PERIODICAL USEFULNESS: THE U.S. LOGISTICS EDUCATOR PERSPECTIVE

PERIODICAL USEFULNESS: THE U.S. LOGISTICS EDUCATOR PERSPECTIVE

Traditional methodologies for evaluating periodicals focus on the quality of research‐oriented, peer refereed journals. This research broadens the evaluation process to include practitioner publications and an assessment of periodical usefulness across three educational activities. More than 100 U.S...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of business logistics 2003-03, Vol.24 (1), p.221-240
Hauptverfasser: Gibson, Brian J., Hanna, Joe B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Logistics
Methods
Operations management
Periodicals
Polls & surveys
Questionnaires
Ratings & rankings
Studies
Teachers
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 240
container_issue 1
container_start_page 221
container_title Journal of business logistics
container_volume 24
creator Gibson, Brian J.
Hanna, Joe B.
description Traditional methodologies for evaluating periodicals focus on the quality of research‐oriented, peer refereed journals. This research broadens the evaluation process to include practitioner publications and an assessment of periodical usefulness across three educational activities. More than 100 U.S. logistics educators identified and evaluated periodicals germane to the logistics discipline. The Journal of Business Logistics, Harvard Business Review, and Supply Chain Management Review achieved the highest usefulness scores based on an analysis of the survey responses.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2003.tb00038.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_212598474</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>334613081</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2978-77f8d6f7af37860ac47a7988f8953d859d52e6c59528af8b87fc478e1164dd393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkF1rwjAYhcPYYM7tPxTv2-WjaRJhA1ejdnQqtnXgTahtA3YfulaZ_vulVLzf1bl4z3NeeADoIeggCPFj6WBEuY2owA6GkDj7NTTBneMV6FxO16ADGaE2YZ53C-7qumxKUMAOeJ7LRTAbBv4gtJJIjpJwKqOob8UTaSVO5FjhbBxEceBHlhwm_iCeLSyDRHPpx8FS3oMbnX7WxcM5uyAZydif2A1mNu0MC8ZtxjTPPc1STRj3YJq5LGWCc80FJTmnIqe48DIqKOap5mvOtKnwAiHPzXMiSBf02t1dtf05FPVeldtD9W1eKowwFdxlrin121JWbeu6KrTaVZuvtDopBFWjS5WqcaIaJ6rRpc661NHATy38u_ksTv8g1etLSLjh7Zbf1PvieOHT6kN5jDCq3qdjtXpDy6VAK7Ugf1HKefE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212598474</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PERIODICAL USEFULNESS: THE U.S. LOGISTICS EDUCATOR PERSPECTIVE</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Gibson, Brian J. ; Hanna, Joe B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Brian J. ; Hanna, Joe B.</creatorcontrib><description>Traditional methodologies for evaluating periodicals focus on the quality of research‐oriented, peer refereed journals. This research broadens the evaluation process to include practitioner publications and an assessment of periodical usefulness across three educational activities. More than 100 U.S. logistics educators identified and evaluated periodicals germane to the logistics discipline. The Journal of Business Logistics, Harvard Business Review, and Supply Chain Management Review achieved the highest usefulness scores based on an analysis of the survey responses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-3766</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2158-1592</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2003.tb00038.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Logistics ; Methods ; Operations management ; Periodicals ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Questionnaires ; Ratings &amp; rankings ; Studies ; Teachers</subject><ispartof>Journal of business logistics, 2003-03, Vol.24 (1), p.221-240</ispartof><rights>2003 Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals</rights><rights>Copyright Council of Logistics Management 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2978-77f8d6f7af37860ac47a7988f8953d859d52e6c59528af8b87fc478e1164dd393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2978-77f8d6f7af37860ac47a7988f8953d859d52e6c59528af8b87fc478e1164dd393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fj.2158-1592.2003.tb00038.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fj.2158-1592.2003.tb00038.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Brian J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanna, Joe B.</creatorcontrib><title>PERIODICAL USEFULNESS: THE U.S. LOGISTICS EDUCATOR PERSPECTIVE</title><title>Journal of business logistics</title><description>Traditional methodologies for evaluating periodicals focus on the quality of research‐oriented, peer refereed journals. This research broadens the evaluation process to include practitioner publications and an assessment of periodical usefulness across three educational activities. More than 100 U.S. logistics educators identified and evaluated periodicals germane to the logistics discipline. The Journal of Business Logistics, Harvard Business Review, and Supply Chain Management Review achieved the highest usefulness scores based on an analysis of the survey responses.</description><subject>Logistics</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Operations management</subject><subject>Periodicals</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Ratings &amp; rankings</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><issn>0735-3766</issn><issn>2158-1592</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkF1rwjAYhcPYYM7tPxTv2-WjaRJhA1ejdnQqtnXgTahtA3YfulaZ_vulVLzf1bl4z3NeeADoIeggCPFj6WBEuY2owA6GkDj7NTTBneMV6FxO16ADGaE2YZ53C-7qumxKUMAOeJ7LRTAbBv4gtJJIjpJwKqOob8UTaSVO5FjhbBxEceBHlhwm_iCeLSyDRHPpx8FS3oMbnX7WxcM5uyAZydif2A1mNu0MC8ZtxjTPPc1STRj3YJq5LGWCc80FJTmnIqe48DIqKOap5mvOtKnwAiHPzXMiSBf02t1dtf05FPVeldtD9W1eKowwFdxlrin121JWbeu6KrTaVZuvtDopBFWjS5WqcaIaJ6rRpc661NHATy38u_ksTv8g1etLSLjh7Zbf1PvieOHT6kN5jDCq3qdjtXpDy6VAK7Ugf1HKefE</recordid><startdate>20030301</startdate><enddate>20030301</enddate><creator>Gibson, Brian J.</creator><creator>Hanna, Joe B.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030301</creationdate><title>PERIODICAL USEFULNESS: THE U.S. LOGISTICS EDUCATOR PERSPECTIVE</title><author>Gibson, Brian J. ; Hanna, Joe B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2978-77f8d6f7af37860ac47a7988f8953d859d52e6c59528af8b87fc478e1164dd393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Logistics</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Operations management</topic><topic>Periodicals</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Ratings &amp; rankings</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Brian J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanna, Joe B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of business logistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gibson, Brian J.</au><au>Hanna, Joe B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PERIODICAL USEFULNESS: THE U.S. LOGISTICS EDUCATOR PERSPECTIVE</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business logistics</jtitle><date>2003-03-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>221</spage><epage>240</epage><pages>221-240</pages><issn>0735-3766</issn><eissn>2158-1592</eissn><abstract>Traditional methodologies for evaluating periodicals focus on the quality of research‐oriented, peer refereed journals. This research broadens the evaluation process to include practitioner publications and an assessment of periodical usefulness across three educational activities. More than 100 U.S. logistics educators identified and evaluated periodicals germane to the logistics discipline. The Journal of Business Logistics, Harvard Business Review, and Supply Chain Management Review achieved the highest usefulness scores based on an analysis of the survey responses.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/j.2158-1592.2003.tb00038.x</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-3766
ispartof Journal of business logistics, 2003-03, Vol.24 (1), p.221-240
issn 0735-3766
2158-1592
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_212598474
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Business Source Complete
subjects Logistics
Methods
Operations management
Periodicals
Polls & surveys
Questionnaires
Ratings & rankings
Studies
Teachers
title PERIODICAL USEFULNESS: THE U.S. LOGISTICS EDUCATOR PERSPECTIVE
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T03%3A37%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PERIODICAL%20USEFULNESS:%20THE%20U.S.%20LOGISTICS%20EDUCATOR%20PERSPECTIVE&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20logistics&rft.au=Gibson,%20Brian%20J.&rft.date=2003-03-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=221&rft.epage=240&rft.pages=221-240&rft.issn=0735-3766&rft.eissn=2158-1592&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2003.tb00038.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E334613081%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212598474&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true