Intermediate monetary targets and macroeconomic fluctuations
It is investigated whether the choice of intermediate target has altered macroeconomic fluctuations and whether the observed changes are consistent with predictions from economic theory. Since implications from the theoretical literature focus on the effects of structural disturbances, an empirical...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Applied economics 1996-10, Vol.28 (10), p.1313-1329 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1329 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1313 |
container_title | Applied economics |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Keating, John W. |
description | It is investigated whether the choice of intermediate target has altered macroeconomic fluctuations and whether the observed changes are consistent with predictions from economic theory. Since implications from the theoretical literature focus on the effects of structural disturbances, an empirical analysis must identify these effects. The structural vector autoregressive (VAR) technique estimates structural disturbances using restrictions from standard macroeconomic theory. Based on descriptions of actual targeting procedures by insiders to Federal Reserve policy decisions, the intermediate target for the United States is identified as the interest rate from 1951 to 1969 and money from 1970 to 1986. VAR models are estimated over each subsample to assess whether the estimated structural disturbances cause endogenous variables to behave as economic theory predicts. Tests are also performed to assess whether or not the targeting rule affects the variance of endogenous variables attributable to structural shocks. The impulse responses are typically consistent with economic theory, with a few exceptions that have been similarly noted by other researchers. All significant differences in variance are predicted by economic theory, except for one which can be explained by unusually large shocks to defence expenditures that coincided with the monetary targeting episode. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/000368496327868 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_212631039</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1518346011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-963ef906c9ea7596851e9f9d8028b6a9cc90f67e679de1f72ab5169166364d783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgrZ69Lnpem9nszibiRcSPQsGLnkOaTWTLblKTLNJ_b0o9Cb3MMLz3ZuY9Qq6B3gHldEEpZchrgaxqOfITMoMasawrzk7JbI-WGcZzchHjJo9QsXZGHpYumTCarlfJFKN3JqmwK3L5MikWynXFqHTwRnvnx14Xdph0mlTqvYuX5MyqIZqrvz4nny_PH09v5er9dfn0uCo1a3gq80vGCopaGNU2AnkDRljRcVrxNSqhtaAWW4Ot6AzYtlLrBlAAIsO6azmbk5vD3m3w35OJSW78FFw-KSuokAFlIpNuj5GgAc5qpACZtTiwsqcYg7FyG_oxW5ZA5T5H-S_HrLg_KHpnfRjVjw9DJ5PaDT7YoJzuo2THxL-kgHYJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1518346011</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intermediate monetary targets and macroeconomic fluctuations</title><source>Taylor & Francis</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Keating, John W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Keating, John W.</creatorcontrib><description>It is investigated whether the choice of intermediate target has altered macroeconomic fluctuations and whether the observed changes are consistent with predictions from economic theory. Since implications from the theoretical literature focus on the effects of structural disturbances, an empirical analysis must identify these effects. The structural vector autoregressive (VAR) technique estimates structural disturbances using restrictions from standard macroeconomic theory. Based on descriptions of actual targeting procedures by insiders to Federal Reserve policy decisions, the intermediate target for the United States is identified as the interest rate from 1951 to 1969 and money from 1970 to 1986. VAR models are estimated over each subsample to assess whether the estimated structural disturbances cause endogenous variables to behave as economic theory predicts. Tests are also performed to assess whether or not the targeting rule affects the variance of endogenous variables attributable to structural shocks. The impulse responses are typically consistent with economic theory, with a few exceptions that have been similarly noted by other researchers. All significant differences in variance are predicted by economic theory, except for one which can be explained by unusually large shocks to defence expenditures that coincided with the monetary targeting episode.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-6846</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-4283</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/000368496327868</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APPEBP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, etc: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><ispartof>Applied economics, 1996-10, Vol.28 (10), p.1313-1329</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1996</rights><rights>Copyright Routledge Oct 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-963ef906c9ea7596851e9f9d8028b6a9cc90f67e679de1f72ab5169166364d783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/000368496327868$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/000368496327868$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27846,27901,27902,59620,60409</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keating, John W.</creatorcontrib><title>Intermediate monetary targets and macroeconomic fluctuations</title><title>Applied economics</title><description>It is investigated whether the choice of intermediate target has altered macroeconomic fluctuations and whether the observed changes are consistent with predictions from economic theory. Since implications from the theoretical literature focus on the effects of structural disturbances, an empirical analysis must identify these effects. The structural vector autoregressive (VAR) technique estimates structural disturbances using restrictions from standard macroeconomic theory. Based on descriptions of actual targeting procedures by insiders to Federal Reserve policy decisions, the intermediate target for the United States is identified as the interest rate from 1951 to 1969 and money from 1970 to 1986. VAR models are estimated over each subsample to assess whether the estimated structural disturbances cause endogenous variables to behave as economic theory predicts. Tests are also performed to assess whether or not the targeting rule affects the variance of endogenous variables attributable to structural shocks. The impulse responses are typically consistent with economic theory, with a few exceptions that have been similarly noted by other researchers. All significant differences in variance are predicted by economic theory, except for one which can be explained by unusually large shocks to defence expenditures that coincided with the monetary targeting episode.</description><issn>0003-6846</issn><issn>1466-4283</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgrZ69Lnpem9nszibiRcSPQsGLnkOaTWTLblKTLNJ_b0o9Cb3MMLz3ZuY9Qq6B3gHldEEpZchrgaxqOfITMoMasawrzk7JbI-WGcZzchHjJo9QsXZGHpYumTCarlfJFKN3JqmwK3L5MikWynXFqHTwRnvnx14Xdph0mlTqvYuX5MyqIZqrvz4nny_PH09v5er9dfn0uCo1a3gq80vGCopaGNU2AnkDRljRcVrxNSqhtaAWW4Ot6AzYtlLrBlAAIsO6azmbk5vD3m3w35OJSW78FFw-KSuokAFlIpNuj5GgAc5qpACZtTiwsqcYg7FyG_oxW5ZA5T5H-S_HrLg_KHpnfRjVjw9DJ5PaDT7YoJzuo2THxL-kgHYJ</recordid><startdate>19961001</startdate><enddate>19961001</enddate><creator>Keating, John W.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Chapman and Hall, etc</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FUVTR</scope><scope>HZAIM</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19961001</creationdate><title>Intermediate monetary targets and macroeconomic fluctuations</title><author>Keating, John W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-963ef906c9ea7596851e9f9d8028b6a9cc90f67e679de1f72ab5169166364d783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keating, John W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 06</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 26</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Applied economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keating, John W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intermediate monetary targets and macroeconomic fluctuations</atitle><jtitle>Applied economics</jtitle><date>1996-10-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1313</spage><epage>1329</epage><pages>1313-1329</pages><issn>0003-6846</issn><eissn>1466-4283</eissn><coden>APPEBP</coden><abstract>It is investigated whether the choice of intermediate target has altered macroeconomic fluctuations and whether the observed changes are consistent with predictions from economic theory. Since implications from the theoretical literature focus on the effects of structural disturbances, an empirical analysis must identify these effects. The structural vector autoregressive (VAR) technique estimates structural disturbances using restrictions from standard macroeconomic theory. Based on descriptions of actual targeting procedures by insiders to Federal Reserve policy decisions, the intermediate target for the United States is identified as the interest rate from 1951 to 1969 and money from 1970 to 1986. VAR models are estimated over each subsample to assess whether the estimated structural disturbances cause endogenous variables to behave as economic theory predicts. Tests are also performed to assess whether or not the targeting rule affects the variance of endogenous variables attributable to structural shocks. The impulse responses are typically consistent with economic theory, with a few exceptions that have been similarly noted by other researchers. All significant differences in variance are predicted by economic theory, except for one which can be explained by unusually large shocks to defence expenditures that coincided with the monetary targeting episode.</abstract><cop>London, etc</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/000368496327868</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-6846 |
ispartof | Applied economics, 1996-10, Vol.28 (10), p.1313-1329 |
issn | 0003-6846 1466-4283 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_212631039 |
source | Taylor & Francis; Periodicals Index Online; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
title | Intermediate monetary targets and macroeconomic fluctuations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T04%3A59%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intermediate%20monetary%20targets%20and%20macroeconomic%20fluctuations&rft.jtitle=Applied%20economics&rft.au=Keating,%20John%20W.&rft.date=1996-10-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1313&rft.epage=1329&rft.pages=1313-1329&rft.issn=0003-6846&rft.eissn=1466-4283&rft.coden=APPEBP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/000368496327868&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E1518346011%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1518346011&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |