A market test of investor reaction to disagreements

The SEC currently requires that firms disclose recent disagreements with their auditors over accounting or auditing matters when a change in auditor is reported. The effectiveness and usefulness of requirements to disclose disagreements have been questioned, and previous empirical research on the is...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of accounting & economics 1982-10, Vol.4 (2), p.109-120
Hauptverfasser: Smith, David B., Nichols, Donald R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 120
container_issue 2
container_start_page 109
container_title Journal of accounting & economics
container_volume 4
creator Smith, David B.
Nichols, Donald R.
description The SEC currently requires that firms disclose recent disagreements with their auditors over accounting or auditing matters when a change in auditor is reported. The effectiveness and usefulness of requirements to disclose disagreements have been questioned, and previous empirical research on the issue has been inconclusive. This study investigates the information content of disclosure of the auditor-firm disagreements. The analysis indicates a significant negative market reaction in the week that the Form 8-K is filed with the SEC. This finding is consistent with the position that the disclosure provides information useful to investors.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0165-4101(82)90016-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_213078612</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0165410182900167</els_id><sourcerecordid>1151711</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-7a73004bdb49b431af33dd2b6cbe9cbe3c112f22efa9083830f0a908cf9af9cd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIfcIjgAoeAH2kSX5CqikelSlzgbDnOGlxoXGy3Uv-eDUG9wWE0u9bs7HoIOWf0hlFW3iImeYHlVc2vJcU2rw7IiNWVzJms6SEZ7SXH5CTGJaW04DUdETHNVjp8QMoSxJR5m7lui5UPWQBtkvNdlnzWuqjfAsAKuhRPyZHVnxHOfnlMXh_uX2ZP-eL5cT6bLnJTTMqUV7oSuKZpm0I2hWDaCtG2vClNAxIhDGPccg5WS1qLWlBL-8pYqa00rRiTi8F3HfzXBo9SS78JHa5UnAla1SXjKLr8S8QEQ10x4RWqikFlgo8xgFXr4PDjO8Wo6jNUfUCqD0jVXP1kqPqx-TAWYA1mPwMASw3Gd2qrhC4QOwQmzZEcoud1_0SlYpyq97RCr7vBCzCyrYOgonHQGWhdAJNU693_x3wDggePcA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1312134527</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A market test of investor reaction to disagreements</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Smith, David B. ; Nichols, Donald R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, David B. ; Nichols, Donald R.</creatorcontrib><description>The SEC currently requires that firms disclose recent disagreements with their auditors over accounting or auditing matters when a change in auditor is reported. The effectiveness and usefulness of requirements to disclose disagreements have been questioned, and previous empirical research on the issue has been inconclusive. This study investigates the information content of disclosure of the auditor-firm disagreements. The analysis indicates a significant negative market reaction in the week that the Form 8-K is filed with the SEC. This finding is consistent with the position that the disclosure provides information useful to investors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-4101</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1980</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0165-4101(82)90016-7</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAECDS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Auditors ; Changes ; Conflict ; Disclosure ; Form 8-K ; Information ; SEC filing requirements ; Statistical analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of accounting &amp; economics, 1982-10, Vol.4 (2), p.109-120</ispartof><rights>1982</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Oct 1982</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-7a73004bdb49b431af33dd2b6cbe9cbe3c112f22efa9083830f0a908cf9af9cd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-7a73004bdb49b431af33dd2b6cbe9cbe3c112f22efa9083830f0a908cf9af9cd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(82)90016-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,4007,27868,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeejaecon/v_3a4_3ay_3a1982_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a109-120.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, David B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, Donald R.</creatorcontrib><title>A market test of investor reaction to disagreements</title><title>Journal of accounting &amp; economics</title><description>The SEC currently requires that firms disclose recent disagreements with their auditors over accounting or auditing matters when a change in auditor is reported. The effectiveness and usefulness of requirements to disclose disagreements have been questioned, and previous empirical research on the issue has been inconclusive. This study investigates the information content of disclosure of the auditor-firm disagreements. The analysis indicates a significant negative market reaction in the week that the Form 8-K is filed with the SEC. This finding is consistent with the position that the disclosure provides information useful to investors.</description><subject>Auditors</subject><subject>Changes</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Disclosure</subject><subject>Form 8-K</subject><subject>Information</subject><subject>SEC filing requirements</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><issn>0165-4101</issn><issn>1879-1980</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1982</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIfcIjgAoeAH2kSX5CqikelSlzgbDnOGlxoXGy3Uv-eDUG9wWE0u9bs7HoIOWf0hlFW3iImeYHlVc2vJcU2rw7IiNWVzJms6SEZ7SXH5CTGJaW04DUdETHNVjp8QMoSxJR5m7lui5UPWQBtkvNdlnzWuqjfAsAKuhRPyZHVnxHOfnlMXh_uX2ZP-eL5cT6bLnJTTMqUV7oSuKZpm0I2hWDaCtG2vClNAxIhDGPccg5WS1qLWlBL-8pYqa00rRiTi8F3HfzXBo9SS78JHa5UnAla1SXjKLr8S8QEQ10x4RWqikFlgo8xgFXr4PDjO8Wo6jNUfUCqD0jVXP1kqPqx-TAWYA1mPwMASw3Gd2qrhC4QOwQmzZEcoud1_0SlYpyq97RCr7vBCzCyrYOgonHQGWhdAJNU693_x3wDggePcA</recordid><startdate>19821001</startdate><enddate>19821001</enddate><creator>Smith, David B.</creator><creator>Nichols, Donald R.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>North-Holland</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JRZRW</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19821001</creationdate><title>A market test of investor reaction to disagreements</title><author>Smith, David B. ; Nichols, Donald R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-7a73004bdb49b431af33dd2b6cbe9cbe3c112f22efa9083830f0a908cf9af9cd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1982</creationdate><topic>Auditors</topic><topic>Changes</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Disclosure</topic><topic>Form 8-K</topic><topic>Information</topic><topic>SEC filing requirements</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, David B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, Donald R.</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 35</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of accounting &amp; economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, David B.</au><au>Nichols, Donald R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A market test of investor reaction to disagreements</atitle><jtitle>Journal of accounting &amp; economics</jtitle><date>1982-10-01</date><risdate>1982</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>109</spage><epage>120</epage><pages>109-120</pages><issn>0165-4101</issn><eissn>1879-1980</eissn><coden>JAECDS</coden><abstract>The SEC currently requires that firms disclose recent disagreements with their auditors over accounting or auditing matters when a change in auditor is reported. The effectiveness and usefulness of requirements to disclose disagreements have been questioned, and previous empirical research on the issue has been inconclusive. This study investigates the information content of disclosure of the auditor-firm disagreements. The analysis indicates a significant negative market reaction in the week that the Form 8-K is filed with the SEC. This finding is consistent with the position that the disclosure provides information useful to investors.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/0165-4101(82)90016-7</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-4101
ispartof Journal of accounting & economics, 1982-10, Vol.4 (2), p.109-120
issn 0165-4101
1879-1980
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_213078612
source RePEc; Periodicals Index Online; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Auditors
Changes
Conflict
Disclosure
Form 8-K
Information
SEC filing requirements
Statistical analysis
title A market test of investor reaction to disagreements
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T13%3A57%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20market%20test%20of%20investor%20reaction%20to%20disagreements&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20accounting%20&%20economics&rft.au=Smith,%20David%20B.&rft.date=1982-10-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=109&rft.epage=120&rft.pages=109-120&rft.issn=0165-4101&rft.eissn=1879-1980&rft.coden=JAECDS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0165-4101(82)90016-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1151711%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1312134527&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0165410182900167&rfr_iscdi=true