A creationist myth: Pragmatic combination not feature creation
Schyns et al. argue that flexibility in categorisation implies “feature creation.” We argue that this notion is flawed, that flexibility can be explained by combinations over fixed feature sets, and that feature creation would in any case fail to explain categorisation. We suggest that flexibility i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Behavioral and brain sciences 1998-02, Vol.21 (1), p.19-20 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Schyns et al. argue that flexibility in categorisation implies
“feature creation.” We argue that this notion is flawed,
that flexibility can be explained by combinations over fixed feature
sets, and that feature creation would in any case fail to explain
categorisation. We suggest that flexibility in categorisation is due
to pragmatic factors influencing feature combination, rendering
feature creation unnecessary. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0140-525X 1469-1825 |
DOI: | 10.1017/S0140525X98260109 |