Analyzing Error Perception and Recognition Among Professional Communication Practitioners and Academics

We investigated the perception and recognition of errors in a population of practitioners and academics in professional and technical communication. Specifically, we measured 303 participants’ botheration levels of 24 usage errors and then correlated those results against their ability to recognize...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Business and professional communication quarterly 2018-12, Vol.81 (4), p.462-484
Hauptverfasser: Boettger, Ryan K., Emory Moore, Lindsay
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 484
container_issue 4
container_start_page 462
container_title Business and professional communication quarterly
container_volume 81
creator Boettger, Ryan K.
Emory Moore, Lindsay
description We investigated the perception and recognition of errors in a population of practitioners and academics in professional and technical communication. Specifically, we measured 303 participants’ botheration levels of 24 usage errors and then correlated those results against their ability to recognize the errors. Results indicated that practitioners were often more bothered by errors than academics and that participants’ overall botheration level might have fluctuated over the past 40 years. Participants’ botheration level also appeared to associate with their ability to identify error. Finally, we found that participants’ gender, job type, and years working in the field influence their error perception.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/2329490618803740
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2133147677</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1196805</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_2329490618803740</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2133147677</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-90b7023de2fd5ba8e76f1dccbb4faf7d1f7b82d9f4d71de75887c7b8429346d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtLw0AQxhdRsNTevQgBz9F9dR_HUOqLgkV6D5t9hJQmW3fTQ_3r3SZSQfA0M9_8vplhALhF8AEhzh8xwZJKyJAQkHAKL8DkJOVUYnx5ziG7BrMYtxBChAUjDE1AXXRqd_xqujpbhuBDtrZB233f-C5Tnck-rPZ11wx10fqErYN3NsYkqF228G176BqtBmAdlO4H1oY42AutjG0bHW_AlVO7aGc_cQo2T8vN4iVfvT-_LopVrglBfS5hxSEmxmJn5pUSljOHjNZVRZ1y3CDHK4GNdNRwZCyfC8F1kiiWhDJDpuB-HLsP_vNgY19u_SGkS2OJUdpAOeM8UXCkdPAxBuvKfWhaFY4lguXpoeXfhybL3WixodFnfPmGkGQCzlM_H_tR1fZ36b_zvgFBnIA3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2133147677</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analyzing Error Perception and Recognition Among Professional Communication Practitioners and Academics</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Boettger, Ryan K. ; Emory Moore, Lindsay</creator><creatorcontrib>Boettger, Ryan K. ; Emory Moore, Lindsay</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated the perception and recognition of errors in a population of practitioners and academics in professional and technical communication. Specifically, we measured 303 participants’ botheration levels of 24 usage errors and then correlated those results against their ability to recognize the errors. Results indicated that practitioners were often more bothered by errors than academics and that participants’ overall botheration level might have fluctuated over the past 40 years. Participants’ botheration level also appeared to associate with their ability to identify error. Finally, we found that participants’ gender, job type, and years working in the field influence their error perception.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2329-4906</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2329-4922</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2329-4922</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2329490618803740</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Business Communication ; College Faculty ; Correlation ; Editing ; Employee Attitudes ; Error Analysis (Language) ; Error Patterns ; Gender Differences ; Identification ; Language Usage ; Occupations ; Professional Personnel ; Taxonomy ; Teacher Attitudes ; Technical Writing</subject><ispartof>Business and professional communication quarterly, 2018-12, Vol.81 (4), p.462-484</ispartof><rights>2018 by the Association for Business Communication</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-90b7023de2fd5ba8e76f1dccbb4faf7d1f7b82d9f4d71de75887c7b8429346d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-90b7023de2fd5ba8e76f1dccbb4faf7d1f7b82d9f4d71de75887c7b8429346d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2329490618803740$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2329490618803740$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21818,27923,27924,43620,43621</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1196805$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boettger, Ryan K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emory Moore, Lindsay</creatorcontrib><title>Analyzing Error Perception and Recognition Among Professional Communication Practitioners and Academics</title><title>Business and professional communication quarterly</title><description>We investigated the perception and recognition of errors in a population of practitioners and academics in professional and technical communication. Specifically, we measured 303 participants’ botheration levels of 24 usage errors and then correlated those results against their ability to recognize the errors. Results indicated that practitioners were often more bothered by errors than academics and that participants’ overall botheration level might have fluctuated over the past 40 years. Participants’ botheration level also appeared to associate with their ability to identify error. Finally, we found that participants’ gender, job type, and years working in the field influence their error perception.</description><subject>Business Communication</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Editing</subject><subject>Employee Attitudes</subject><subject>Error Analysis (Language)</subject><subject>Error Patterns</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Language Usage</subject><subject>Occupations</subject><subject>Professional Personnel</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Technical Writing</subject><issn>2329-4906</issn><issn>2329-4922</issn><issn>2329-4922</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtLw0AQxhdRsNTevQgBz9F9dR_HUOqLgkV6D5t9hJQmW3fTQ_3r3SZSQfA0M9_8vplhALhF8AEhzh8xwZJKyJAQkHAKL8DkJOVUYnx5ziG7BrMYtxBChAUjDE1AXXRqd_xqujpbhuBDtrZB233f-C5Tnck-rPZ11wx10fqErYN3NsYkqF228G176BqtBmAdlO4H1oY42AutjG0bHW_AlVO7aGc_cQo2T8vN4iVfvT-_LopVrglBfS5hxSEmxmJn5pUSljOHjNZVRZ1y3CDHK4GNdNRwZCyfC8F1kiiWhDJDpuB-HLsP_vNgY19u_SGkS2OJUdpAOeM8UXCkdPAxBuvKfWhaFY4lguXpoeXfhybL3WixodFnfPmGkGQCzlM_H_tR1fZ36b_zvgFBnIA3</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Boettger, Ryan K.</creator><creator>Emory Moore, Lindsay</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>Analyzing Error Perception and Recognition Among Professional Communication Practitioners and Academics</title><author>Boettger, Ryan K. ; Emory Moore, Lindsay</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-90b7023de2fd5ba8e76f1dccbb4faf7d1f7b82d9f4d71de75887c7b8429346d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Business Communication</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Editing</topic><topic>Employee Attitudes</topic><topic>Error Analysis (Language)</topic><topic>Error Patterns</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Language Usage</topic><topic>Occupations</topic><topic>Professional Personnel</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Technical Writing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boettger, Ryan K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emory Moore, Lindsay</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Business and professional communication quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boettger, Ryan K.</au><au>Emory Moore, Lindsay</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1196805</ericid><atitle>Analyzing Error Perception and Recognition Among Professional Communication Practitioners and Academics</atitle><jtitle>Business and professional communication quarterly</jtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>462</spage><epage>484</epage><pages>462-484</pages><issn>2329-4906</issn><issn>2329-4922</issn><eissn>2329-4922</eissn><abstract>We investigated the perception and recognition of errors in a population of practitioners and academics in professional and technical communication. Specifically, we measured 303 participants’ botheration levels of 24 usage errors and then correlated those results against their ability to recognize the errors. Results indicated that practitioners were often more bothered by errors than academics and that participants’ overall botheration level might have fluctuated over the past 40 years. Participants’ botheration level also appeared to associate with their ability to identify error. Finally, we found that participants’ gender, job type, and years working in the field influence their error perception.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/2329490618803740</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2329-4906
ispartof Business and professional communication quarterly, 2018-12, Vol.81 (4), p.462-484
issn 2329-4906
2329-4922
2329-4922
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2133147677
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Business Communication
College Faculty
Correlation
Editing
Employee Attitudes
Error Analysis (Language)
Error Patterns
Gender Differences
Identification
Language Usage
Occupations
Professional Personnel
Taxonomy
Teacher Attitudes
Technical Writing
title Analyzing Error Perception and Recognition Among Professional Communication Practitioners and Academics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T09%3A02%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analyzing%20Error%20Perception%20and%20Recognition%20Among%20Professional%20Communication%20Practitioners%20and%20Academics&rft.jtitle=Business%20and%20professional%20communication%20quarterly&rft.au=Boettger,%20Ryan%20K.&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=462&rft.epage=484&rft.pages=462-484&rft.issn=2329-4906&rft.eissn=2329-4922&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2329490618803740&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2133147677%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2133147677&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1196805&rft_sage_id=10.1177_2329490618803740&rfr_iscdi=true