211-5545</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6258-1838</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6543-0333</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0930-9154</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201810</creationdate><title>Estimating Soil Respiration in a Subalpine Landscape Using Point, Terrain, Climate, and Greenness Data</title><author>Berryman, Erin M. ; Vanderhoof, Melanie K. ; Bradford, John B. ; Hawbaker, Todd J. ; Henne, Paul D. ; Burns, Sean P. ; Frank, John M. ; Birdsey, Richard A. ; Ryan, Michael G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3074-8ac9a1a369633463af7a206d922b39e2d039be2c27b11aa6506d64fcac9286423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Aridity</topic><topic>Carbon cycle</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emissions</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Covariance</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Growing season</topic><topic>Landsat</topic><topic>Landsat satellites</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>MODIS</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Primary production</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil mapping</topic><topic>Soil temperature</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Spatial data</topic><topic>Statistical models</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Variability</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Vegetation index</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berryman, Erin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanderhoof, Melanie K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradford, John B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawbaker, Todd J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henne, Paul D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burns, Sean P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frank, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birdsey, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berryman, Erin M.</au><au>Vanderhoof, Melanie K.</au><au>Bradford, John B.</au><au>Hawbaker, Todd J.</au><au>Henne, Paul D.</au><au>Burns, Sean P.</au><au>Frank, John M.</au><au>Birdsey, Richard A.</au><au>Ryan, Michael G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimating Soil Respiration in a Subalpine Landscape Using Point, Terrain, Climate, and Greenness Data</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</jtitle><date>2018-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>123</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3231</spage><epage>3249</epage><pages>3231-3249</pages><issn>2169-8953</issn><eissn>2169-8961</eissn><abstract>Landscape carbon (C) flux estimates help assess the ability of terrestrial ecosystems to buffer further increases in anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Advances in remote sensing have led to coarse‐scale estimates of gross primary productivity (GPP; e.g., MODIS 17), yet efforts to develop spatial respiration products are lacking. Here we demonstrate a method to predict growing season soil respiration at a regional scale in a mixed subalpine ecosystem. We related field measurements (n = 396) of growing season soil respiration mostly from subalpine forests in the Southern Rocky Mountains ecoregion to a suite of biophysical predictors using a Random Forest model (30‐m pixel size). We found that Landsat Enhanced Vegetation Index, growing season aridity index, temperature, precipitation, elevation, and slope aspect explained spatiotemporal variability in soil respiration. Our model had a psuedo‐r2 of 0.45 and root‐mean‐square error of roughly one quarter of the mean value of respiration. Predicted growing season soil respiration across the region was remarkably consistent across 2004, 2005, and 2006 (150‐day sums of 542.8, 544.3, and 536.5 g C/m2, respectively). Yet we observed substantial variability in spatial patterns of soil respiration predictions that varied among years, suggesting that our method is sensitive to changes in respiration drivers. Mean predicted growing season soil respiration was 73% of MODIS GPP, while predicted soil respiration was generally within 20% of nocturnal net ecosystem exchange from nearby eddy covariance towers. Thus, geospatial and remotely sensed data sets can be used to estimate soil respiration at landscape scales. Plain Language Summary Soil respiration returns carbon dioxide back to the atmosphere and is an important part of the carbon cycle, but estimates of soil respiration across large landscapes are difficult to come by. Soil respiration is sensitive to changes in climate and vegetation, which are available as mapped data products, thanks to remote sensing and geospatial technology. We developed a statistical model that mapped soil respiration across three forests and an entire region based on climate and vegetation spatial data. While this work was limited to subalpine forests in the Southern Rocky Mountains, our method can be used in other ecosystems to better understand how ecosystems interact with atmospheric carbon dioxide. Key Points Subalpine soil respiration was estimated across the Southern Rocky Mountains using 396 point measurements, Landsat Enhanced Vegetation Index, climate, and terrain Predicted soil respiration compared reasonably well to eddy covariance nocturnal respiration and MODIS GPP This method shows promise for large‐scale estimates of soil respiration, a large component of the terrestrial carbon cycle</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2018JG004613</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3595-1100</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8699-2474</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2500-6738</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0101-5533</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9257-6303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1211-5545</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6258-1838</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6543-0333</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0930-9154</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-8953
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences, 2018-10, Vol.123 (10), p.3231-3249
issn 2169-8953
2169-8961
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2135922108
source Wiley Online Library; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Anthropogenic factors
Aridity
Carbon cycle
Carbon dioxide
Carbon dioxide emissions
Climate
Climate change
Covariance
Data
Ecosystems
Estimates
Forests
Growing season
Landsat
Landsat satellites
Landscape
Mathematical models
Methods
MODIS
Mountains
Precipitation
Predictions
Primary production
Remote sensing
Respiration
Seasons
Soil
Soil mapping
Soil temperature
Soils
Spatial data
Statistical models
Terrestrial ecosystems
Variability
Vegetation
Vegetation index
title Estimating Soil Respiration in a Subalpine Landscape Using Point, Terrain, Climate, and Greenness Data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T01%3A07%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimating%20Soil%20Respiration%20in%20a%20Subalpine%20Landscape%20Using%20Point,%20Terrain,%20Climate,%20and%20Greenness%20Data&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Biogeosciences&rft.au=Berryman,%20Erin%20M.&rft.date=2018-10&rft.volume=123&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3231&rft.epage=3249&rft.pages=3231-3249&rft.issn=2169-8953&rft.eissn=2169-8961&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2018JG004613&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2135922108%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2135922108&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true