Impacts of Spatial Patterns in Pasture on Animal Grazing Behavior, Intake, and Performance
Control over the quantity and quality of food ingested by grazing ruminants in temperate pasture systems remains elusive. This is due in part to the foraging choices that animals make when grazing from communities of mixed plant species. Grazing behavior and intake interact strongly with the feed su...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Crop science 2007-01, Vol.47 (1), p.399-415 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 415 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 399 |
container_title | Crop science |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Chapman, D.F Parsons, A.J Cosgrove, G.P Barker, D.J Marotti, D.M Venning, K.J Rutter, S.M Hill, J Thompson, A.N |
description | Control over the quantity and quality of food ingested by grazing ruminants in temperate pasture systems remains elusive. This is due in part to the foraging choices that animals make when grazing from communities of mixed plant species. Grazing behavior and intake interact strongly with the feed supply-demand balance, pasture composition, and grazing method. These interactions are not completely understood, even for relatively simple pasture communities such as a perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.)-white clover (Trifolium repens L.) mixture. When offered a free choice between these species, ruminants exhibit a partial preference for clover compared to grass (about 0.7:0.3) and have a higher intake rate from clover but do not graze to maximize their daily intake of dry matter (DM). When monocultures of grass and clover are offered as a free choice in 50:50 area ratio, animal performance is no different than from a clover monoculture alone. Thus, all of the feeding value benefits of clover are available when only 0.5 of the grazing area is sown to clover. These observations accord with the satiety theory and imply that there are constraints to eating pure clover that animals can overcome by adding grass to their diet, provided their ability to locate and ingest each food is not seriously limited. The challenge for grassland management is to present feed to animals at pasture in ways that allow them to meet their dietary preferences, while also allowing high rates of animal production per hectare. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2135/cropsci2006.01.0036 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_212632152</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1361803031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4266-1b6681a508ec009a1549881c0c9f347b8af473a653aa5fcd7dff1cad3da69b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUcFu1DAQtRBILIUv4ICFxK1ZZuzYSY4lou1KlboiICEu1qxjl5RdJ9hZUPn6erUrwZHTjGbevKf3hrHXCEuBUr23cZySHQSAXgIuAaR-whZYSlWAVvIpWwAgFljLr8_Zi5TuAaBqKrVg31a7ieyc-Oh5N9E80JavaZ5dDIkPIfdp3kfHx8AvwrDL26tIf4Zwxz-47_RrGOM5X4WZfrhzTqHnaxf9GHcUrHvJnnnaJvfqVM9Yd_nxc3td3NxerdqLm8KWQusCN1rXSApqZwEaQlU2dY0WbONlWW1q8mUlKdsgUt72Ve89WuplT7rZyDP29sg6xfHn3qXZ3I_7GLKgESi0FKhEBskjKAeVUnTeTDGbiQ8GwRwSNP8kaADNIcF89e5ETcnS1sfsakh_T2ulNZZNxl0ecb-HrXv4H2rTdq1oP92uu3Z1mAOeBN8ciTyNhu5iFvvSCUCZv6UQqlI-Aj82kLo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212632152</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impacts of Spatial Patterns in Pasture on Animal Grazing Behavior, Intake, and Performance</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Chapman, D.F ; Parsons, A.J ; Cosgrove, G.P ; Barker, D.J ; Marotti, D.M ; Venning, K.J ; Rutter, S.M ; Hill, J ; Thompson, A.N</creator><creatorcontrib>Chapman, D.F ; Parsons, A.J ; Cosgrove, G.P ; Barker, D.J ; Marotti, D.M ; Venning, K.J ; Rutter, S.M ; Hill, J ; Thompson, A.N</creatorcontrib><description>Control over the quantity and quality of food ingested by grazing ruminants in temperate pasture systems remains elusive. This is due in part to the foraging choices that animals make when grazing from communities of mixed plant species. Grazing behavior and intake interact strongly with the feed supply-demand balance, pasture composition, and grazing method. These interactions are not completely understood, even for relatively simple pasture communities such as a perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.)-white clover (Trifolium repens L.) mixture. When offered a free choice between these species, ruminants exhibit a partial preference for clover compared to grass (about 0.7:0.3) and have a higher intake rate from clover but do not graze to maximize their daily intake of dry matter (DM). When monocultures of grass and clover are offered as a free choice in 50:50 area ratio, animal performance is no different than from a clover monoculture alone. Thus, all of the feeding value benefits of clover are available when only 0.5 of the grazing area is sown to clover. These observations accord with the satiety theory and imply that there are constraints to eating pure clover that animals can overcome by adding grass to their diet, provided their ability to locate and ingest each food is not seriously limited. The challenge for grassland management is to present feed to animals at pasture in ways that allow them to meet their dietary preferences, while also allowing high rates of animal production per hectare.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2006.01.0036</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CRPSAY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison, WI: Crop Science Society of America</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; animal performance ; Animal production ; Animal productions ; Animals ; Behavior ; Biological and medical sciences ; botanical composition ; Diet ; Dry matter ; dry matter intake ; Environmental conditions ; Environmental impact ; feed intake ; feeding preferences ; Food quality ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Grasses ; Grassland management ; Grasslands ; Grazing ; literature reviews ; livestock ; Management decisions ; Monoculture ; nutrient availability ; Pasture ; pasture management ; Pastures ; plant communities ; Plant species ; range management ; rangelands ; satiety ; spatial variation ; Supply & demand ; Terrestrial animal productions ; Vertebrates</subject><ispartof>Crop science, 2007-01, Vol.47 (1), p.399-415</ispartof><rights>Crop Science Society of America</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Jan/Feb 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4266-1b6681a508ec009a1549881c0c9f347b8af473a653aa5fcd7dff1cad3da69b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4266-1b6681a508ec009a1549881c0c9f347b8af473a653aa5fcd7dff1cad3da69b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2135%2Fcropsci2006.01.0036$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2135%2Fcropsci2006.01.0036$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,1411,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18566149$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chapman, D.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parsons, A.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosgrove, G.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barker, D.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marotti, D.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venning, K.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutter, S.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, A.N</creatorcontrib><title>Impacts of Spatial Patterns in Pasture on Animal Grazing Behavior, Intake, and Performance</title><title>Crop science</title><description>Control over the quantity and quality of food ingested by grazing ruminants in temperate pasture systems remains elusive. This is due in part to the foraging choices that animals make when grazing from communities of mixed plant species. Grazing behavior and intake interact strongly with the feed supply-demand balance, pasture composition, and grazing method. These interactions are not completely understood, even for relatively simple pasture communities such as a perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.)-white clover (Trifolium repens L.) mixture. When offered a free choice between these species, ruminants exhibit a partial preference for clover compared to grass (about 0.7:0.3) and have a higher intake rate from clover but do not graze to maximize their daily intake of dry matter (DM). When monocultures of grass and clover are offered as a free choice in 50:50 area ratio, animal performance is no different than from a clover monoculture alone. Thus, all of the feeding value benefits of clover are available when only 0.5 of the grazing area is sown to clover. These observations accord with the satiety theory and imply that there are constraints to eating pure clover that animals can overcome by adding grass to their diet, provided their ability to locate and ingest each food is not seriously limited. The challenge for grassland management is to present feed to animals at pasture in ways that allow them to meet their dietary preferences, while also allowing high rates of animal production per hectare.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>animal performance</subject><subject>Animal production</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>botanical composition</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Dry matter</subject><subject>dry matter intake</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>feed intake</subject><subject>feeding preferences</subject><subject>Food quality</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Grassland management</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>literature reviews</subject><subject>livestock</subject><subject>Management decisions</subject><subject>Monoculture</subject><subject>nutrient availability</subject><subject>Pasture</subject><subject>pasture management</subject><subject>Pastures</subject><subject>plant communities</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>range management</subject><subject>rangelands</subject><subject>satiety</subject><subject>spatial variation</subject><subject>Supply & demand</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><issn>0011-183X</issn><issn>1435-0653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUcFu1DAQtRBILIUv4ICFxK1ZZuzYSY4lou1KlboiICEu1qxjl5RdJ9hZUPn6erUrwZHTjGbevKf3hrHXCEuBUr23cZySHQSAXgIuAaR-whZYSlWAVvIpWwAgFljLr8_Zi5TuAaBqKrVg31a7ieyc-Oh5N9E80JavaZ5dDIkPIfdp3kfHx8AvwrDL26tIf4Zwxz-47_RrGOM5X4WZfrhzTqHnaxf9GHcUrHvJnnnaJvfqVM9Yd_nxc3td3NxerdqLm8KWQusCN1rXSApqZwEaQlU2dY0WbONlWW1q8mUlKdsgUt72Ve89WuplT7rZyDP29sg6xfHn3qXZ3I_7GLKgESi0FKhEBskjKAeVUnTeTDGbiQ8GwRwSNP8kaADNIcF89e5ETcnS1sfsakh_T2ulNZZNxl0ecb-HrXv4H2rTdq1oP92uu3Z1mAOeBN8ciTyNhu5iFvvSCUCZv6UQqlI-Aj82kLo</recordid><startdate>200701</startdate><enddate>200701</enddate><creator>Chapman, D.F</creator><creator>Parsons, A.J</creator><creator>Cosgrove, G.P</creator><creator>Barker, D.J</creator><creator>Marotti, D.M</creator><creator>Venning, K.J</creator><creator>Rutter, S.M</creator><creator>Hill, J</creator><creator>Thompson, A.N</creator><general>Crop Science Society of America</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200701</creationdate><title>Impacts of Spatial Patterns in Pasture on Animal Grazing Behavior, Intake, and Performance</title><author>Chapman, D.F ; Parsons, A.J ; Cosgrove, G.P ; Barker, D.J ; Marotti, D.M ; Venning, K.J ; Rutter, S.M ; Hill, J ; Thompson, A.N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4266-1b6681a508ec009a1549881c0c9f347b8af473a653aa5fcd7dff1cad3da69b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>animal performance</topic><topic>Animal production</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>botanical composition</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Dry matter</topic><topic>dry matter intake</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>feed intake</topic><topic>feeding preferences</topic><topic>Food quality</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Grassland management</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>literature reviews</topic><topic>livestock</topic><topic>Management decisions</topic><topic>Monoculture</topic><topic>nutrient availability</topic><topic>Pasture</topic><topic>pasture management</topic><topic>Pastures</topic><topic>plant communities</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>range management</topic><topic>rangelands</topic><topic>satiety</topic><topic>spatial variation</topic><topic>Supply & demand</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chapman, D.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parsons, A.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosgrove, G.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barker, D.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marotti, D.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venning, K.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutter, S.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, A.N</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Crop science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chapman, D.F</au><au>Parsons, A.J</au><au>Cosgrove, G.P</au><au>Barker, D.J</au><au>Marotti, D.M</au><au>Venning, K.J</au><au>Rutter, S.M</au><au>Hill, J</au><au>Thompson, A.N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impacts of Spatial Patterns in Pasture on Animal Grazing Behavior, Intake, and Performance</atitle><jtitle>Crop science</jtitle><date>2007-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>399</spage><epage>415</epage><pages>399-415</pages><issn>0011-183X</issn><eissn>1435-0653</eissn><coden>CRPSAY</coden><abstract>Control over the quantity and quality of food ingested by grazing ruminants in temperate pasture systems remains elusive. This is due in part to the foraging choices that animals make when grazing from communities of mixed plant species. Grazing behavior and intake interact strongly with the feed supply-demand balance, pasture composition, and grazing method. These interactions are not completely understood, even for relatively simple pasture communities such as a perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.)-white clover (Trifolium repens L.) mixture. When offered a free choice between these species, ruminants exhibit a partial preference for clover compared to grass (about 0.7:0.3) and have a higher intake rate from clover but do not graze to maximize their daily intake of dry matter (DM). When monocultures of grass and clover are offered as a free choice in 50:50 area ratio, animal performance is no different than from a clover monoculture alone. Thus, all of the feeding value benefits of clover are available when only 0.5 of the grazing area is sown to clover. These observations accord with the satiety theory and imply that there are constraints to eating pure clover that animals can overcome by adding grass to their diet, provided their ability to locate and ingest each food is not seriously limited. The challenge for grassland management is to present feed to animals at pasture in ways that allow them to meet their dietary preferences, while also allowing high rates of animal production per hectare.</abstract><cop>Madison, WI</cop><pub>Crop Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.2135/cropsci2006.01.0036</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0011-183X |
ispartof | Crop science, 2007-01, Vol.47 (1), p.399-415 |
issn | 0011-183X 1435-0653 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_212632152 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Animal behavior animal performance Animal production Animal productions Animals Behavior Biological and medical sciences botanical composition Diet Dry matter dry matter intake Environmental conditions Environmental impact feed intake feeding preferences Food quality Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Grasses Grassland management Grasslands Grazing literature reviews livestock Management decisions Monoculture nutrient availability Pasture pasture management Pastures plant communities Plant species range management rangelands satiety spatial variation Supply & demand Terrestrial animal productions Vertebrates |
title | Impacts of Spatial Patterns in Pasture on Animal Grazing Behavior, Intake, and Performance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T09%3A50%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impacts%20of%20Spatial%20Patterns%20in%20Pasture%20on%20Animal%20Grazing%20Behavior,%20Intake,%20and%20Performance&rft.jtitle=Crop%20science&rft.au=Chapman,%20D.F&rft.date=2007-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=399&rft.epage=415&rft.pages=399-415&rft.issn=0011-183X&rft.eissn=1435-0653&rft.coden=CRPSAY&rft_id=info:doi/10.2135/cropsci2006.01.0036&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1361803031%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212632152&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |