Mutations and karyotype predict treatment response in myelodysplastic syndromes

We examined the influence of mutations and karyotype on conventional treatment response, specifically hematological improvement in anemia, in primary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Cytogenetic and next generation sequencing (NGS)‐derived mutation information was available in 357 patients (median a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of hematology 2018-11, Vol.93 (11), p.1420-1426
Hauptverfasser: Idossa, Dame, Lasho, Terra L., Finke, Christy M., Ketterling, Rhett P., Patnaik, Mrinal M., Pardanani, Animesh, Gangat, Naseema, Tefferi, Ayalew
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1426
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1420
container_title American journal of hematology
container_volume 93
creator Idossa, Dame
Lasho, Terra L.
Finke, Christy M.
Ketterling, Rhett P.
Patnaik, Mrinal M.
Pardanani, Animesh
Gangat, Naseema
Tefferi, Ayalew
description We examined the influence of mutations and karyotype on conventional treatment response, specifically hematological improvement in anemia, in primary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Cytogenetic and next generation sequencing (NGS)‐derived mutation information was available in 357 patients (median age 74 years; 70% males); the revised international prognostic scoring system risk distribution was very high in 11%, high 15%, intermediate 17%, low 40% and very low 16%. At least one mutation was detected in 81% of patients; most frequent were SF3B1 (32%), ASXL1 (27%), TET2 (24%) and U2AF1 (15%). At median follow‐up of 24 months, treatment with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) was documented in 121 (34%) patients, lenalidomide (LEN) in 55 (15%), and erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) in 136 (38%). ASXL1 mutations adversely affected response to HMAs (27% vs 48%; P = 0.02) and LEN (9% vs 43%; P = 0.04), but not ESAs (P = 0.6). LEN response was also adversely affected by U2AF1 mutations (0% vs 42%; P = 0.02) and high risk karyotype (0% vs 41% in intermediate vs 47% in low risk; P = 0.01). Patients with SF3B1 mutations were more likely to respond to LEN (56% vs 27%; P = 0.04). Contrary to previous reports, we found no association between TET2 mutations and HMA treatment response (40% vs 41%; P = 0.9), even in the absence of ASXL1 mutations (P = 0.4).We conclude that ASXL1 mutations in MDS predict inferior response to treatment with both HMAs and LEN; response to LEN was also compromised by U2AF1 mutations and high risk karyotype; SF3B1 mutations identified patients likely to respond to LEN.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ajh.25267
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2123430091</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2123430091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-68a78d128fdcd7bb4575eb7b9e723447e3081e997529dd273cccbbca615f70da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQQC0EoqUw8AeQJSaGUH8ksTNWFVBQUReYI8e-iJR8YTtC-fcYUtiY7oand7qH0CUlt5QQtlT7t1uWsFQcoTklWRrJNGHHaE54SsNOshk6c25PCKWxJKdoxglNmJTJHO2eB6981bUOq9bgd2XHzo894N6CqbTH3oLyDbQeW3B94ABXLW5GqDszur5Wzlcau7E1tmvAnaOTUtUOLg5zgV7v717Wm2i7e3hcr7aR5lKKKJVKSEOZLI02oijiRCRQiCIDwXgcC-BEUsgykbDMGCa41rootEppUgpiFF-g68nb2-5jAOfzfTfYNpzMGQ0KTkhGA3UzUdp2zlko895WTfgxpyT_TpeHdPlPusBeHYxD0YD5I39bBWA5AZ9VDeP_pnz1tJmUXziqeUo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2123430091</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mutations and karyotype predict treatment response in myelodysplastic syndromes</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Idossa, Dame ; Lasho, Terra L. ; Finke, Christy M. ; Ketterling, Rhett P. ; Patnaik, Mrinal M. ; Pardanani, Animesh ; Gangat, Naseema ; Tefferi, Ayalew</creator><creatorcontrib>Idossa, Dame ; Lasho, Terra L. ; Finke, Christy M. ; Ketterling, Rhett P. ; Patnaik, Mrinal M. ; Pardanani, Animesh ; Gangat, Naseema ; Tefferi, Ayalew</creatorcontrib><description>We examined the influence of mutations and karyotype on conventional treatment response, specifically hematological improvement in anemia, in primary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Cytogenetic and next generation sequencing (NGS)‐derived mutation information was available in 357 patients (median age 74 years; 70% males); the revised international prognostic scoring system risk distribution was very high in 11%, high 15%, intermediate 17%, low 40% and very low 16%. At least one mutation was detected in 81% of patients; most frequent were SF3B1 (32%), ASXL1 (27%), TET2 (24%) and U2AF1 (15%). At median follow‐up of 24 months, treatment with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) was documented in 121 (34%) patients, lenalidomide (LEN) in 55 (15%), and erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) in 136 (38%). ASXL1 mutations adversely affected response to HMAs (27% vs 48%; P = 0.02) and LEN (9% vs 43%; P = 0.04), but not ESAs (P = 0.6). LEN response was also adversely affected by U2AF1 mutations (0% vs 42%; P = 0.02) and high risk karyotype (0% vs 41% in intermediate vs 47% in low risk; P = 0.01). Patients with SF3B1 mutations were more likely to respond to LEN (56% vs 27%; P = 0.04). Contrary to previous reports, we found no association between TET2 mutations and HMA treatment response (40% vs 41%; P = 0.9), even in the absence of ASXL1 mutations (P = 0.4).We conclude that ASXL1 mutations in MDS predict inferior response to treatment with both HMAs and LEN; response to LEN was also compromised by U2AF1 mutations and high risk karyotype; SF3B1 mutations identified patients likely to respond to LEN.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-8609</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-8652</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25267</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30152885</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic - pharmacology ; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic - therapeutic use ; DNA-Binding Proteins - genetics ; Erythropoiesis ; Female ; Hematology ; Humans ; Karyotype ; Lenalidomide - pharmacology ; Lenalidomide - therapeutic use ; Male ; Mutation ; Myelodysplastic syndrome ; Myelodysplastic syndromes ; Myelodysplastic Syndromes - diagnosis ; Myelodysplastic Syndromes - genetics ; Next-generation sequencing ; Patients ; Phosphoproteins - genetics ; Prognosis ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins - genetics ; Repressor Proteins - genetics ; RNA Splicing Factors - genetics ; Splicing Factor U2AF - genetics ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>American journal of hematology, 2018-11, Vol.93 (11), p.1420-1426</ispartof><rights>2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-68a78d128fdcd7bb4575eb7b9e723447e3081e997529dd273cccbbca615f70da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-68a78d128fdcd7bb4575eb7b9e723447e3081e997529dd273cccbbca615f70da3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9104-6172 ; 0000-0001-6998-662X ; 0000-0003-4605-3821</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fajh.25267$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fajh.25267$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30152885$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Idossa, Dame</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lasho, Terra L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finke, Christy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ketterling, Rhett P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patnaik, Mrinal M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pardanani, Animesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gangat, Naseema</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tefferi, Ayalew</creatorcontrib><title>Mutations and karyotype predict treatment response in myelodysplastic syndromes</title><title>American journal of hematology</title><addtitle>Am J Hematol</addtitle><description>We examined the influence of mutations and karyotype on conventional treatment response, specifically hematological improvement in anemia, in primary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Cytogenetic and next generation sequencing (NGS)‐derived mutation information was available in 357 patients (median age 74 years; 70% males); the revised international prognostic scoring system risk distribution was very high in 11%, high 15%, intermediate 17%, low 40% and very low 16%. At least one mutation was detected in 81% of patients; most frequent were SF3B1 (32%), ASXL1 (27%), TET2 (24%) and U2AF1 (15%). At median follow‐up of 24 months, treatment with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) was documented in 121 (34%) patients, lenalidomide (LEN) in 55 (15%), and erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) in 136 (38%). ASXL1 mutations adversely affected response to HMAs (27% vs 48%; P = 0.02) and LEN (9% vs 43%; P = 0.04), but not ESAs (P = 0.6). LEN response was also adversely affected by U2AF1 mutations (0% vs 42%; P = 0.02) and high risk karyotype (0% vs 41% in intermediate vs 47% in low risk; P = 0.01). Patients with SF3B1 mutations were more likely to respond to LEN (56% vs 27%; P = 0.04). Contrary to previous reports, we found no association between TET2 mutations and HMA treatment response (40% vs 41%; P = 0.9), even in the absence of ASXL1 mutations (P = 0.4).We conclude that ASXL1 mutations in MDS predict inferior response to treatment with both HMAs and LEN; response to LEN was also compromised by U2AF1 mutations and high risk karyotype; SF3B1 mutations identified patients likely to respond to LEN.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic - pharmacology</subject><subject>Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic - therapeutic use</subject><subject>DNA-Binding Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Erythropoiesis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Karyotype</subject><subject>Lenalidomide - pharmacology</subject><subject>Lenalidomide - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Myelodysplastic syndrome</subject><subject>Myelodysplastic syndromes</subject><subject>Myelodysplastic Syndromes - diagnosis</subject><subject>Myelodysplastic Syndromes - genetics</subject><subject>Next-generation sequencing</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Phosphoproteins - genetics</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Proto-Oncogene Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Repressor Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>RNA Splicing Factors - genetics</subject><subject>Splicing Factor U2AF - genetics</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0361-8609</issn><issn>1096-8652</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQQC0EoqUw8AeQJSaGUH8ksTNWFVBQUReYI8e-iJR8YTtC-fcYUtiY7oand7qH0CUlt5QQtlT7t1uWsFQcoTklWRrJNGHHaE54SsNOshk6c25PCKWxJKdoxglNmJTJHO2eB6981bUOq9bgd2XHzo894N6CqbTH3oLyDbQeW3B94ABXLW5GqDszur5Wzlcau7E1tmvAnaOTUtUOLg5zgV7v717Wm2i7e3hcr7aR5lKKKJVKSEOZLI02oijiRCRQiCIDwXgcC-BEUsgykbDMGCa41rootEppUgpiFF-g68nb2-5jAOfzfTfYNpzMGQ0KTkhGA3UzUdp2zlko895WTfgxpyT_TpeHdPlPusBeHYxD0YD5I39bBWA5AZ9VDeP_pnz1tJmUXziqeUo</recordid><startdate>201811</startdate><enddate>201811</enddate><creator>Idossa, Dame</creator><creator>Lasho, Terra L.</creator><creator>Finke, Christy M.</creator><creator>Ketterling, Rhett P.</creator><creator>Patnaik, Mrinal M.</creator><creator>Pardanani, Animesh</creator><creator>Gangat, Naseema</creator><creator>Tefferi, Ayalew</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9104-6172</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6998-662X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4605-3821</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201811</creationdate><title>Mutations and karyotype predict treatment response in myelodysplastic syndromes</title><author>Idossa, Dame ; Lasho, Terra L. ; Finke, Christy M. ; Ketterling, Rhett P. ; Patnaik, Mrinal M. ; Pardanani, Animesh ; Gangat, Naseema ; Tefferi, Ayalew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-68a78d128fdcd7bb4575eb7b9e723447e3081e997529dd273cccbbca615f70da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic - pharmacology</topic><topic>Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic - therapeutic use</topic><topic>DNA-Binding Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Erythropoiesis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Karyotype</topic><topic>Lenalidomide - pharmacology</topic><topic>Lenalidomide - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Myelodysplastic syndrome</topic><topic>Myelodysplastic syndromes</topic><topic>Myelodysplastic Syndromes - diagnosis</topic><topic>Myelodysplastic Syndromes - genetics</topic><topic>Next-generation sequencing</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Phosphoproteins - genetics</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Proto-Oncogene Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Repressor Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>RNA Splicing Factors - genetics</topic><topic>Splicing Factor U2AF - genetics</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Idossa, Dame</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lasho, Terra L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finke, Christy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ketterling, Rhett P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patnaik, Mrinal M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pardanani, Animesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gangat, Naseema</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tefferi, Ayalew</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>American journal of hematology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Idossa, Dame</au><au>Lasho, Terra L.</au><au>Finke, Christy M.</au><au>Ketterling, Rhett P.</au><au>Patnaik, Mrinal M.</au><au>Pardanani, Animesh</au><au>Gangat, Naseema</au><au>Tefferi, Ayalew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mutations and karyotype predict treatment response in myelodysplastic syndromes</atitle><jtitle>American journal of hematology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Hematol</addtitle><date>2018-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1420</spage><epage>1426</epage><pages>1420-1426</pages><issn>0361-8609</issn><eissn>1096-8652</eissn><abstract>We examined the influence of mutations and karyotype on conventional treatment response, specifically hematological improvement in anemia, in primary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Cytogenetic and next generation sequencing (NGS)‐derived mutation information was available in 357 patients (median age 74 years; 70% males); the revised international prognostic scoring system risk distribution was very high in 11%, high 15%, intermediate 17%, low 40% and very low 16%. At least one mutation was detected in 81% of patients; most frequent were SF3B1 (32%), ASXL1 (27%), TET2 (24%) and U2AF1 (15%). At median follow‐up of 24 months, treatment with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) was documented in 121 (34%) patients, lenalidomide (LEN) in 55 (15%), and erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) in 136 (38%). ASXL1 mutations adversely affected response to HMAs (27% vs 48%; P = 0.02) and LEN (9% vs 43%; P = 0.04), but not ESAs (P = 0.6). LEN response was also adversely affected by U2AF1 mutations (0% vs 42%; P = 0.02) and high risk karyotype (0% vs 41% in intermediate vs 47% in low risk; P = 0.01). Patients with SF3B1 mutations were more likely to respond to LEN (56% vs 27%; P = 0.04). Contrary to previous reports, we found no association between TET2 mutations and HMA treatment response (40% vs 41%; P = 0.9), even in the absence of ASXL1 mutations (P = 0.4).We conclude that ASXL1 mutations in MDS predict inferior response to treatment with both HMAs and LEN; response to LEN was also compromised by U2AF1 mutations and high risk karyotype; SF3B1 mutations identified patients likely to respond to LEN.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>30152885</pmid><doi>10.1002/ajh.25267</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9104-6172</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6998-662X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4605-3821</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-8609
ispartof American journal of hematology, 2018-11, Vol.93 (11), p.1420-1426
issn 0361-8609
1096-8652
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2123430091
source Wiley Free Content; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Aged
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic - pharmacology
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic - therapeutic use
DNA-Binding Proteins - genetics
Erythropoiesis
Female
Hematology
Humans
Karyotype
Lenalidomide - pharmacology
Lenalidomide - therapeutic use
Male
Mutation
Myelodysplastic syndrome
Myelodysplastic syndromes
Myelodysplastic Syndromes - diagnosis
Myelodysplastic Syndromes - genetics
Next-generation sequencing
Patients
Phosphoproteins - genetics
Prognosis
Proto-Oncogene Proteins - genetics
Repressor Proteins - genetics
RNA Splicing Factors - genetics
Splicing Factor U2AF - genetics
Treatment Outcome
title Mutations and karyotype predict treatment response in myelodysplastic syndromes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T08%3A11%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mutations%20and%20karyotype%20predict%20treatment%20response%20in%20myelodysplastic%20syndromes&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20hematology&rft.au=Idossa,%20Dame&rft.date=2018-11&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1420&rft.epage=1426&rft.pages=1420-1426&rft.issn=0361-8609&rft.eissn=1096-8652&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ajh.25267&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2123430091%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2123430091&rft_id=info:pmid/30152885&rfr_iscdi=true