Mapping of water-related ecosystem services in the uMngeni catchment using a daily time-step hydrological model for prioritisation of ecological infrastructure investment – part 2 : outputs

South Africa is a semi-arid country which frequently faces water shortages, and experienced a severe drought in the 2016 and 2017 rainfall seasons. Government is under pressure to continue to deliver clean water to the growing population at a high assurance of supply. Studies now show that the deliv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water S. A. 2018-10, Vol.44 (4), p.590-600
Hauptverfasser: Jewitt, G.P.W., Schulze, R.E., Hughes, C.J., de Winnaar, G., Mander, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 600
container_issue 4
container_start_page 590
container_title Water S. A.
container_volume 44
creator Jewitt, G.P.W.
Schulze, R.E.
Hughes, C.J.
de Winnaar, G.
Mander, M.
description South Africa is a semi-arid country which frequently faces water shortages, and experienced a severe drought in the 2016 and 2017 rainfall seasons. Government is under pressure to continue to deliver clean water to the growing population at a high assurance of supply. Studies now show that the delivery of water may be sustained not only through built infrastructure such as dams and pipelines, but also through investment in ecological infrastructure (EI). Part 1 of this paper in 2 parts concentrated on the role of EI in delivering water-related ecosystem services, as well as the motivation for this study, and the methods used in modelling and mapping the catchment. Part 2 explores and illustrates the current level of delivery of water-related ecosystem services in different parts of the catchment, with potential hydrological benefits of rehabilitation and protection of EI in the uMngeni catchment. The Mpendle, Lions River, Karkloof, Inanda and Durban sub-catchments are important areas for the generation of streamflows which accumulate downstream (i.e. water yield in the catchment) when annual totals are considered. Modelled annual sediment yield (in tonnes) from naturally vegetated areas is most severe in the lower catchment areas with steeper slopes such as Inanda, and in the high-altitude areas which have both steeper slopes and higher rainfall. The central and eastern parts of the uMngeni catchment were found to contribute the greatest yield of sediment from degraded areas with low protective vegetation cover. This combined modelling and mapping exercise highlighted areas of priority ecosystem service delivery, such as higher altitude grassland areas, which could be recommended for formal conservation, or protection under private partnerships. Generally, these areas confirm the intuitive sense of catchment stakeholders, but provide a robust and more defendable analysis through which water volumes are quantifiable, and potential investment into catchment interventions are justified.
doi_str_mv 10.4314/wsa.v44i4.08
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2135079746</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sabinet_id>https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-11de6da4e4</sabinet_id><sourcerecordid>2135079746</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-d745bd93cfbdf8746b587b20933cf9d37bcf49ffaf7c3bcf54cb4643d1851df33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kU2O1DAQhSMEEs3AjgOUxJY0dux0EjYItYY_zYgNrC3HLnc8Suzgnx71jjtwIO7CSXBPw6rKrs_vufSq6iUlW84of3Mf5fbIueVb0j-qNrSnu7obWvK42hDW9TXvWP-0ehbjHSENY3zYVL9v5bpadwBv4F4mDHXAuVQNqHw8xYQLRAxHqzCCdZAmhHzrDugsKJnUtKBLkONZQoKWdj5BsgvW5eUK00kHP_uDVXKGxWucwfgAa7A-2GSjTNa7s3Ux-49ZZ4KMKWSVcsByPGJMDy5_fv6CVYYEDbwFn9OaU3xePTFyjvjiX72qvn-4_rb_VN98_fh5__6mVmXpVOuOt6MemDKjNn3Hd2Pbd2NDBlauBs26URk-GCNNp1jpW65GvuNM076l2jB2Vb266K7B_8jlR-LO5-CKpWgoa0k3FNFCvb5QKvgYAxpRVl1kOAlKxDkiUSISDxEJ0hf83QWPcrQOk4gS1zyKKaU1iknPYpJOzyjOM0rahojrL3tBqcadlhw5-wvPMKME</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2135079746</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mapping of water-related ecosystem services in the uMngeni catchment using a daily time-step hydrological model for prioritisation of ecological infrastructure investment – part 2 : outputs</title><source>African Journals Online (Open Access)</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Sabinet African Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Jewitt, G.P.W. ; Schulze, R.E. ; Hughes, C.J. ; de Winnaar, G. ; Mander, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jewitt, G.P.W. ; Schulze, R.E. ; Hughes, C.J. ; de Winnaar, G. ; Mander, M.</creatorcontrib><description>South Africa is a semi-arid country which frequently faces water shortages, and experienced a severe drought in the 2016 and 2017 rainfall seasons. Government is under pressure to continue to deliver clean water to the growing population at a high assurance of supply. Studies now show that the delivery of water may be sustained not only through built infrastructure such as dams and pipelines, but also through investment in ecological infrastructure (EI). Part 1 of this paper in 2 parts concentrated on the role of EI in delivering water-related ecosystem services, as well as the motivation for this study, and the methods used in modelling and mapping the catchment. Part 2 explores and illustrates the current level of delivery of water-related ecosystem services in different parts of the catchment, with potential hydrological benefits of rehabilitation and protection of EI in the uMngeni catchment. The Mpendle, Lions River, Karkloof, Inanda and Durban sub-catchments are important areas for the generation of streamflows which accumulate downstream (i.e. water yield in the catchment) when annual totals are considered. Modelled annual sediment yield (in tonnes) from naturally vegetated areas is most severe in the lower catchment areas with steeper slopes such as Inanda, and in the high-altitude areas which have both steeper slopes and higher rainfall. The central and eastern parts of the uMngeni catchment were found to contribute the greatest yield of sediment from degraded areas with low protective vegetation cover. This combined modelling and mapping exercise highlighted areas of priority ecosystem service delivery, such as higher altitude grassland areas, which could be recommended for formal conservation, or protection under private partnerships. Generally, these areas confirm the intuitive sense of catchment stakeholders, but provide a robust and more defendable analysis through which water volumes are quantifiable, and potential investment into catchment interventions are justified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-4738</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1816-7950</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1816-7950</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4314/wsa.v44i4.08</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Gezina: Water Research Commission (WRC)</publisher><subject>Arid regions ; Catchment area ; Catchment areas ; Catchments ; Drought ; Ecological infrastructure ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Grasslands ; High altitude ; Hydrologic models ; Hydrological modelling ; Hydrology ; Infrastructure ; Investment ; Mapping ; Modelling ; Motivation ; Partnerships ; Plant cover ; Protection ; Rain ; Rainfall ; Rehabilitation ; Rivers ; Sediment ; Sediment yield ; Sediments ; Slope ; Slopes ; Stream flow ; Submarine pipelines ; Time series ; Vegetation cover ; Water ; Water shortages ; Water supply ; Water yield ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Water S. A., 2018-10, Vol.44 (4), p.590-600</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is published under NOCC (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-d745bd93cfbdf8746b587b20933cf9d37bcf49ffaf7c3bcf54cb4643d1851df33</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,865,27929,27930,39247</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jewitt, G.P.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulze, R.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, C.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Winnaar, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mander, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Mapping of water-related ecosystem services in the uMngeni catchment using a daily time-step hydrological model for prioritisation of ecological infrastructure investment – part 2 : outputs</title><title>Water S. A.</title><description>South Africa is a semi-arid country which frequently faces water shortages, and experienced a severe drought in the 2016 and 2017 rainfall seasons. Government is under pressure to continue to deliver clean water to the growing population at a high assurance of supply. Studies now show that the delivery of water may be sustained not only through built infrastructure such as dams and pipelines, but also through investment in ecological infrastructure (EI). Part 1 of this paper in 2 parts concentrated on the role of EI in delivering water-related ecosystem services, as well as the motivation for this study, and the methods used in modelling and mapping the catchment. Part 2 explores and illustrates the current level of delivery of water-related ecosystem services in different parts of the catchment, with potential hydrological benefits of rehabilitation and protection of EI in the uMngeni catchment. The Mpendle, Lions River, Karkloof, Inanda and Durban sub-catchments are important areas for the generation of streamflows which accumulate downstream (i.e. water yield in the catchment) when annual totals are considered. Modelled annual sediment yield (in tonnes) from naturally vegetated areas is most severe in the lower catchment areas with steeper slopes such as Inanda, and in the high-altitude areas which have both steeper slopes and higher rainfall. The central and eastern parts of the uMngeni catchment were found to contribute the greatest yield of sediment from degraded areas with low protective vegetation cover. This combined modelling and mapping exercise highlighted areas of priority ecosystem service delivery, such as higher altitude grassland areas, which could be recommended for formal conservation, or protection under private partnerships. Generally, these areas confirm the intuitive sense of catchment stakeholders, but provide a robust and more defendable analysis through which water volumes are quantifiable, and potential investment into catchment interventions are justified.</description><subject>Arid regions</subject><subject>Catchment area</subject><subject>Catchment areas</subject><subject>Catchments</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Ecological infrastructure</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>High altitude</subject><subject>Hydrologic models</subject><subject>Hydrological modelling</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Investment</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Partnerships</subject><subject>Plant cover</subject><subject>Protection</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>Sediment yield</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Slope</subject><subject>Slopes</subject><subject>Stream flow</subject><subject>Submarine pipelines</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Vegetation cover</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water shortages</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><subject>Water yield</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>0378-4738</issn><issn>1816-7950</issn><issn>1816-7950</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>JRA</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kU2O1DAQhSMEEs3AjgOUxJY0dux0EjYItYY_zYgNrC3HLnc8Suzgnx71jjtwIO7CSXBPw6rKrs_vufSq6iUlW84of3Mf5fbIueVb0j-qNrSnu7obWvK42hDW9TXvWP-0ehbjHSENY3zYVL9v5bpadwBv4F4mDHXAuVQNqHw8xYQLRAxHqzCCdZAmhHzrDugsKJnUtKBLkONZQoKWdj5BsgvW5eUK00kHP_uDVXKGxWucwfgAa7A-2GSjTNa7s3Ux-49ZZ4KMKWSVcsByPGJMDy5_fv6CVYYEDbwFn9OaU3xePTFyjvjiX72qvn-4_rb_VN98_fh5__6mVmXpVOuOt6MemDKjNn3Hd2Pbd2NDBlauBs26URk-GCNNp1jpW65GvuNM076l2jB2Vb266K7B_8jlR-LO5-CKpWgoa0k3FNFCvb5QKvgYAxpRVl1kOAlKxDkiUSISDxEJ0hf83QWPcrQOk4gS1zyKKaU1iknPYpJOzyjOM0rahojrL3tBqcadlhw5-wvPMKME</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>Jewitt, G.P.W.</creator><creator>Schulze, R.E.</creator><creator>Hughes, C.J.</creator><creator>de Winnaar, G.</creator><creator>Mander, M.</creator><general>Water Research Commission (WRC)</general><general>Water Research Commission</general><scope>AEIZH</scope><scope>JRA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>Mapping of water-related ecosystem services in the uMngeni catchment using a daily time-step hydrological model for prioritisation of ecological infrastructure investment – part 2 : outputs</title><author>Jewitt, G.P.W. ; Schulze, R.E. ; Hughes, C.J. ; de Winnaar, G. ; Mander, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-d745bd93cfbdf8746b587b20933cf9d37bcf49ffaf7c3bcf54cb4643d1851df33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Arid regions</topic><topic>Catchment area</topic><topic>Catchment areas</topic><topic>Catchments</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Ecological infrastructure</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>High altitude</topic><topic>Hydrologic models</topic><topic>Hydrological modelling</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Investment</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Partnerships</topic><topic>Plant cover</topic><topic>Protection</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>Sediment yield</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Slope</topic><topic>Slopes</topic><topic>Stream flow</topic><topic>Submarine pipelines</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Vegetation cover</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water shortages</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><topic>Water yield</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jewitt, G.P.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulze, R.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, C.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Winnaar, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mander, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Sabinet:Open Access</collection><collection>Sabinet African Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East &amp; Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water S. A.</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jewitt, G.P.W.</au><au>Schulze, R.E.</au><au>Hughes, C.J.</au><au>de Winnaar, G.</au><au>Mander, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mapping of water-related ecosystem services in the uMngeni catchment using a daily time-step hydrological model for prioritisation of ecological infrastructure investment – part 2 : outputs</atitle><jtitle>Water S. A.</jtitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>590</spage><epage>600</epage><pages>590-600</pages><issn>0378-4738</issn><issn>1816-7950</issn><eissn>1816-7950</eissn><abstract>South Africa is a semi-arid country which frequently faces water shortages, and experienced a severe drought in the 2016 and 2017 rainfall seasons. Government is under pressure to continue to deliver clean water to the growing population at a high assurance of supply. Studies now show that the delivery of water may be sustained not only through built infrastructure such as dams and pipelines, but also through investment in ecological infrastructure (EI). Part 1 of this paper in 2 parts concentrated on the role of EI in delivering water-related ecosystem services, as well as the motivation for this study, and the methods used in modelling and mapping the catchment. Part 2 explores and illustrates the current level of delivery of water-related ecosystem services in different parts of the catchment, with potential hydrological benefits of rehabilitation and protection of EI in the uMngeni catchment. The Mpendle, Lions River, Karkloof, Inanda and Durban sub-catchments are important areas for the generation of streamflows which accumulate downstream (i.e. water yield in the catchment) when annual totals are considered. Modelled annual sediment yield (in tonnes) from naturally vegetated areas is most severe in the lower catchment areas with steeper slopes such as Inanda, and in the high-altitude areas which have both steeper slopes and higher rainfall. The central and eastern parts of the uMngeni catchment were found to contribute the greatest yield of sediment from degraded areas with low protective vegetation cover. This combined modelling and mapping exercise highlighted areas of priority ecosystem service delivery, such as higher altitude grassland areas, which could be recommended for formal conservation, or protection under private partnerships. Generally, these areas confirm the intuitive sense of catchment stakeholders, but provide a robust and more defendable analysis through which water volumes are quantifiable, and potential investment into catchment interventions are justified.</abstract><cop>Gezina</cop><pub>Water Research Commission (WRC)</pub><doi>10.4314/wsa.v44i4.08</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-4738
ispartof Water S. A., 2018-10, Vol.44 (4), p.590-600
issn 0378-4738
1816-7950
1816-7950
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2135079746
source African Journals Online (Open Access); DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Sabinet African Journals Open Access Collection; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Arid regions
Catchment area
Catchment areas
Catchments
Drought
Ecological infrastructure
Ecosystem services
Ecosystems
Grasslands
High altitude
Hydrologic models
Hydrological modelling
Hydrology
Infrastructure
Investment
Mapping
Modelling
Motivation
Partnerships
Plant cover
Protection
Rain
Rainfall
Rehabilitation
Rivers
Sediment
Sediment yield
Sediments
Slope
Slopes
Stream flow
Submarine pipelines
Time series
Vegetation cover
Water
Water shortages
Water supply
Water yield
Wildlife conservation
title Mapping of water-related ecosystem services in the uMngeni catchment using a daily time-step hydrological model for prioritisation of ecological infrastructure investment – part 2 : outputs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T09%3A36%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mapping%20of%20water-related%20ecosystem%20services%20in%20the%20uMngeni%20catchment%20using%20a%20daily%20time-step%20hydrological%20model%20for%20prioritisation%20of%20ecological%20infrastructure%20investment%20%E2%80%93%20part%202%20:%20outputs&rft.jtitle=Water%20S.%20A.&rft.au=Jewitt,%20G.P.W.&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=590&rft.epage=600&rft.pages=590-600&rft.issn=0378-4738&rft.eissn=1816-7950&rft_id=info:doi/10.4314/wsa.v44i4.08&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2135079746%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2135079746&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sabinet_id=https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-11de6da4e4&rfr_iscdi=true