Development of a Screening Method for Drought Tolerance in Cotton Seedlings
The key to an efficient screening method is the ability to screen large amounts of plant material in the shortest time possible. Due to the complexity of drought tolerance, a quick and effective screen for this trait has yet to be established. The research reported herein was designed to evaluate a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Crop science 2006-09, Vol.46 (5), p.2104-2110 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2110 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 2104 |
| container_title | Crop science |
| container_volume | 46 |
| creator | Longenberger, P.S Smith, C.W Thaxton, P.S McMichael, B.L |
| description | The key to an efficient screening method is the ability to screen large amounts of plant material in the shortest time possible. Due to the complexity of drought tolerance, a quick and effective screen for this trait has yet to be established. The research reported herein was designed to evaluate a screening method for drought tolerance in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) seedlings. Twenty-one converted race stocks (CRS) and two cultivars were evaluated for seedling drought tolerance (SDT) on an individual plant basis. Genotypes were evaluated October-November 2004 and February-March 2005 under greenhouse conditions. Seedlings were subjected to three sequential cycles of drought at 15 d after planting (DAP). Drought cycles consisted of withholding water until the moisture content of indicator 'Deltapine 491' (DP 491) plants had an average volumetric water content of 0.07. Plants then were watered to saturation and allowed to drain to field capacity and percent survival recorded after 48 h. Genotypes differed in their percent survival following three consecutive drought cycles. Drought cycles 2 and 3 did not contribute to the separation of genotypes. DP 491 was the most tolerant genotype evaluated. The drought tolerance of the CRS was similar to that of 'Acala 1517-99'. CRS M-9044-0165 was the most stable genotype, according to an analysis of the difference in percentage of survival for each genotype across the two experiments. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2135/cropsci2006.01.0026 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_212625172</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1291086291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5386-ae46225b966c2d38ff0fa501b32df4cd5e8e8c1bd08459d082b9e0f3b694be73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV9L5DAUxcOisOOfT7APBmEfO94kTdo-StVVVBQ7wr6FNL0ZK7WZTTorfvvNMAP6uBASuPzOOdwTQn4wmHMm5JkNfhVtzwHUHNgcgKtvZMZyITNQUuyRGQBjGSvF7-_kIMZXACiqQs7I7QX-xcGv3nCcqHfU0MYGxLEfl_QepxffUecDvQh-vXyZ6MIPGMxokfYjrf00-ZE2iN2Q-HhE9p0ZIh7v3kOyuLpc1NfZ3cOvm_r8LrNSlCozmCvOZVspZXknSufAGQmsFbxzue0kllha1nZQ5rJKN28rBCdaVeUtFuKQnG5tV8H_WWOc9KtfhzElas644pIVPEFiC6VqYgzo9Cr0byZ8aAZ605n-0pkGpjedJdXPnbWJ1gxus2ofP6Ulk1XJIXFXW-69H_Djf6x13dS8fnp4bOqbzRzYLvBka-SM12YZUthzw4GJ9D8ynUL8A7_OjAg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212625172</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development of a Screening Method for Drought Tolerance in Cotton Seedlings</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Longenberger, P.S ; Smith, C.W ; Thaxton, P.S ; McMichael, B.L</creator><creatorcontrib>Longenberger, P.S ; Smith, C.W ; Thaxton, P.S ; McMichael, B.L</creatorcontrib><description>The key to an efficient screening method is the ability to screen large amounts of plant material in the shortest time possible. Due to the complexity of drought tolerance, a quick and effective screen for this trait has yet to be established. The research reported herein was designed to evaluate a screening method for drought tolerance in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) seedlings. Twenty-one converted race stocks (CRS) and two cultivars were evaluated for seedling drought tolerance (SDT) on an individual plant basis. Genotypes were evaluated October-November 2004 and February-March 2005 under greenhouse conditions. Seedlings were subjected to three sequential cycles of drought at 15 d after planting (DAP). Drought cycles consisted of withholding water until the moisture content of indicator 'Deltapine 491' (DP 491) plants had an average volumetric water content of 0.07. Plants then were watered to saturation and allowed to drain to field capacity and percent survival recorded after 48 h. Genotypes differed in their percent survival following three consecutive drought cycles. Drought cycles 2 and 3 did not contribute to the separation of genotypes. DP 491 was the most tolerant genotype evaluated. The drought tolerance of the CRS was similar to that of 'Acala 1517-99'. CRS M-9044-0165 was the most stable genotype, according to an analysis of the difference in percentage of survival for each genotype across the two experiments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2006.01.0026</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CRPSAY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: Crop Science Society of America</publisher><subject>Adaptation to environment and cultivation conditions ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Competition ; cotton ; Cultivars ; Drought ; Drought resistance ; drought tolerance ; Environmental conditions ; experimental design ; Experiments ; Field capacity ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genetics and breeding of economic plants ; Genotype & phenotype ; Genotypes ; Gossypium hirsutum ; Methods ; Moisture content ; mortality ; Numbers ; plant genetic resources ; screening ; Seedlings ; Studies ; Varietal selection. Specialized plant breeding, plant breeding aims ; variety trials ; Water content ; water stress</subject><ispartof>Crop science, 2006-09, Vol.46 (5), p.2104-2110</ispartof><rights>Crop Science Society of America</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Sep/Oct 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5386-ae46225b966c2d38ff0fa501b32df4cd5e8e8c1bd08459d082b9e0f3b694be73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5386-ae46225b966c2d38ff0fa501b32df4cd5e8e8c1bd08459d082b9e0f3b694be73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2135%2Fcropsci2006.01.0026$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2135%2Fcropsci2006.01.0026$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18159820$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Longenberger, P.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, C.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thaxton, P.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMichael, B.L</creatorcontrib><title>Development of a Screening Method for Drought Tolerance in Cotton Seedlings</title><title>Crop science</title><description>The key to an efficient screening method is the ability to screen large amounts of plant material in the shortest time possible. Due to the complexity of drought tolerance, a quick and effective screen for this trait has yet to be established. The research reported herein was designed to evaluate a screening method for drought tolerance in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) seedlings. Twenty-one converted race stocks (CRS) and two cultivars were evaluated for seedling drought tolerance (SDT) on an individual plant basis. Genotypes were evaluated October-November 2004 and February-March 2005 under greenhouse conditions. Seedlings were subjected to three sequential cycles of drought at 15 d after planting (DAP). Drought cycles consisted of withholding water until the moisture content of indicator 'Deltapine 491' (DP 491) plants had an average volumetric water content of 0.07. Plants then were watered to saturation and allowed to drain to field capacity and percent survival recorded after 48 h. Genotypes differed in their percent survival following three consecutive drought cycles. Drought cycles 2 and 3 did not contribute to the separation of genotypes. DP 491 was the most tolerant genotype evaluated. The drought tolerance of the CRS was similar to that of 'Acala 1517-99'. CRS M-9044-0165 was the most stable genotype, according to an analysis of the difference in percentage of survival for each genotype across the two experiments.</description><subject>Adaptation to environment and cultivation conditions</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>cotton</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Drought resistance</subject><subject>drought tolerance</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>experimental design</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Field capacity</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genetics and breeding of economic plants</subject><subject>Genotype & phenotype</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Gossypium hirsutum</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>mortality</subject><subject>Numbers</subject><subject>plant genetic resources</subject><subject>screening</subject><subject>Seedlings</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Varietal selection. Specialized plant breeding, plant breeding aims</subject><subject>variety trials</subject><subject>Water content</subject><subject>water stress</subject><issn>0011-183X</issn><issn>1435-0653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV9L5DAUxcOisOOfT7APBmEfO94kTdo-StVVVBQ7wr6FNL0ZK7WZTTorfvvNMAP6uBASuPzOOdwTQn4wmHMm5JkNfhVtzwHUHNgcgKtvZMZyITNQUuyRGQBjGSvF7-_kIMZXACiqQs7I7QX-xcGv3nCcqHfU0MYGxLEfl_QepxffUecDvQh-vXyZ6MIPGMxokfYjrf00-ZE2iN2Q-HhE9p0ZIh7v3kOyuLpc1NfZ3cOvm_r8LrNSlCozmCvOZVspZXknSufAGQmsFbxzue0kllha1nZQ5rJKN28rBCdaVeUtFuKQnG5tV8H_WWOc9KtfhzElas644pIVPEFiC6VqYgzo9Cr0byZ8aAZ605n-0pkGpjedJdXPnbWJ1gxus2ofP6Ulk1XJIXFXW-69H_Djf6x13dS8fnp4bOqbzRzYLvBka-SM12YZUthzw4GJ9D8ynUL8A7_OjAg</recordid><startdate>200609</startdate><enddate>200609</enddate><creator>Longenberger, P.S</creator><creator>Smith, C.W</creator><creator>Thaxton, P.S</creator><creator>McMichael, B.L</creator><general>Crop Science Society of America</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200609</creationdate><title>Development of a Screening Method for Drought Tolerance in Cotton Seedlings</title><author>Longenberger, P.S ; Smith, C.W ; Thaxton, P.S ; McMichael, B.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5386-ae46225b966c2d38ff0fa501b32df4cd5e8e8c1bd08459d082b9e0f3b694be73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adaptation to environment and cultivation conditions</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>cotton</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Drought resistance</topic><topic>drought tolerance</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>experimental design</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Field capacity</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genetics and breeding of economic plants</topic><topic>Genotype & phenotype</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Gossypium hirsutum</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>mortality</topic><topic>Numbers</topic><topic>plant genetic resources</topic><topic>screening</topic><topic>Seedlings</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Varietal selection. Specialized plant breeding, plant breeding aims</topic><topic>variety trials</topic><topic>Water content</topic><topic>water stress</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Longenberger, P.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, C.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thaxton, P.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMichael, B.L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Crop science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Longenberger, P.S</au><au>Smith, C.W</au><au>Thaxton, P.S</au><au>McMichael, B.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development of a Screening Method for Drought Tolerance in Cotton Seedlings</atitle><jtitle>Crop science</jtitle><date>2006-09</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2104</spage><epage>2110</epage><pages>2104-2110</pages><issn>0011-183X</issn><eissn>1435-0653</eissn><coden>CRPSAY</coden><abstract>The key to an efficient screening method is the ability to screen large amounts of plant material in the shortest time possible. Due to the complexity of drought tolerance, a quick and effective screen for this trait has yet to be established. The research reported herein was designed to evaluate a screening method for drought tolerance in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) seedlings. Twenty-one converted race stocks (CRS) and two cultivars were evaluated for seedling drought tolerance (SDT) on an individual plant basis. Genotypes were evaluated October-November 2004 and February-March 2005 under greenhouse conditions. Seedlings were subjected to three sequential cycles of drought at 15 d after planting (DAP). Drought cycles consisted of withholding water until the moisture content of indicator 'Deltapine 491' (DP 491) plants had an average volumetric water content of 0.07. Plants then were watered to saturation and allowed to drain to field capacity and percent survival recorded after 48 h. Genotypes differed in their percent survival following three consecutive drought cycles. Drought cycles 2 and 3 did not contribute to the separation of genotypes. DP 491 was the most tolerant genotype evaluated. The drought tolerance of the CRS was similar to that of 'Acala 1517-99'. CRS M-9044-0165 was the most stable genotype, according to an analysis of the difference in percentage of survival for each genotype across the two experiments.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>Crop Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.2135/cropsci2006.01.0026</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0011-183X |
| ispartof | Crop science, 2006-09, Vol.46 (5), p.2104-2110 |
| issn | 0011-183X 1435-0653 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_212625172 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Adaptation to environment and cultivation conditions Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Biological and medical sciences Competition cotton Cultivars Drought Drought resistance drought tolerance Environmental conditions experimental design Experiments Field capacity Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Genetics and breeding of economic plants Genotype & phenotype Genotypes Gossypium hirsutum Methods Moisture content mortality Numbers plant genetic resources screening Seedlings Studies Varietal selection. Specialized plant breeding, plant breeding aims variety trials Water content water stress |
| title | Development of a Screening Method for Drought Tolerance in Cotton Seedlings |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T18%3A45%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20of%20a%20Screening%20Method%20for%20Drought%20Tolerance%20in%20Cotton%20Seedlings&rft.jtitle=Crop%20science&rft.au=Longenberger,%20P.S&rft.date=2006-09&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2104&rft.epage=2110&rft.pages=2104-2110&rft.issn=0011-183X&rft.eissn=1435-0653&rft.coden=CRPSAY&rft_id=info:doi/10.2135/cropsci2006.01.0026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1291086291%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212625172&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |