Critical Period for Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control in Pickling Cucumber

Field studies were conducted in North Carolina to determine the critical period for Palmer amaranth control (CPPAC) in pickling cucumber. In removal treatments (REM), emerged Palmer amaranth were allowed to compete with cucumber for 14, 21, 28, or 35 d after sowing (DAS) in 2014 and 14, 21, 35, or 4...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Weed technology 2018-10, Vol.32 (5), p.586-591
Hauptverfasser: McGowen, Samuel J, Jennings, Katherine M, Chaudhari, Sushila, Monks, David W, Schultheis, Jonathan R, Reberg-Horton, Chris
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 591
container_issue 5
container_start_page 586
container_title Weed technology
container_volume 32
creator McGowen, Samuel J
Jennings, Katherine M
Chaudhari, Sushila
Monks, David W
Schultheis, Jonathan R
Reberg-Horton, Chris
description Field studies were conducted in North Carolina to determine the critical period for Palmer amaranth control (CPPAC) in pickling cucumber. In removal treatments (REM), emerged Palmer amaranth were allowed to compete with cucumber for 14, 21, 28, or 35 d after sowing (DAS) in 2014 and 14, 21, 35, or 42 DAS in 2015, and cucumber was kept weed-free for the remainder of the season. In the establishment treatments (EST), cucumber was maintained free of Palmer amaranth by hand removal until 14, 21, 28, or 35 DAS in 2014 and until 14, 21, 35, or 42 DAS in 2015; after this, Palmer amaranth was allowed to establish and compete with the cucumber for the remainder of the season. The beginning and end of the CPPAC, based on 5% loss of marketable yield, was determined by fitting log-logistic and Gompertz equations to the relative yield data representing REM and EST, respectively. Season-long competition by Palmer amaranth reduced pickling cucumber yield by 45% to 98% and 88% to 98% during 2014 and 2015, respectively. When cucumber was planted on April 25, 2015, the CPPAC ranged from 570 to 1,002 heat units (HU), which corresponded to 32 to 49 DAS. However, when cucumber planting was delayed 2 to 4 wk (May 7 and May 21, 2014 and May 4, 2015), the CPPAC lasted from 100 to 918 HU (7 to 44 DAS). This research suggested that planting pickling cucumber as early as possible during the season may help to reduce competition by Palmer amaranth and delay the beginning of the CPPAC. Nomenclature: Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats. AMAPA; cucumber, Cucumis sativus L.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/wet.2018.58
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2131512930</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26567627</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26567627</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-2779a8da1a9e9463289cf763c84b1f6460ea11a06787f72d1f83189a5548840c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFZPnoUFLxZpndnNfuRYgl8g2IMFb8sm3ejWNFs3CeJ_b2rUo6cZeD_ezHuEnCLMEFBdfbh2xgD1TOg9MkIhYMpUAvtkBDqFKXD1fEiOmmYNgJIxGJFlFn3rC1vRhYs-rGgZIl3YauMinW9stHX7Si9-t66h22_NT2gW6jaGivqaLnzxVvn6hWZd0W1yF4_JQWmrxp38zDFZ3lw_ZXfTh8fb-2z-MM05qrb_TaVWryza1KWJ5EynRakkL3SSYykTCc4iWpBKq1KxFZaao06tEInWCRR8TM4H320M751rWrMOXaz7k4YhR4Es5dBTlwNVxNA00ZVmG32f6NMgmF1vpu_N7HozQvf02UCvmzbEP5RJIZVkqtcng577EGr3r9cXwjB2FQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2131512930</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Critical Period for Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control in Pickling Cucumber</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>McGowen, Samuel J ; Jennings, Katherine M ; Chaudhari, Sushila ; Monks, David W ; Schultheis, Jonathan R ; Reberg-Horton, Chris</creator><creatorcontrib>McGowen, Samuel J ; Jennings, Katherine M ; Chaudhari, Sushila ; Monks, David W ; Schultheis, Jonathan R ; Reberg-Horton, Chris</creatorcontrib><description>Field studies were conducted in North Carolina to determine the critical period for Palmer amaranth control (CPPAC) in pickling cucumber. In removal treatments (REM), emerged Palmer amaranth were allowed to compete with cucumber for 14, 21, 28, or 35 d after sowing (DAS) in 2014 and 14, 21, 35, or 42 DAS in 2015, and cucumber was kept weed-free for the remainder of the season. In the establishment treatments (EST), cucumber was maintained free of Palmer amaranth by hand removal until 14, 21, 28, or 35 DAS in 2014 and until 14, 21, 35, or 42 DAS in 2015; after this, Palmer amaranth was allowed to establish and compete with the cucumber for the remainder of the season. The beginning and end of the CPPAC, based on 5% loss of marketable yield, was determined by fitting log-logistic and Gompertz equations to the relative yield data representing REM and EST, respectively. Season-long competition by Palmer amaranth reduced pickling cucumber yield by 45% to 98% and 88% to 98% during 2014 and 2015, respectively. When cucumber was planted on April 25, 2015, the CPPAC ranged from 570 to 1,002 heat units (HU), which corresponded to 32 to 49 DAS. However, when cucumber planting was delayed 2 to 4 wk (May 7 and May 21, 2014 and May 4, 2015), the CPPAC lasted from 100 to 918 HU (7 to 44 DAS). This research suggested that planting pickling cucumber as early as possible during the season may help to reduce competition by Palmer amaranth and delay the beginning of the CPPAC. Nomenclature: Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats. AMAPA; cucumber, Cucumis sativus L.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/wet.2018.58</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Amaranth ; Amaranthus palmeri ; Competition ; Crop yield ; Establishment ; heat units ; Herbicides ; Horticulture ; Pickling ; Planting ; removal ; Seasons ; Soil sciences ; Vegetables ; weed competition ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 2018-10, Vol.32 (5), p.586-591</ispartof><rights>Weed Science Society of America, 2018.</rights><rights>Weed Science Society of America, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-2779a8da1a9e9463289cf763c84b1f6460ea11a06787f72d1f83189a5548840c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-2779a8da1a9e9463289cf763c84b1f6460ea11a06787f72d1f83189a5548840c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26567627$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26567627$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McGowen, Samuel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jennings, Katherine M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaudhari, Sushila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monks, David W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultheis, Jonathan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reberg-Horton, Chris</creatorcontrib><title>Critical Period for Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control in Pickling Cucumber</title><title>Weed technology</title><addtitle>Weed Technol</addtitle><description>Field studies were conducted in North Carolina to determine the critical period for Palmer amaranth control (CPPAC) in pickling cucumber. In removal treatments (REM), emerged Palmer amaranth were allowed to compete with cucumber for 14, 21, 28, or 35 d after sowing (DAS) in 2014 and 14, 21, 35, or 42 DAS in 2015, and cucumber was kept weed-free for the remainder of the season. In the establishment treatments (EST), cucumber was maintained free of Palmer amaranth by hand removal until 14, 21, 28, or 35 DAS in 2014 and until 14, 21, 35, or 42 DAS in 2015; after this, Palmer amaranth was allowed to establish and compete with the cucumber for the remainder of the season. The beginning and end of the CPPAC, based on 5% loss of marketable yield, was determined by fitting log-logistic and Gompertz equations to the relative yield data representing REM and EST, respectively. Season-long competition by Palmer amaranth reduced pickling cucumber yield by 45% to 98% and 88% to 98% during 2014 and 2015, respectively. When cucumber was planted on April 25, 2015, the CPPAC ranged from 570 to 1,002 heat units (HU), which corresponded to 32 to 49 DAS. However, when cucumber planting was delayed 2 to 4 wk (May 7 and May 21, 2014 and May 4, 2015), the CPPAC lasted from 100 to 918 HU (7 to 44 DAS). This research suggested that planting pickling cucumber as early as possible during the season may help to reduce competition by Palmer amaranth and delay the beginning of the CPPAC. Nomenclature: Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats. AMAPA; cucumber, Cucumis sativus L.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Amaranth</subject><subject>Amaranthus palmeri</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Establishment</subject><subject>heat units</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Horticulture</subject><subject>Pickling</subject><subject>Planting</subject><subject>removal</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Soil sciences</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><subject>weed competition</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFZPnoUFLxZpndnNfuRYgl8g2IMFb8sm3ejWNFs3CeJ_b2rUo6cZeD_ezHuEnCLMEFBdfbh2xgD1TOg9MkIhYMpUAvtkBDqFKXD1fEiOmmYNgJIxGJFlFn3rC1vRhYs-rGgZIl3YauMinW9stHX7Si9-t66h22_NT2gW6jaGivqaLnzxVvn6hWZd0W1yF4_JQWmrxp38zDFZ3lw_ZXfTh8fb-2z-MM05qrb_TaVWryza1KWJ5EynRakkL3SSYykTCc4iWpBKq1KxFZaao06tEInWCRR8TM4H320M751rWrMOXaz7k4YhR4Es5dBTlwNVxNA00ZVmG32f6NMgmF1vpu_N7HozQvf02UCvmzbEP5RJIZVkqtcng577EGr3r9cXwjB2FQ</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>McGowen, Samuel J</creator><creator>Jennings, Katherine M</creator><creator>Chaudhari, Sushila</creator><creator>Monks, David W</creator><creator>Schultheis, Jonathan R</creator><creator>Reberg-Horton, Chris</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>Critical Period for Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control in Pickling Cucumber</title><author>McGowen, Samuel J ; Jennings, Katherine M ; Chaudhari, Sushila ; Monks, David W ; Schultheis, Jonathan R ; Reberg-Horton, Chris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b317t-2779a8da1a9e9463289cf763c84b1f6460ea11a06787f72d1f83189a5548840c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Amaranth</topic><topic>Amaranthus palmeri</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Establishment</topic><topic>heat units</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Horticulture</topic><topic>Pickling</topic><topic>Planting</topic><topic>removal</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Soil sciences</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><topic>weed competition</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McGowen, Samuel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jennings, Katherine M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaudhari, Sushila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monks, David W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultheis, Jonathan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reberg-Horton, Chris</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McGowen, Samuel J</au><au>Jennings, Katherine M</au><au>Chaudhari, Sushila</au><au>Monks, David W</au><au>Schultheis, Jonathan R</au><au>Reberg-Horton, Chris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Critical Period for Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control in Pickling Cucumber</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><stitle>Weed Technol</stitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>586</spage><epage>591</epage><pages>586-591</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><abstract>Field studies were conducted in North Carolina to determine the critical period for Palmer amaranth control (CPPAC) in pickling cucumber. In removal treatments (REM), emerged Palmer amaranth were allowed to compete with cucumber for 14, 21, 28, or 35 d after sowing (DAS) in 2014 and 14, 21, 35, or 42 DAS in 2015, and cucumber was kept weed-free for the remainder of the season. In the establishment treatments (EST), cucumber was maintained free of Palmer amaranth by hand removal until 14, 21, 28, or 35 DAS in 2014 and until 14, 21, 35, or 42 DAS in 2015; after this, Palmer amaranth was allowed to establish and compete with the cucumber for the remainder of the season. The beginning and end of the CPPAC, based on 5% loss of marketable yield, was determined by fitting log-logistic and Gompertz equations to the relative yield data representing REM and EST, respectively. Season-long competition by Palmer amaranth reduced pickling cucumber yield by 45% to 98% and 88% to 98% during 2014 and 2015, respectively. When cucumber was planted on April 25, 2015, the CPPAC ranged from 570 to 1,002 heat units (HU), which corresponded to 32 to 49 DAS. However, when cucumber planting was delayed 2 to 4 wk (May 7 and May 21, 2014 and May 4, 2015), the CPPAC lasted from 100 to 918 HU (7 to 44 DAS). This research suggested that planting pickling cucumber as early as possible during the season may help to reduce competition by Palmer amaranth and delay the beginning of the CPPAC. Nomenclature: Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats. AMAPA; cucumber, Cucumis sativus L.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/wet.2018.58</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-037X
ispartof Weed technology, 2018-10, Vol.32 (5), p.586-591
issn 0890-037X
1550-2740
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2131512930
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Cambridge Journals
subjects Agricultural production
Agriculture
Amaranth
Amaranthus palmeri
Competition
Crop yield
Establishment
heat units
Herbicides
Horticulture
Pickling
Planting
removal
Seasons
Soil sciences
Vegetables
weed competition
Weeds
title Critical Period for Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control in Pickling Cucumber
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T07%3A02%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Critical%20Period%20for%20Palmer%20Amaranth%20(Amaranthus%20palmeri)%20Control%20in%20Pickling%20Cucumber&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=McGowen,%20Samuel%20J&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=586&rft.epage=591&rft.pages=586-591&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/wet.2018.58&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26567627%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2131512930&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26567627&rfr_iscdi=true