Is the spin connection confined or condensed?

he spin connection enters the theory of gravity as a non-Abelian gauge field associated with local Lorentz transformations. Normally it is eliminated from making an extra assumption-that of the metricity of the vierbein field. However, treated by itself with the usual gauge action, it has a negative...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physical review. D 2017-08, Vol.96 (4), p.044003, Article 044003
1. Verfasser: Donoghue, John F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 044003
container_title Physical review. D
container_volume 96
creator Donoghue, John F.
description he spin connection enters the theory of gravity as a non-Abelian gauge field associated with local Lorentz transformations. Normally it is eliminated from making an extra assumption-that of the metricity of the vierbein field. However, treated by itself with the usual gauge action, it has a negative beta function, implying that it is asymptotically free. I suggest that the spin connection could be confined (or perhaps partially confined) in the same way as other non-Abelian gauge fields. This would remove the need to make the extra assumption of metricity, as the spin connection would not be present in the low energy theory, leaving the symmetry to be realized only using metric variables.
doi_str_mv 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.044003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2125765035</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2125765035</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-d85c6e4cd4b99b256a585d1cfc71ec6fb61e1e740563c084a34d5173028bdd733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AURQdRsNT-AVcB16nvzWdmJVK1FgqK6HpIZl5oiiZxJhX6722NurpncbkXDmOXCHNEENfPm316oa-7udVzkBJAnLAJlwZyAG5P_xnhnM1S2sIBNViDOGH5KmXDhrLUN23mu7YlPzTdD9ZNSyHr4pEDtYnCzQU7q8v3RLPfnLK3h_vXxWO-flquFrfr3Au0Qx4K5TVJH2RlbcWVLlWhAvraGySv60ojIRkJSgsPhSyFDAqNAF5UIRghpuxq3O1j97mjNLhtt4vt4dJx5MpoBUIdWnxs-dilFKl2fWw-yrh3CO5oxv2ZcVa70Yz4BtynVnQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2125765035</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is the spin connection confined or condensed?</title><source>American Physical Society Journals</source><creator>Donoghue, John F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Donoghue, John F.</creatorcontrib><description>he spin connection enters the theory of gravity as a non-Abelian gauge field associated with local Lorentz transformations. Normally it is eliminated from making an extra assumption-that of the metricity of the vierbein field. However, treated by itself with the usual gauge action, it has a negative beta function, implying that it is asymptotically free. I suggest that the spin connection could be confined (or perhaps partially confined) in the same way as other non-Abelian gauge fields. This would remove the need to make the extra assumption of metricity, as the spin connection would not be present in the low energy theory, leaving the symmetry to be realized only using metric variables.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2470-0010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2470-0029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.044003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>College Park: American Physical Society</publisher><subject>Energy theory ; Lorentz transformations</subject><ispartof>Physical review. D, 2017-08, Vol.96 (4), p.044003, Article 044003</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Physical Society Aug 15, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-d85c6e4cd4b99b256a585d1cfc71ec6fb61e1e740563c084a34d5173028bdd733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-d85c6e4cd4b99b256a585d1cfc71ec6fb61e1e740563c084a34d5173028bdd733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2862,2863,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Donoghue, John F.</creatorcontrib><title>Is the spin connection confined or condensed?</title><title>Physical review. D</title><description>he spin connection enters the theory of gravity as a non-Abelian gauge field associated with local Lorentz transformations. Normally it is eliminated from making an extra assumption-that of the metricity of the vierbein field. However, treated by itself with the usual gauge action, it has a negative beta function, implying that it is asymptotically free. I suggest that the spin connection could be confined (or perhaps partially confined) in the same way as other non-Abelian gauge fields. This would remove the need to make the extra assumption of metricity, as the spin connection would not be present in the low energy theory, leaving the symmetry to be realized only using metric variables.</description><subject>Energy theory</subject><subject>Lorentz transformations</subject><issn>2470-0010</issn><issn>2470-0029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AURQdRsNT-AVcB16nvzWdmJVK1FgqK6HpIZl5oiiZxJhX6722NurpncbkXDmOXCHNEENfPm316oa-7udVzkBJAnLAJlwZyAG5P_xnhnM1S2sIBNViDOGH5KmXDhrLUN23mu7YlPzTdD9ZNSyHr4pEDtYnCzQU7q8v3RLPfnLK3h_vXxWO-flquFrfr3Au0Qx4K5TVJH2RlbcWVLlWhAvraGySv60ojIRkJSgsPhSyFDAqNAF5UIRghpuxq3O1j97mjNLhtt4vt4dJx5MpoBUIdWnxs-dilFKl2fWw-yrh3CO5oxv2ZcVa70Yz4BtynVnQ</recordid><startdate>20170815</startdate><enddate>20170815</enddate><creator>Donoghue, John F.</creator><general>American Physical Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170815</creationdate><title>Is the spin connection confined or condensed?</title><author>Donoghue, John F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-d85c6e4cd4b99b256a585d1cfc71ec6fb61e1e740563c084a34d5173028bdd733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Energy theory</topic><topic>Lorentz transformations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Donoghue, John F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Physical review. D</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Donoghue, John F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is the spin connection confined or condensed?</atitle><jtitle>Physical review. D</jtitle><date>2017-08-15</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>044003</spage><pages>044003-</pages><artnum>044003</artnum><issn>2470-0010</issn><eissn>2470-0029</eissn><abstract>he spin connection enters the theory of gravity as a non-Abelian gauge field associated with local Lorentz transformations. Normally it is eliminated from making an extra assumption-that of the metricity of the vierbein field. However, treated by itself with the usual gauge action, it has a negative beta function, implying that it is asymptotically free. I suggest that the spin connection could be confined (or perhaps partially confined) in the same way as other non-Abelian gauge fields. This would remove the need to make the extra assumption of metricity, as the spin connection would not be present in the low energy theory, leaving the symmetry to be realized only using metric variables.</abstract><cop>College Park</cop><pub>American Physical Society</pub><doi>10.1103/PhysRevD.96.044003</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2470-0010
ispartof Physical review. D, 2017-08, Vol.96 (4), p.044003, Article 044003
issn 2470-0010
2470-0029
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2125765035
source American Physical Society Journals
subjects Energy theory
Lorentz transformations
title Is the spin connection confined or condensed?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T20%3A19%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20the%20spin%20connection%20confined%20or%20condensed?&rft.jtitle=Physical%20review.%20D&rft.au=Donoghue,%20John%20F.&rft.date=2017-08-15&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=044003&rft.pages=044003-&rft.artnum=044003&rft.issn=2470-0010&rft.eissn=2470-0029&rft_id=info:doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.044003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2125765035%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2125765035&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true