Estimating Soil Respiration in a Subalpine Landscape Using Point, Terrain, Climate, and Greenness Data
Landscape carbon (C) flux estimates help assess the ability of terrestrial ecosystems to buffer further increases in anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Advances in remote sensing have led to coarse‐scale estimates of gross primary productivity (GPP; e.g., MODIS 17), yet efforts to develop...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences 2018-10, Vol.123 (10), p.3231-3249 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3249 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 3231 |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences |
container_volume | 123 |
creator | Berryman, Erin M. Vanderhoof, Melanie K. Bradford, John B. Hawbaker, Todd J. Henne, Paul D. Burns, Sean P. Frank, John M. Birdsey, Richard A. Ryan, Michael G. |
description | Landscape carbon (C) flux estimates help assess the ability of terrestrial ecosystems to buffer further increases in anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Advances in remote sensing have led to coarse‐scale estimates of gross primary productivity (GPP; e.g., MODIS 17), yet efforts to develop spatial respiration products are lacking. Here we demonstrate a method to predict growing season soil respiration at a regional scale in a mixed subalpine ecosystem. We related field measurements (n = 396) of growing season soil respiration mostly from subalpine forests in the Southern Rocky Mountains ecoregion to a suite of biophysical predictors using a Random Forest model (30‐m pixel size). We found that Landsat Enhanced Vegetation Index, growing season aridity index, temperature, precipitation, elevation, and slope aspect explained spatiotemporal variability in soil respiration. Our model had a psuedo‐r2 of 0.45 and root‐mean‐square error of roughly one quarter of the mean value of respiration. Predicted growing season soil respiration across the region was remarkably consistent across 2004, 2005, and 2006 (150‐day sums of 542.8, 544.3, and 536.5 g C/m2, respectively). Yet we observed substantial variability in spatial patterns of soil respiration predictions that varied among years, suggesting that our method is sensitive to changes in respiration drivers. Mean predicted growing season soil respiration was 73% of MODIS GPP, while predicted soil respiration was generally within 20% of nocturnal net ecosystem exchange from nearby eddy covariance towers. Thus, geospatial and remotely sensed data sets can be used to estimate soil respiration at landscape scales.
Plain Language Summary
Soil respiration returns carbon dioxide back to the atmosphere and is an important part of the carbon cycle, but estimates of soil respiration across large landscapes are difficult to come by. Soil respiration is sensitive to changes in climate and vegetation, which are available as mapped data products, thanks to remote sensing and geospatial technology. We developed a statistical model that mapped soil respiration across three forests and an entire region based on climate and vegetation spatial data. While this work was limited to subalpine forests in the Southern Rocky Mountains, our method can be used in other ecosystems to better understand how ecosystems interact with atmospheric carbon dioxide.
Key Points
Subalpine soil respiration was estimated across the Southern Rocky M |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2018JG004613 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2135922108</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2135922108</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3074-8ac9a1a369633463af7a206d922b39e2d039be2c27b11aa6506d64fcac9286423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEEtPYjR8QiWsLcdJlzRGNUZgmgfZxjtwuRZlKWpJOaP9-mYYQJ3yx9frxa8uE3AK7B8bVA2eQzwvGMgniggw4SJXmSsLlbz0W12QUwo7FyKMEMCD1LPT2E3vrPuiqtQ1dmtBZH4XWUeso0tW-xKazztAFum2osDN0E078e2tdn9C18R6tS-i0OTmZhEaOFt4Y50wI9Al7vCFXNTbBjH7ykGyeZ-vpS7p4K16nj4u0EmySpTlWCgGFVFKITAqsJ8iZ3CrOS6EM3zKhSsMrPikBEOU49mRWV3GM5zLjYkjuzr6db7_2JvR61-69iys1BzGOPsDySCVnqvJtCN7UuvPxdH_QwPTpmfrvMyMuzvi3bczhX1bPi2XBgYtMHAE2o3Oz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2135922108</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimating Soil Respiration in a Subalpine Landscape Using Point, Terrain, Climate, and Greenness Data</title><source>Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Berryman, Erin M. ; Vanderhoof, Melanie K. ; Bradford, John B. ; Hawbaker, Todd J. ; Henne, Paul D. ; Burns, Sean P. ; Frank, John M. ; Birdsey, Richard A. ; Ryan, Michael G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Berryman, Erin M. ; Vanderhoof, Melanie K. ; Bradford, John B. ; Hawbaker, Todd J. ; Henne, Paul D. ; Burns, Sean P. ; Frank, John M. ; Birdsey, Richard A. ; Ryan, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><description>Landscape carbon (C) flux estimates help assess the ability of terrestrial ecosystems to buffer further increases in anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Advances in remote sensing have led to coarse‐scale estimates of gross primary productivity (GPP; e.g., MODIS 17), yet efforts to develop spatial respiration products are lacking. Here we demonstrate a method to predict growing season soil respiration at a regional scale in a mixed subalpine ecosystem. We related field measurements (n = 396) of growing season soil respiration mostly from subalpine forests in the Southern Rocky Mountains ecoregion to a suite of biophysical predictors using a Random Forest model (30‐m pixel size). We found that Landsat Enhanced Vegetation Index, growing season aridity index, temperature, precipitation, elevation, and slope aspect explained spatiotemporal variability in soil respiration. Our model had a psuedo‐r2 of 0.45 and root‐mean‐square error of roughly one quarter of the mean value of respiration. Predicted growing season soil respiration across the region was remarkably consistent across 2004, 2005, and 2006 (150‐day sums of 542.8, 544.3, and 536.5 g C/m2, respectively). Yet we observed substantial variability in spatial patterns of soil respiration predictions that varied among years, suggesting that our method is sensitive to changes in respiration drivers. Mean predicted growing season soil respiration was 73% of MODIS GPP, while predicted soil respiration was generally within 20% of nocturnal net ecosystem exchange from nearby eddy covariance towers. Thus, geospatial and remotely sensed data sets can be used to estimate soil respiration at landscape scales.
Plain Language Summary
Soil respiration returns carbon dioxide back to the atmosphere and is an important part of the carbon cycle, but estimates of soil respiration across large landscapes are difficult to come by. Soil respiration is sensitive to changes in climate and vegetation, which are available as mapped data products, thanks to remote sensing and geospatial technology. We developed a statistical model that mapped soil respiration across three forests and an entire region based on climate and vegetation spatial data. While this work was limited to subalpine forests in the Southern Rocky Mountains, our method can be used in other ecosystems to better understand how ecosystems interact with atmospheric carbon dioxide.
Key Points
Subalpine soil respiration was estimated across the Southern Rocky Mountains using 396 point measurements, Landsat Enhanced Vegetation Index, climate, and terrain
Predicted soil respiration compared reasonably well to eddy covariance nocturnal respiration and MODIS GPP
This method shows promise for large‐scale estimates of soil respiration, a large component of the terrestrial carbon cycle</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-8953</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8961</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2018JG004613</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Anthropogenic factors ; Aridity ; Carbon cycle ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide emissions ; Climate ; Climate change ; Covariance ; Data ; Ecosystems ; Estimates ; Forests ; Growing season ; Landsat ; Landsat satellites ; Landscape ; Mathematical models ; Methods ; MODIS ; Mountains ; Precipitation ; Predictions ; Primary production ; Remote sensing ; Respiration ; Seasons ; Soil ; Soil mapping ; Soil temperature ; Soils ; Spatial data ; Statistical models ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Variability ; Vegetation ; Vegetation index</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences, 2018-10, Vol.123 (10), p.3231-3249</ispartof><rights>2018. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3074-8ac9a1a369633463af7a206d922b39e2d039be2c27b11aa6506d64fcac9286423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3074-8ac9a1a369633463af7a206d922b39e2d039be2c27b11aa6506d64fcac9286423</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3595-1100 ; 0000-0001-8699-2474 ; 0000-0002-2500-6738 ; 0000-0002-0101-5533 ; 0000-0001-9257-6303 ; 0000-0003-1211-5545 ; 0000-0002-6258-1838 ; 0000-0001-6543-0333 ; 0000-0003-0930-9154</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2018JG004613$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2018JG004613$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berryman, Erin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanderhoof, Melanie K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradford, John B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawbaker, Todd J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henne, Paul D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burns, Sean P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frank, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birdsey, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><title>Estimating Soil Respiration in a Subalpine Landscape Using Point, Terrain, Climate, and Greenness Data</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</title><description>Landscape carbon (C) flux estimates help assess the ability of terrestrial ecosystems to buffer further increases in anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Advances in remote sensing have led to coarse‐scale estimates of gross primary productivity (GPP; e.g., MODIS 17), yet efforts to develop spatial respiration products are lacking. Here we demonstrate a method to predict growing season soil respiration at a regional scale in a mixed subalpine ecosystem. We related field measurements (n = 396) of growing season soil respiration mostly from subalpine forests in the Southern Rocky Mountains ecoregion to a suite of biophysical predictors using a Random Forest model (30‐m pixel size). We found that Landsat Enhanced Vegetation Index, growing season aridity index, temperature, precipitation, elevation, and slope aspect explained spatiotemporal variability in soil respiration. Our model had a psuedo‐r2 of 0.45 and root‐mean‐square error of roughly one quarter of the mean value of respiration. Predicted growing season soil respiration across the region was remarkably consistent across 2004, 2005, and 2006 (150‐day sums of 542.8, 544.3, and 536.5 g C/m2, respectively). Yet we observed substantial variability in spatial patterns of soil respiration predictions that varied among years, suggesting that our method is sensitive to changes in respiration drivers. Mean predicted growing season soil respiration was 73% of MODIS GPP, while predicted soil respiration was generally within 20% of nocturnal net ecosystem exchange from nearby eddy covariance towers. Thus, geospatial and remotely sensed data sets can be used to estimate soil respiration at landscape scales.
Plain Language Summary
Soil respiration returns carbon dioxide back to the atmosphere and is an important part of the carbon cycle, but estimates of soil respiration across large landscapes are difficult to come by. Soil respiration is sensitive to changes in climate and vegetation, which are available as mapped data products, thanks to remote sensing and geospatial technology. We developed a statistical model that mapped soil respiration across three forests and an entire region based on climate and vegetation spatial data. While this work was limited to subalpine forests in the Southern Rocky Mountains, our method can be used in other ecosystems to better understand how ecosystems interact with atmospheric carbon dioxide.
Key Points
Subalpine soil respiration was estimated across the Southern Rocky Mountains using 396 point measurements, Landsat Enhanced Vegetation Index, climate, and terrain
Predicted soil respiration compared reasonably well to eddy covariance nocturnal respiration and MODIS GPP
This method shows promise for large‐scale estimates of soil respiration, a large component of the terrestrial carbon cycle</description><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Aridity</subject><subject>Carbon cycle</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emissions</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Covariance</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Growing season</subject><subject>Landsat</subject><subject>Landsat satellites</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>MODIS</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Primary production</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil mapping</subject><subject>Soil temperature</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Spatial data</subject><subject>Statistical models</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Variability</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Vegetation index</subject><issn>2169-8953</issn><issn>2169-8961</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEEtPYjR8QiWsLcdJlzRGNUZgmgfZxjtwuRZlKWpJOaP9-mYYQJ3yx9frxa8uE3AK7B8bVA2eQzwvGMgniggw4SJXmSsLlbz0W12QUwo7FyKMEMCD1LPT2E3vrPuiqtQ1dmtBZH4XWUeso0tW-xKazztAFum2osDN0E078e2tdn9C18R6tS-i0OTmZhEaOFt4Y50wI9Al7vCFXNTbBjH7ykGyeZ-vpS7p4K16nj4u0EmySpTlWCgGFVFKITAqsJ8iZ3CrOS6EM3zKhSsMrPikBEOU49mRWV3GM5zLjYkjuzr6db7_2JvR61-69iys1BzGOPsDySCVnqvJtCN7UuvPxdH_QwPTpmfrvMyMuzvi3bczhX1bPi2XBgYtMHAE2o3Oz</recordid><startdate>201810</startdate><enddate>201810</enddate><creator>Berryman, Erin M.</creator><creator>Vanderhoof, Melanie K.</creator><creator>Bradford, John B.</creator><creator>Hawbaker, Todd J.</creator><creator>Henne, Paul D.</creator><creator>Burns, Sean P.</creator><creator>Frank, John M.</creator><creator>Birdsey, Richard A.</creator><creator>Ryan, Michael G.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3595-1100</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8699-2474</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2500-6738</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0101-5533</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9257-6303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1211-5545</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6258-1838</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6543-0333</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0930-9154</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201810</creationdate><title>Estimating Soil Respiration in a Subalpine Landscape Using Point, Terrain, Climate, and Greenness Data</title><author>Berryman, Erin M. ; Vanderhoof, Melanie K. ; Bradford, John B. ; Hawbaker, Todd J. ; Henne, Paul D. ; Burns, Sean P. ; Frank, John M. ; Birdsey, Richard A. ; Ryan, Michael G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3074-8ac9a1a369633463af7a206d922b39e2d039be2c27b11aa6506d64fcac9286423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Aridity</topic><topic>Carbon cycle</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emissions</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Covariance</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Growing season</topic><topic>Landsat</topic><topic>Landsat satellites</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>MODIS</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Primary production</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil mapping</topic><topic>Soil temperature</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Spatial data</topic><topic>Statistical models</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Variability</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Vegetation index</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berryman, Erin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanderhoof, Melanie K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradford, John B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawbaker, Todd J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henne, Paul D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burns, Sean P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frank, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birdsey, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berryman, Erin M.</au><au>Vanderhoof, Melanie K.</au><au>Bradford, John B.</au><au>Hawbaker, Todd J.</au><au>Henne, Paul D.</au><au>Burns, Sean P.</au><au>Frank, John M.</au><au>Birdsey, Richard A.</au><au>Ryan, Michael G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimating Soil Respiration in a Subalpine Landscape Using Point, Terrain, Climate, and Greenness Data</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</jtitle><date>2018-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>123</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3231</spage><epage>3249</epage><pages>3231-3249</pages><issn>2169-8953</issn><eissn>2169-8961</eissn><abstract>Landscape carbon (C) flux estimates help assess the ability of terrestrial ecosystems to buffer further increases in anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Advances in remote sensing have led to coarse‐scale estimates of gross primary productivity (GPP; e.g., MODIS 17), yet efforts to develop spatial respiration products are lacking. Here we demonstrate a method to predict growing season soil respiration at a regional scale in a mixed subalpine ecosystem. We related field measurements (n = 396) of growing season soil respiration mostly from subalpine forests in the Southern Rocky Mountains ecoregion to a suite of biophysical predictors using a Random Forest model (30‐m pixel size). We found that Landsat Enhanced Vegetation Index, growing season aridity index, temperature, precipitation, elevation, and slope aspect explained spatiotemporal variability in soil respiration. Our model had a psuedo‐r2 of 0.45 and root‐mean‐square error of roughly one quarter of the mean value of respiration. Predicted growing season soil respiration across the region was remarkably consistent across 2004, 2005, and 2006 (150‐day sums of 542.8, 544.3, and 536.5 g C/m2, respectively). Yet we observed substantial variability in spatial patterns of soil respiration predictions that varied among years, suggesting that our method is sensitive to changes in respiration drivers. Mean predicted growing season soil respiration was 73% of MODIS GPP, while predicted soil respiration was generally within 20% of nocturnal net ecosystem exchange from nearby eddy covariance towers. Thus, geospatial and remotely sensed data sets can be used to estimate soil respiration at landscape scales.
Plain Language Summary
Soil respiration returns carbon dioxide back to the atmosphere and is an important part of the carbon cycle, but estimates of soil respiration across large landscapes are difficult to come by. Soil respiration is sensitive to changes in climate and vegetation, which are available as mapped data products, thanks to remote sensing and geospatial technology. We developed a statistical model that mapped soil respiration across three forests and an entire region based on climate and vegetation spatial data. While this work was limited to subalpine forests in the Southern Rocky Mountains, our method can be used in other ecosystems to better understand how ecosystems interact with atmospheric carbon dioxide.
Key Points
Subalpine soil respiration was estimated across the Southern Rocky Mountains using 396 point measurements, Landsat Enhanced Vegetation Index, climate, and terrain
Predicted soil respiration compared reasonably well to eddy covariance nocturnal respiration and MODIS GPP
This method shows promise for large‐scale estimates of soil respiration, a large component of the terrestrial carbon cycle</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2018JG004613</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3595-1100</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8699-2474</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2500-6738</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0101-5533</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9257-6303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1211-5545</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6258-1838</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6543-0333</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0930-9154</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-8953 |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences, 2018-10, Vol.123 (10), p.3231-3249 |
issn | 2169-8953 2169-8961 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2135922108 |
source | Wiley Online Library; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Anthropogenic factors Aridity Carbon cycle Carbon dioxide Carbon dioxide emissions Climate Climate change Covariance Data Ecosystems Estimates Forests Growing season Landsat Landsat satellites Landscape Mathematical models Methods MODIS Mountains Precipitation Predictions Primary production Remote sensing Respiration Seasons Soil Soil mapping Soil temperature Soils Spatial data Statistical models Terrestrial ecosystems Variability Vegetation Vegetation index |
title | Estimating Soil Respiration in a Subalpine Landscape Using Point, Terrain, Climate, and Greenness Data |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T01%3A07%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimating%20Soil%20Respiration%20in%20a%20Subalpine%20Landscape%20Using%20Point,%20Terrain,%20Climate,%20and%20Greenness%20Data&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Biogeosciences&rft.au=Berryman,%20Erin%20M.&rft.date=2018-10&rft.volume=123&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3231&rft.epage=3249&rft.pages=3231-3249&rft.issn=2169-8953&rft.eissn=2169-8961&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2018JG004613&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2135922108%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2135922108&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |