A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: Towards a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis

This paper presents a framework for organizational analysis. The empirically derived approach does not emerge from the observation of actual organizations, but from the ordering, through multivariate techniques, of criteria that organizational theorists and researchers use to evaluate the performanc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Management science 1983-03, Vol.29 (3), p.363-377
Hauptverfasser: Quinn, Robert E, Rohrbaugh, John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 377
container_issue 3
container_start_page 363
container_title Management science
container_volume 29
creator Quinn, Robert E
Rohrbaugh, John
description This paper presents a framework for organizational analysis. The empirically derived approach does not emerge from the observation of actual organizations, but from the ordering, through multivariate techniques, of criteria that organizational theorists and researchers use to evaluate the performance of organizations. In a two-stage study, organizational theorists and researchers were impaneled to make judgments about the similarity of commonly used effectiveness criteria. The model derived from the second group closely replicated the first, and in convergence suggested that three value dimensions (control-flexibility, internal-external, and means-ends) underlie conceptualizations of organizational effectiveness. When these value dimensions are juxtaposed, a spatial model emerges. The model serves a number of important functions. It organizes the organizational effectiveness literature, indicates which concepts are most central to the construct of organizational effectiveness, makes clear the values in which the concepts are embedded, demonstrates that the effectiveness literature and the general literature on organizational analysis are analogues of one another, and provides an overarching framework to guide subsequent efforts at organizational assessment.
doi_str_mv 10.1287/mnsc.29.3.363
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_213159178</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2631061</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2631061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-6f3682dbb18ae2671a75aeea224cd4cd8ad339960ccb1547652e49e3236aadc33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhS1EJYbCkh0LCxZsyNSP-MVuNCovteqCwta64zgzHk3iYKethl-PQ6CsCpKvj6X73eMjXYReULKkTKuzrs9uycySL7nkj9CCCiYrIQh9jBaEMFFRQ8wT9DTnPSFEaSUXKKzwlwHGAAd8GRt_wLHF523r3Rhufe9zxusURp8CvMPX8Q5SkzHgdewGP4Z-i7_B4cZnvBqGFMHt8BjxVdpCH34U09gX21W5jjnkZ-ikhUP2z3_rKfr6_vx6_bG6uPrwab26qJyoyVjJlkvNms2GavBMKgpKgPfAWO2acjQ0nBsjiXMbKmolBfO18ZxxCdA4zk_Rq9m3JPpeso12H29SCZEto5wKQ5X-J0SEFoxQVqDXD0GUGaU05fX0XzVTLsWck2_tkEIH6WgpsdNe7LQXy4zltuyl8J9nPvnBu3s49F1Mv8hby2Gi4ViKGl3GIJSadJhUlpdSdjd2xezlbLbPY0z3ZkxySiQt7bdzO_Rtcc__jfZmxndhu7sLyds_cx0UMPwlfwKQrb-P</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205852012</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: Towards a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>RePEc</source><source>INFORMS PubsOnLine</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Quinn, Robert E ; Rohrbaugh, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Robert E ; Rohrbaugh, John</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents a framework for organizational analysis. The empirically derived approach does not emerge from the observation of actual organizations, but from the ordering, through multivariate techniques, of criteria that organizational theorists and researchers use to evaluate the performance of organizations. In a two-stage study, organizational theorists and researchers were impaneled to make judgments about the similarity of commonly used effectiveness criteria. The model derived from the second group closely replicated the first, and in convergence suggested that three value dimensions (control-flexibility, internal-external, and means-ends) underlie conceptualizations of organizational effectiveness. When these value dimensions are juxtaposed, a spatial model emerges. The model serves a number of important functions. It organizes the organizational effectiveness literature, indicates which concepts are most central to the construct of organizational effectiveness, makes clear the values in which the concepts are embedded, demonstrates that the effectiveness literature and the general literature on organizational analysis are analogues of one another, and provides an overarching framework to guide subsequent efforts at organizational assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-1909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-5501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.29.3.363</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MNSCDI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Linthicum: INFORMS</publisher><subject>Cognitive models ; Effectiveness ; Human relations ; Judgment ; Management science ; Modeling ; Multidimensional scaling ; Open systems ; Organization theory ; organization: analysis ; organization: analysis, effectiveness ; Organizational ; Organizational effectiveness ; Productivity ; Seashores ; Spatial models ; Structure ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Management science, 1983-03, Vol.29 (3), p.363-377</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1983 The Institute of Management Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Mar 1983</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-6f3682dbb18ae2671a75aeea224cd4cd8ad339960ccb1547652e49e3236aadc33</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2631061$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/full/10.1287/mnsc.29.3.363$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginforms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3679,3994,27846,27901,27902,57992,58225,62589</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/inmormnsc/v_3a29_3ay_3a1983_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a363-377.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Robert E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohrbaugh, John</creatorcontrib><title>A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: Towards a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis</title><title>Management science</title><description>This paper presents a framework for organizational analysis. The empirically derived approach does not emerge from the observation of actual organizations, but from the ordering, through multivariate techniques, of criteria that organizational theorists and researchers use to evaluate the performance of organizations. In a two-stage study, organizational theorists and researchers were impaneled to make judgments about the similarity of commonly used effectiveness criteria. The model derived from the second group closely replicated the first, and in convergence suggested that three value dimensions (control-flexibility, internal-external, and means-ends) underlie conceptualizations of organizational effectiveness. When these value dimensions are juxtaposed, a spatial model emerges. The model serves a number of important functions. It organizes the organizational effectiveness literature, indicates which concepts are most central to the construct of organizational effectiveness, makes clear the values in which the concepts are embedded, demonstrates that the effectiveness literature and the general literature on organizational analysis are analogues of one another, and provides an overarching framework to guide subsequent efforts at organizational assessment.</description><subject>Cognitive models</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Human relations</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Management science</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Multidimensional scaling</subject><subject>Open systems</subject><subject>Organization theory</subject><subject>organization: analysis</subject><subject>organization: analysis, effectiveness</subject><subject>Organizational</subject><subject>Organizational effectiveness</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Seashores</subject><subject>Spatial models</subject><subject>Structure</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0025-1909</issn><issn>1526-5501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1983</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhS1EJYbCkh0LCxZsyNSP-MVuNCovteqCwta64zgzHk3iYKethl-PQ6CsCpKvj6X73eMjXYReULKkTKuzrs9uycySL7nkj9CCCiYrIQh9jBaEMFFRQ8wT9DTnPSFEaSUXKKzwlwHGAAd8GRt_wLHF523r3Rhufe9zxusURp8CvMPX8Q5SkzHgdewGP4Z-i7_B4cZnvBqGFMHt8BjxVdpCH34U09gX21W5jjnkZ-ikhUP2z3_rKfr6_vx6_bG6uPrwab26qJyoyVjJlkvNms2GavBMKgpKgPfAWO2acjQ0nBsjiXMbKmolBfO18ZxxCdA4zk_Rq9m3JPpeso12H29SCZEto5wKQ5X-J0SEFoxQVqDXD0GUGaU05fX0XzVTLsWck2_tkEIH6WgpsdNe7LQXy4zltuyl8J9nPvnBu3s49F1Mv8hby2Gi4ViKGl3GIJSadJhUlpdSdjd2xezlbLbPY0z3ZkxySiQt7bdzO_Rtcc__jfZmxndhu7sLyds_cx0UMPwlfwKQrb-P</recordid><startdate>19830301</startdate><enddate>19830301</enddate><creator>Quinn, Robert E</creator><creator>Rohrbaugh, John</creator><general>INFORMS</general><general>Institute of Management Sciences</general><general>Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SAAPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0A</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19830301</creationdate><title>A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: Towards a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis</title><author>Quinn, Robert E ; Rohrbaugh, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-6f3682dbb18ae2671a75aeea224cd4cd8ad339960ccb1547652e49e3236aadc33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1983</creationdate><topic>Cognitive models</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Human relations</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Management science</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Multidimensional scaling</topic><topic>Open systems</topic><topic>Organization theory</topic><topic>organization: analysis</topic><topic>organization: analysis, effectiveness</topic><topic>Organizational</topic><topic>Organizational effectiveness</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Seashores</topic><topic>Spatial models</topic><topic>Structure</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Robert E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohrbaugh, John</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 42</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Archive</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Management science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quinn, Robert E</au><au>Rohrbaugh, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: Towards a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Management science</jtitle><date>1983-03-01</date><risdate>1983</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>363</spage><epage>377</epage><pages>363-377</pages><issn>0025-1909</issn><eissn>1526-5501</eissn><coden>MNSCDI</coden><abstract>This paper presents a framework for organizational analysis. The empirically derived approach does not emerge from the observation of actual organizations, but from the ordering, through multivariate techniques, of criteria that organizational theorists and researchers use to evaluate the performance of organizations. In a two-stage study, organizational theorists and researchers were impaneled to make judgments about the similarity of commonly used effectiveness criteria. The model derived from the second group closely replicated the first, and in convergence suggested that three value dimensions (control-flexibility, internal-external, and means-ends) underlie conceptualizations of organizational effectiveness. When these value dimensions are juxtaposed, a spatial model emerges. The model serves a number of important functions. It organizes the organizational effectiveness literature, indicates which concepts are most central to the construct of organizational effectiveness, makes clear the values in which the concepts are embedded, demonstrates that the effectiveness literature and the general literature on organizational analysis are analogues of one another, and provides an overarching framework to guide subsequent efforts at organizational assessment.</abstract><cop>Linthicum</cop><pub>INFORMS</pub><doi>10.1287/mnsc.29.3.363</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-1909
ispartof Management science, 1983-03, Vol.29 (3), p.363-377
issn 0025-1909
1526-5501
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_213159178
source Jstor Complete Legacy; RePEc; INFORMS PubsOnLine; Business Source Complete; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Cognitive models
Effectiveness
Human relations
Judgment
Management science
Modeling
Multidimensional scaling
Open systems
Organization theory
organization: analysis
organization: analysis, effectiveness
Organizational
Organizational effectiveness
Productivity
Seashores
Spatial models
Structure
Studies
title A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: Towards a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T23%3A59%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Spatial%20Model%20of%20Effectiveness%20Criteria:%20Towards%20a%20Competing%20Values%20Approach%20to%20Organizational%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Management%20science&rft.au=Quinn,%20Robert%20E&rft.date=1983-03-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=363&rft.epage=377&rft.pages=363-377&rft.issn=0025-1909&rft.eissn=1526-5501&rft.coden=MNSCDI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287/mnsc.29.3.363&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2631061%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205852012&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2631061&rfr_iscdi=true