Life Cycle and Economic Assessments of Key Emerging Energy Efficient Wastewater Treatment Processes for Climate Change Adaptation
New emerging wastewater treatment technologies like bioelectrochemical systems (BESs) and membrane bioreactors (MBRs) have been introduced in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) for producing energy and treating urban wastewater. This study compares WWTPs that combine new emerging technologies of me...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International Journal of Environmental Research 2018-12, Vol.12 (6), p.815-827 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 827 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 815 |
| container_title | International Journal of Environmental Research |
| container_volume | 12 |
| creator | Rashidi, Jouan Rhee, GaHee Kim, Minhyun Nam, KiJeon Heo, Sungku Yoo, ChangKyoo Karbassi, Abdolreza |
| description | New emerging wastewater treatment technologies like bioelectrochemical systems (BESs) and membrane bioreactors (MBRs) have been introduced in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) for producing energy and treating urban wastewater. This study compares WWTPs that combine new emerging technologies of membrane bioreactors (MBRs), microbial fuel cells (MFCs), and microbial electrolysis (MEC) with the conventional techniques (anaerobic, anoxic, and oxic, A
2
O). The environmental and economic impacts of the combined emerging treatment technologies are evaluated. Life cycle assessment (LCA) and economic assessment of the total cost considering both capital and operating cost are performed to evaluate the environmental and economic impacts, respectively. The environmental impact evaluation demonstrated that A
2
O + MBR and A
2
O + MFC processes are the most environmentally friendly processes in the construction and operation stages, respectively. Detailed analyses of the dominant environmental impact categories showed that the total volume for the construction stage, the effluent quality, and methane emission for the operation stage are important parameters. The results of economic impact showed that A
2
O and A
2
O + MFC processes have the lowest capital cost and operational cost, respectively. Furthermore, it can be inferred that A
2
O + MFC is the most economic process based on total economic impact, which included both the capital and the operational cost over 20 years. The proposed method provided guidance on the use of economical and environmentally friendly emerging techniques in WWTPs. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s41742-018-0135-6 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2125334532</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A706629773</galeid><sourcerecordid>A706629773</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-3237e59bced935538543e033cc35efe366371f8483a62645e8766a007131db6a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UU2PFCEQJUYTJ7P7A7yReO6Vjwa6j5POqBsncQ9rPBKWLkY2MzACGzNH_7nVaRNPQgjw6r0qqEfIO87uOGPmQ-256UXH-IBLqk6_IhvB2NAJyfrXZMPNAg5avSW3tT4zHHIcda835PchBqDT1Z-AujTTvc8pn6Onu1qh1jOkVmkO9Atc6f4M5RjTke4THvAeQvQRGfS7qw1-uQaFPhZwbZHRh5I9LFloyIVOp3hGAp1-uHQEupvdpbkWc7ohb4I7Vbj9u2_Jt4_7x-lzd_j66X7aHTovlWqdFNKAGp88zCMCclC9BCalxzAEkFpLw8PQD9JpoXsFg9HaYXe45POTdnJL3q95LyX_fIHa7HN-KQlLWsGFkrJXWGNL7lbW0Z3AxhRyK87jnAG7khOEiPjOMK3FaIxEAV8FvuRaCwR7KfjTcrWc2cUdu7pj0R27uGM1asSqqcjFbpR_T_m_6A-2hZFM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2125334532</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Life Cycle and Economic Assessments of Key Emerging Energy Efficient Wastewater Treatment Processes for Climate Change Adaptation</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Bioline International</source><creator>Rashidi, Jouan ; Rhee, GaHee ; Kim, Minhyun ; Nam, KiJeon ; Heo, Sungku ; Yoo, ChangKyoo ; Karbassi, Abdolreza</creator><creatorcontrib>Rashidi, Jouan ; Rhee, GaHee ; Kim, Minhyun ; Nam, KiJeon ; Heo, Sungku ; Yoo, ChangKyoo ; Karbassi, Abdolreza</creatorcontrib><description>New emerging wastewater treatment technologies like bioelectrochemical systems (BESs) and membrane bioreactors (MBRs) have been introduced in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) for producing energy and treating urban wastewater. This study compares WWTPs that combine new emerging technologies of membrane bioreactors (MBRs), microbial fuel cells (MFCs), and microbial electrolysis (MEC) with the conventional techniques (anaerobic, anoxic, and oxic, A
2
O). The environmental and economic impacts of the combined emerging treatment technologies are evaluated. Life cycle assessment (LCA) and economic assessment of the total cost considering both capital and operating cost are performed to evaluate the environmental and economic impacts, respectively. The environmental impact evaluation demonstrated that A
2
O + MBR and A
2
O + MFC processes are the most environmentally friendly processes in the construction and operation stages, respectively. Detailed analyses of the dominant environmental impact categories showed that the total volume for the construction stage, the effluent quality, and methane emission for the operation stage are important parameters. The results of economic impact showed that A
2
O and A
2
O + MFC processes have the lowest capital cost and operational cost, respectively. Furthermore, it can be inferred that A
2
O + MFC is the most economic process based on total economic impact, which included both the capital and the operational cost over 20 years. The proposed method provided guidance on the use of economical and environmentally friendly emerging techniques in WWTPs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1735-6865</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2008-2304</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s41742-018-0135-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Anaerobic microorganisms ; Analysis ; Biochemical fuel cells ; Bioreactors ; Capital ; Climate change ; Construction ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Economic aspects ; Economic impact ; Economics ; Effluent quality ; Electrolysis ; Electrolytic cells ; Energy efficiency ; Energy use ; Environment ; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology ; Environmental impact ; Environmental Management ; Force and energy ; Fuel cell industry ; Fuel cells ; Fuel technology ; Geoecology/Natural Processes ; Global temperature changes ; Green market ; Impact analysis ; Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning ; Life cycle analysis ; Life cycle assessment ; Life cycle engineering ; Life cycles ; Methane ; Microorganisms ; Natural Hazards ; Nuclear fuels ; Operating costs ; Purification ; Research Paper ; Sewage ; Wastewater treatment ; Wastewater treatment plants ; Water treatment ; Water treatment plants</subject><ispartof>International Journal of Environmental Research, 2018-12, Vol.12 (6), p.815-827</ispartof><rights>University of Tehran 2018</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Springer</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-3237e59bced935538543e033cc35efe366371f8483a62645e8766a007131db6a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-3237e59bced935538543e033cc35efe366371f8483a62645e8766a007131db6a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9408-908X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41742-018-0135-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41742-018-0135-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rashidi, Jouan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhee, GaHee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Minhyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, KiJeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heo, Sungku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoo, ChangKyoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karbassi, Abdolreza</creatorcontrib><title>Life Cycle and Economic Assessments of Key Emerging Energy Efficient Wastewater Treatment Processes for Climate Change Adaptation</title><title>International Journal of Environmental Research</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res</addtitle><description>New emerging wastewater treatment technologies like bioelectrochemical systems (BESs) and membrane bioreactors (MBRs) have been introduced in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) for producing energy and treating urban wastewater. This study compares WWTPs that combine new emerging technologies of membrane bioreactors (MBRs), microbial fuel cells (MFCs), and microbial electrolysis (MEC) with the conventional techniques (anaerobic, anoxic, and oxic, A
2
O). The environmental and economic impacts of the combined emerging treatment technologies are evaluated. Life cycle assessment (LCA) and economic assessment of the total cost considering both capital and operating cost are performed to evaluate the environmental and economic impacts, respectively. The environmental impact evaluation demonstrated that A
2
O + MBR and A
2
O + MFC processes are the most environmentally friendly processes in the construction and operation stages, respectively. Detailed analyses of the dominant environmental impact categories showed that the total volume for the construction stage, the effluent quality, and methane emission for the operation stage are important parameters. The results of economic impact showed that A
2
O and A
2
O + MFC processes have the lowest capital cost and operational cost, respectively. Furthermore, it can be inferred that A
2
O + MFC is the most economic process based on total economic impact, which included both the capital and the operational cost over 20 years. The proposed method provided guidance on the use of economical and environmentally friendly emerging techniques in WWTPs.</description><subject>Anaerobic microorganisms</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biochemical fuel cells</subject><subject>Bioreactors</subject><subject>Capital</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Effluent quality</subject><subject>Electrolysis</subject><subject>Electrolytic cells</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Energy use</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Force and energy</subject><subject>Fuel cell industry</subject><subject>Fuel cells</subject><subject>Fuel technology</subject><subject>Geoecology/Natural Processes</subject><subject>Global temperature changes</subject><subject>Green market</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</subject><subject>Life cycle analysis</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment</subject><subject>Life cycle engineering</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Natural Hazards</subject><subject>Nuclear fuels</subject><subject>Operating costs</subject><subject>Purification</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Sewage</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment plants</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><subject>Water treatment plants</subject><issn>1735-6865</issn><issn>2008-2304</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UU2PFCEQJUYTJ7P7A7yReO6Vjwa6j5POqBsncQ9rPBKWLkY2MzACGzNH_7nVaRNPQgjw6r0qqEfIO87uOGPmQ-256UXH-IBLqk6_IhvB2NAJyfrXZMPNAg5avSW3tT4zHHIcda835PchBqDT1Z-AujTTvc8pn6Onu1qh1jOkVmkO9Atc6f4M5RjTke4THvAeQvQRGfS7qw1-uQaFPhZwbZHRh5I9LFloyIVOp3hGAp1-uHQEupvdpbkWc7ohb4I7Vbj9u2_Jt4_7x-lzd_j66X7aHTovlWqdFNKAGp88zCMCclC9BCalxzAEkFpLw8PQD9JpoXsFg9HaYXe45POTdnJL3q95LyX_fIHa7HN-KQlLWsGFkrJXWGNL7lbW0Z3AxhRyK87jnAG7khOEiPjOMK3FaIxEAV8FvuRaCwR7KfjTcrWc2cUdu7pj0R27uGM1asSqqcjFbpR_T_m_6A-2hZFM</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>Rashidi, Jouan</creator><creator>Rhee, GaHee</creator><creator>Kim, Minhyun</creator><creator>Nam, KiJeon</creator><creator>Heo, Sungku</creator><creator>Yoo, ChangKyoo</creator><creator>Karbassi, Abdolreza</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9408-908X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>Life Cycle and Economic Assessments of Key Emerging Energy Efficient Wastewater Treatment Processes for Climate Change Adaptation</title><author>Rashidi, Jouan ; Rhee, GaHee ; Kim, Minhyun ; Nam, KiJeon ; Heo, Sungku ; Yoo, ChangKyoo ; Karbassi, Abdolreza</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-3237e59bced935538543e033cc35efe366371f8483a62645e8766a007131db6a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Anaerobic microorganisms</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biochemical fuel cells</topic><topic>Bioreactors</topic><topic>Capital</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Effluent quality</topic><topic>Electrolysis</topic><topic>Electrolytic cells</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Energy use</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Force and energy</topic><topic>Fuel cell industry</topic><topic>Fuel cells</topic><topic>Fuel technology</topic><topic>Geoecology/Natural Processes</topic><topic>Global temperature changes</topic><topic>Green market</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</topic><topic>Life cycle analysis</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment</topic><topic>Life cycle engineering</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Natural Hazards</topic><topic>Nuclear fuels</topic><topic>Operating costs</topic><topic>Purification</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Sewage</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment plants</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><topic>Water treatment plants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rashidi, Jouan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhee, GaHee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Minhyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, KiJeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heo, Sungku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoo, ChangKyoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karbassi, Abdolreza</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International Journal of Environmental Research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rashidi, Jouan</au><au>Rhee, GaHee</au><au>Kim, Minhyun</au><au>Nam, KiJeon</au><au>Heo, Sungku</au><au>Yoo, ChangKyoo</au><au>Karbassi, Abdolreza</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Life Cycle and Economic Assessments of Key Emerging Energy Efficient Wastewater Treatment Processes for Climate Change Adaptation</atitle><jtitle>International Journal of Environmental Research</jtitle><stitle>Int J Environ Res</stitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>815</spage><epage>827</epage><pages>815-827</pages><issn>1735-6865</issn><eissn>2008-2304</eissn><abstract>New emerging wastewater treatment technologies like bioelectrochemical systems (BESs) and membrane bioreactors (MBRs) have been introduced in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) for producing energy and treating urban wastewater. This study compares WWTPs that combine new emerging technologies of membrane bioreactors (MBRs), microbial fuel cells (MFCs), and microbial electrolysis (MEC) with the conventional techniques (anaerobic, anoxic, and oxic, A
2
O). The environmental and economic impacts of the combined emerging treatment technologies are evaluated. Life cycle assessment (LCA) and economic assessment of the total cost considering both capital and operating cost are performed to evaluate the environmental and economic impacts, respectively. The environmental impact evaluation demonstrated that A
2
O + MBR and A
2
O + MFC processes are the most environmentally friendly processes in the construction and operation stages, respectively. Detailed analyses of the dominant environmental impact categories showed that the total volume for the construction stage, the effluent quality, and methane emission for the operation stage are important parameters. The results of economic impact showed that A
2
O and A
2
O + MFC processes have the lowest capital cost and operational cost, respectively. Furthermore, it can be inferred that A
2
O + MFC is the most economic process based on total economic impact, which included both the capital and the operational cost over 20 years. The proposed method provided guidance on the use of economical and environmentally friendly emerging techniques in WWTPs.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s41742-018-0135-6</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9408-908X</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1735-6865 |
| ispartof | International Journal of Environmental Research, 2018-12, Vol.12 (6), p.815-827 |
| issn | 1735-6865 2008-2304 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2125334532 |
| source | SpringerNature Journals; Bioline International |
| subjects | Anaerobic microorganisms Analysis Biochemical fuel cells Bioreactors Capital Climate change Construction Earth and Environmental Science Economic aspects Economic impact Economics Effluent quality Electrolysis Electrolytic cells Energy efficiency Energy use Environment Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology Environmental impact Environmental Management Force and energy Fuel cell industry Fuel cells Fuel technology Geoecology/Natural Processes Global temperature changes Green market Impact analysis Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning Life cycle analysis Life cycle assessment Life cycle engineering Life cycles Methane Microorganisms Natural Hazards Nuclear fuels Operating costs Purification Research Paper Sewage Wastewater treatment Wastewater treatment plants Water treatment Water treatment plants |
| title | Life Cycle and Economic Assessments of Key Emerging Energy Efficient Wastewater Treatment Processes for Climate Change Adaptation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T03%3A24%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Life%20Cycle%20and%20Economic%20Assessments%20of%20Key%20Emerging%20Energy%20Efficient%20Wastewater%20Treatment%20Processes%20for%20Climate%20Change%20Adaptation&rft.jtitle=International%20Journal%20of%20Environmental%20Research&rft.au=Rashidi,%20Jouan&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=815&rft.epage=827&rft.pages=815-827&rft.issn=1735-6865&rft.eissn=2008-2304&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s41742-018-0135-6&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA706629773%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2125334532&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A706629773&rfr_iscdi=true |