Left-liberal discourse: theory and practice of betrayal
The article focuses on a critical analysis of the main provisions of B. Yu. Kagarlitskiy's new book "Between Class and Discourse. How Left Intellectuals Serve Capitalism." Despite the era of crisis that neo-liberal version of global capitalism entered, left-liberal intellectuals could...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia 2018 (7), p.162-169 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng ; rus |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 169 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 162 |
container_title | Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia |
container_volume | |
creator | Fishman, Leonid |
description | The article focuses on a critical analysis of the main provisions of B. Yu. Kagarlitskiy's new book "Between Class and Discourse. How Left Intellectuals Serve Capitalism." Despite the era of crisis that neo-liberal version of global capitalism entered, left-liberal intellectuals could not provide an adequate response to new challenges. Instead of justifying and implementing class policies aimed at protecting the interests of workers, they adopted a postmodern "discourse" of identity, multiculturalism, and political correctness. This discourse contributes to the implementation of the "fragmentation policy" and is objectively one of the tools of neoliberal social policy. B. Kagarlitskiy convincingly demonstrates relationship between this discourse and neoliberal policy of transformation of the state of general welfare, which contributes to the rejection of universalism of social policy in favor of targeted social assistance and clientelism. All this allows the author to draw a conclusion about the treachery of left-liberal intellectuals. Major attention of the book is on the changes taking place in economy and social structure of modern societies that contribute to the destruction of previous classes and the formation of new social groups. Presently these transformations find their political expression in the growth of left and right-populist parties and movements. The left, developing their strategy, must interact carefully and critically with these new political forces. At the same time, not all of the author's conclusions look indisputable. Is it possible, as follows from B. Kagarlitskiy arguments, to compose a new progressive "historical bloc" from the decaying classes? Is it right to speak of the "treachery of intellectuals", if their "discourse" is an organic consequence of their social being? This review draws attention to the problematic nature of these and some other answers that the book author has provided for his own questions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.31857/S013216250000193-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2132686509</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2132686509</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c157t-df90053ab71e93cafcaae82e1193e6112420abad86cb533f4b251957a9e27c9a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdULtOAzEQdAESIfAFNJaoDX7E9pkORbykkyiA2lr71uKiIxdsp7i_50Ko2Gak0Wh2Zgi5EvxGiUbb2zculBRGaj6fcIrpE7I4cOxAnpHzUjacK2l4syC2xVTZ0AfMMNCuL3Hc54J3tH7imCcK247uMsTaR6RjogFrhgmGC3KaYCh4-YdL8vH48L5-Zu3r08v6vmVRaFtZlxznWkGwAp2KkCIANhLFnAuNEHIlOQToGhODViqtgtTCaQsOpY0O1JJcH313efzeY6l-Mwfczi-9nCuZxmjuZpU6qmIeS8mY_C73X5AnL7j_XcX_X8Vr9QMwOlXZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2132686509</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Left-liberal discourse: theory and practice of betrayal</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>East View Russia Individual Titles (UDB-IND)</source><creator>Fishman, Leonid</creator><creatorcontrib>Fishman, Leonid ; Institute of Philosophy and Law, UrB RAS</creatorcontrib><description>The article focuses on a critical analysis of the main provisions of B. Yu. Kagarlitskiy's new book "Between Class and Discourse. How Left Intellectuals Serve Capitalism." Despite the era of crisis that neo-liberal version of global capitalism entered, left-liberal intellectuals could not provide an adequate response to new challenges. Instead of justifying and implementing class policies aimed at protecting the interests of workers, they adopted a postmodern "discourse" of identity, multiculturalism, and political correctness. This discourse contributes to the implementation of the "fragmentation policy" and is objectively one of the tools of neoliberal social policy. B. Kagarlitskiy convincingly demonstrates relationship between this discourse and neoliberal policy of transformation of the state of general welfare, which contributes to the rejection of universalism of social policy in favor of targeted social assistance and clientelism. All this allows the author to draw a conclusion about the treachery of left-liberal intellectuals. Major attention of the book is on the changes taking place in economy and social structure of modern societies that contribute to the destruction of previous classes and the formation of new social groups. Presently these transformations find their political expression in the growth of left and right-populist parties and movements. The left, developing their strategy, must interact carefully and critically with these new political forces. At the same time, not all of the author's conclusions look indisputable. Is it possible, as follows from B. Kagarlitskiy arguments, to compose a new progressive "historical bloc" from the decaying classes? Is it right to speak of the "treachery of intellectuals", if their "discourse" is an organic consequence of their social being? This review draws attention to the problematic nature of these and some other answers that the book author has provided for his own questions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0132-1625</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.31857/S013216250000193-5</identifier><language>eng ; rus</language><publisher>Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences, c/o Izdatelstvo Nauka</publisher><subject>Capitalism ; Clientelism ; Discourse ; Global economy ; Globalization ; Intellectuals ; Modern society ; Multiculturalism & pluralism ; Neoliberalism ; Patronage ; Policy implementation ; Political change ; Political correctness ; Politics ; Populism ; Postmodernism ; Social change ; Social groups ; Social policy ; Social structure ; Universalism ; Welfare state</subject><ispartof>Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 2018 (7), p.162-169</ispartof><rights>Copyright Russian Academy of Sciences, c/o Izdatelstvo Nauka 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,33774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fishman, Leonid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Institute of Philosophy and Law, UrB RAS</creatorcontrib><title>Left-liberal discourse: theory and practice of betrayal</title><title>Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia</title><description>The article focuses on a critical analysis of the main provisions of B. Yu. Kagarlitskiy's new book "Between Class and Discourse. How Left Intellectuals Serve Capitalism." Despite the era of crisis that neo-liberal version of global capitalism entered, left-liberal intellectuals could not provide an adequate response to new challenges. Instead of justifying and implementing class policies aimed at protecting the interests of workers, they adopted a postmodern "discourse" of identity, multiculturalism, and political correctness. This discourse contributes to the implementation of the "fragmentation policy" and is objectively one of the tools of neoliberal social policy. B. Kagarlitskiy convincingly demonstrates relationship between this discourse and neoliberal policy of transformation of the state of general welfare, which contributes to the rejection of universalism of social policy in favor of targeted social assistance and clientelism. All this allows the author to draw a conclusion about the treachery of left-liberal intellectuals. Major attention of the book is on the changes taking place in economy and social structure of modern societies that contribute to the destruction of previous classes and the formation of new social groups. Presently these transformations find their political expression in the growth of left and right-populist parties and movements. The left, developing their strategy, must interact carefully and critically with these new political forces. At the same time, not all of the author's conclusions look indisputable. Is it possible, as follows from B. Kagarlitskiy arguments, to compose a new progressive "historical bloc" from the decaying classes? Is it right to speak of the "treachery of intellectuals", if their "discourse" is an organic consequence of their social being? This review draws attention to the problematic nature of these and some other answers that the book author has provided for his own questions.</description><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Clientelism</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Global economy</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>Intellectuals</subject><subject>Modern society</subject><subject>Multiculturalism & pluralism</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Patronage</subject><subject>Policy implementation</subject><subject>Political change</subject><subject>Political correctness</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Populism</subject><subject>Postmodernism</subject><subject>Social change</subject><subject>Social groups</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><subject>Social structure</subject><subject>Universalism</subject><subject>Welfare state</subject><issn>0132-1625</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdULtOAzEQdAESIfAFNJaoDX7E9pkORbykkyiA2lr71uKiIxdsp7i_50Ko2Gak0Wh2Zgi5EvxGiUbb2zculBRGaj6fcIrpE7I4cOxAnpHzUjacK2l4syC2xVTZ0AfMMNCuL3Hc54J3tH7imCcK247uMsTaR6RjogFrhgmGC3KaYCh4-YdL8vH48L5-Zu3r08v6vmVRaFtZlxznWkGwAp2KkCIANhLFnAuNEHIlOQToGhODViqtgtTCaQsOpY0O1JJcH313efzeY6l-Mwfczi-9nCuZxmjuZpU6qmIeS8mY_C73X5AnL7j_XcX_X8Vr9QMwOlXZ</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Fishman, Leonid</creator><general>Russian Academy of Sciences, c/o Izdatelstvo Nauka</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>Left-liberal discourse: theory and practice of betrayal</title><author>Fishman, Leonid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c157t-df90053ab71e93cafcaae82e1193e6112420abad86cb533f4b251957a9e27c9a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; rus</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Clientelism</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Global economy</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>Intellectuals</topic><topic>Modern society</topic><topic>Multiculturalism & pluralism</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Patronage</topic><topic>Policy implementation</topic><topic>Political change</topic><topic>Political correctness</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Populism</topic><topic>Postmodernism</topic><topic>Social change</topic><topic>Social groups</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><topic>Social structure</topic><topic>Universalism</topic><topic>Welfare state</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fishman, Leonid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Institute of Philosophy and Law, UrB RAS</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fishman, Leonid</au><aucorp>Institute of Philosophy and Law, UrB RAS</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Left-liberal discourse: theory and practice of betrayal</atitle><jtitle>Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia</jtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><issue>7</issue><spage>162</spage><epage>169</epage><pages>162-169</pages><issn>0132-1625</issn><abstract>The article focuses on a critical analysis of the main provisions of B. Yu. Kagarlitskiy's new book "Between Class and Discourse. How Left Intellectuals Serve Capitalism." Despite the era of crisis that neo-liberal version of global capitalism entered, left-liberal intellectuals could not provide an adequate response to new challenges. Instead of justifying and implementing class policies aimed at protecting the interests of workers, they adopted a postmodern "discourse" of identity, multiculturalism, and political correctness. This discourse contributes to the implementation of the "fragmentation policy" and is objectively one of the tools of neoliberal social policy. B. Kagarlitskiy convincingly demonstrates relationship between this discourse and neoliberal policy of transformation of the state of general welfare, which contributes to the rejection of universalism of social policy in favor of targeted social assistance and clientelism. All this allows the author to draw a conclusion about the treachery of left-liberal intellectuals. Major attention of the book is on the changes taking place in economy and social structure of modern societies that contribute to the destruction of previous classes and the formation of new social groups. Presently these transformations find their political expression in the growth of left and right-populist parties and movements. The left, developing their strategy, must interact carefully and critically with these new political forces. At the same time, not all of the author's conclusions look indisputable. Is it possible, as follows from B. Kagarlitskiy arguments, to compose a new progressive "historical bloc" from the decaying classes? Is it right to speak of the "treachery of intellectuals", if their "discourse" is an organic consequence of their social being? This review draws attention to the problematic nature of these and some other answers that the book author has provided for his own questions.</abstract><cop>Moscow</cop><pub>Russian Academy of Sciences, c/o Izdatelstvo Nauka</pub><doi>10.31857/S013216250000193-5</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0132-1625 |
ispartof | Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 2018 (7), p.162-169 |
issn | 0132-1625 |
language | eng ; rus |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2132686509 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Sociological Abstracts; East View Russia Individual Titles (UDB-IND) |
subjects | Capitalism Clientelism Discourse Global economy Globalization Intellectuals Modern society Multiculturalism & pluralism Neoliberalism Patronage Policy implementation Political change Political correctness Politics Populism Postmodernism Social change Social groups Social policy Social structure Universalism Welfare state |
title | Left-liberal discourse: theory and practice of betrayal |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T09%3A39%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Left-liberal%20discourse:%20theory%20and%20practice%20of%20betrayal&rft.jtitle=Sotsiologicheskie%20issledovaniia&rft.au=Fishman,%20Leonid&rft.aucorp=Institute%20of%20Philosophy%20and%20Law,%20UrB%20RAS&rft.date=2018&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=162&rft.epage=169&rft.pages=162-169&rft.issn=0132-1625&rft_id=info:doi/10.31857/S013216250000193-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2132686509%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2132686509&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |