Three decades of the International Political Science Review (IPSR): A map of the methodological preferences in IPSR articles

Where does the International Political Science Review (IPSR) stand in relation to the hierarchies of knowledge in the discipline? IPSR is the journal of the International Political Science Association and a well-established journal in the discipline of Political Science. The journal has been publish...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International Political Science Review 2018-11, Vol.39 (5), p.679-689
Hauptverfasser: Lima, Enzo, Morschbacher, Melina, Peres, Paulo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 689
container_issue 5
container_start_page 679
container_title International Political Science Review
container_volume 39
creator Lima, Enzo
Morschbacher, Melina
Peres, Paulo
description Where does the International Political Science Review (IPSR) stand in relation to the hierarchies of knowledge in the discipline? IPSR is the journal of the International Political Science Association and a well-established journal in the discipline of Political Science. The journal has been published since 1980 and in 2016 ranked 54 out of 163 journals in the field. Mapping IPSR’s profile can help us understand the changing thematic, epistemological and methodological preferences within the world of political science. This report maps the distribution of methodological techniques across 152 issues of IPSR, by analysing the abstracts of every article published between 1980 and 2015. In doing so, it aims to provide a clearer picture of the methodological approaches used by political scientists and endorsed by the political science community as acceptable scientific modes of knowledge making.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0192512118755596
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2133264820</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26956763</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0192512118755596</sage_id><sourcerecordid>26956763</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-b173f1a496a938f818e8c57035721eb1236ca17d622c0fcf496ce55cb98913883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LAzEUxIMoWKt3L0LAix5W85Lm66jFj4JgaSt4W9L0rd2ybmqyVfzv3bKi4MHTG5jfDI8h5BjYBYDWlwwsl8ABjJZSWrVDejBQLBNaPO-S3tbOtv4-OUhpxRhTVvEeuZ4tIyJdoHcLTDQUtFkiHdUNxto1ZahdRcehKpvSt2rqS6w90gm-l_hBz0bj6eT8kOwVrkp49H375On2Zja8zx4e70bDq4fMCwFNNgctCnADq5wVpjBg0HipmZCaA86BC-Ud6IXi3LPCFy3oUUo_t8aCMEb0yWnXu47hbYOpyVdh035ZpZyDEFwNDGctxTrKx5BSxCJfx_LVxc8cWL5dKv-7VBvJukhyL_hb-g9_0vGr1IT408-VlUorIb4AJHNu5w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2133264820</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Three decades of the International Political Science Review (IPSR): A map of the methodological preferences in IPSR articles</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Journals Online</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Lima, Enzo ; Morschbacher, Melina ; Peres, Paulo</creator><creatorcontrib>Lima, Enzo ; Morschbacher, Melina ; Peres, Paulo</creatorcontrib><description>Where does the International Political Science Review (IPSR) stand in relation to the hierarchies of knowledge in the discipline? IPSR is the journal of the International Political Science Association and a well-established journal in the discipline of Political Science. The journal has been published since 1980 and in 2016 ranked 54 out of 163 journals in the field. Mapping IPSR’s profile can help us understand the changing thematic, epistemological and methodological preferences within the world of political science. This report maps the distribution of methodological techniques across 152 issues of IPSR, by analysing the abstracts of every article published between 1980 and 2015. In doing so, it aims to provide a clearer picture of the methodological approaches used by political scientists and endorsed by the political science community as acceptable scientific modes of knowledge making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0192-5121</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-373X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0192512118755596</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Sage Publications, Ltd</publisher><subject>Mapping ; Methodological approaches ; Political science ; Political scientists ; Research methodology ; Research Report ; Scientific knowledge</subject><ispartof>International Political Science Review, 2018-11, Vol.39 (5), p.679-689</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-b173f1a496a938f818e8c57035721eb1236ca17d622c0fcf496ce55cb98913883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-b173f1a496a938f818e8c57035721eb1236ca17d622c0fcf496ce55cb98913883</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5280-4252</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26956763$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26956763$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,776,780,788,799,21798,27899,27901,27902,43597,43598,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lima, Enzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morschbacher, Melina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peres, Paulo</creatorcontrib><title>Three decades of the International Political Science Review (IPSR): A map of the methodological preferences in IPSR articles</title><title>International Political Science Review</title><description>Where does the International Political Science Review (IPSR) stand in relation to the hierarchies of knowledge in the discipline? IPSR is the journal of the International Political Science Association and a well-established journal in the discipline of Political Science. The journal has been published since 1980 and in 2016 ranked 54 out of 163 journals in the field. Mapping IPSR’s profile can help us understand the changing thematic, epistemological and methodological preferences within the world of political science. This report maps the distribution of methodological techniques across 152 issues of IPSR, by analysing the abstracts of every article published between 1980 and 2015. In doing so, it aims to provide a clearer picture of the methodological approaches used by political scientists and endorsed by the political science community as acceptable scientific modes of knowledge making.</description><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Methodological approaches</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Political scientists</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Research Report</subject><subject>Scientific knowledge</subject><issn>0192-5121</issn><issn>1460-373X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1LAzEUxIMoWKt3L0LAix5W85Lm66jFj4JgaSt4W9L0rd2ybmqyVfzv3bKi4MHTG5jfDI8h5BjYBYDWlwwsl8ABjJZSWrVDejBQLBNaPO-S3tbOtv4-OUhpxRhTVvEeuZ4tIyJdoHcLTDQUtFkiHdUNxto1ZahdRcehKpvSt2rqS6w90gm-l_hBz0bj6eT8kOwVrkp49H375On2Zja8zx4e70bDq4fMCwFNNgctCnADq5wVpjBg0HipmZCaA86BC-Ud6IXi3LPCFy3oUUo_t8aCMEb0yWnXu47hbYOpyVdh035ZpZyDEFwNDGctxTrKx5BSxCJfx_LVxc8cWL5dKv-7VBvJukhyL_hb-g9_0vGr1IT408-VlUorIb4AJHNu5w</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Lima, Enzo</creator><creator>Morschbacher, Melina</creator><creator>Peres, Paulo</creator><general>Sage Publications, Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5280-4252</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Three decades of the International Political Science Review (IPSR)</title><author>Lima, Enzo ; Morschbacher, Melina ; Peres, Paulo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-b173f1a496a938f818e8c57035721eb1236ca17d622c0fcf496ce55cb98913883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Methodological approaches</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Political scientists</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Research Report</topic><topic>Scientific knowledge</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lima, Enzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morschbacher, Melina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peres, Paulo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International Political Science Review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lima, Enzo</au><au>Morschbacher, Melina</au><au>Peres, Paulo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Three decades of the International Political Science Review (IPSR): A map of the methodological preferences in IPSR articles</atitle><jtitle>International Political Science Review</jtitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>679</spage><epage>689</epage><pages>679-689</pages><issn>0192-5121</issn><eissn>1460-373X</eissn><abstract>Where does the International Political Science Review (IPSR) stand in relation to the hierarchies of knowledge in the discipline? IPSR is the journal of the International Political Science Association and a well-established journal in the discipline of Political Science. The journal has been published since 1980 and in 2016 ranked 54 out of 163 journals in the field. Mapping IPSR’s profile can help us understand the changing thematic, epistemological and methodological preferences within the world of political science. This report maps the distribution of methodological techniques across 152 issues of IPSR, by analysing the abstracts of every article published between 1980 and 2015. In doing so, it aims to provide a clearer picture of the methodological approaches used by political scientists and endorsed by the political science community as acceptable scientific modes of knowledge making.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Sage Publications, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1177/0192512118755596</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5280-4252</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0192-5121
ispartof International Political Science Review, 2018-11, Vol.39 (5), p.679-689
issn 0192-5121
1460-373X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2133264820
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Journals Online; JSTOR
subjects Mapping
Methodological approaches
Political science
Political scientists
Research methodology
Research Report
Scientific knowledge
title Three decades of the International Political Science Review (IPSR): A map of the methodological preferences in IPSR articles
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T02%3A00%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Three%20decades%20of%20the%20International%20Political%20Science%20Review%20(IPSR):%20A%20map%20of%20the%20methodological%20preferences%20in%20IPSR%20articles&rft.jtitle=International%20Political%20Science%20Review&rft.au=Lima,%20Enzo&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=679&rft.epage=689&rft.pages=679-689&rft.issn=0192-5121&rft.eissn=1460-373X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0192512118755596&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26956763%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2133264820&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26956763&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0192512118755596&rfr_iscdi=true