Psychoanalytic Research: Personal Reflections

In this paper I reflect on and argue for the importance for our profession of the issues I address in the book I wrote on clinical research, Research on the Couch: Subjectivity, Single Case Studies and Psychoanalytic Knowledge. Psychoanalytic theories, often dismissed when first proposed, have been...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of psychotherapy 2018-11, Vol.34 (4), p.539-548
1. Verfasser: Hinshelwood, R.D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 548
container_issue 4
container_start_page 539
container_title British journal of psychotherapy
container_volume 34
creator Hinshelwood, R.D.
description In this paper I reflect on and argue for the importance for our profession of the issues I address in the book I wrote on clinical research, Research on the Couch: Subjectivity, Single Case Studies and Psychoanalytic Knowledge. Psychoanalytic theories, often dismissed when first proposed, have been subjected to more serious critical attack for several decades, and thoughtful responses need to be given. This paper summarizes some of my thinking (and that of others) around two issues which constrain the parameters of psychoanalytic research and on which some believe psychoanalytic research has foundered. The first is the problem of subjectivity in contrast to the bedrock of objectivity in the natural sciences; and the second is the inappropriateness of large sample research (as used by many experimental psychologists) for the task of investigating the nature and effectiveness of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysts have to rely instead on single cases. Brief accounts are given here of research paradigms appropriate to the investigation and validation of psychoanalytic theory and practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/bjp.12403
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2124641870</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2124641870</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3253-50f659d21600f030c72bd7cfa41c8128abcae6ac391b05a98520477b7c731ee53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsHv0HBk4dtZ5LNJuutFv9SsIieQzadpVvW7ppsKfvtjdZ6cy4Dj98b3jzGLhHGGGdSrNsx8hTEERugkjwBRH3MBsAzmeRai1N2FsIaQHIJesCSRejdqrEbW_dd5UavFMh6t7oZLciHJspRKmtyXdVswjk7KW0d6OJ3D9n7_d3b7DGZvzw8zabzxAkuRSKhzGS-5JgBlCDAKV4slSttik4j17ZwljLrRI4FSJtrySFVqlBOCSSSYsiu9ndb33xuKXRm3Wx9DBMMj99lKWoFkbreU843IXgqTeurD-t7g2C-2zCxDfPTRmQne3ZX1dT_D5rb58XBcchA7Y6KP0sEDIjUgBT5VHwBfKhqiA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2124641870</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychoanalytic Research: Personal Reflections</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Hinshelwood, R.D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hinshelwood, R.D.</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper I reflect on and argue for the importance for our profession of the issues I address in the book I wrote on clinical research, Research on the Couch: Subjectivity, Single Case Studies and Psychoanalytic Knowledge. Psychoanalytic theories, often dismissed when first proposed, have been subjected to more serious critical attack for several decades, and thoughtful responses need to be given. This paper summarizes some of my thinking (and that of others) around two issues which constrain the parameters of psychoanalytic research and on which some believe psychoanalytic research has foundered. The first is the problem of subjectivity in contrast to the bedrock of objectivity in the natural sciences; and the second is the inappropriateness of large sample research (as used by many experimental psychologists) for the task of investigating the nature and effectiveness of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysts have to rely instead on single cases. Brief accounts are given here of research paradigms appropriate to the investigation and validation of psychoanalytic theory and practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0265-9883</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-0118</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bjp.12403</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Artesian Books</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Clinical research ; Hypothetico‐Deductive Methodology ; Inappropriateness ; Objectivity ; Paradigms ; Psychoanalysis ; Psychoanalysts ; Psychoanalytic theory ; Psychologists ; Single Case Studies ; Subjectivity ; Validity</subject><ispartof>British journal of psychotherapy, 2018-11, Vol.34 (4), p.539-548</ispartof><rights>2018 BPF and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3253-50f659d21600f030c72bd7cfa41c8128abcae6ac391b05a98520477b7c731ee53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3253-50f659d21600f030c72bd7cfa41c8128abcae6ac391b05a98520477b7c731ee53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbjp.12403$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbjp.12403$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hinshelwood, R.D.</creatorcontrib><title>Psychoanalytic Research: Personal Reflections</title><title>British journal of psychotherapy</title><description>In this paper I reflect on and argue for the importance for our profession of the issues I address in the book I wrote on clinical research, Research on the Couch: Subjectivity, Single Case Studies and Psychoanalytic Knowledge. Psychoanalytic theories, often dismissed when first proposed, have been subjected to more serious critical attack for several decades, and thoughtful responses need to be given. This paper summarizes some of my thinking (and that of others) around two issues which constrain the parameters of psychoanalytic research and on which some believe psychoanalytic research has foundered. The first is the problem of subjectivity in contrast to the bedrock of objectivity in the natural sciences; and the second is the inappropriateness of large sample research (as used by many experimental psychologists) for the task of investigating the nature and effectiveness of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysts have to rely instead on single cases. Brief accounts are given here of research paradigms appropriate to the investigation and validation of psychoanalytic theory and practice.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Clinical research</subject><subject>Hypothetico‐Deductive Methodology</subject><subject>Inappropriateness</subject><subject>Objectivity</subject><subject>Paradigms</subject><subject>Psychoanalysis</subject><subject>Psychoanalysts</subject><subject>Psychoanalytic theory</subject><subject>Psychologists</subject><subject>Single Case Studies</subject><subject>Subjectivity</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0265-9883</issn><issn>1752-0118</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsHv0HBk4dtZ5LNJuutFv9SsIieQzadpVvW7ppsKfvtjdZ6cy4Dj98b3jzGLhHGGGdSrNsx8hTEERugkjwBRH3MBsAzmeRai1N2FsIaQHIJesCSRejdqrEbW_dd5UavFMh6t7oZLciHJspRKmtyXdVswjk7KW0d6OJ3D9n7_d3b7DGZvzw8zabzxAkuRSKhzGS-5JgBlCDAKV4slSttik4j17ZwljLrRI4FSJtrySFVqlBOCSSSYsiu9ndb33xuKXRm3Wx9DBMMj99lKWoFkbreU843IXgqTeurD-t7g2C-2zCxDfPTRmQne3ZX1dT_D5rb58XBcchA7Y6KP0sEDIjUgBT5VHwBfKhqiA</recordid><startdate>201811</startdate><enddate>201811</enddate><creator>Hinshelwood, R.D.</creator><general>Artesian Books</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201811</creationdate><title>Psychoanalytic Research: Personal Reflections</title><author>Hinshelwood, R.D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3253-50f659d21600f030c72bd7cfa41c8128abcae6ac391b05a98520477b7c731ee53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Clinical research</topic><topic>Hypothetico‐Deductive Methodology</topic><topic>Inappropriateness</topic><topic>Objectivity</topic><topic>Paradigms</topic><topic>Psychoanalysis</topic><topic>Psychoanalysts</topic><topic>Psychoanalytic theory</topic><topic>Psychologists</topic><topic>Single Case Studies</topic><topic>Subjectivity</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hinshelwood, R.D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>British journal of psychotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hinshelwood, R.D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychoanalytic Research: Personal Reflections</atitle><jtitle>British journal of psychotherapy</jtitle><date>2018-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>539</spage><epage>548</epage><pages>539-548</pages><issn>0265-9883</issn><eissn>1752-0118</eissn><abstract>In this paper I reflect on and argue for the importance for our profession of the issues I address in the book I wrote on clinical research, Research on the Couch: Subjectivity, Single Case Studies and Psychoanalytic Knowledge. Psychoanalytic theories, often dismissed when first proposed, have been subjected to more serious critical attack for several decades, and thoughtful responses need to be given. This paper summarizes some of my thinking (and that of others) around two issues which constrain the parameters of psychoanalytic research and on which some believe psychoanalytic research has foundered. The first is the problem of subjectivity in contrast to the bedrock of objectivity in the natural sciences; and the second is the inappropriateness of large sample research (as used by many experimental psychologists) for the task of investigating the nature and effectiveness of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysts have to rely instead on single cases. Brief accounts are given here of research paradigms appropriate to the investigation and validation of psychoanalytic theory and practice.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Artesian Books</pub><doi>10.1111/bjp.12403</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0265-9883
ispartof British journal of psychotherapy, 2018-11, Vol.34 (4), p.539-548
issn 0265-9883
1752-0118
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2124641870
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Case studies
Clinical research
Hypothetico‐Deductive Methodology
Inappropriateness
Objectivity
Paradigms
Psychoanalysis
Psychoanalysts
Psychoanalytic theory
Psychologists
Single Case Studies
Subjectivity
Validity
title Psychoanalytic Research: Personal Reflections
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T05%3A52%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychoanalytic%20Research:%20Personal%20Reflections&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20psychotherapy&rft.au=Hinshelwood,%20R.D.&rft.date=2018-11&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=539&rft.epage=548&rft.pages=539-548&rft.issn=0265-9883&rft.eissn=1752-0118&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bjp.12403&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2124641870%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2124641870&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true