Three decades of the International Political Science Review (IPSR): A map of the methodological preferences in IPSR articles
Where does the International Political Science Review (IPSR) stand in relation to the hierarchies of knowledge in the discipline? IPSR is the journal of the International Political Science Association and a well-established journal in the discipline of Political Science. The journal has been publish...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International Political Science Review 2018-11, Vol.39 (5), p.679-689 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 689 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 679 |
container_title | International Political Science Review |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Lima, Enzo Morschbacher, Melina Peres, Paulo |
description | Where does the International Political Science Review (IPSR) stand in relation to the hierarchies of knowledge in the discipline? IPSR is the journal of the International Political Science Association and a well-established journal in the discipline of Political Science. The journal has been published since 1980 and in 2016 ranked 54 out of 163 journals in the field. Mapping IPSR’s profile can help us understand the changing thematic, epistemological and methodological preferences within the world of political science. This report maps the distribution of methodological techniques across 152 issues of IPSR, by analysing the abstracts of every article published between 1980 and 2015. In doing so, it aims to provide a clearer picture of the methodological approaches used by political scientists and endorsed by the political science community as acceptable scientific modes of knowledge making. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0192512118755596 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2133264820</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26956763</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0192512118755596</sage_id><sourcerecordid>26956763</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-b173f1a496a938f818e8c57035721eb1236ca17d622c0fcf496ce55cb98913883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LAzEUxIMoWKt3L0LAix5W85Lm66jFj4JgaSt4W9L0rd2ybmqyVfzv3bKi4MHTG5jfDI8h5BjYBYDWlwwsl8ABjJZSWrVDejBQLBNaPO-S3tbOtv4-OUhpxRhTVvEeuZ4tIyJdoHcLTDQUtFkiHdUNxto1ZahdRcehKpvSt2rqS6w90gm-l_hBz0bj6eT8kOwVrkp49H375On2Zja8zx4e70bDq4fMCwFNNgctCnADq5wVpjBg0HipmZCaA86BC-Ud6IXi3LPCFy3oUUo_t8aCMEb0yWnXu47hbYOpyVdh035ZpZyDEFwNDGctxTrKx5BSxCJfx_LVxc8cWL5dKv-7VBvJukhyL_hb-g9_0vGr1IT408-VlUorIb4AJHNu5w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2133264820</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Three decades of the International Political Science Review (IPSR): A map of the methodological preferences in IPSR articles</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Journals Online</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Lima, Enzo ; Morschbacher, Melina ; Peres, Paulo</creator><creatorcontrib>Lima, Enzo ; Morschbacher, Melina ; Peres, Paulo</creatorcontrib><description>Where does the International Political Science Review (IPSR) stand in relation to the hierarchies of knowledge in the discipline? IPSR is the journal of the International Political Science Association and a well-established journal in the discipline of Political Science. The journal has been published since 1980 and in 2016 ranked 54 out of 163 journals in the field. Mapping IPSR’s profile can help us understand the changing thematic, epistemological and methodological preferences within the world of political science. This report maps the distribution of methodological techniques across 152 issues of IPSR, by analysing the abstracts of every article published between 1980 and 2015. In doing so, it aims to provide a clearer picture of the methodological approaches used by political scientists and endorsed by the political science community as acceptable scientific modes of knowledge making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0192-5121</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-373X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0192512118755596</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Sage Publications, Ltd</publisher><subject>Mapping ; Methodological approaches ; Political science ; Political scientists ; Research methodology ; Research Report ; Scientific knowledge</subject><ispartof>International Political Science Review, 2018-11, Vol.39 (5), p.679-689</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-b173f1a496a938f818e8c57035721eb1236ca17d622c0fcf496ce55cb98913883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-b173f1a496a938f818e8c57035721eb1236ca17d622c0fcf496ce55cb98913883</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5280-4252</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26956763$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26956763$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,776,780,788,799,21798,27899,27901,27902,43597,43598,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lima, Enzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morschbacher, Melina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peres, Paulo</creatorcontrib><title>Three decades of the International Political Science Review (IPSR): A map of the methodological preferences in IPSR articles</title><title>International Political Science Review</title><description>Where does the International Political Science Review (IPSR) stand in relation to the hierarchies of knowledge in the discipline? IPSR is the journal of the International Political Science Association and a well-established journal in the discipline of Political Science. The journal has been published since 1980 and in 2016 ranked 54 out of 163 journals in the field. Mapping IPSR’s profile can help us understand the changing thematic, epistemological and methodological preferences within the world of political science. This report maps the distribution of methodological techniques across 152 issues of IPSR, by analysing the abstracts of every article published between 1980 and 2015. In doing so, it aims to provide a clearer picture of the methodological approaches used by political scientists and endorsed by the political science community as acceptable scientific modes of knowledge making.</description><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Methodological approaches</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Political scientists</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Research Report</subject><subject>Scientific knowledge</subject><issn>0192-5121</issn><issn>1460-373X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1LAzEUxIMoWKt3L0LAix5W85Lm66jFj4JgaSt4W9L0rd2ybmqyVfzv3bKi4MHTG5jfDI8h5BjYBYDWlwwsl8ABjJZSWrVDejBQLBNaPO-S3tbOtv4-OUhpxRhTVvEeuZ4tIyJdoHcLTDQUtFkiHdUNxto1ZahdRcehKpvSt2rqS6w90gm-l_hBz0bj6eT8kOwVrkp49H375On2Zja8zx4e70bDq4fMCwFNNgctCnADq5wVpjBg0HipmZCaA86BC-Ud6IXi3LPCFy3oUUo_t8aCMEb0yWnXu47hbYOpyVdh035ZpZyDEFwNDGctxTrKx5BSxCJfx_LVxc8cWL5dKv-7VBvJukhyL_hb-g9_0vGr1IT408-VlUorIb4AJHNu5w</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Lima, Enzo</creator><creator>Morschbacher, Melina</creator><creator>Peres, Paulo</creator><general>Sage Publications, Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5280-4252</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Three decades of the International Political Science Review (IPSR)</title><author>Lima, Enzo ; Morschbacher, Melina ; Peres, Paulo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-b173f1a496a938f818e8c57035721eb1236ca17d622c0fcf496ce55cb98913883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Methodological approaches</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Political scientists</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Research Report</topic><topic>Scientific knowledge</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lima, Enzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morschbacher, Melina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peres, Paulo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International Political Science Review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lima, Enzo</au><au>Morschbacher, Melina</au><au>Peres, Paulo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Three decades of the International Political Science Review (IPSR): A map of the methodological preferences in IPSR articles</atitle><jtitle>International Political Science Review</jtitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>679</spage><epage>689</epage><pages>679-689</pages><issn>0192-5121</issn><eissn>1460-373X</eissn><abstract>Where does the International Political Science Review (IPSR) stand in relation to the hierarchies of knowledge in the discipline? IPSR is the journal of the International Political Science Association and a well-established journal in the discipline of Political Science. The journal has been published since 1980 and in 2016 ranked 54 out of 163 journals in the field. Mapping IPSR’s profile can help us understand the changing thematic, epistemological and methodological preferences within the world of political science. This report maps the distribution of methodological techniques across 152 issues of IPSR, by analysing the abstracts of every article published between 1980 and 2015. In doing so, it aims to provide a clearer picture of the methodological approaches used by political scientists and endorsed by the political science community as acceptable scientific modes of knowledge making.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Sage Publications, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1177/0192512118755596</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5280-4252</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0192-5121 |
ispartof | International Political Science Review, 2018-11, Vol.39 (5), p.679-689 |
issn | 0192-5121 1460-373X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2133264820 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Journals Online; JSTOR |
subjects | Mapping Methodological approaches Political science Political scientists Research methodology Research Report Scientific knowledge |
title | Three decades of the International Political Science Review (IPSR): A map of the methodological preferences in IPSR articles |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T02%3A00%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Three%20decades%20of%20the%20International%20Political%20Science%20Review%20(IPSR):%20A%20map%20of%20the%20methodological%20preferences%20in%20IPSR%20articles&rft.jtitle=International%20Political%20Science%20Review&rft.au=Lima,%20Enzo&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=679&rft.epage=689&rft.pages=679-689&rft.issn=0192-5121&rft.eissn=1460-373X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0192512118755596&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26956763%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2133264820&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26956763&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0192512118755596&rfr_iscdi=true |