Competition–cooperation interplay during multifirm technology coordination: The effect of firm heterogeneity on conflict and consensus in a technology standards organization

Research Summary: We examine how competitive tensions and cooperative motivations together shape firms’ interactions and group‐level outcomes during technology coordination activities in multifirm settings. Analyzing the communication and voting behavior of 115 firms across three subcommittees of a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Strategic management journal 2018-12, Vol.39 (12), p.3193-3221
Hauptverfasser: Ranganathan, Ram, Ghosh, Anindya, Rosenkopf, Lori
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3221
container_issue 12
container_start_page 3193
container_title Strategic management journal
container_volume 39
creator Ranganathan, Ram
Ghosh, Anindya
Rosenkopf, Lori
description Research Summary: We examine how competitive tensions and cooperative motivations together shape firms’ interactions and group‐level outcomes during technology coordination activities in multifirm settings. Analyzing the communication and voting behavior of 115 firms across three subcommittees of a computing industry technology standards‐setting organization over 14 years, we find that existing product‐market positions influence how firms with highly overlapped technological resources differ in their interactions: when their product‐markets are more competitive, they exhibit greater support for the emerging standard, as evidenced by positivity and certainty of interaction tone; but when they possess a broader array of complementary products, support is tempered. At the subcommittee level, after accounting for aggregate competitive tensions in prior interactions, heterogeneity in both firms’ relational influence as well as their prior multiparty experience improve consensus. Managerial Summary: In innovation ecosystems, competing firms are often obligated to collaborate with each other in large multifirm forums to develop the technical standards that enable interoperability between their products. We show how the networks of technical and commercial relationships between firms shape such standards activities in two steps. First, firms who share many common technology interests with others communicate their support for new standards more vigorously when they participate in more competitive product‐markets, but less vigorously when they possess more complementary products. Second, communities find broader support for standards when there is greater imbalance across both firms’ prior collaborative experiences as well as their pattern of relationships. We demonstrate these results in a study of 115 firms participating in computer peripherals standards development over 14 years.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/smj.2786
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2130798089</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26806444</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26806444</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4386-56b0d9c00773c2fc9367076ba83bf01ef2969c082d9af040ee76c2fc5168f6bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKxDAUBuAgCo6j4AsIBTduOp6kbS5LGbwy4kJdh17SMaVtatIi3fkOvqFPYmpF3LhKQr7zH_gROsawwgDk3DXVijBOd9ACg2AhEEp30QJwHIUERLKPDpyrAPxViAXarE3TqV732rSf7x-5MZ2y6fQKdNsr29XpGBSD1e02aIa616W2TdCr_KU1tdmOgZ-whW6_Rw7RXpnWTh39nEv0fHX5tL4JNw_Xt-uLTZjHEadhQjMoRA7AWJSTMhcRZcBolvIoKwGrkgjqvzkpRFpCDEoxOrkEU17SrIiW6HTO7ax5HZTrZWUG2_qVkuAImODAhVdns8qtcc6qUnZWN6kdJQY5dSV9V3LqytNgpio3rXZ_YCwSwIyDJ-FM3nStxn-j5OP93U_kyewr1xv76wnlQOM4jr4A-c-A4g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2130798089</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Competition–cooperation interplay during multifirm technology coordination: The effect of firm heterogeneity on conflict and consensus in a technology standards organization</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ranganathan, Ram ; Ghosh, Anindya ; Rosenkopf, Lori</creator><creatorcontrib>Ranganathan, Ram ; Ghosh, Anindya ; Rosenkopf, Lori</creatorcontrib><description>Research Summary: We examine how competitive tensions and cooperative motivations together shape firms’ interactions and group‐level outcomes during technology coordination activities in multifirm settings. Analyzing the communication and voting behavior of 115 firms across three subcommittees of a computing industry technology standards‐setting organization over 14 years, we find that existing product‐market positions influence how firms with highly overlapped technological resources differ in their interactions: when their product‐markets are more competitive, they exhibit greater support for the emerging standard, as evidenced by positivity and certainty of interaction tone; but when they possess a broader array of complementary products, support is tempered. At the subcommittee level, after accounting for aggregate competitive tensions in prior interactions, heterogeneity in both firms’ relational influence as well as their prior multiparty experience improve consensus. Managerial Summary: In innovation ecosystems, competing firms are often obligated to collaborate with each other in large multifirm forums to develop the technical standards that enable interoperability between their products. We show how the networks of technical and commercial relationships between firms shape such standards activities in two steps. First, firms who share many common technology interests with others communicate their support for new standards more vigorously when they participate in more competitive product‐markets, but less vigorously when they possess more complementary products. Second, communities find broader support for standards when there is greater imbalance across both firms’ prior collaborative experiences as well as their pattern of relationships. We demonstrate these results in a study of 115 firms participating in computer peripherals standards development over 14 years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-2095</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0266</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/smj.2786</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: Wiley</publisher><subject>alliances ; Collaboration ; Communication ; Companies ; Competition ; Cooperation ; Coordination ; ecosystems ; Imbalance ; innovation ; Innovations ; Markets ; networks ; Positive emotions ; SPECIAL ISSUE ARTICLE ; technological change ; Technology ; Voter behavior ; Voting</subject><ispartof>Strategic management journal, 2018-12, Vol.39 (12), p.3193-3221</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4386-56b0d9c00773c2fc9367076ba83bf01ef2969c082d9af040ee76c2fc5168f6bd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4386-56b0d9c00773c2fc9367076ba83bf01ef2969c082d9af040ee76c2fc5168f6bd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8302-3798</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26806444$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26806444$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ranganathan, Ram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghosh, Anindya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenkopf, Lori</creatorcontrib><title>Competition–cooperation interplay during multifirm technology coordination: The effect of firm heterogeneity on conflict and consensus in a technology standards organization</title><title>Strategic management journal</title><description>Research Summary: We examine how competitive tensions and cooperative motivations together shape firms’ interactions and group‐level outcomes during technology coordination activities in multifirm settings. Analyzing the communication and voting behavior of 115 firms across three subcommittees of a computing industry technology standards‐setting organization over 14 years, we find that existing product‐market positions influence how firms with highly overlapped technological resources differ in their interactions: when their product‐markets are more competitive, they exhibit greater support for the emerging standard, as evidenced by positivity and certainty of interaction tone; but when they possess a broader array of complementary products, support is tempered. At the subcommittee level, after accounting for aggregate competitive tensions in prior interactions, heterogeneity in both firms’ relational influence as well as their prior multiparty experience improve consensus. Managerial Summary: In innovation ecosystems, competing firms are often obligated to collaborate with each other in large multifirm forums to develop the technical standards that enable interoperability between their products. We show how the networks of technical and commercial relationships between firms shape such standards activities in two steps. First, firms who share many common technology interests with others communicate their support for new standards more vigorously when they participate in more competitive product‐markets, but less vigorously when they possess more complementary products. Second, communities find broader support for standards when there is greater imbalance across both firms’ prior collaborative experiences as well as their pattern of relationships. We demonstrate these results in a study of 115 firms participating in computer peripherals standards development over 14 years.</description><subject>alliances</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>ecosystems</subject><subject>Imbalance</subject><subject>innovation</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>networks</subject><subject>Positive emotions</subject><subject>SPECIAL ISSUE ARTICLE</subject><subject>technological change</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Voter behavior</subject><subject>Voting</subject><issn>0143-2095</issn><issn>1097-0266</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10MtKxDAUBuAgCo6j4AsIBTduOp6kbS5LGbwy4kJdh17SMaVtatIi3fkOvqFPYmpF3LhKQr7zH_gROsawwgDk3DXVijBOd9ACg2AhEEp30QJwHIUERLKPDpyrAPxViAXarE3TqV732rSf7x-5MZ2y6fQKdNsr29XpGBSD1e02aIa616W2TdCr_KU1tdmOgZ-whW6_Rw7RXpnWTh39nEv0fHX5tL4JNw_Xt-uLTZjHEadhQjMoRA7AWJSTMhcRZcBolvIoKwGrkgjqvzkpRFpCDEoxOrkEU17SrIiW6HTO7ax5HZTrZWUG2_qVkuAImODAhVdns8qtcc6qUnZWN6kdJQY5dSV9V3LqytNgpio3rXZ_YCwSwIyDJ-FM3nStxn-j5OP93U_kyewr1xv76wnlQOM4jr4A-c-A4g</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Ranganathan, Ram</creator><creator>Ghosh, Anindya</creator><creator>Rosenkopf, Lori</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8302-3798</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>Competition–cooperation interplay during multifirm technology coordination</title><author>Ranganathan, Ram ; Ghosh, Anindya ; Rosenkopf, Lori</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4386-56b0d9c00773c2fc9367076ba83bf01ef2969c082d9af040ee76c2fc5168f6bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>alliances</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>ecosystems</topic><topic>Imbalance</topic><topic>innovation</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>networks</topic><topic>Positive emotions</topic><topic>SPECIAL ISSUE ARTICLE</topic><topic>technological change</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Voter behavior</topic><topic>Voting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ranganathan, Ram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghosh, Anindya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenkopf, Lori</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Strategic management journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ranganathan, Ram</au><au>Ghosh, Anindya</au><au>Rosenkopf, Lori</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Competition–cooperation interplay during multifirm technology coordination: The effect of firm heterogeneity on conflict and consensus in a technology standards organization</atitle><jtitle>Strategic management journal</jtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3193</spage><epage>3221</epage><pages>3193-3221</pages><issn>0143-2095</issn><eissn>1097-0266</eissn><abstract>Research Summary: We examine how competitive tensions and cooperative motivations together shape firms’ interactions and group‐level outcomes during technology coordination activities in multifirm settings. Analyzing the communication and voting behavior of 115 firms across three subcommittees of a computing industry technology standards‐setting organization over 14 years, we find that existing product‐market positions influence how firms with highly overlapped technological resources differ in their interactions: when their product‐markets are more competitive, they exhibit greater support for the emerging standard, as evidenced by positivity and certainty of interaction tone; but when they possess a broader array of complementary products, support is tempered. At the subcommittee level, after accounting for aggregate competitive tensions in prior interactions, heterogeneity in both firms’ relational influence as well as their prior multiparty experience improve consensus. Managerial Summary: In innovation ecosystems, competing firms are often obligated to collaborate with each other in large multifirm forums to develop the technical standards that enable interoperability between their products. We show how the networks of technical and commercial relationships between firms shape such standards activities in two steps. First, firms who share many common technology interests with others communicate their support for new standards more vigorously when they participate in more competitive product‐markets, but less vigorously when they possess more complementary products. Second, communities find broader support for standards when there is greater imbalance across both firms’ prior collaborative experiences as well as their pattern of relationships. We demonstrate these results in a study of 115 firms participating in computer peripherals standards development over 14 years.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/smj.2786</doi><tpages>29</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8302-3798</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0143-2095
ispartof Strategic management journal, 2018-12, Vol.39 (12), p.3193-3221
issn 0143-2095
1097-0266
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2130798089
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects alliances
Collaboration
Communication
Companies
Competition
Cooperation
Coordination
ecosystems
Imbalance
innovation
Innovations
Markets
networks
Positive emotions
SPECIAL ISSUE ARTICLE
technological change
Technology
Voter behavior
Voting
title Competition–cooperation interplay during multifirm technology coordination: The effect of firm heterogeneity on conflict and consensus in a technology standards organization
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T09%3A47%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Competition%E2%80%93cooperation%20interplay%20during%20multifirm%20technology%20coordination:%20The%20effect%20of%20firm%20heterogeneity%20on%20conflict%20and%20consensus%20in%20a%20technology%20standards%20organization&rft.jtitle=Strategic%20management%20journal&rft.au=Ranganathan,%20Ram&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3193&rft.epage=3221&rft.pages=3193-3221&rft.issn=0143-2095&rft.eissn=1097-0266&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/smj.2786&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26806444%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2130798089&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26806444&rfr_iscdi=true