Comprehensive comparison of numerical relativity and effective-one-body results to inform improvements in waveform models for binary neutron star systems

We present a detailed comparison between tidal effective-one-body (EOB) models and new state-of-the-art numerical relativity simulations for nonspinning binary neutron star systems. This comparison is the most extensive one to date, covering a wide range in the parameter space and encompassing the e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physical review. D 2017-06, Vol.95 (12), Article 124006
Hauptverfasser: Dietrich, Tim, Hinderer, Tanja
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 12
container_start_page
container_title Physical review. D
container_volume 95
creator Dietrich, Tim
Hinderer, Tanja
description We present a detailed comparison between tidal effective-one-body (EOB) models and new state-of-the-art numerical relativity simulations for nonspinning binary neutron star systems. This comparison is the most extensive one to date, covering a wide range in the parameter space and encompassing the energetics of the binary, the periastron advance, the time and frequency evolution of the gravitational wave phase for the dominant mode, and several subdominant modes. We consider different EOB models with tidal effects that have been proposed, including the model with dynamical tides of Hinderer et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 181101 (2016)] and the gravitational self-force (GSF) inspired tidal EOB model of Bernuzzi et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 161103 (2015)]. The EOB model with dynamical tides leads to the best representation of the systems considered here; however, the differences to the GSF-inspired model are small. A common feature is that for systems where matter effects are large, i.e., stiff equations of state or small total masses, all EOB models underestimate the tidal effects and differences to the results from numerical relativity simulations become noticeable near the merger. We analyze this regime to diagnose the shortcomings of the models in the late inspiral, where the two neutron stars are no longer isolated bodies moving in vacuum. Our work will serve to guide further advances in modeling these systems.
doi_str_mv 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.124006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2125723540</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2125723540</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-1c89ff8d784f87a5f8315232bed8f9864096f1d29891d0ef6440ed866a5feceb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UctKBDEQDKLgovsDngKeZ00yr-Qo6xMWFNFzyMx02CwzyZpkRuZT_Fujq566qruoaiiELihZUUryq-ftHF5gulmJckVZQUh1hBasqElGCBPH_5iSU7QMYUcSrIioKV2gz7Ub9h62YIOZALeJKW-Cs9hpbMcBvGlVjz30KprJxBkr22HQGtrEIXMWssZ1c1KEsY8BR4eN1c4P2CRjN8EANq2NxR9qgp_D4DroA04YN8YqP2MLY_QpM0TlcZhDhCGcoxOt-gDL33mG3u5uX9cP2ebp_nF9vcnanIqY0ZYLrXlX80LzWpWa57RkOWug41rwqiCi0rRjggvaEdBVUZB0qqokhRaa_AxdHnzTt-8jhCh3bvQ2RUpGWVmzvCxIUrGDqvUuBA9a7r0Z0u-SEvndgvxrQYpSHlrIvwCpJYFG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2125723540</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comprehensive comparison of numerical relativity and effective-one-body results to inform improvements in waveform models for binary neutron star systems</title><source>American Physical Society Journals</source><creator>Dietrich, Tim ; Hinderer, Tanja</creator><creatorcontrib>Dietrich, Tim ; Hinderer, Tanja</creatorcontrib><description>We present a detailed comparison between tidal effective-one-body (EOB) models and new state-of-the-art numerical relativity simulations for nonspinning binary neutron star systems. This comparison is the most extensive one to date, covering a wide range in the parameter space and encompassing the energetics of the binary, the periastron advance, the time and frequency evolution of the gravitational wave phase for the dominant mode, and several subdominant modes. We consider different EOB models with tidal effects that have been proposed, including the model with dynamical tides of Hinderer et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 181101 (2016)] and the gravitational self-force (GSF) inspired tidal EOB model of Bernuzzi et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 161103 (2015)]. The EOB model with dynamical tides leads to the best representation of the systems considered here; however, the differences to the GSF-inspired model are small. A common feature is that for systems where matter effects are large, i.e., stiff equations of state or small total masses, all EOB models underestimate the tidal effects and differences to the results from numerical relativity simulations become noticeable near the merger. We analyze this regime to diagnose the shortcomings of the models in the late inspiral, where the two neutron stars are no longer isolated bodies moving in vacuum. Our work will serve to guide further advances in modeling these systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2470-0010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2470-0029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.124006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>College Park: American Physical Society</publisher><subject>Binary stars ; Computer simulation ; Equations of state ; Gravitation ; Gravitational waves ; Mathematical models ; Neutron stars ; Neutrons ; Numerical relativity ; Relativity ; State of the art ; Stellar systems ; System effectiveness ; Tidal effects ; Tides</subject><ispartof>Physical review. D, 2017-06, Vol.95 (12), Article 124006</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Physical Society Jun 15, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-1c89ff8d784f87a5f8315232bed8f9864096f1d29891d0ef6440ed866a5feceb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-1c89ff8d784f87a5f8315232bed8f9864096f1d29891d0ef6440ed866a5feceb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2862,2863,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dietrich, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinderer, Tanja</creatorcontrib><title>Comprehensive comparison of numerical relativity and effective-one-body results to inform improvements in waveform models for binary neutron star systems</title><title>Physical review. D</title><description>We present a detailed comparison between tidal effective-one-body (EOB) models and new state-of-the-art numerical relativity simulations for nonspinning binary neutron star systems. This comparison is the most extensive one to date, covering a wide range in the parameter space and encompassing the energetics of the binary, the periastron advance, the time and frequency evolution of the gravitational wave phase for the dominant mode, and several subdominant modes. We consider different EOB models with tidal effects that have been proposed, including the model with dynamical tides of Hinderer et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 181101 (2016)] and the gravitational self-force (GSF) inspired tidal EOB model of Bernuzzi et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 161103 (2015)]. The EOB model with dynamical tides leads to the best representation of the systems considered here; however, the differences to the GSF-inspired model are small. A common feature is that for systems where matter effects are large, i.e., stiff equations of state or small total masses, all EOB models underestimate the tidal effects and differences to the results from numerical relativity simulations become noticeable near the merger. We analyze this regime to diagnose the shortcomings of the models in the late inspiral, where the two neutron stars are no longer isolated bodies moving in vacuum. Our work will serve to guide further advances in modeling these systems.</description><subject>Binary stars</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Equations of state</subject><subject>Gravitation</subject><subject>Gravitational waves</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Neutron stars</subject><subject>Neutrons</subject><subject>Numerical relativity</subject><subject>Relativity</subject><subject>State of the art</subject><subject>Stellar systems</subject><subject>System effectiveness</subject><subject>Tidal effects</subject><subject>Tides</subject><issn>2470-0010</issn><issn>2470-0029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9UctKBDEQDKLgovsDngKeZ00yr-Qo6xMWFNFzyMx02CwzyZpkRuZT_Fujq566qruoaiiELihZUUryq-ftHF5gulmJckVZQUh1hBasqElGCBPH_5iSU7QMYUcSrIioKV2gz7Ub9h62YIOZALeJKW-Cs9hpbMcBvGlVjz30KprJxBkr22HQGtrEIXMWssZ1c1KEsY8BR4eN1c4P2CRjN8EANq2NxR9qgp_D4DroA04YN8YqP2MLY_QpM0TlcZhDhCGcoxOt-gDL33mG3u5uX9cP2ebp_nF9vcnanIqY0ZYLrXlX80LzWpWa57RkOWug41rwqiCi0rRjggvaEdBVUZB0qqokhRaa_AxdHnzTt-8jhCh3bvQ2RUpGWVmzvCxIUrGDqvUuBA9a7r0Z0u-SEvndgvxrQYpSHlrIvwCpJYFG</recordid><startdate>20170615</startdate><enddate>20170615</enddate><creator>Dietrich, Tim</creator><creator>Hinderer, Tanja</creator><general>American Physical Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170615</creationdate><title>Comprehensive comparison of numerical relativity and effective-one-body results to inform improvements in waveform models for binary neutron star systems</title><author>Dietrich, Tim ; Hinderer, Tanja</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-1c89ff8d784f87a5f8315232bed8f9864096f1d29891d0ef6440ed866a5feceb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Binary stars</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Equations of state</topic><topic>Gravitation</topic><topic>Gravitational waves</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Neutron stars</topic><topic>Neutrons</topic><topic>Numerical relativity</topic><topic>Relativity</topic><topic>State of the art</topic><topic>Stellar systems</topic><topic>System effectiveness</topic><topic>Tidal effects</topic><topic>Tides</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dietrich, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinderer, Tanja</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Physical review. D</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dietrich, Tim</au><au>Hinderer, Tanja</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comprehensive comparison of numerical relativity and effective-one-body results to inform improvements in waveform models for binary neutron star systems</atitle><jtitle>Physical review. D</jtitle><date>2017-06-15</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>12</issue><artnum>124006</artnum><issn>2470-0010</issn><eissn>2470-0029</eissn><abstract>We present a detailed comparison between tidal effective-one-body (EOB) models and new state-of-the-art numerical relativity simulations for nonspinning binary neutron star systems. This comparison is the most extensive one to date, covering a wide range in the parameter space and encompassing the energetics of the binary, the periastron advance, the time and frequency evolution of the gravitational wave phase for the dominant mode, and several subdominant modes. We consider different EOB models with tidal effects that have been proposed, including the model with dynamical tides of Hinderer et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 181101 (2016)] and the gravitational self-force (GSF) inspired tidal EOB model of Bernuzzi et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 161103 (2015)]. The EOB model with dynamical tides leads to the best representation of the systems considered here; however, the differences to the GSF-inspired model are small. A common feature is that for systems where matter effects are large, i.e., stiff equations of state or small total masses, all EOB models underestimate the tidal effects and differences to the results from numerical relativity simulations become noticeable near the merger. We analyze this regime to diagnose the shortcomings of the models in the late inspiral, where the two neutron stars are no longer isolated bodies moving in vacuum. Our work will serve to guide further advances in modeling these systems.</abstract><cop>College Park</cop><pub>American Physical Society</pub><doi>10.1103/PhysRevD.95.124006</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2470-0010
ispartof Physical review. D, 2017-06, Vol.95 (12), Article 124006
issn 2470-0010
2470-0029
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2125723540
source American Physical Society Journals
subjects Binary stars
Computer simulation
Equations of state
Gravitation
Gravitational waves
Mathematical models
Neutron stars
Neutrons
Numerical relativity
Relativity
State of the art
Stellar systems
System effectiveness
Tidal effects
Tides
title Comprehensive comparison of numerical relativity and effective-one-body results to inform improvements in waveform models for binary neutron star systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T07%3A09%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comprehensive%20comparison%20of%20numerical%20relativity%20and%20effective-one-body%20results%20to%20inform%20improvements%20in%20waveform%20models%20for%20binary%20neutron%20star%20systems&rft.jtitle=Physical%20review.%20D&rft.au=Dietrich,%20Tim&rft.date=2017-06-15&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=12&rft.artnum=124006&rft.issn=2470-0010&rft.eissn=2470-0029&rft_id=info:doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.124006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2125723540%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2125723540&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true