Stream Runoff and Nitrate Recovery Times After Forest Disturbance in the USA and Japan
To understand mechanisms of long‐term hydrological and biogeochemical recovery after forest disturbance, it is important to evaluate recovery times (i.e., time scales associated with the return to baseline or predisturbance conditions) of stream runoff and nitrate concentration. Previous studies hav...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Water resources research 2018-09, Vol.54 (9), p.6042-6054 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 6054 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 6042 |
| container_title | Water resources research |
| container_volume | 54 |
| creator | Oda, Tomoki Green, Mark B. Urakawa, Rieko Scanlon, Todd M. Sebestyen, Stephen D. McGuire, Kevin J. Katsuyama, Masanori Fukuzawa, Karibu Adams, Mary B. Ohte, Nobuhito |
| description | To understand mechanisms of long‐term hydrological and biogeochemical recovery after forest disturbance, it is important to evaluate recovery times (i.e., time scales associated with the return to baseline or predisturbance conditions) of stream runoff and nitrate concentration. Previous studies have focused on either the response of runoff or nitrate concentration, and some have specifically addressed recovery times following disturbance. However, controlling factors have not yet been elucidated. Knowing these relationships will advance our understanding of each recovery process. The objectives of this study were to explore the relationship between runoff and nitrate recovery times and identify potential factors controlling each. We acquired long‐term runoff and stream water nitrate concentration data from 20 sites in the USA and Japan. We then examined the relationship between runoff and nitrate recovery times at these multiple sites and use these relationships to discuss the ecosystem dynamics following forest disturbance. Nitrate response was detected at all study sites, while runoff responses were detected at all sites with disturbance intensities greater than 75% of the catchment area. The runoff recovery time was significantly correlated with the nitrate recovery time for catchments that had a runoff response. For these catchments, hydrological recovery times were slower than nitrate recovery times. The relationship between these two recovery times suggests that forest regeneration was a common control on both recovery times. However, the faster recovery time for nitrate suggests that nitrogen was less available or less mobile in these catchments than water.
Key Points
Recovery times of stream runoff and nitrate concentration after forest disturbance were defined and compared using data from 20 sites
A linear correlation between runoff and nitrate recovery times was significant for catchments where impacts of runoff were observed
Stream runoff recovery times were longer than nitrate recovery times after extreme forest disturbance |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2017WR021986 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2123912014</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2123912014</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4345-8f665b9636fdc007414df445df2796bc96e96d58d8c1c53be22579161a8b20963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EEqWw8QMssRLwt-OxKrSAKpDSlo6W49giVZsU2wH13xMoAxPTXc597-oAcInRDUZE3RKE5apABKtcHIEBVoxlUkl6DAYIMZphquQpOItxjRBmXMgBeJ2n4MwWFl3Teg9NU8HnOgWTHCycbT9c2MNFvXURjnxyAU7a4GKCd3VMXShNYx2sG5jeHFzORz_1J7MzzTk48WYT3cVvDsFycr8YP2Szl-njeDTLDKOMZ7kXgpdKUOEri5BkmFWeMV55IpUorRJOiYrnVW6x5bR0hHCpsMAmLwnqe0Nwdbi7C-171y_T67YLTf9SE0yowr0S1lPXB8qGNsbgvN6FemvCXmOkv83pv-Z6nB7wz3rj9v-yelWMC0I54fQLvZltVw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2123912014</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stream Runoff and Nitrate Recovery Times After Forest Disturbance in the USA and Japan</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Oda, Tomoki ; Green, Mark B. ; Urakawa, Rieko ; Scanlon, Todd M. ; Sebestyen, Stephen D. ; McGuire, Kevin J. ; Katsuyama, Masanori ; Fukuzawa, Karibu ; Adams, Mary B. ; Ohte, Nobuhito</creator><creatorcontrib>Oda, Tomoki ; Green, Mark B. ; Urakawa, Rieko ; Scanlon, Todd M. ; Sebestyen, Stephen D. ; McGuire, Kevin J. ; Katsuyama, Masanori ; Fukuzawa, Karibu ; Adams, Mary B. ; Ohte, Nobuhito</creatorcontrib><description>To understand mechanisms of long‐term hydrological and biogeochemical recovery after forest disturbance, it is important to evaluate recovery times (i.e., time scales associated with the return to baseline or predisturbance conditions) of stream runoff and nitrate concentration. Previous studies have focused on either the response of runoff or nitrate concentration, and some have specifically addressed recovery times following disturbance. However, controlling factors have not yet been elucidated. Knowing these relationships will advance our understanding of each recovery process. The objectives of this study were to explore the relationship between runoff and nitrate recovery times and identify potential factors controlling each. We acquired long‐term runoff and stream water nitrate concentration data from 20 sites in the USA and Japan. We then examined the relationship between runoff and nitrate recovery times at these multiple sites and use these relationships to discuss the ecosystem dynamics following forest disturbance. Nitrate response was detected at all study sites, while runoff responses were detected at all sites with disturbance intensities greater than 75% of the catchment area. The runoff recovery time was significantly correlated with the nitrate recovery time for catchments that had a runoff response. For these catchments, hydrological recovery times were slower than nitrate recovery times. The relationship between these two recovery times suggests that forest regeneration was a common control on both recovery times. However, the faster recovery time for nitrate suggests that nitrogen was less available or less mobile in these catchments than water.
Key Points
Recovery times of stream runoff and nitrate concentration after forest disturbance were defined and compared using data from 20 sites
A linear correlation between runoff and nitrate recovery times was significant for catchments where impacts of runoff were observed
Stream runoff recovery times were longer than nitrate recovery times after extreme forest disturbance</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2017WR021986</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Biogeochemistry ; Catchment area ; Catchment areas ; Catchments ; Disturbances ; Dynamics ; Ecosystem disturbance ; Ecosystem dynamics ; forest disturbance ; Forest ecosystems ; Forest management ; Forest regeneration ; Forests ; Hydrology ; nitrate concentration ; Nitrates ; Recovery ; Recovery time ; Regeneration ; Regeneration (biological) ; Rivers ; Runoff ; stream runoff</subject><ispartof>Water resources research, 2018-09, Vol.54 (9), p.6042-6054</ispartof><rights>2018. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>2018. American Geophysical Union. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4345-8f665b9636fdc007414df445df2796bc96e96d58d8c1c53be22579161a8b20963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4345-8f665b9636fdc007414df445df2796bc96e96d58d8c1c53be22579161a8b20963</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2391-7802 ; 0000-0001-8869-1675 ; 0000-0001-5751-3956 ; 0000-0002-7415-7209 ; 0000-0003-1677-4425 ; 0000-0002-6315-0108</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2017WR021986$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2017WR021986$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,11493,27901,27902,45550,45551,46443,46867</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oda, Tomoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Mark B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urakawa, Rieko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scanlon, Todd M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sebestyen, Stephen D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuire, Kevin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katsuyama, Masanori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuzawa, Karibu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Mary B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohte, Nobuhito</creatorcontrib><title>Stream Runoff and Nitrate Recovery Times After Forest Disturbance in the USA and Japan</title><title>Water resources research</title><description>To understand mechanisms of long‐term hydrological and biogeochemical recovery after forest disturbance, it is important to evaluate recovery times (i.e., time scales associated with the return to baseline or predisturbance conditions) of stream runoff and nitrate concentration. Previous studies have focused on either the response of runoff or nitrate concentration, and some have specifically addressed recovery times following disturbance. However, controlling factors have not yet been elucidated. Knowing these relationships will advance our understanding of each recovery process. The objectives of this study were to explore the relationship between runoff and nitrate recovery times and identify potential factors controlling each. We acquired long‐term runoff and stream water nitrate concentration data from 20 sites in the USA and Japan. We then examined the relationship between runoff and nitrate recovery times at these multiple sites and use these relationships to discuss the ecosystem dynamics following forest disturbance. Nitrate response was detected at all study sites, while runoff responses were detected at all sites with disturbance intensities greater than 75% of the catchment area. The runoff recovery time was significantly correlated with the nitrate recovery time for catchments that had a runoff response. For these catchments, hydrological recovery times were slower than nitrate recovery times. The relationship between these two recovery times suggests that forest regeneration was a common control on both recovery times. However, the faster recovery time for nitrate suggests that nitrogen was less available or less mobile in these catchments than water.
Key Points
Recovery times of stream runoff and nitrate concentration after forest disturbance were defined and compared using data from 20 sites
A linear correlation between runoff and nitrate recovery times was significant for catchments where impacts of runoff were observed
Stream runoff recovery times were longer than nitrate recovery times after extreme forest disturbance</description><subject>Biogeochemistry</subject><subject>Catchment area</subject><subject>Catchment areas</subject><subject>Catchments</subject><subject>Disturbances</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Ecosystem disturbance</subject><subject>Ecosystem dynamics</subject><subject>forest disturbance</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forest regeneration</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>nitrate concentration</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Recovery time</subject><subject>Regeneration</subject><subject>Regeneration (biological)</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>stream runoff</subject><issn>0043-1397</issn><issn>1944-7973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EEqWw8QMssRLwt-OxKrSAKpDSlo6W49giVZsU2wH13xMoAxPTXc597-oAcInRDUZE3RKE5apABKtcHIEBVoxlUkl6DAYIMZphquQpOItxjRBmXMgBeJ2n4MwWFl3Teg9NU8HnOgWTHCycbT9c2MNFvXURjnxyAU7a4GKCd3VMXShNYx2sG5jeHFzORz_1J7MzzTk48WYT3cVvDsFycr8YP2Szl-njeDTLDKOMZ7kXgpdKUOEri5BkmFWeMV55IpUorRJOiYrnVW6x5bR0hHCpsMAmLwnqe0Nwdbi7C-171y_T67YLTf9SE0yowr0S1lPXB8qGNsbgvN6FemvCXmOkv83pv-Z6nB7wz3rj9v-yelWMC0I54fQLvZltVw</recordid><startdate>201809</startdate><enddate>201809</enddate><creator>Oda, Tomoki</creator><creator>Green, Mark B.</creator><creator>Urakawa, Rieko</creator><creator>Scanlon, Todd M.</creator><creator>Sebestyen, Stephen D.</creator><creator>McGuire, Kevin J.</creator><creator>Katsuyama, Masanori</creator><creator>Fukuzawa, Karibu</creator><creator>Adams, Mary B.</creator><creator>Ohte, Nobuhito</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2391-7802</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8869-1675</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5751-3956</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7415-7209</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1677-4425</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6315-0108</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201809</creationdate><title>Stream Runoff and Nitrate Recovery Times After Forest Disturbance in the USA and Japan</title><author>Oda, Tomoki ; Green, Mark B. ; Urakawa, Rieko ; Scanlon, Todd M. ; Sebestyen, Stephen D. ; McGuire, Kevin J. ; Katsuyama, Masanori ; Fukuzawa, Karibu ; Adams, Mary B. ; Ohte, Nobuhito</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4345-8f665b9636fdc007414df445df2796bc96e96d58d8c1c53be22579161a8b20963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Biogeochemistry</topic><topic>Catchment area</topic><topic>Catchment areas</topic><topic>Catchments</topic><topic>Disturbances</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Ecosystem disturbance</topic><topic>Ecosystem dynamics</topic><topic>forest disturbance</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forest regeneration</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>nitrate concentration</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Recovery time</topic><topic>Regeneration</topic><topic>Regeneration (biological)</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>stream runoff</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oda, Tomoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Mark B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urakawa, Rieko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scanlon, Todd M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sebestyen, Stephen D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuire, Kevin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katsuyama, Masanori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuzawa, Karibu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Mary B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohte, Nobuhito</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oda, Tomoki</au><au>Green, Mark B.</au><au>Urakawa, Rieko</au><au>Scanlon, Todd M.</au><au>Sebestyen, Stephen D.</au><au>McGuire, Kevin J.</au><au>Katsuyama, Masanori</au><au>Fukuzawa, Karibu</au><au>Adams, Mary B.</au><au>Ohte, Nobuhito</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stream Runoff and Nitrate Recovery Times After Forest Disturbance in the USA and Japan</atitle><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle><date>2018-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>6042</spage><epage>6054</epage><pages>6042-6054</pages><issn>0043-1397</issn><eissn>1944-7973</eissn><abstract>To understand mechanisms of long‐term hydrological and biogeochemical recovery after forest disturbance, it is important to evaluate recovery times (i.e., time scales associated with the return to baseline or predisturbance conditions) of stream runoff and nitrate concentration. Previous studies have focused on either the response of runoff or nitrate concentration, and some have specifically addressed recovery times following disturbance. However, controlling factors have not yet been elucidated. Knowing these relationships will advance our understanding of each recovery process. The objectives of this study were to explore the relationship between runoff and nitrate recovery times and identify potential factors controlling each. We acquired long‐term runoff and stream water nitrate concentration data from 20 sites in the USA and Japan. We then examined the relationship between runoff and nitrate recovery times at these multiple sites and use these relationships to discuss the ecosystem dynamics following forest disturbance. Nitrate response was detected at all study sites, while runoff responses were detected at all sites with disturbance intensities greater than 75% of the catchment area. The runoff recovery time was significantly correlated with the nitrate recovery time for catchments that had a runoff response. For these catchments, hydrological recovery times were slower than nitrate recovery times. The relationship between these two recovery times suggests that forest regeneration was a common control on both recovery times. However, the faster recovery time for nitrate suggests that nitrogen was less available or less mobile in these catchments than water.
Key Points
Recovery times of stream runoff and nitrate concentration after forest disturbance were defined and compared using data from 20 sites
A linear correlation between runoff and nitrate recovery times was significant for catchments where impacts of runoff were observed
Stream runoff recovery times were longer than nitrate recovery times after extreme forest disturbance</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2017WR021986</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2391-7802</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8869-1675</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5751-3956</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7415-7209</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1677-4425</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6315-0108</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0043-1397 |
| ispartof | Water resources research, 2018-09, Vol.54 (9), p.6042-6054 |
| issn | 0043-1397 1944-7973 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2123912014 |
| source | Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
| subjects | Biogeochemistry Catchment area Catchment areas Catchments Disturbances Dynamics Ecosystem disturbance Ecosystem dynamics forest disturbance Forest ecosystems Forest management Forest regeneration Forests Hydrology nitrate concentration Nitrates Recovery Recovery time Regeneration Regeneration (biological) Rivers Runoff stream runoff |
| title | Stream Runoff and Nitrate Recovery Times After Forest Disturbance in the USA and Japan |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A02%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stream%20Runoff%20and%20Nitrate%20Recovery%20Times%20After%20Forest%20Disturbance%20in%20the%20USA%20and%20Japan&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20research&rft.au=Oda,%20Tomoki&rft.date=2018-09&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=6042&rft.epage=6054&rft.pages=6042-6054&rft.issn=0043-1397&rft.eissn=1944-7973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2017WR021986&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2123912014%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2123912014&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |