Estimating the water use efficiency of spring barley using crop models

In the current study, simulations by five crop models (WOFOST, CERES-Barley, HERMES, DAISY and AQUACROP) were compared for 7–12 growing seasons of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) at three sites in the Czech Republic. The aims were to compare how various process-based crop models with different calcu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of agricultural science 2018-07, Vol.156 (5), p.628-644
Hauptverfasser: Pohanková, E., Hlavinka, P., Orság, M., Takáč, J., Kersebaum, K. C., Gobin, A., Trnka, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 644
container_issue 5
container_start_page 628
container_title The Journal of agricultural science
container_volume 156
creator Pohanková, E.
Hlavinka, P.
Orság, M.
Takáč, J.
Kersebaum, K. C.
Gobin, A.
Trnka, M.
description In the current study, simulations by five crop models (WOFOST, CERES-Barley, HERMES, DAISY and AQUACROP) were compared for 7–12 growing seasons of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) at three sites in the Czech Republic. The aims were to compare how various process-based crop models with different calculation approaches simulate different values of transpiration (Ta) and evapotranspiration (ET) based on the same input data and compare the outputs of these simulations with reference data. From the outputs of each model, the water use efficiency (WUE) from Ta (WUETa) and from actual ET (WUEETa) was calculated for grain yields and above-ground biomass yield. The results of the first part of the study show that the model with the Penman approach for calculating ET simulates lower actual ET (ETa) sums, at an average of 250 mm during the growing season, than other models, which use the Penman–Monteith approach and simulate 330 mm on average during the growing season. In the second part of the current study, WUE reference values in the range 1.9–2.4 kg/m3 were calculated for spring barley and grain yield. Values of WUETa/WUEETa calculated from the outputs of individual models for grain yields and above-ground biomass yields ranged from 2.0/1.0 to 5.9/3.8 kg/m3 with an average value of 3.2/2.0 kg/m3 and from 3.9/2.1 to 10.5/6.8 kg/m3 with an average value of 6.5/4.0 kg/m3, respectively. The results confirm that the average values of all models are nearest to actual values.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0021859618000060
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2123010561</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0021859618000060</cupid><sourcerecordid>2123010561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-58b45d88dd06df69615935f3d19d90e71eed7cba3c67d7b4dc3559c6669f576e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UN9LwzAQDqJgnf4BvgV8ruaWJmkeZWwqDHxQn0uaXGZHu86kRfbfm7KBD-I93HF8P-7jCLkFdg8M1MMbY3MohZZQslSSnZEMCqlzkfo5ySY4n_BLchXjNlEU02VGVss4NJ0Zmt2GDp9Iv82AgY4RKXrf2AZ39kB7T-M-TJTahBYPCZ8WG_o97XqHbbwmF960EW9Oc0Y-Vsv3xXO-fn16WTyuc8tBDbko60K4snSOSedlSis0F5470E4zVIDolK0Nt1I5VRfOciG0lVJqL5REPiN3R9996L9GjEO17cewSyerOcw5AyYkJBYcWSlhjAF9ldJ3JhwqYNX0rurPu5KGnzSmq0PjNvhr_b_qBwtSa6E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2123010561</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimating the water use efficiency of spring barley using crop models</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><creator>Pohanková, E. ; Hlavinka, P. ; Orság, M. ; Takáč, J. ; Kersebaum, K. C. ; Gobin, A. ; Trnka, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pohanková, E. ; Hlavinka, P. ; Orság, M. ; Takáč, J. ; Kersebaum, K. C. ; Gobin, A. ; Trnka, M.</creatorcontrib><description>In the current study, simulations by five crop models (WOFOST, CERES-Barley, HERMES, DAISY and AQUACROP) were compared for 7–12 growing seasons of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) at three sites in the Czech Republic. The aims were to compare how various process-based crop models with different calculation approaches simulate different values of transpiration (Ta) and evapotranspiration (ET) based on the same input data and compare the outputs of these simulations with reference data. From the outputs of each model, the water use efficiency (WUE) from Ta (WUETa) and from actual ET (WUEETa) was calculated for grain yields and above-ground biomass yield. The results of the first part of the study show that the model with the Penman approach for calculating ET simulates lower actual ET (ETa) sums, at an average of 250 mm during the growing season, than other models, which use the Penman–Monteith approach and simulate 330 mm on average during the growing season. In the second part of the current study, WUE reference values in the range 1.9–2.4 kg/m3 were calculated for spring barley and grain yield. Values of WUETa/WUEETa calculated from the outputs of individual models for grain yields and above-ground biomass yields ranged from 2.0/1.0 to 5.9/3.8 kg/m3 with an average value of 3.2/2.0 kg/m3 and from 3.9/2.1 to 10.5/6.8 kg/m3 with an average value of 6.5/4.0 kg/m3, respectively. The results confirm that the average values of all models are nearest to actual values.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8596</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-5146</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0021859618000060</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Barley ; Biomass ; Cereal crops ; Climate change ; Computer simulation ; Corn ; Crop yield ; Crops ; Crops and Soils Research Paper ; Drought ; Efficiency ; Evapotranspiration ; Grain ; Growing season ; Hydrology ; Mathematical models ; Precipitation ; Rain ; Sorghum ; Spring ; Transpiration ; Water shortages ; Water use ; Water use efficiency ; Wheat</subject><ispartof>The Journal of agricultural science, 2018-07, Vol.156 (5), p.628-644</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-58b45d88dd06df69615935f3d19d90e71eed7cba3c67d7b4dc3559c6669f576e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-58b45d88dd06df69615935f3d19d90e71eed7cba3c67d7b4dc3559c6669f576e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0021859618000060/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,315,782,786,27933,27934,55637</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pohanková, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hlavinka, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orság, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takáč, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kersebaum, K. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gobin, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trnka, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Estimating the water use efficiency of spring barley using crop models</title><title>The Journal of agricultural science</title><addtitle>J. Agric. Sci</addtitle><description>In the current study, simulations by five crop models (WOFOST, CERES-Barley, HERMES, DAISY and AQUACROP) were compared for 7–12 growing seasons of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) at three sites in the Czech Republic. The aims were to compare how various process-based crop models with different calculation approaches simulate different values of transpiration (Ta) and evapotranspiration (ET) based on the same input data and compare the outputs of these simulations with reference data. From the outputs of each model, the water use efficiency (WUE) from Ta (WUETa) and from actual ET (WUEETa) was calculated for grain yields and above-ground biomass yield. The results of the first part of the study show that the model with the Penman approach for calculating ET simulates lower actual ET (ETa) sums, at an average of 250 mm during the growing season, than other models, which use the Penman–Monteith approach and simulate 330 mm on average during the growing season. In the second part of the current study, WUE reference values in the range 1.9–2.4 kg/m3 were calculated for spring barley and grain yield. Values of WUETa/WUEETa calculated from the outputs of individual models for grain yields and above-ground biomass yields ranged from 2.0/1.0 to 5.9/3.8 kg/m3 with an average value of 3.2/2.0 kg/m3 and from 3.9/2.1 to 10.5/6.8 kg/m3 with an average value of 6.5/4.0 kg/m3, respectively. The results confirm that the average values of all models are nearest to actual values.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Barley</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Cereal crops</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Crops and Soils Research Paper</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Evapotranspiration</subject><subject>Grain</subject><subject>Growing season</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Sorghum</subject><subject>Spring</subject><subject>Transpiration</subject><subject>Water shortages</subject><subject>Water use</subject><subject>Water use efficiency</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><issn>0021-8596</issn><issn>1469-5146</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UN9LwzAQDqJgnf4BvgV8ruaWJmkeZWwqDHxQn0uaXGZHu86kRfbfm7KBD-I93HF8P-7jCLkFdg8M1MMbY3MohZZQslSSnZEMCqlzkfo5ySY4n_BLchXjNlEU02VGVss4NJ0Zmt2GDp9Iv82AgY4RKXrf2AZ39kB7T-M-TJTahBYPCZ8WG_o97XqHbbwmF960EW9Oc0Y-Vsv3xXO-fn16WTyuc8tBDbko60K4snSOSedlSis0F5470E4zVIDolK0Nt1I5VRfOciG0lVJqL5REPiN3R9996L9GjEO17cewSyerOcw5AyYkJBYcWSlhjAF9ldJ3JhwqYNX0rurPu5KGnzSmq0PjNvhr_b_qBwtSa6E</recordid><startdate>201807</startdate><enddate>201807</enddate><creator>Pohanková, E.</creator><creator>Hlavinka, P.</creator><creator>Orság, M.</creator><creator>Takáč, J.</creator><creator>Kersebaum, K. C.</creator><creator>Gobin, A.</creator><creator>Trnka, M.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201807</creationdate><title>Estimating the water use efficiency of spring barley using crop models</title><author>Pohanková, E. ; Hlavinka, P. ; Orság, M. ; Takáč, J. ; Kersebaum, K. C. ; Gobin, A. ; Trnka, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-58b45d88dd06df69615935f3d19d90e71eed7cba3c67d7b4dc3559c6669f576e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Barley</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Cereal crops</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Crops and Soils Research Paper</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Evapotranspiration</topic><topic>Grain</topic><topic>Growing season</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Sorghum</topic><topic>Spring</topic><topic>Transpiration</topic><topic>Water shortages</topic><topic>Water use</topic><topic>Water use efficiency</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pohanková, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hlavinka, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orság, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takáč, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kersebaum, K. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gobin, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trnka, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of agricultural science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pohanková, E.</au><au>Hlavinka, P.</au><au>Orság, M.</au><au>Takáč, J.</au><au>Kersebaum, K. C.</au><au>Gobin, A.</au><au>Trnka, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimating the water use efficiency of spring barley using crop models</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of agricultural science</jtitle><addtitle>J. Agric. Sci</addtitle><date>2018-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>156</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>628</spage><epage>644</epage><pages>628-644</pages><issn>0021-8596</issn><eissn>1469-5146</eissn><abstract>In the current study, simulations by five crop models (WOFOST, CERES-Barley, HERMES, DAISY and AQUACROP) were compared for 7–12 growing seasons of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) at three sites in the Czech Republic. The aims were to compare how various process-based crop models with different calculation approaches simulate different values of transpiration (Ta) and evapotranspiration (ET) based on the same input data and compare the outputs of these simulations with reference data. From the outputs of each model, the water use efficiency (WUE) from Ta (WUETa) and from actual ET (WUEETa) was calculated for grain yields and above-ground biomass yield. The results of the first part of the study show that the model with the Penman approach for calculating ET simulates lower actual ET (ETa) sums, at an average of 250 mm during the growing season, than other models, which use the Penman–Monteith approach and simulate 330 mm on average during the growing season. In the second part of the current study, WUE reference values in the range 1.9–2.4 kg/m3 were calculated for spring barley and grain yield. Values of WUETa/WUEETa calculated from the outputs of individual models for grain yields and above-ground biomass yields ranged from 2.0/1.0 to 5.9/3.8 kg/m3 with an average value of 3.2/2.0 kg/m3 and from 3.9/2.1 to 10.5/6.8 kg/m3 with an average value of 6.5/4.0 kg/m3, respectively. The results confirm that the average values of all models are nearest to actual values.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0021859618000060</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8596
ispartof The Journal of agricultural science, 2018-07, Vol.156 (5), p.628-644
issn 0021-8596
1469-5146
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2123010561
source Cambridge Journals Online
subjects Agricultural production
Barley
Biomass
Cereal crops
Climate change
Computer simulation
Corn
Crop yield
Crops
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Drought
Efficiency
Evapotranspiration
Grain
Growing season
Hydrology
Mathematical models
Precipitation
Rain
Sorghum
Spring
Transpiration
Water shortages
Water use
Water use efficiency
Wheat
title Estimating the water use efficiency of spring barley using crop models
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T14%3A17%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimating%20the%20water%20use%20efficiency%20of%20spring%20barley%20using%20crop%20models&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20agricultural%20science&rft.au=Pohankov%C3%A1,%20E.&rft.date=2018-07&rft.volume=156&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=628&rft.epage=644&rft.pages=628-644&rft.issn=0021-8596&rft.eissn=1469-5146&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0021859618000060&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2123010561%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2123010561&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0021859618000060&rfr_iscdi=true