Selective use of intraoperative touch prep analysis of sentinel nodes in breast cancer. Discussion

Imprint cytology (touch prep) is often used for intraoperative examination of sentinel nodes in breast cancer. This allows axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) to be performed immediately for tumor-positive nodes. We evaluated the accuracy of touch prep examination of sentinel nodes and its role in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: FORBES, Rachel C, PITCHFORD, Clovis, SIMPSON, Jean F, BALCH, Glen C, KELLEY, Mark C, WITHERSPOON, Laura E, LEVINE, Edward A, ADAMS, Gregory F
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 962
container_issue 11
container_start_page 955
container_title
container_volume 71
creator FORBES, Rachel C
PITCHFORD, Clovis
SIMPSON, Jean F
BALCH, Glen C
KELLEY, Mark C
WITHERSPOON, Laura E
LEVINE, Edward A
ADAMS, Gregory F
KELLEY, Mark C
description Imprint cytology (touch prep) is often used for intraoperative examination of sentinel nodes in breast cancer. This allows axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) to be performed immediately for tumor-positive nodes. We evaluated the accuracy of touch prep examination of sentinel nodes and its role in the surgical treatment of breast cancer. We analyzed 169 breast cancer patients who underwent 170 lymphatic mapping procedures with intraoperative touch prep examination. Results from the touch prep were correlated with histopathology and clinical variables. There were 115 true-negative, 35 true-positive, 15 false-negative, and 5 false-positive results. Touch prep had a sensitivity of 70 per cent and specificity of 96 per cent. Positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were all 88 per cent. The false-negative rate was 30 per cent and correlated with the size of the nodal metastasis and number of involved nodes, but not other patient factors. Touch prep is useful for the evaluation of sentinel nodes in breast cancer, but it has a lower sensitivity than initially reported, particularly in patients with micrometastases. False positive results occur, although they may be reduced after experience with the technique. We recommend that suspicious findings on touch prep should be confirmed by frozen section and that ALND only be performed for histologically documented metastases. We currently perform touch prep only in patients who are at high risk of nodal metastasis or will undergo mastectomy. This improves operative efficiency and limits the impact of false positive and negative results without dramatically increasing the number of patients who require a second surgical procedure. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_212826160</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>939722331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p570-1a6ae201f7d23659281b9eb9d872bd8d1ae0b5d91b8cca96828b42eeed1e23333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjttKxDAQhoMouK6-QxC8rOTQtMmlrIcVFrxw70sOU8xSk5pphX17q-7c_MzPN8N3RlZcKVUZLeQ5WTHGZMVlrS_JFeJhWetG8RVx7zCAn-I30BmB5p7GNBWbRyj2r53y7D_oWGCkNtnhiBF_KYQ0xQQDTTkALkfUFbA4UW-Th3JPHyP6GTHmdE0uejsg3JxyTfbPT_vNttq9vbxuHnbVqFpWcdtYEIz3bRCyUUZo7gw4E3QrXNCBW2BOBcOd9t6aRgvtagEAgYOQy6zJ7f_bseSvGXDqDnkuizJ2ggstGt6wBbo7QRa9Hfqy2EbsxhI_bTl2vJU1E8zIH4miX5c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>212826160</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Selective use of intraoperative touch prep analysis of sentinel nodes in breast cancer. Discussion</title><source>SAGE Journals</source><creator>FORBES, Rachel C ; PITCHFORD, Clovis ; SIMPSON, Jean F ; BALCH, Glen C ; KELLEY, Mark C ; WITHERSPOON, Laura E ; LEVINE, Edward A ; ADAMS, Gregory F ; KELLEY, Mark C</creator><creatorcontrib>FORBES, Rachel C ; PITCHFORD, Clovis ; SIMPSON, Jean F ; BALCH, Glen C ; KELLEY, Mark C ; WITHERSPOON, Laura E ; LEVINE, Edward A ; ADAMS, Gregory F ; KELLEY, Mark C</creatorcontrib><description>Imprint cytology (touch prep) is often used for intraoperative examination of sentinel nodes in breast cancer. This allows axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) to be performed immediately for tumor-positive nodes. We evaluated the accuracy of touch prep examination of sentinel nodes and its role in the surgical treatment of breast cancer. We analyzed 169 breast cancer patients who underwent 170 lymphatic mapping procedures with intraoperative touch prep examination. Results from the touch prep were correlated with histopathology and clinical variables. There were 115 true-negative, 35 true-positive, 15 false-negative, and 5 false-positive results. Touch prep had a sensitivity of 70 per cent and specificity of 96 per cent. Positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were all 88 per cent. The false-negative rate was 30 per cent and correlated with the size of the nodal metastasis and number of involved nodes, but not other patient factors. Touch prep is useful for the evaluation of sentinel nodes in breast cancer, but it has a lower sensitivity than initially reported, particularly in patients with micrometastases. False positive results occur, although they may be reduced after experience with the technique. We recommend that suspicious findings on touch prep should be confirmed by frozen section and that ALND only be performed for histologically documented metastases. We currently perform touch prep only in patients who are at high risk of nodal metastasis or will undergo mastectomy. This improves operative efficiency and limits the impact of false positive and negative results without dramatically increasing the number of patients who require a second surgical procedure. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-1348</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-9823</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMSUAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Atlanta, GA: Southeastern Surgical Congress</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biopsy ; Breast cancer ; General aspects ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Lymphatic system ; Mammary gland diseases ; Medical sciences ; Patients ; Risk ; Tumors ; Women</subject><ispartof>The American surgeon, 2005, Vol.71 (11), p.955-962</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright The Southeastern Surgical Congress Nov 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,23909,23910,25118</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17340209$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>FORBES, Rachel C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PITCHFORD, Clovis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIMPSON, Jean F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BALCH, Glen C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KELLEY, Mark C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WITHERSPOON, Laura E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEVINE, Edward A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ADAMS, Gregory F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KELLEY, Mark C</creatorcontrib><title>Selective use of intraoperative touch prep analysis of sentinel nodes in breast cancer. Discussion</title><title>The American surgeon</title><description>Imprint cytology (touch prep) is often used for intraoperative examination of sentinel nodes in breast cancer. This allows axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) to be performed immediately for tumor-positive nodes. We evaluated the accuracy of touch prep examination of sentinel nodes and its role in the surgical treatment of breast cancer. We analyzed 169 breast cancer patients who underwent 170 lymphatic mapping procedures with intraoperative touch prep examination. Results from the touch prep were correlated with histopathology and clinical variables. There were 115 true-negative, 35 true-positive, 15 false-negative, and 5 false-positive results. Touch prep had a sensitivity of 70 per cent and specificity of 96 per cent. Positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were all 88 per cent. The false-negative rate was 30 per cent and correlated with the size of the nodal metastasis and number of involved nodes, but not other patient factors. Touch prep is useful for the evaluation of sentinel nodes in breast cancer, but it has a lower sensitivity than initially reported, particularly in patients with micrometastases. False positive results occur, although they may be reduced after experience with the technique. We recommend that suspicious findings on touch prep should be confirmed by frozen section and that ALND only be performed for histologically documented metastases. We currently perform touch prep only in patients who are at high risk of nodal metastasis or will undergo mastectomy. This improves operative efficiency and limits the impact of false positive and negative results without dramatically increasing the number of patients who require a second surgical procedure. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0003-1348</issn><issn>1555-9823</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotjttKxDAQhoMouK6-QxC8rOTQtMmlrIcVFrxw70sOU8xSk5pphX17q-7c_MzPN8N3RlZcKVUZLeQ5WTHGZMVlrS_JFeJhWetG8RVx7zCAn-I30BmB5p7GNBWbRyj2r53y7D_oWGCkNtnhiBF_KYQ0xQQDTTkALkfUFbA4UW-Th3JPHyP6GTHmdE0uejsg3JxyTfbPT_vNttq9vbxuHnbVqFpWcdtYEIz3bRCyUUZo7gw4E3QrXNCBW2BOBcOd9t6aRgvtagEAgYOQy6zJ7f_bseSvGXDqDnkuizJ2ggstGt6wBbo7QRa9Hfqy2EbsxhI_bTl2vJU1E8zIH4miX5c</recordid><startdate>20051101</startdate><enddate>20051101</enddate><creator>FORBES, Rachel C</creator><creator>PITCHFORD, Clovis</creator><creator>SIMPSON, Jean F</creator><creator>BALCH, Glen C</creator><creator>KELLEY, Mark C</creator><creator>WITHERSPOON, Laura E</creator><creator>LEVINE, Edward A</creator><creator>ADAMS, Gregory F</creator><creator>KELLEY, Mark C</creator><general>Southeastern Surgical Congress</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051101</creationdate><title>Selective use of intraoperative touch prep analysis of sentinel nodes in breast cancer. Discussion</title><author>FORBES, Rachel C ; PITCHFORD, Clovis ; SIMPSON, Jean F ; BALCH, Glen C ; KELLEY, Mark C ; WITHERSPOON, Laura E ; LEVINE, Edward A ; ADAMS, Gregory F ; KELLEY, Mark C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p570-1a6ae201f7d23659281b9eb9d872bd8d1ae0b5d91b8cca96828b42eeed1e23333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FORBES, Rachel C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PITCHFORD, Clovis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIMPSON, Jean F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BALCH, Glen C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KELLEY, Mark C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WITHERSPOON, Laura E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEVINE, Edward A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ADAMS, Gregory F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KELLEY, Mark C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FORBES, Rachel C</au><au>PITCHFORD, Clovis</au><au>SIMPSON, Jean F</au><au>BALCH, Glen C</au><au>KELLEY, Mark C</au><au>WITHERSPOON, Laura E</au><au>LEVINE, Edward A</au><au>ADAMS, Gregory F</au><au>KELLEY, Mark C</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Selective use of intraoperative touch prep analysis of sentinel nodes in breast cancer. Discussion</atitle><btitle>The American surgeon</btitle><date>2005-11-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>955</spage><epage>962</epage><pages>955-962</pages><issn>0003-1348</issn><eissn>1555-9823</eissn><coden>AMSUAW</coden><abstract>Imprint cytology (touch prep) is often used for intraoperative examination of sentinel nodes in breast cancer. This allows axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) to be performed immediately for tumor-positive nodes. We evaluated the accuracy of touch prep examination of sentinel nodes and its role in the surgical treatment of breast cancer. We analyzed 169 breast cancer patients who underwent 170 lymphatic mapping procedures with intraoperative touch prep examination. Results from the touch prep were correlated with histopathology and clinical variables. There were 115 true-negative, 35 true-positive, 15 false-negative, and 5 false-positive results. Touch prep had a sensitivity of 70 per cent and specificity of 96 per cent. Positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were all 88 per cent. The false-negative rate was 30 per cent and correlated with the size of the nodal metastasis and number of involved nodes, but not other patient factors. Touch prep is useful for the evaluation of sentinel nodes in breast cancer, but it has a lower sensitivity than initially reported, particularly in patients with micrometastases. False positive results occur, although they may be reduced after experience with the technique. We recommend that suspicious findings on touch prep should be confirmed by frozen section and that ALND only be performed for histologically documented metastases. We currently perform touch prep only in patients who are at high risk of nodal metastasis or will undergo mastectomy. This improves operative efficiency and limits the impact of false positive and negative results without dramatically increasing the number of patients who require a second surgical procedure. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Atlanta, GA</cop><pub>Southeastern Surgical Congress</pub><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-1348
ispartof The American surgeon, 2005, Vol.71 (11), p.955-962
issn 0003-1348
1555-9823
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_212826160
source SAGE Journals
subjects Accuracy
Biological and medical sciences
Biopsy
Breast cancer
General aspects
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Lymphatic system
Mammary gland diseases
Medical sciences
Patients
Risk
Tumors
Women
title Selective use of intraoperative touch prep analysis of sentinel nodes in breast cancer. Discussion
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T08%3A05%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Selective%20use%20of%20intraoperative%20touch%20prep%20analysis%20of%20sentinel%20nodes%20in%20breast%20cancer.%20Discussion&rft.btitle=The%20American%20surgeon&rft.au=FORBES,%20Rachel%20C&rft.date=2005-11-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=955&rft.epage=962&rft.pages=955-962&rft.issn=0003-1348&rft.eissn=1555-9823&rft.coden=AMSUAW&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E939722331%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212826160&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true