He being dead, yet speaketh: the preacher's voice in early seventeenth‐century posthumous sermon collections

Recent studies of the early modern sermon argue that we need to read them in their historical context, but these studies often define context to mean, primarily, the original performance of the sermon, emphasizing how the paratexts of printed sermons preserve information about the time, place, and o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Renaissance studies 2018-11, Vol.32 (5), p.738-754
1. Verfasser: Clement, Jennifer
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 754
container_issue 5
container_start_page 738
container_title Renaissance studies
container_volume 32
creator Clement, Jennifer
description Recent studies of the early modern sermon argue that we need to read them in their historical context, but these studies often define context to mean, primarily, the original performance of the sermon, emphasizing how the paratexts of printed sermons preserve information about the time, place, and occasion of original delivery. Although I agree that understanding the conditions of the preached sermon is important, I suggest that the authority of the sermon event is less important to justify the printed sermon than we tend to assume. In this article, I focus on the paratextual means by which early seventeenth‐century sermon collections were framed, especially by editors of posthumous works, as the living voices of dead preachers. As I show, such collections do not preserve information about the original sermon event so much as they focus on print's ability to preserve the words, ideas, and wisdom of the dead.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/rest.12362
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2124680541</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2124680541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2602-3fcb70f239bce62355423e87940b5016762ee10640198dae8b053f3db560ccbc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9KxDAQh4MouK5efIKAB0Hsmj9N2nqTZXUFQdD1HNp0art2m5q0K735CD6jT2LWenZg-F2-mWE-hE4pmVFfVxZcN6OMS7aHJjSMoiCUIt5HE8JkElBG-SE6cm5NCBEhFRPULAFnUDWvOIc0v8QDdNi1kL5BV17jrgTcWkh1Cfbc4a2pNOCqwZDaesAOttB04Lv8_vzSPns74Na4ruw3pncesBvTYG3qGnRXmcYdo4MirR2c_OUUvdwuVvNl8PB4dz-_eQg0k4QFvNBZRArGk0yDZFyIkHGIoyQkmSBURpIBUCJDQpM4TyHOiOAFzzMhidaZ5lN0Nu5trXnvvRS1Nr1t_EnFKAtlvHvfUxcjpa1xzkKhWlttUjsoStTOp9r5VL8-PUxH-KOqYfiHVE-L59U48wMH0Xob</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2124680541</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>He being dead, yet speaketh: the preacher's voice in early seventeenth‐century posthumous sermon collections</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Clement, Jennifer</creator><creatorcontrib>Clement, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><description>Recent studies of the early modern sermon argue that we need to read them in their historical context, but these studies often define context to mean, primarily, the original performance of the sermon, emphasizing how the paratexts of printed sermons preserve information about the time, place, and occasion of original delivery. Although I agree that understanding the conditions of the preached sermon is important, I suggest that the authority of the sermon event is less important to justify the printed sermon than we tend to assume. In this article, I focus on the paratextual means by which early seventeenth‐century sermon collections were framed, especially by editors of posthumous works, as the living voices of dead preachers. As I show, such collections do not preserve information about the original sermon event so much as they focus on print's ability to preserve the words, ideas, and wisdom of the dead.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-1213</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-4658</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/rest.12362</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>17th century ; Anthologies ; Early modern period ; Early modern sermons ; John Preston ; Literary history ; paratexts ; posthumous sermon collections ; print culture ; Public speaking ; Religious literature ; Renaissance period ; Richard Sibbes ; Sermons</subject><ispartof>Renaissance studies, 2018-11, Vol.32 (5), p.738-754</ispartof><rights>2017 The Society for Renaissance Studies and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-1588-3259</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Frest.12362$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Frest.12362$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clement, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><title>He being dead, yet speaketh: the preacher's voice in early seventeenth‐century posthumous sermon collections</title><title>Renaissance studies</title><description>Recent studies of the early modern sermon argue that we need to read them in their historical context, but these studies often define context to mean, primarily, the original performance of the sermon, emphasizing how the paratexts of printed sermons preserve information about the time, place, and occasion of original delivery. Although I agree that understanding the conditions of the preached sermon is important, I suggest that the authority of the sermon event is less important to justify the printed sermon than we tend to assume. In this article, I focus on the paratextual means by which early seventeenth‐century sermon collections were framed, especially by editors of posthumous works, as the living voices of dead preachers. As I show, such collections do not preserve information about the original sermon event so much as they focus on print's ability to preserve the words, ideas, and wisdom of the dead.</description><subject>17th century</subject><subject>Anthologies</subject><subject>Early modern period</subject><subject>Early modern sermons</subject><subject>John Preston</subject><subject>Literary history</subject><subject>paratexts</subject><subject>posthumous sermon collections</subject><subject>print culture</subject><subject>Public speaking</subject><subject>Religious literature</subject><subject>Renaissance period</subject><subject>Richard Sibbes</subject><subject>Sermons</subject><issn>0269-1213</issn><issn>1477-4658</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9KxDAQh4MouK5efIKAB0Hsmj9N2nqTZXUFQdD1HNp0art2m5q0K735CD6jT2LWenZg-F2-mWE-hE4pmVFfVxZcN6OMS7aHJjSMoiCUIt5HE8JkElBG-SE6cm5NCBEhFRPULAFnUDWvOIc0v8QDdNi1kL5BV17jrgTcWkh1Cfbc4a2pNOCqwZDaesAOttB04Lv8_vzSPns74Na4ruw3pncesBvTYG3qGnRXmcYdo4MirR2c_OUUvdwuVvNl8PB4dz-_eQg0k4QFvNBZRArGk0yDZFyIkHGIoyQkmSBURpIBUCJDQpM4TyHOiOAFzzMhidaZ5lN0Nu5trXnvvRS1Nr1t_EnFKAtlvHvfUxcjpa1xzkKhWlttUjsoStTOp9r5VL8-PUxH-KOqYfiHVE-L59U48wMH0Xob</recordid><startdate>201811</startdate><enddate>201811</enddate><creator>Clement, Jennifer</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8XN</scope><scope>C18</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1588-3259</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201811</creationdate><title>He being dead, yet speaketh: the preacher's voice in early seventeenth‐century posthumous sermon collections</title><author>Clement, Jennifer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2602-3fcb70f239bce62355423e87940b5016762ee10640198dae8b053f3db560ccbc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>17th century</topic><topic>Anthologies</topic><topic>Early modern period</topic><topic>Early modern sermons</topic><topic>John Preston</topic><topic>Literary history</topic><topic>paratexts</topic><topic>posthumous sermon collections</topic><topic>print culture</topic><topic>Public speaking</topic><topic>Religious literature</topic><topic>Renaissance period</topic><topic>Richard Sibbes</topic><topic>Sermons</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clement, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>Renaissance studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clement, Jennifer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>He being dead, yet speaketh: the preacher's voice in early seventeenth‐century posthumous sermon collections</atitle><jtitle>Renaissance studies</jtitle><date>2018-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>738</spage><epage>754</epage><pages>738-754</pages><issn>0269-1213</issn><eissn>1477-4658</eissn><abstract>Recent studies of the early modern sermon argue that we need to read them in their historical context, but these studies often define context to mean, primarily, the original performance of the sermon, emphasizing how the paratexts of printed sermons preserve information about the time, place, and occasion of original delivery. Although I agree that understanding the conditions of the preached sermon is important, I suggest that the authority of the sermon event is less important to justify the printed sermon than we tend to assume. In this article, I focus on the paratextual means by which early seventeenth‐century sermon collections were framed, especially by editors of posthumous works, as the living voices of dead preachers. As I show, such collections do not preserve information about the original sermon event so much as they focus on print's ability to preserve the words, ideas, and wisdom of the dead.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/rest.12362</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1588-3259</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-1213
ispartof Renaissance studies, 2018-11, Vol.32 (5), p.738-754
issn 0269-1213
1477-4658
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2124680541
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects 17th century
Anthologies
Early modern period
Early modern sermons
John Preston
Literary history
paratexts
posthumous sermon collections
print culture
Public speaking
Religious literature
Renaissance period
Richard Sibbes
Sermons
title He being dead, yet speaketh: the preacher's voice in early seventeenth‐century posthumous sermon collections
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T10%3A26%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=He%20being%20dead,%20yet%20speaketh:%20the%20preacher's%20voice%20in%20early%20seventeenth%E2%80%90century%20posthumous%20sermon%20collections&rft.jtitle=Renaissance%20studies&rft.au=Clement,%20Jennifer&rft.date=2018-11&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=738&rft.epage=754&rft.pages=738-754&rft.issn=0269-1213&rft.eissn=1477-4658&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/rest.12362&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2124680541%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2124680541&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true