Breast surgery techniques : Preoperative bracketing wire localization by surgeons. Discussion

With the development of expertise in image guidance for breast surgery, many surgeons now perform preoperative wire localization themselves. Use of a single wire versus multiple wires to bracket a radiographic breast abnormality has previously been described, although benefits of this technique base...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American surgeon 2007-06, Vol.73 (6), p.574-579
Hauptverfasser: BURKHOLDER, Hans C, WITHERSPOON, Laura E, BURNS, R. Phillip, HORN, Jeffrey S, BIDERMAN, Michael D, FUHRMAN, George M, CHAGPAR, Anees, GATMAITAN, Patrick
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 579
container_issue 6
container_start_page 574
container_title The American surgeon
container_volume 73
creator BURKHOLDER, Hans C
WITHERSPOON, Laura E
BURNS, R. Phillip
HORN, Jeffrey S
BIDERMAN, Michael D
FUHRMAN, George M
CHAGPAR, Anees
GATMAITAN, Patrick
description With the development of expertise in image guidance for breast surgery, many surgeons now perform preoperative wire localization themselves. Use of a single wire versus multiple wires to bracket a radiographic breast abnormality has previously been described, although benefits of this technique based on clinical outcomes such as margin status, tissue volume removed, and re-excision rates have not been established. This study is a retrospective analysis of wire-localized breast biopsies performed by 14 surgeons over 29 months; stereotactic and ultrasound guidance were used. During this time, 489 wire localizations were done, of which 159 used multiple wires. Two hundred eleven of these biopsies were done for malignant disease, 86 using multiple wires. After controlling for tumor node metastases stage, single and multiple wire placements were compared using endpoints of margin status, need for re-excision, and total volume of tissue removed. Neither margin status nor re-excision was related to the number of wires placed. However, the number of wires placed was significantly related to the total volume of tissue removed. Use of more than one localizing wire was associated with greater volume of tissue removal (measured in centimeters cubed) in benign disease (46 vs 25, P < 0.001), equivalent volumes in stage 0 disease (73 vs 67), less volume in stage 1 disease (113 vs 164), and less volume in stages 2 through 4 (158 vs 207, P = 0.03). Outcomes based on surgeon case volume during the study period demonstrated that low- (1-40), medium- (41-80), and high-volume (>80) surgeons did not differ in the type or stage of breast pathology treated. Surgeons with high case volumes were more likely to place multiple localizing wires (P < 0.001) and were more likely to do a breast-conserving procedure if re-excision was performed (P < 0.018). Surgeons with low case volumes were more likely to perform a re-excision (P < 0.025). Surgeon experience has a positive impact on quality outcome measures such as performance of a definitive procedure at the time of initial surgery and use of breast-conserving procedures at the time of re-excision. Multiple wire localization can be used to significantly reduce the volume of breast tissue removed in malignant disease without sacrificing margin status or increasing the need for future re-excision. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_212822164</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1314097101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p574-672009fb07f7953ba6c736e23ab50e3e6b1d31d5064d2a1a80c80470697f98913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotTktLxDAYDKJgXf0PQfBYyaN5edPVVWFBD3uVkqZf16y1rUmr1F9vZPc0zIOZOUIZFULkRjN-jDJCCM8pL_QpOotxl2ghBc3Q210AG0ccp7CFMOMR3HvnvyaI-Aa_BugHCHb034CrYN0HjL7b4h8fALe9s63_TWbf4WreN_RdvMb3PropxqSfo5PGthEuDrhAm9XDZvmUr18en5e363wQqsilYoSYpiKqUUbwykqnuATGbSUIcJAVrTmtBZFFzSy1mjhNCkWkUY3RhvIFutzXDqH_vz6Wu34KXVosGWWaMSqLFLo6hGxMz5tgO-djOQT_acNcUq2VUFTzPz1ZXPo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212822164</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Breast surgery techniques : Preoperative bracketing wire localization by surgeons. Discussion</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>BURKHOLDER, Hans C ; WITHERSPOON, Laura E ; BURNS, R. Phillip ; HORN, Jeffrey S ; BIDERMAN, Michael D ; FUHRMAN, George M ; CHAGPAR, Anees ; GATMAITAN, Patrick</creator><creatorcontrib>BURKHOLDER, Hans C ; WITHERSPOON, Laura E ; BURNS, R. Phillip ; HORN, Jeffrey S ; BIDERMAN, Michael D ; FUHRMAN, George M ; CHAGPAR, Anees ; GATMAITAN, Patrick</creatorcontrib><description>With the development of expertise in image guidance for breast surgery, many surgeons now perform preoperative wire localization themselves. Use of a single wire versus multiple wires to bracket a radiographic breast abnormality has previously been described, although benefits of this technique based on clinical outcomes such as margin status, tissue volume removed, and re-excision rates have not been established. This study is a retrospective analysis of wire-localized breast biopsies performed by 14 surgeons over 29 months; stereotactic and ultrasound guidance were used. During this time, 489 wire localizations were done, of which 159 used multiple wires. Two hundred eleven of these biopsies were done for malignant disease, 86 using multiple wires. After controlling for tumor node metastases stage, single and multiple wire placements were compared using endpoints of margin status, need for re-excision, and total volume of tissue removed. Neither margin status nor re-excision was related to the number of wires placed. However, the number of wires placed was significantly related to the total volume of tissue removed. Use of more than one localizing wire was associated with greater volume of tissue removal (measured in centimeters cubed) in benign disease (46 vs 25, P &lt; 0.001), equivalent volumes in stage 0 disease (73 vs 67), less volume in stage 1 disease (113 vs 164), and less volume in stages 2 through 4 (158 vs 207, P = 0.03). Outcomes based on surgeon case volume during the study period demonstrated that low- (1-40), medium- (41-80), and high-volume (&gt;80) surgeons did not differ in the type or stage of breast pathology treated. Surgeons with high case volumes were more likely to place multiple localizing wires (P &lt; 0.001) and were more likely to do a breast-conserving procedure if re-excision was performed (P &lt; 0.018). Surgeons with low case volumes were more likely to perform a re-excision (P &lt; 0.025). Surgeon experience has a positive impact on quality outcome measures such as performance of a definitive procedure at the time of initial surgery and use of breast-conserving procedures at the time of re-excision. Multiple wire localization can be used to significantly reduce the volume of breast tissue removed in malignant disease without sacrificing margin status or increasing the need for future re-excision. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-1348</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-9823</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMSUAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Atlanta, GA: Southeastern Surgical Congress</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Breast cancer ; Clinical outcomes ; General aspects ; Health participants ; Medical sciences ; Patients ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Surgeons ; Thoracic surgery ; Wire</subject><ispartof>The American surgeon, 2007-06, Vol.73 (6), p.574-579</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Southeastern Surgical Congress Jun 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18875718$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BURKHOLDER, Hans C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WITHERSPOON, Laura E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BURNS, R. Phillip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HORN, Jeffrey S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BIDERMAN, Michael D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FUHRMAN, George M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHAGPAR, Anees</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GATMAITAN, Patrick</creatorcontrib><title>Breast surgery techniques : Preoperative bracketing wire localization by surgeons. Discussion</title><title>The American surgeon</title><description>With the development of expertise in image guidance for breast surgery, many surgeons now perform preoperative wire localization themselves. Use of a single wire versus multiple wires to bracket a radiographic breast abnormality has previously been described, although benefits of this technique based on clinical outcomes such as margin status, tissue volume removed, and re-excision rates have not been established. This study is a retrospective analysis of wire-localized breast biopsies performed by 14 surgeons over 29 months; stereotactic and ultrasound guidance were used. During this time, 489 wire localizations were done, of which 159 used multiple wires. Two hundred eleven of these biopsies were done for malignant disease, 86 using multiple wires. After controlling for tumor node metastases stage, single and multiple wire placements were compared using endpoints of margin status, need for re-excision, and total volume of tissue removed. Neither margin status nor re-excision was related to the number of wires placed. However, the number of wires placed was significantly related to the total volume of tissue removed. Use of more than one localizing wire was associated with greater volume of tissue removal (measured in centimeters cubed) in benign disease (46 vs 25, P &lt; 0.001), equivalent volumes in stage 0 disease (73 vs 67), less volume in stage 1 disease (113 vs 164), and less volume in stages 2 through 4 (158 vs 207, P = 0.03). Outcomes based on surgeon case volume during the study period demonstrated that low- (1-40), medium- (41-80), and high-volume (&gt;80) surgeons did not differ in the type or stage of breast pathology treated. Surgeons with high case volumes were more likely to place multiple localizing wires (P &lt; 0.001) and were more likely to do a breast-conserving procedure if re-excision was performed (P &lt; 0.018). Surgeons with low case volumes were more likely to perform a re-excision (P &lt; 0.025). Surgeon experience has a positive impact on quality outcome measures such as performance of a definitive procedure at the time of initial surgery and use of breast-conserving procedures at the time of re-excision. Multiple wire localization can be used to significantly reduce the volume of breast tissue removed in malignant disease without sacrificing margin status or increasing the need for future re-excision. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Health participants</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Thoracic surgery</subject><subject>Wire</subject><issn>0003-1348</issn><issn>1555-9823</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotTktLxDAYDKJgXf0PQfBYyaN5edPVVWFBD3uVkqZf16y1rUmr1F9vZPc0zIOZOUIZFULkRjN-jDJCCM8pL_QpOotxl2ghBc3Q210AG0ccp7CFMOMR3HvnvyaI-Aa_BugHCHb034CrYN0HjL7b4h8fALe9s63_TWbf4WreN_RdvMb3PropxqSfo5PGthEuDrhAm9XDZvmUr18en5e363wQqsilYoSYpiKqUUbwykqnuATGbSUIcJAVrTmtBZFFzSy1mjhNCkWkUY3RhvIFutzXDqH_vz6Wu34KXVosGWWaMSqLFLo6hGxMz5tgO-djOQT_acNcUq2VUFTzPz1ZXPo</recordid><startdate>20070601</startdate><enddate>20070601</enddate><creator>BURKHOLDER, Hans C</creator><creator>WITHERSPOON, Laura E</creator><creator>BURNS, R. Phillip</creator><creator>HORN, Jeffrey S</creator><creator>BIDERMAN, Michael D</creator><creator>FUHRMAN, George M</creator><creator>CHAGPAR, Anees</creator><creator>GATMAITAN, Patrick</creator><general>Southeastern Surgical Congress</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070601</creationdate><title>Breast surgery techniques : Preoperative bracketing wire localization by surgeons. Discussion</title><author>BURKHOLDER, Hans C ; WITHERSPOON, Laura E ; BURNS, R. Phillip ; HORN, Jeffrey S ; BIDERMAN, Michael D ; FUHRMAN, George M ; CHAGPAR, Anees ; GATMAITAN, Patrick</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p574-672009fb07f7953ba6c736e23ab50e3e6b1d31d5064d2a1a80c80470697f98913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Health participants</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Thoracic surgery</topic><topic>Wire</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BURKHOLDER, Hans C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WITHERSPOON, Laura E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BURNS, R. Phillip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HORN, Jeffrey S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BIDERMAN, Michael D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FUHRMAN, George M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHAGPAR, Anees</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GATMAITAN, Patrick</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BURKHOLDER, Hans C</au><au>WITHERSPOON, Laura E</au><au>BURNS, R. Phillip</au><au>HORN, Jeffrey S</au><au>BIDERMAN, Michael D</au><au>FUHRMAN, George M</au><au>CHAGPAR, Anees</au><au>GATMAITAN, Patrick</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Breast surgery techniques : Preoperative bracketing wire localization by surgeons. Discussion</atitle><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle><date>2007-06-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>574</spage><epage>579</epage><pages>574-579</pages><issn>0003-1348</issn><eissn>1555-9823</eissn><coden>AMSUAW</coden><abstract>With the development of expertise in image guidance for breast surgery, many surgeons now perform preoperative wire localization themselves. Use of a single wire versus multiple wires to bracket a radiographic breast abnormality has previously been described, although benefits of this technique based on clinical outcomes such as margin status, tissue volume removed, and re-excision rates have not been established. This study is a retrospective analysis of wire-localized breast biopsies performed by 14 surgeons over 29 months; stereotactic and ultrasound guidance were used. During this time, 489 wire localizations were done, of which 159 used multiple wires. Two hundred eleven of these biopsies were done for malignant disease, 86 using multiple wires. After controlling for tumor node metastases stage, single and multiple wire placements were compared using endpoints of margin status, need for re-excision, and total volume of tissue removed. Neither margin status nor re-excision was related to the number of wires placed. However, the number of wires placed was significantly related to the total volume of tissue removed. Use of more than one localizing wire was associated with greater volume of tissue removal (measured in centimeters cubed) in benign disease (46 vs 25, P &lt; 0.001), equivalent volumes in stage 0 disease (73 vs 67), less volume in stage 1 disease (113 vs 164), and less volume in stages 2 through 4 (158 vs 207, P = 0.03). Outcomes based on surgeon case volume during the study period demonstrated that low- (1-40), medium- (41-80), and high-volume (&gt;80) surgeons did not differ in the type or stage of breast pathology treated. Surgeons with high case volumes were more likely to place multiple localizing wires (P &lt; 0.001) and were more likely to do a breast-conserving procedure if re-excision was performed (P &lt; 0.018). Surgeons with low case volumes were more likely to perform a re-excision (P &lt; 0.025). Surgeon experience has a positive impact on quality outcome measures such as performance of a definitive procedure at the time of initial surgery and use of breast-conserving procedures at the time of re-excision. Multiple wire localization can be used to significantly reduce the volume of breast tissue removed in malignant disease without sacrificing margin status or increasing the need for future re-excision. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Atlanta, GA</cop><pub>Southeastern Surgical Congress</pub><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-1348
ispartof The American surgeon, 2007-06, Vol.73 (6), p.574-579
issn 0003-1348
1555-9823
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_212822164
source SAGE Complete
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Breast cancer
Clinical outcomes
General aspects
Health participants
Medical sciences
Patients
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Surgeons
Thoracic surgery
Wire
title Breast surgery techniques : Preoperative bracketing wire localization by surgeons. Discussion
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T12%3A26%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Breast%20surgery%20techniques%20:%20Preoperative%20bracketing%20wire%20localization%20by%20surgeons.%20Discussion&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20surgeon&rft.au=BURKHOLDER,%20Hans%20C&rft.date=2007-06-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=574&rft.epage=579&rft.pages=574-579&rft.issn=0003-1348&rft.eissn=1555-9823&rft.coden=AMSUAW&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E1314097101%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212822164&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true