Is the spin connection confined or condensed?
he spin connection enters the theory of gravity as a non-Abelian gauge field associated with local Lorentz transformations. Normally it is eliminated from making an extra assumption-that of the metricity of the vierbein field. However, treated by itself with the usual gauge action, it has a negative...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physical review. D 2017-08, Vol.96 (4), p.044003, Article 044003 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 044003 |
container_title | Physical review. D |
container_volume | 96 |
creator | Donoghue, John F. |
description | he spin connection enters the theory of gravity as a non-Abelian gauge field associated with local Lorentz transformations. Normally it is eliminated from making an extra assumption-that of the metricity of the vierbein field. However, treated by itself with the usual gauge action, it has a negative beta function, implying that it is asymptotically free. I suggest that the spin connection could be confined (or perhaps partially confined) in the same way as other non-Abelian gauge fields. This would remove the need to make the extra assumption of metricity, as the spin connection would not be present in the low energy theory, leaving the symmetry to be realized only using metric variables. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.044003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2125765035</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2125765035</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-d85c6e4cd4b99b256a585d1cfc71ec6fb61e1e740563c084a34d5173028bdd733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AURQdRsNT-AVcB16nvzWdmJVK1FgqK6HpIZl5oiiZxJhX6722NurpncbkXDmOXCHNEENfPm316oa-7udVzkBJAnLAJlwZyAG5P_xnhnM1S2sIBNViDOGH5KmXDhrLUN23mu7YlPzTdD9ZNSyHr4pEDtYnCzQU7q8v3RLPfnLK3h_vXxWO-flquFrfr3Au0Qx4K5TVJH2RlbcWVLlWhAvraGySv60ojIRkJSgsPhSyFDAqNAF5UIRghpuxq3O1j97mjNLhtt4vt4dJx5MpoBUIdWnxs-dilFKl2fWw-yrh3CO5oxv2ZcVa70Yz4BtynVnQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2125765035</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is the spin connection confined or condensed?</title><source>American Physical Society Journals</source><creator>Donoghue, John F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Donoghue, John F.</creatorcontrib><description>he spin connection enters the theory of gravity as a non-Abelian gauge field associated with local Lorentz transformations. Normally it is eliminated from making an extra assumption-that of the metricity of the vierbein field. However, treated by itself with the usual gauge action, it has a negative beta function, implying that it is asymptotically free. I suggest that the spin connection could be confined (or perhaps partially confined) in the same way as other non-Abelian gauge fields. This would remove the need to make the extra assumption of metricity, as the spin connection would not be present in the low energy theory, leaving the symmetry to be realized only using metric variables.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2470-0010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2470-0029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.044003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>College Park: American Physical Society</publisher><subject>Energy theory ; Lorentz transformations</subject><ispartof>Physical review. D, 2017-08, Vol.96 (4), p.044003, Article 044003</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Physical Society Aug 15, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-d85c6e4cd4b99b256a585d1cfc71ec6fb61e1e740563c084a34d5173028bdd733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-d85c6e4cd4b99b256a585d1cfc71ec6fb61e1e740563c084a34d5173028bdd733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2862,2863,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Donoghue, John F.</creatorcontrib><title>Is the spin connection confined or condensed?</title><title>Physical review. D</title><description>he spin connection enters the theory of gravity as a non-Abelian gauge field associated with local Lorentz transformations. Normally it is eliminated from making an extra assumption-that of the metricity of the vierbein field. However, treated by itself with the usual gauge action, it has a negative beta function, implying that it is asymptotically free. I suggest that the spin connection could be confined (or perhaps partially confined) in the same way as other non-Abelian gauge fields. This would remove the need to make the extra assumption of metricity, as the spin connection would not be present in the low energy theory, leaving the symmetry to be realized only using metric variables.</description><subject>Energy theory</subject><subject>Lorentz transformations</subject><issn>2470-0010</issn><issn>2470-0029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AURQdRsNT-AVcB16nvzWdmJVK1FgqK6HpIZl5oiiZxJhX6722NurpncbkXDmOXCHNEENfPm316oa-7udVzkBJAnLAJlwZyAG5P_xnhnM1S2sIBNViDOGH5KmXDhrLUN23mu7YlPzTdD9ZNSyHr4pEDtYnCzQU7q8v3RLPfnLK3h_vXxWO-flquFrfr3Au0Qx4K5TVJH2RlbcWVLlWhAvraGySv60ojIRkJSgsPhSyFDAqNAF5UIRghpuxq3O1j97mjNLhtt4vt4dJx5MpoBUIdWnxs-dilFKl2fWw-yrh3CO5oxv2ZcVa70Yz4BtynVnQ</recordid><startdate>20170815</startdate><enddate>20170815</enddate><creator>Donoghue, John F.</creator><general>American Physical Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170815</creationdate><title>Is the spin connection confined or condensed?</title><author>Donoghue, John F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-d85c6e4cd4b99b256a585d1cfc71ec6fb61e1e740563c084a34d5173028bdd733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Energy theory</topic><topic>Lorentz transformations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Donoghue, John F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Physical review. D</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Donoghue, John F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is the spin connection confined or condensed?</atitle><jtitle>Physical review. D</jtitle><date>2017-08-15</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>044003</spage><pages>044003-</pages><artnum>044003</artnum><issn>2470-0010</issn><eissn>2470-0029</eissn><abstract>he spin connection enters the theory of gravity as a non-Abelian gauge field associated with local Lorentz transformations. Normally it is eliminated from making an extra assumption-that of the metricity of the vierbein field. However, treated by itself with the usual gauge action, it has a negative beta function, implying that it is asymptotically free. I suggest that the spin connection could be confined (or perhaps partially confined) in the same way as other non-Abelian gauge fields. This would remove the need to make the extra assumption of metricity, as the spin connection would not be present in the low energy theory, leaving the symmetry to be realized only using metric variables.</abstract><cop>College Park</cop><pub>American Physical Society</pub><doi>10.1103/PhysRevD.96.044003</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2470-0010 |
ispartof | Physical review. D, 2017-08, Vol.96 (4), p.044003, Article 044003 |
issn | 2470-0010 2470-0029 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2125765035 |
source | American Physical Society Journals |
subjects | Energy theory Lorentz transformations |
title | Is the spin connection confined or condensed? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T20%3A19%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20the%20spin%20connection%20confined%20or%20condensed?&rft.jtitle=Physical%20review.%20D&rft.au=Donoghue,%20John%20F.&rft.date=2017-08-15&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=044003&rft.pages=044003-&rft.artnum=044003&rft.issn=2470-0010&rft.eissn=2470-0029&rft_id=info:doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.044003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2125765035%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2125765035&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |