Paris Needs Geneva, and Vice Versa

This paper proposes and seeks to explain how the launching of a new negotiation on trade in carbon‐reduction‐related goods and services in Geneva could help to restore the effective market penetration of the Paris Agreement mechanisms, and how the subsequent implementation of the Paris Agreement can...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global policy 2018-11, Vol.9 (4), p.570-577
Hauptverfasser: Chu, C. Y. Cyrus, Lee, Po‐Ching
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 577
container_issue 4
container_start_page 570
container_title Global policy
container_volume 9
creator Chu, C. Y. Cyrus
Lee, Po‐Ching
description This paper proposes and seeks to explain how the launching of a new negotiation on trade in carbon‐reduction‐related goods and services in Geneva could help to restore the effective market penetration of the Paris Agreement mechanisms, and how the subsequent implementation of the Paris Agreement can revitalize the so‐called ‘paralyzed WTO‘ at Geneva. It suggests that new negotiations be dedicated to the liberalization of trade in goods that relate closely to greenhouse‐gas reduction. Drawing on experiences from the stalled Environmental Goods Agreement (EGA) negotiations, this narrowing of the scope of the talks might help establish a clear theme, thus avoiding potential conflicts of interest among the negotiating parties. Moreover, if the market penetration of green technologies is to be advanced effectively, negotiations must cover trade in related services (e.g. systems engineering) as well. Inclusion of services can also mitigate the ‘critical mass’ concerns inherent in the goods‐only context. Improving market access to government procurements and facilitating technology transfer in carbon‐reduction sectors will help to spread green technologies globally, and could be the topic of the new framework. In the end, the paper envisages a scenario of high participation and offers a possible approach to the initiation of new talks. This article seeks to map out the possibility of launching, or re‐launching, a trade negotiation covering goods and services that relate to carbon reduction.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1758-5899.12584
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2135043544</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2135043544</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3164-b66b26615fcc3e3d444dbea9a404b433b1efba4a6a8beac7e74fd56c4e1fddd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFULFOwzAUtBBIVKUzawQrae342XFGVEFAimiHqqvl2C9SqpIUm4L69zgEdeWW93S6e093hNwyOmcRC5YLlQpVFHOWCQUXZHJmLs-7otdkFsKORnBV0IxNyN3a-DYkb4guJCV2-GUeEtO5ZNtaTLbog7khV43ZB5z9zSnZPD9tli9ptSpfl49VajmTkNZS1pmUTDTWcuQOAFyNpjBAoQbOa4ZNbcBIoyJtc8yhcUJaQNY45_iU3I9nD77_OGL41Lv-6Lv4UWeMCwpcAETVYlRZ34fgsdEH374bf9KM6qEKPYTVQ3D9W0V0yNHx3e7x9J9cl-tVNRp_AFy1Xrg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2135043544</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Paris Needs Geneva, and Vice Versa</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Chu, C. Y. Cyrus ; Lee, Po‐Ching</creator><creatorcontrib>Chu, C. Y. Cyrus ; Lee, Po‐Ching</creatorcontrib><description>This paper proposes and seeks to explain how the launching of a new negotiation on trade in carbon‐reduction‐related goods and services in Geneva could help to restore the effective market penetration of the Paris Agreement mechanisms, and how the subsequent implementation of the Paris Agreement can revitalize the so‐called ‘paralyzed WTO‘ at Geneva. It suggests that new negotiations be dedicated to the liberalization of trade in goods that relate closely to greenhouse‐gas reduction. Drawing on experiences from the stalled Environmental Goods Agreement (EGA) negotiations, this narrowing of the scope of the talks might help establish a clear theme, thus avoiding potential conflicts of interest among the negotiating parties. Moreover, if the market penetration of green technologies is to be advanced effectively, negotiations must cover trade in related services (e.g. systems engineering) as well. Inclusion of services can also mitigate the ‘critical mass’ concerns inherent in the goods‐only context. Improving market access to government procurements and facilitating technology transfer in carbon‐reduction sectors will help to spread green technologies globally, and could be the topic of the new framework. In the end, the paper envisages a scenario of high participation and offers a possible approach to the initiation of new talks. This article seeks to map out the possibility of launching, or re‐launching, a trade negotiation covering goods and services that relate to carbon reduction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1758-5880</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-5899</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12584</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Carbon ; Clean technology ; Conflicts of interest ; Critical mass ; Free trade ; Greenhouse gases ; Liberalization ; Market penetration ; Markets ; Negotiation ; Negotiations ; Participation ; Penetration ; Reduction ; Regeneration ; Service restoration ; Services ; System effectiveness ; Systems engineering ; Technology transfer ; Trade ; Trade liberalization</subject><ispartof>Global policy, 2018-11, Vol.9 (4), p.570-577</ispartof><rights>2018 University of Durham and John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 University of Durham and John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3164-b66b26615fcc3e3d444dbea9a404b433b1efba4a6a8beac7e74fd56c4e1fddd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3164-b66b26615fcc3e3d444dbea9a404b433b1efba4a6a8beac7e74fd56c4e1fddd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1758-5899.12584$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1758-5899.12584$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27847,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chu, C. Y. Cyrus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Po‐Ching</creatorcontrib><title>Paris Needs Geneva, and Vice Versa</title><title>Global policy</title><description>This paper proposes and seeks to explain how the launching of a new negotiation on trade in carbon‐reduction‐related goods and services in Geneva could help to restore the effective market penetration of the Paris Agreement mechanisms, and how the subsequent implementation of the Paris Agreement can revitalize the so‐called ‘paralyzed WTO‘ at Geneva. It suggests that new negotiations be dedicated to the liberalization of trade in goods that relate closely to greenhouse‐gas reduction. Drawing on experiences from the stalled Environmental Goods Agreement (EGA) negotiations, this narrowing of the scope of the talks might help establish a clear theme, thus avoiding potential conflicts of interest among the negotiating parties. Moreover, if the market penetration of green technologies is to be advanced effectively, negotiations must cover trade in related services (e.g. systems engineering) as well. Inclusion of services can also mitigate the ‘critical mass’ concerns inherent in the goods‐only context. Improving market access to government procurements and facilitating technology transfer in carbon‐reduction sectors will help to spread green technologies globally, and could be the topic of the new framework. In the end, the paper envisages a scenario of high participation and offers a possible approach to the initiation of new talks. This article seeks to map out the possibility of launching, or re‐launching, a trade negotiation covering goods and services that relate to carbon reduction.</description><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Clean technology</subject><subject>Conflicts of interest</subject><subject>Critical mass</subject><subject>Free trade</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Liberalization</subject><subject>Market penetration</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Negotiation</subject><subject>Negotiations</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Penetration</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Regeneration</subject><subject>Service restoration</subject><subject>Services</subject><subject>System effectiveness</subject><subject>Systems engineering</subject><subject>Technology transfer</subject><subject>Trade</subject><subject>Trade liberalization</subject><issn>1758-5880</issn><issn>1758-5899</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFULFOwzAUtBBIVKUzawQrae342XFGVEFAimiHqqvl2C9SqpIUm4L69zgEdeWW93S6e093hNwyOmcRC5YLlQpVFHOWCQUXZHJmLs-7otdkFsKORnBV0IxNyN3a-DYkb4guJCV2-GUeEtO5ZNtaTLbog7khV43ZB5z9zSnZPD9tli9ptSpfl49VajmTkNZS1pmUTDTWcuQOAFyNpjBAoQbOa4ZNbcBIoyJtc8yhcUJaQNY45_iU3I9nD77_OGL41Lv-6Lv4UWeMCwpcAETVYlRZ34fgsdEH374bf9KM6qEKPYTVQ3D9W0V0yNHx3e7x9J9cl-tVNRp_AFy1Xrg</recordid><startdate>201811</startdate><enddate>201811</enddate><creator>Chu, C. Y. Cyrus</creator><creator>Lee, Po‐Ching</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201811</creationdate><title>Paris Needs Geneva, and Vice Versa</title><author>Chu, C. Y. Cyrus ; Lee, Po‐Ching</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3164-b66b26615fcc3e3d444dbea9a404b433b1efba4a6a8beac7e74fd56c4e1fddd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Clean technology</topic><topic>Conflicts of interest</topic><topic>Critical mass</topic><topic>Free trade</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Liberalization</topic><topic>Market penetration</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Negotiation</topic><topic>Negotiations</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Penetration</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Regeneration</topic><topic>Service restoration</topic><topic>Services</topic><topic>System effectiveness</topic><topic>Systems engineering</topic><topic>Technology transfer</topic><topic>Trade</topic><topic>Trade liberalization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chu, C. Y. Cyrus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Po‐Ching</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Global policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chu, C. Y. Cyrus</au><au>Lee, Po‐Ching</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Paris Needs Geneva, and Vice Versa</atitle><jtitle>Global policy</jtitle><date>2018-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>570</spage><epage>577</epage><pages>570-577</pages><issn>1758-5880</issn><eissn>1758-5899</eissn><abstract>This paper proposes and seeks to explain how the launching of a new negotiation on trade in carbon‐reduction‐related goods and services in Geneva could help to restore the effective market penetration of the Paris Agreement mechanisms, and how the subsequent implementation of the Paris Agreement can revitalize the so‐called ‘paralyzed WTO‘ at Geneva. It suggests that new negotiations be dedicated to the liberalization of trade in goods that relate closely to greenhouse‐gas reduction. Drawing on experiences from the stalled Environmental Goods Agreement (EGA) negotiations, this narrowing of the scope of the talks might help establish a clear theme, thus avoiding potential conflicts of interest among the negotiating parties. Moreover, if the market penetration of green technologies is to be advanced effectively, negotiations must cover trade in related services (e.g. systems engineering) as well. Inclusion of services can also mitigate the ‘critical mass’ concerns inherent in the goods‐only context. Improving market access to government procurements and facilitating technology transfer in carbon‐reduction sectors will help to spread green technologies globally, and could be the topic of the new framework. In the end, the paper envisages a scenario of high participation and offers a possible approach to the initiation of new talks. This article seeks to map out the possibility of launching, or re‐launching, a trade negotiation covering goods and services that relate to carbon reduction.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/1758-5899.12584</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1758-5880
ispartof Global policy, 2018-11, Vol.9 (4), p.570-577
issn 1758-5880
1758-5899
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2135043544
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Political Science Complete
subjects Carbon
Clean technology
Conflicts of interest
Critical mass
Free trade
Greenhouse gases
Liberalization
Market penetration
Markets
Negotiation
Negotiations
Participation
Penetration
Reduction
Regeneration
Service restoration
Services
System effectiveness
Systems engineering
Technology transfer
Trade
Trade liberalization
title Paris Needs Geneva, and Vice Versa
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T00%3A05%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Paris%20Needs%20Geneva,%20and%20Vice%20Versa&rft.jtitle=Global%20policy&rft.au=Chu,%20C.%20Y.%20Cyrus&rft.date=2018-11&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=570&rft.epage=577&rft.pages=570-577&rft.issn=1758-5880&rft.eissn=1758-5899&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1758-5899.12584&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2135043544%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2135043544&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true