The impact of rainfall distribution patterns on hydrological and hydraulic response in arid regions: case study Medina, Saudi Arabia
Rainfall distribution patterns (RDPs) are crucial for hydrologic design. Hydrologic modeling is based on Soil Conservation Services (SCS) type RDPs (SCS type I, IA, II, and III). SCS type II method is widely used by hydrologists in arid regions. These RDPs were designed for the USA and similar tempe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Arabian journal of geosciences 2018-11, Vol.11 (21), p.1-18, Article 679 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 18 |
---|---|
container_issue | 21 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Arabian journal of geosciences |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Abdulrazzak, Mohamed Elfeki, Amro Kamis, Ahmed Samy Kassab, Mostafa Alamri, Nassir Noor, Kashif Chaabani, Anis |
description | Rainfall distribution patterns (RDPs) are crucial for hydrologic design. Hydrologic modeling is based on
Soil Conservation Services
(SCS) type RDPs (SCS type I, IA, II, and III). SCS type II method is widely used by hydrologists in arid regions. These RDPs were designed for the USA and similar temperate regions. There is no scientific justification for using SCS type II method in arid regions. The consequences of using SCS type II have impacts on the hydrologic and hydraulic modeling studies. The current paper investigates the validity of the SCS type II and in arid regions. New temporal RDPs were applied and compared with SCS type II RDPs. The produced peak discharges, volumes, maximum inundation depths, top widths, and velocities from both approaches were analyzed. An application is made on the protection channel in Taibah and Islamic Universities campuses in Medina, Saudi Arabia. A methodology was followed which included frequency analysis, catchment modeling, hydrological modeling, and hydraulic modeling. Results indicated that there are considerable consequences on infrastructural design, and hydrologic and hydraulic parameters if inappropriate RDPs are used. The investigation confirmed that the SCS type RDPs do not reflect the actual flood features in arid regions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12517-018-4043-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2131273545</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2131273545</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-6aa6e8b5c69b450f143160257032c151baef5d83af39b18c46b27902934f62ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDtPxDAQhCMEEsfjB9BZoiXgtWMnoTshXtIhCqC2No59GOWcYCfFXc0Px3AIKqodjeablSbLToCeA6XlRQQmoMwpVHlBC55vdrIZVFLmpeDV7q8G2M8OYnyjVFa0rGbZx_OrIW41oB5Jb0lA5y12HWldHINrptH1ngw4jib4SJJ-Xbeh7_ql09gR9O23gVPnNAkmDr2Pqc8TDK5NxjLh8ZJoTG4cp3ZNHkzrPJ6RJ5xaR-YBG4dH2V56Gs3xzz3MXm6un6_u8sXj7f3VfJFrLuoxl4jSVI3Qsm4KQS0UHCRloqScaRDQoLGirThaXjdQ6UI2rKwpq3lhJbOWH2an294h9O-TiaN666fg00vFgAMruShESsE2pUMfYzBWDcGtMKwVUPU1ttqOrdLY6mtstUkM2zIxZf3ShL_m_6FPZcSD0Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2131273545</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of rainfall distribution patterns on hydrological and hydraulic response in arid regions: case study Medina, Saudi Arabia</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Abdulrazzak, Mohamed ; Elfeki, Amro ; Kamis, Ahmed Samy ; Kassab, Mostafa ; Alamri, Nassir ; Noor, Kashif ; Chaabani, Anis</creator><creatorcontrib>Abdulrazzak, Mohamed ; Elfeki, Amro ; Kamis, Ahmed Samy ; Kassab, Mostafa ; Alamri, Nassir ; Noor, Kashif ; Chaabani, Anis</creatorcontrib><description>Rainfall distribution patterns (RDPs) are crucial for hydrologic design. Hydrologic modeling is based on
Soil Conservation Services
(SCS) type RDPs (SCS type I, IA, II, and III). SCS type II method is widely used by hydrologists in arid regions. These RDPs were designed for the USA and similar temperate regions. There is no scientific justification for using SCS type II method in arid regions. The consequences of using SCS type II have impacts on the hydrologic and hydraulic modeling studies. The current paper investigates the validity of the SCS type II and in arid regions. New temporal RDPs were applied and compared with SCS type II RDPs. The produced peak discharges, volumes, maximum inundation depths, top widths, and velocities from both approaches were analyzed. An application is made on the protection channel in Taibah and Islamic Universities campuses in Medina, Saudi Arabia. A methodology was followed which included frequency analysis, catchment modeling, hydrological modeling, and hydraulic modeling. Results indicated that there are considerable consequences on infrastructural design, and hydrologic and hydraulic parameters if inappropriate RDPs are used. The investigation confirmed that the SCS type RDPs do not reflect the actual flood features in arid regions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1866-7511</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1866-7538</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12517-018-4043-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Arid regions ; Arid zones ; Case studies ; Catchment area ; Catchment models ; Colleges & universities ; Distribution ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth science ; Earth Sciences ; Educational institutions ; Flooding ; Frequency analysis ; Hydraulics ; Hydrologic models ; Hydrology ; Methods ; Modelling ; Original Paper ; Rain ; Rainfall ; Rainfall distribution ; Soil ; Soil conservation</subject><ispartof>Arabian journal of geosciences, 2018-11, Vol.11 (21), p.1-18, Article 679</ispartof><rights>Saudi Society for Geosciences 2018</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-6aa6e8b5c69b450f143160257032c151baef5d83af39b18c46b27902934f62ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-6aa6e8b5c69b450f143160257032c151baef5d83af39b18c46b27902934f62ff3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3940-6254</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12517-018-4043-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12517-018-4043-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abdulrazzak, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elfeki, Amro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamis, Ahmed Samy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kassab, Mostafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alamri, Nassir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noor, Kashif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaabani, Anis</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of rainfall distribution patterns on hydrological and hydraulic response in arid regions: case study Medina, Saudi Arabia</title><title>Arabian journal of geosciences</title><addtitle>Arab J Geosci</addtitle><description>Rainfall distribution patterns (RDPs) are crucial for hydrologic design. Hydrologic modeling is based on
Soil Conservation Services
(SCS) type RDPs (SCS type I, IA, II, and III). SCS type II method is widely used by hydrologists in arid regions. These RDPs were designed for the USA and similar temperate regions. There is no scientific justification for using SCS type II method in arid regions. The consequences of using SCS type II have impacts on the hydrologic and hydraulic modeling studies. The current paper investigates the validity of the SCS type II and in arid regions. New temporal RDPs were applied and compared with SCS type II RDPs. The produced peak discharges, volumes, maximum inundation depths, top widths, and velocities from both approaches were analyzed. An application is made on the protection channel in Taibah and Islamic Universities campuses in Medina, Saudi Arabia. A methodology was followed which included frequency analysis, catchment modeling, hydrological modeling, and hydraulic modeling. Results indicated that there are considerable consequences on infrastructural design, and hydrologic and hydraulic parameters if inappropriate RDPs are used. The investigation confirmed that the SCS type RDPs do not reflect the actual flood features in arid regions.</description><subject>Arid regions</subject><subject>Arid zones</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Catchment area</subject><subject>Catchment models</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Educational institutions</subject><subject>Flooding</subject><subject>Frequency analysis</subject><subject>Hydraulics</subject><subject>Hydrologic models</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Rainfall distribution</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil conservation</subject><issn>1866-7511</issn><issn>1866-7538</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kDtPxDAQhCMEEsfjB9BZoiXgtWMnoTshXtIhCqC2No59GOWcYCfFXc0Px3AIKqodjeablSbLToCeA6XlRQQmoMwpVHlBC55vdrIZVFLmpeDV7q8G2M8OYnyjVFa0rGbZx_OrIW41oB5Jb0lA5y12HWldHINrptH1ngw4jib4SJJ-Xbeh7_ql09gR9O23gVPnNAkmDr2Pqc8TDK5NxjLh8ZJoTG4cp3ZNHkzrPJ6RJ5xaR-YBG4dH2V56Gs3xzz3MXm6un6_u8sXj7f3VfJFrLuoxl4jSVI3Qsm4KQS0UHCRloqScaRDQoLGirThaXjdQ6UI2rKwpq3lhJbOWH2an294h9O-TiaN666fg00vFgAMruShESsE2pUMfYzBWDcGtMKwVUPU1ttqOrdLY6mtstUkM2zIxZf3ShL_m_6FPZcSD0Q</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Abdulrazzak, Mohamed</creator><creator>Elfeki, Amro</creator><creator>Kamis, Ahmed Samy</creator><creator>Kassab, Mostafa</creator><creator>Alamri, Nassir</creator><creator>Noor, Kashif</creator><creator>Chaabani, Anis</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3940-6254</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>The impact of rainfall distribution patterns on hydrological and hydraulic response in arid regions: case study Medina, Saudi Arabia</title><author>Abdulrazzak, Mohamed ; Elfeki, Amro ; Kamis, Ahmed Samy ; Kassab, Mostafa ; Alamri, Nassir ; Noor, Kashif ; Chaabani, Anis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-6aa6e8b5c69b450f143160257032c151baef5d83af39b18c46b27902934f62ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Arid regions</topic><topic>Arid zones</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Catchment area</topic><topic>Catchment models</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Educational institutions</topic><topic>Flooding</topic><topic>Frequency analysis</topic><topic>Hydraulics</topic><topic>Hydrologic models</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Rainfall distribution</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abdulrazzak, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elfeki, Amro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamis, Ahmed Samy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kassab, Mostafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alamri, Nassir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noor, Kashif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaabani, Anis</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Arabian journal of geosciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abdulrazzak, Mohamed</au><au>Elfeki, Amro</au><au>Kamis, Ahmed Samy</au><au>Kassab, Mostafa</au><au>Alamri, Nassir</au><au>Noor, Kashif</au><au>Chaabani, Anis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of rainfall distribution patterns on hydrological and hydraulic response in arid regions: case study Medina, Saudi Arabia</atitle><jtitle>Arabian journal of geosciences</jtitle><stitle>Arab J Geosci</stitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>1-18</pages><artnum>679</artnum><issn>1866-7511</issn><eissn>1866-7538</eissn><abstract>Rainfall distribution patterns (RDPs) are crucial for hydrologic design. Hydrologic modeling is based on
Soil Conservation Services
(SCS) type RDPs (SCS type I, IA, II, and III). SCS type II method is widely used by hydrologists in arid regions. These RDPs were designed for the USA and similar temperate regions. There is no scientific justification for using SCS type II method in arid regions. The consequences of using SCS type II have impacts on the hydrologic and hydraulic modeling studies. The current paper investigates the validity of the SCS type II and in arid regions. New temporal RDPs were applied and compared with SCS type II RDPs. The produced peak discharges, volumes, maximum inundation depths, top widths, and velocities from both approaches were analyzed. An application is made on the protection channel in Taibah and Islamic Universities campuses in Medina, Saudi Arabia. A methodology was followed which included frequency analysis, catchment modeling, hydrological modeling, and hydraulic modeling. Results indicated that there are considerable consequences on infrastructural design, and hydrologic and hydraulic parameters if inappropriate RDPs are used. The investigation confirmed that the SCS type RDPs do not reflect the actual flood features in arid regions.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s12517-018-4043-z</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3940-6254</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1866-7511 |
ispartof | Arabian journal of geosciences, 2018-11, Vol.11 (21), p.1-18, Article 679 |
issn | 1866-7511 1866-7538 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2131273545 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Arid regions Arid zones Case studies Catchment area Catchment models Colleges & universities Distribution Earth and Environmental Science Earth science Earth Sciences Educational institutions Flooding Frequency analysis Hydraulics Hydrologic models Hydrology Methods Modelling Original Paper Rain Rainfall Rainfall distribution Soil Soil conservation |
title | The impact of rainfall distribution patterns on hydrological and hydraulic response in arid regions: case study Medina, Saudi Arabia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T08%3A59%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20rainfall%20distribution%20patterns%20on%20hydrological%20and%20hydraulic%20response%20in%20arid%20regions:%20case%20study%20Medina,%20Saudi%20Arabia&rft.jtitle=Arabian%20journal%20of%20geosciences&rft.au=Abdulrazzak,%20Mohamed&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=1-18&rft.artnum=679&rft.issn=1866-7511&rft.eissn=1866-7538&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12517-018-4043-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2131273545%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2131273545&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |