A creationist myth: Pragmatic combination not feature creation
Schyns et al. argue that flexibility in categorisation implies “feature creation.” We argue that this notion is flawed, that flexibility can be explained by combinations over fixed feature sets, and that feature creation would in any case fail to explain categorisation. We suggest that flexibility i...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Behavioral and brain sciences 1998-02, Vol.21 (1), p.19-20 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 20 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 19 |
| container_title | The Behavioral and brain sciences |
| container_volume | 21 |
| creator | Braisby, Nick Franks, Bradley |
| description | Schyns et al. argue that flexibility in categorisation implies
“feature creation.” We argue that this notion is flawed,
that flexibility can be explained by combinations over fixed feature
sets, and that feature creation would in any case fail to explain
categorisation. We suggest that flexibility in categorisation is due
to pragmatic factors influencing feature combination, rendering
feature creation unnecessary. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0140525X98260109 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_212285201</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0140525X98260109</cupid><sourcerecordid>30848384</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-f6379cad784c431ab225ba988ca8ebcad3cdfcee8379c4fb0208b15918ff9eec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF9LwzAUxYMoOKcfwLeiz9XcpGkTH4QxdYoDHf7bW0iyZHbadqYduG9v6sYQZE8X7vmdey4HoWPAZ4AhO3_CkGBG2FhwkmLAYgd1IElFDJywXdRp5bjV99FBXc8wxixhooMue5HxVjV5VeZ1ExXL5v0ievRqWoSdiUxV6Lz8laOyaiIX0IW3G88h2nPqs7ZH69lFLzfXz_3bePgwuOv3hrEhadLELqWZMGqS8cQkFJQmhGklODeKWx0EaibOWMtbLHEaE8w1MAHcOWGtoV10sro799XXwtaNnFULX4ZISYAQzgiGAJ1ug4BnGU6pABEoWFHGV3XtrZNznxfKLyVg2XYp_3UZPPHKEzqy3xuD8h8yzWjGZDoYyXv6dvU6GHE5DjxdZ6hC-3wytX9e2ZryA9fHhTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1877063919</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A creationist myth: Pragmatic combination not feature creation</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Braisby, Nick ; Franks, Bradley</creator><creatorcontrib>Braisby, Nick ; Franks, Bradley</creatorcontrib><description>Schyns et al. argue that flexibility in categorisation implies
“feature creation.” We argue that this notion is flawed,
that flexibility can be explained by combinations over fixed feature
sets, and that feature creation would in any case fail to explain
categorisation. We suggest that flexibility in categorisation is due
to pragmatic factors influencing feature combination, rendering
feature creation unnecessary.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-525X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-1825</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X98260109</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BBSCDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Behavioral sciences ; Open Peer Commentary ; Schyns, P. G., et al.: The development of features in object concepts</subject><ispartof>The Behavioral and brain sciences, 1998-02, Vol.21 (1), p.19-20</ispartof><rights>1998 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press, Publishing Division Feb 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0140525X98260109/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,315,781,785,27874,27929,27930,55633</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Braisby, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franks, Bradley</creatorcontrib><title>A creationist myth: Pragmatic combination not feature creation</title><title>The Behavioral and brain sciences</title><addtitle>Behav Brain Sci</addtitle><description>Schyns et al. argue that flexibility in categorisation implies
“feature creation.” We argue that this notion is flawed,
that flexibility can be explained by combinations over fixed feature
sets, and that feature creation would in any case fail to explain
categorisation. We suggest that flexibility in categorisation is due
to pragmatic factors influencing feature combination, rendering
feature creation unnecessary.</description><subject>Behavioral sciences</subject><subject>Open Peer Commentary</subject><subject>Schyns, P. G., et al.: The development of features in object concepts</subject><issn>0140-525X</issn><issn>1469-1825</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF9LwzAUxYMoOKcfwLeiz9XcpGkTH4QxdYoDHf7bW0iyZHbadqYduG9v6sYQZE8X7vmdey4HoWPAZ4AhO3_CkGBG2FhwkmLAYgd1IElFDJywXdRp5bjV99FBXc8wxixhooMue5HxVjV5VeZ1ExXL5v0ievRqWoSdiUxV6Lz8laOyaiIX0IW3G88h2nPqs7ZH69lFLzfXz_3bePgwuOv3hrEhadLELqWZMGqS8cQkFJQmhGklODeKWx0EaibOWMtbLHEaE8w1MAHcOWGtoV10sro799XXwtaNnFULX4ZISYAQzgiGAJ1ug4BnGU6pABEoWFHGV3XtrZNznxfKLyVg2XYp_3UZPPHKEzqy3xuD8h8yzWjGZDoYyXv6dvU6GHE5DjxdZ6hC-3wytX9e2ZryA9fHhTA</recordid><startdate>199802</startdate><enddate>199802</enddate><creator>Braisby, Nick</creator><creator>Franks, Bradley</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HJHVS</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199802</creationdate><title>A creationist myth: Pragmatic combination not feature creation</title><author>Braisby, Nick ; Franks, Bradley</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-f6379cad784c431ab225ba988ca8ebcad3cdfcee8379c4fb0208b15918ff9eec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Behavioral sciences</topic><topic>Open Peer Commentary</topic><topic>Schyns, P. G., et al.: The development of features in object concepts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Braisby, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franks, Bradley</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 19</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>The Behavioral and brain sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Braisby, Nick</au><au>Franks, Bradley</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A creationist myth: Pragmatic combination not feature creation</atitle><jtitle>The Behavioral and brain sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Behav Brain Sci</addtitle><date>1998-02</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>20</epage><pages>19-20</pages><issn>0140-525X</issn><eissn>1469-1825</eissn><coden>BBSCDH</coden><abstract>Schyns et al. argue that flexibility in categorisation implies
“feature creation.” We argue that this notion is flawed,
that flexibility can be explained by combinations over fixed feature
sets, and that feature creation would in any case fail to explain
categorisation. We suggest that flexibility in categorisation is due
to pragmatic factors influencing feature combination, rendering
feature creation unnecessary.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0140525X98260109</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0140-525X |
| ispartof | The Behavioral and brain sciences, 1998-02, Vol.21 (1), p.19-20 |
| issn | 0140-525X 1469-1825 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_212285201 |
| source | Periodicals Index Online; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | Behavioral sciences Open Peer Commentary Schyns, P. G., et al.: The development of features in object concepts |
| title | A creationist myth: Pragmatic combination not feature creation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T00%3A40%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20creationist%20myth:%20Pragmatic%20combination%20not%20feature%20creation&rft.jtitle=The%20Behavioral%20and%20brain%20sciences&rft.au=Braisby,%20Nick&rft.date=1998-02&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=20&rft.pages=19-20&rft.issn=0140-525X&rft.eissn=1469-1825&rft.coden=BBSCDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0140525X98260109&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E30848384%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1877063919&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0140525X98260109&rfr_iscdi=true |