Transparency: the new peer review watchword
CPAs need to adopt transparency as the watchword for their own rules and procedures. Professions that want the trust and respect of the public need to lay out their internal controls for everyone to see. For CPAs, nowhere is this more relevant today than with their peer review program. This is not t...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The CPA journal (1975) 2004-10, Vol.74 (10), p.6 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 6 |
| container_title | The CPA journal (1975) |
| container_volume | 74 |
| creator | Bunting, Robert L |
| description | CPAs need to adopt transparency as the watchword for their own rules and procedures. Professions that want the trust and respect of the public need to lay out their internal controls for everyone to see. For CPAs, nowhere is this more relevant today than with their peer review program. This is not the first time peer review has acted as a litmus test for the accounting profession. Peer review began in the early 1960s. In 1977, the AICPA created a single uniform peer review program with the establishment of the Division for CPA Firms, the result of an agreement with federal regulators after Congressional hearings. A member referendum will ultimately decide the specific ways to increase peer review transparency. At its May 2004 meeting, the AICPA's Governing Council approved a resolution expressing its support for increased transparency. Great professions take responsibility for themselves. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_212294127</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A123709158</galeid><sourcerecordid>A123709158</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1047-80d7c8aeeb7b2f761abdf90d7fff3145279d40264c57ff54ebbec39276f9dab43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptjctqwzAQRbVoIWmafzDdFhe9LFndhdAXBLpJ10aPkePgSq7s1PTvK0iWYRYzHM69c4OWWDJa1pxVC3Q3jkeMMRGCLdHjPukwDjpBsH_PxXSAIsBcDACpSPDb5XvWkz3MMbl7dOt1P8L6slfo6_Vlv30vd59vH9vNrmwJ5rKssZO21gBGGuqlINo4rzL03jPCKyqV45gKbquMKg7GgGWKSuGV04azFXo49w4p_pxgnJpjPKWQXzaUUKo4oTJL5VlqdQ9NF3yckrYtBEi6jwF8l_GGUCaxIlWd_acrfh4H3529EvgHAhxcfA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212294127</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transparency: the new peer review watchword</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Bunting, Robert L</creator><creatorcontrib>Bunting, Robert L</creatorcontrib><description>CPAs need to adopt transparency as the watchword for their own rules and procedures. Professions that want the trust and respect of the public need to lay out their internal controls for everyone to see. For CPAs, nowhere is this more relevant today than with their peer review program. This is not the first time peer review has acted as a litmus test for the accounting profession. Peer review began in the early 1960s. In 1977, the AICPA created a single uniform peer review program with the establishment of the Division for CPA Firms, the result of an agreement with federal regulators after Congressional hearings. A member referendum will ultimately decide the specific ways to increase peer review transparency. At its May 2004 meeting, the AICPA's Governing Council approved a resolution expressing its support for increased transparency. Great professions take responsibility for themselves.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-8435</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: New York State Society of Certified Public Accountants</publisher><subject>Accountants ; Accounting firms ; Associations ; Auditing standards ; Committees ; CPAs ; Peer review ; Practice ; Professional education ; Referendums ; Responsibilities ; Self regulation</subject><ispartof>The CPA journal (1975), 2004-10, Vol.74 (10), p.6</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2004 New York State Society of Certified Public Accountants</rights><rights>Copyright New York State Society of Certified Public Accountants Oct 2004</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bunting, Robert L</creatorcontrib><title>Transparency: the new peer review watchword</title><title>The CPA journal (1975)</title><description>CPAs need to adopt transparency as the watchword for their own rules and procedures. Professions that want the trust and respect of the public need to lay out their internal controls for everyone to see. For CPAs, nowhere is this more relevant today than with their peer review program. This is not the first time peer review has acted as a litmus test for the accounting profession. Peer review began in the early 1960s. In 1977, the AICPA created a single uniform peer review program with the establishment of the Division for CPA Firms, the result of an agreement with federal regulators after Congressional hearings. A member referendum will ultimately decide the specific ways to increase peer review transparency. At its May 2004 meeting, the AICPA's Governing Council approved a resolution expressing its support for increased transparency. Great professions take responsibility for themselves.</description><subject>Accountants</subject><subject>Accounting firms</subject><subject>Associations</subject><subject>Auditing standards</subject><subject>Committees</subject><subject>CPAs</subject><subject>Peer review</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Professional education</subject><subject>Referendums</subject><subject>Responsibilities</subject><subject>Self regulation</subject><issn>0732-8435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptjctqwzAQRbVoIWmafzDdFhe9LFndhdAXBLpJ10aPkePgSq7s1PTvK0iWYRYzHM69c4OWWDJa1pxVC3Q3jkeMMRGCLdHjPukwDjpBsH_PxXSAIsBcDACpSPDb5XvWkz3MMbl7dOt1P8L6slfo6_Vlv30vd59vH9vNrmwJ5rKssZO21gBGGuqlINo4rzL03jPCKyqV45gKbquMKg7GgGWKSuGV04azFXo49w4p_pxgnJpjPKWQXzaUUKo4oTJL5VlqdQ9NF3yckrYtBEi6jwF8l_GGUCaxIlWd_acrfh4H3529EvgHAhxcfA</recordid><startdate>20041001</startdate><enddate>20041001</enddate><creator>Bunting, Robert L</creator><general>New York State Society of Certified Public Accountants</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041001</creationdate><title>Transparency: the new peer review watchword</title><author>Bunting, Robert L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1047-80d7c8aeeb7b2f761abdf90d7fff3145279d40264c57ff54ebbec39276f9dab43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Accountants</topic><topic>Accounting firms</topic><topic>Associations</topic><topic>Auditing standards</topic><topic>Committees</topic><topic>CPAs</topic><topic>Peer review</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Professional education</topic><topic>Referendums</topic><topic>Responsibilities</topic><topic>Self regulation</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bunting, Robert L</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The CPA journal (1975)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bunting, Robert L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transparency: the new peer review watchword</atitle><jtitle>The CPA journal (1975)</jtitle><date>2004-10-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>6</spage><pages>6-</pages><issn>0732-8435</issn><abstract>CPAs need to adopt transparency as the watchword for their own rules and procedures. Professions that want the trust and respect of the public need to lay out their internal controls for everyone to see. For CPAs, nowhere is this more relevant today than with their peer review program. This is not the first time peer review has acted as a litmus test for the accounting profession. Peer review began in the early 1960s. In 1977, the AICPA created a single uniform peer review program with the establishment of the Division for CPA Firms, the result of an agreement with federal regulators after Congressional hearings. A member referendum will ultimately decide the specific ways to increase peer review transparency. At its May 2004 meeting, the AICPA's Governing Council approved a resolution expressing its support for increased transparency. Great professions take responsibility for themselves.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>New York State Society of Certified Public Accountants</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0732-8435 |
| ispartof | The CPA journal (1975), 2004-10, Vol.74 (10), p.6 |
| issn | 0732-8435 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_212294127 |
| source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Accountants Accounting firms Associations Auditing standards Committees CPAs Peer review Practice Professional education Referendums Responsibilities Self regulation |
| title | Transparency: the new peer review watchword |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T04%3A01%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transparency:%20the%20new%20peer%20review%20watchword&rft.jtitle=The%20CPA%20journal%20(1975)&rft.au=Bunting,%20Robert%20L&rft.date=2004-10-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=6&rft.pages=6-&rft.issn=0732-8435&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA123709158%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212294127&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A123709158&rfr_iscdi=true |