Home Range and Habitat Use of Female White-Tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in the Northern Lower Peninsula of Michigan

Because knowledge of home range dynamics and habitat selection is lacking for whitetailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in the northern lower peninsula of Michigan, we radiomarked 89 female deer and studied these aspects of their biology during 2005–2008. Mean (± SE) size of annual home ranges and c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:MAMMAL STUDY 2018-09, Vol.43 (3), p.179-185
Hauptverfasser: Clayton K. Nielsen, Janice K. Stroud-Settles
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 185
container_issue 3
container_start_page 179
container_title MAMMAL STUDY
container_volume 43
creator Clayton K. Nielsen
Janice K. Stroud-Settles
description Because knowledge of home range dynamics and habitat selection is lacking for whitetailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in the northern lower peninsula of Michigan, we radiomarked 89 female deer and studied these aspects of their biology during 2005–2008. Mean (± SE) size of annual home ranges and core areas (n = 89) were 2.3 ± 0.1 km2 and 0.5 ± 0.2 km2, respectively, and somewhat smaller than in other northern deer populations. Mean home-range and core-area sizes for the springsummer period (n = 87) were 1.9 ± 0.1 km2 and 0.4 ± 0.1 km2, respectively. Mean home-range and core-area sizes for the fall-winter period (n = 29) were 2.1 ± 0.2 km2 and 0.5 ± 0.1 km2, respectively. Neither home-range nor core-area sizes differed seasonally (P > 0.135), and seasonal home ranges were comparable in size to other northern deer populations. Cover-type use did not differ seasonally between home ranges and core areas (P = 0.752). Most deer resided in the same general area year-round and had overlapping seasonal home ranges and core areas. We conclude that stability observed in seasonal home ranges and habitat selection were influenced by relatively warm winter conditions during our study.
doi_str_mv 10.3106/ms2017-0085
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2129993167</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2129993167</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b484t-1f2388c56e5778c74a34ce05b9589365809d2ae31ea3cc988beefc7cbb8de6ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtL7TAURotcwefIPxBwoCLVpGnaZCjnqkc4PhDFYUjT3XMibeJNWh_4502t4OxOupuwsr7NlyR7BJ9QgovTLmSYlCnGnK0lm4TmPC1Igf98_9M0JyzbSLZCeMaYUlaSzeRz7jpA98ouASlbo7mqTK969BgAuQZdQKdaQE8r00P6oEwLNfoL4NHhbe20i-choFfjl8YaZYdwhIxF_QrQjfNxeIsW7i3id2CNDUOrRum10SuzVHYnWW9UG2D3Z24njxfnD7N5uri9vJqdLdIq53mfkiajnGtWACtLrstc0VwDZpVgXNCCcSzqTAEloKjWgvMKoNGlripeQxEvt5P9yfvi3b8BQi-f3eBtjJQZyYQQlBRlpI4nSnsXgodGvnjTKf8hCZZju3JqV47tRvrgx2nA_5KxZTm2LHOKKZakFJG8nMgOaqNV62xrLPyuUL-TTnVxqSjnUT6-HIeMWSJ-YhhhBcnHzKPJVBnnouJ_-30BDGmcHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2129993167</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Home Range and Habitat Use of Female White-Tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in the Northern Lower Peninsula of Michigan</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Clayton K. Nielsen ; Janice K. Stroud-Settles</creator><creatorcontrib>Clayton K. Nielsen ; Janice K. Stroud-Settles ; Cooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory ; Southern Illinois University</creatorcontrib><description>Because knowledge of home range dynamics and habitat selection is lacking for whitetailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in the northern lower peninsula of Michigan, we radiomarked 89 female deer and studied these aspects of their biology during 2005–2008. Mean (± SE) size of annual home ranges and core areas (n = 89) were 2.3 ± 0.1 km2 and 0.5 ± 0.2 km2, respectively, and somewhat smaller than in other northern deer populations. Mean home-range and core-area sizes for the springsummer period (n = 87) were 1.9 ± 0.1 km2 and 0.4 ± 0.1 km2, respectively. Mean home-range and core-area sizes for the fall-winter period (n = 29) were 2.1 ± 0.2 km2 and 0.5 ± 0.1 km2, respectively. Neither home-range nor core-area sizes differed seasonally (P &gt; 0.135), and seasonal home ranges were comparable in size to other northern deer populations. Cover-type use did not differ seasonally between home ranges and core areas (P = 0.752). Most deer resided in the same general area year-round and had overlapping seasonal home ranges and core areas. We conclude that stability observed in seasonal home ranges and habitat selection were influenced by relatively warm winter conditions during our study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1343-4152</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1348-6160</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1348-6160</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3106/ms2017-0085</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tokyo: UniBio Press</publisher><subject>Animal populations ; Biology ; Deer ; Habitat selection ; Habitat utilization ; Habitats ; Home range ; Management ; Odocoileus virginianus ; population ; Populations ; space use ; Winter</subject><ispartof>MAMMAL STUDY, 2018-09, Vol.43 (3), p.179-185</ispartof><rights>The Mammal Society of Japan</rights><rights>Copyright BioOne Sep 2018</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b484t-1f2388c56e5778c74a34ce05b9589365809d2ae31ea3cc988beefc7cbb8de6ea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b484t-1f2388c56e5778c74a34ce05b9589365809d2ae31ea3cc988beefc7cbb8de6ea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clayton K. Nielsen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janice K. Stroud-Settles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Southern Illinois University</creatorcontrib><title>Home Range and Habitat Use of Female White-Tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in the Northern Lower Peninsula of Michigan</title><title>MAMMAL STUDY</title><description>Because knowledge of home range dynamics and habitat selection is lacking for whitetailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in the northern lower peninsula of Michigan, we radiomarked 89 female deer and studied these aspects of their biology during 2005–2008. Mean (± SE) size of annual home ranges and core areas (n = 89) were 2.3 ± 0.1 km2 and 0.5 ± 0.2 km2, respectively, and somewhat smaller than in other northern deer populations. Mean home-range and core-area sizes for the springsummer period (n = 87) were 1.9 ± 0.1 km2 and 0.4 ± 0.1 km2, respectively. Mean home-range and core-area sizes for the fall-winter period (n = 29) were 2.1 ± 0.2 km2 and 0.5 ± 0.1 km2, respectively. Neither home-range nor core-area sizes differed seasonally (P &gt; 0.135), and seasonal home ranges were comparable in size to other northern deer populations. Cover-type use did not differ seasonally between home ranges and core areas (P = 0.752). Most deer resided in the same general area year-round and had overlapping seasonal home ranges and core areas. We conclude that stability observed in seasonal home ranges and habitat selection were influenced by relatively warm winter conditions during our study.</description><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Deer</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Habitat utilization</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Home range</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Odocoileus virginianus</subject><subject>population</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>space use</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>1343-4152</issn><issn>1348-6160</issn><issn>1348-6160</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtL7TAURotcwefIPxBwoCLVpGnaZCjnqkc4PhDFYUjT3XMibeJNWh_4502t4OxOupuwsr7NlyR7BJ9QgovTLmSYlCnGnK0lm4TmPC1Igf98_9M0JyzbSLZCeMaYUlaSzeRz7jpA98ouASlbo7mqTK969BgAuQZdQKdaQE8r00P6oEwLNfoL4NHhbe20i-choFfjl8YaZYdwhIxF_QrQjfNxeIsW7i3id2CNDUOrRum10SuzVHYnWW9UG2D3Z24njxfnD7N5uri9vJqdLdIq53mfkiajnGtWACtLrstc0VwDZpVgXNCCcSzqTAEloKjWgvMKoNGlripeQxEvt5P9yfvi3b8BQi-f3eBtjJQZyYQQlBRlpI4nSnsXgodGvnjTKf8hCZZju3JqV47tRvrgx2nA_5KxZTm2LHOKKZakFJG8nMgOaqNV62xrLPyuUL-TTnVxqSjnUT6-HIeMWSJ-YhhhBcnHzKPJVBnnouJ_-30BDGmcHw</recordid><startdate>201809</startdate><enddate>201809</enddate><creator>Clayton K. Nielsen</creator><creator>Janice K. Stroud-Settles</creator><general>UniBio Press</general><general>The Mammal Society of Japan</general><general>BioOne</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201809</creationdate><title>Home Range and Habitat Use of Female White-Tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in the Northern Lower Peninsula of Michigan</title><author>Clayton K. Nielsen ; Janice K. Stroud-Settles</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b484t-1f2388c56e5778c74a34ce05b9589365809d2ae31ea3cc988beefc7cbb8de6ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Deer</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Habitat utilization</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Home range</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Odocoileus virginianus</topic><topic>population</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>space use</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clayton K. Nielsen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janice K. Stroud-Settles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Southern Illinois University</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>MAMMAL STUDY</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clayton K. Nielsen</au><au>Janice K. Stroud-Settles</au><aucorp>Cooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory</aucorp><aucorp>Southern Illinois University</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Home Range and Habitat Use of Female White-Tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in the Northern Lower Peninsula of Michigan</atitle><jtitle>MAMMAL STUDY</jtitle><date>2018-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>179</spage><epage>185</epage><pages>179-185</pages><issn>1343-4152</issn><issn>1348-6160</issn><eissn>1348-6160</eissn><abstract>Because knowledge of home range dynamics and habitat selection is lacking for whitetailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in the northern lower peninsula of Michigan, we radiomarked 89 female deer and studied these aspects of their biology during 2005–2008. Mean (± SE) size of annual home ranges and core areas (n = 89) were 2.3 ± 0.1 km2 and 0.5 ± 0.2 km2, respectively, and somewhat smaller than in other northern deer populations. Mean home-range and core-area sizes for the springsummer period (n = 87) were 1.9 ± 0.1 km2 and 0.4 ± 0.1 km2, respectively. Mean home-range and core-area sizes for the fall-winter period (n = 29) were 2.1 ± 0.2 km2 and 0.5 ± 0.1 km2, respectively. Neither home-range nor core-area sizes differed seasonally (P &gt; 0.135), and seasonal home ranges were comparable in size to other northern deer populations. Cover-type use did not differ seasonally between home ranges and core areas (P = 0.752). Most deer resided in the same general area year-round and had overlapping seasonal home ranges and core areas. We conclude that stability observed in seasonal home ranges and habitat selection were influenced by relatively warm winter conditions during our study.</abstract><cop>Tokyo</cop><pub>UniBio Press</pub><doi>10.3106/ms2017-0085</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1343-4152
ispartof MAMMAL STUDY, 2018-09, Vol.43 (3), p.179-185
issn 1343-4152
1348-6160
1348-6160
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2129993167
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Animal populations
Biology
Deer
Habitat selection
Habitat utilization
Habitats
Home range
Management
Odocoileus virginianus
population
Populations
space use
Winter
title Home Range and Habitat Use of Female White-Tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in the Northern Lower Peninsula of Michigan
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T18%3A27%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Home%20Range%20and%20Habitat%20Use%20of%20Female%20White-Tailed%20Deer%20(Odocoileus%20virginianus)%20in%20the%20Northern%20Lower%20Peninsula%20of%20Michigan&rft.jtitle=MAMMAL%20STUDY&rft.au=Clayton%20K.%20Nielsen&rft.aucorp=Cooperative%20Wildlife%20Research%20Laboratory&rft.date=2018-09&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=179&rft.epage=185&rft.pages=179-185&rft.issn=1343-4152&rft.eissn=1348-6160&rft_id=info:doi/10.3106/ms2017-0085&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2129993167%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2129993167&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true