Flow structure of a low aspect ratio wall-mounted airfoil operating in a low Reynolds number flow

•Flow-field across the span of a low aspect ratio wall-mounted airfoil was studied.•Laminar separation and transitional laminar separation were observed.•Mean and fluctuating velocity field varied across the span at lifting conditions.•Near-wake vortex shedding varies with spanwise location and angl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Experimental thermal and fluid science 2018-12, Vol.99, p.94-116
Hauptverfasser: Awasthi, M., Moreau, D.J., Doolan, C.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 116
container_issue
container_start_page 94
container_title Experimental thermal and fluid science
container_volume 99
creator Awasthi, M.
Moreau, D.J.
Doolan, C.J.
description •Flow-field across the span of a low aspect ratio wall-mounted airfoil was studied.•Laminar separation and transitional laminar separation were observed.•Mean and fluctuating velocity field varied across the span at lifting conditions.•Near-wake vortex shedding varies with spanwise location and angle of attack.•A region of spanwise shear with weak dependency on angle of attack was observed. Measurements on a wall-mounted NACA 0012 airfoil with an aspect ratio (AR) of 0.5 operating in the low Reynolds number (274,000, based on chord) regime were performed. Measurements included oil flow visualizations and velocity data obtained with a combination of pitot and hotwire probes. Three different geometric angles of attack (αg) equal to 0°, 5°, and 10° were considered and the effective angles of attack corresponding to these were quantified through measurements of the velocity vector in the potential flow around the airfoil. The flow around such a low AR airfoil is complex and can be three-dimensional across the span due to strong interaction between the junction, airfoil, and tip flows. In the mid-span region of the airfoil, laminar separation with and without reattachment was present on the suction-side and pressure-side respectively. The pressure-side separation, which is located near the trailing-edge, leads to vortex shedding in the near-wake of the airfoil. The character of this shedding, however, is different between αg = 5° and 10°. Towards the airfoil root (at 25% span), this shedding is supressed by the turbulent junction flow. Towards the free-end of the airfoil (at 75% span), shedding is observed even in the absence of pressure-side laminar separation and may be attributed to the interaction between the spanwise tip flow and the suction-side separation bubble. The airfoil boundary layer in this region is also thinner compared to that at the mid-span point. Further towards the airfoil tip (at 90% span), the shedding still exists; however, its intensity and character are modified by the dominant vortex dynamics. In proximity to the airfoil tip, the velocity and turbulence are affected by both the primary and secondary vorticity for the highest angle of attack studied.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2018.07.019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2122774390</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0894177718308148</els_id><sourcerecordid>2122774390</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-b15f5687daae9fa6ecd7e379f314f0b66adaf0e50b59255e5a57b857a994dc3c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFLxDAQhYMouK7-h4BeW5O0aRrwIourwoIgeg5pOtGUtqlJ67r_3i67F2-eBt6894b5ELqhJKWEFrdNCj_D-Amhs-0UjUsZoWVKREqoPEELWgqZMFYWp2hBSpknVAhxji5ibAghJaNkgfS69VscxzCZcQqAvcUa7yUdBzAjDnp0Hm912yadn_oRaqxdsN612A-w3_Yf2PXH0Cvset_WEfdTV0HAdhYv0ZnVbYSr41yi9_XD2-op2bw8Pq_uN4nJKRuTinLLi1LUWoO0ugBTC8iEtBnNLamKQtfaEuCk4pJxDlxzUZVcaCnz2mQmW6LrQ-8Q_NcEcVSNn0I_n1SMMiZEnkkyu-4OLhN8jAGsGoLrdNgpStQeqmrUX6hqD1URoWaoc3x9iMP8ybeDoGYH9AZqF2Zcqvbuf0W_I-yLUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2122774390</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Flow structure of a low aspect ratio wall-mounted airfoil operating in a low Reynolds number flow</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Awasthi, M. ; Moreau, D.J. ; Doolan, C.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Awasthi, M. ; Moreau, D.J. ; Doolan, C.J.</creatorcontrib><description>•Flow-field across the span of a low aspect ratio wall-mounted airfoil was studied.•Laminar separation and transitional laminar separation were observed.•Mean and fluctuating velocity field varied across the span at lifting conditions.•Near-wake vortex shedding varies with spanwise location and angle of attack.•A region of spanwise shear with weak dependency on angle of attack was observed. Measurements on a wall-mounted NACA 0012 airfoil with an aspect ratio (AR) of 0.5 operating in the low Reynolds number (274,000, based on chord) regime were performed. Measurements included oil flow visualizations and velocity data obtained with a combination of pitot and hotwire probes. Three different geometric angles of attack (αg) equal to 0°, 5°, and 10° were considered and the effective angles of attack corresponding to these were quantified through measurements of the velocity vector in the potential flow around the airfoil. The flow around such a low AR airfoil is complex and can be three-dimensional across the span due to strong interaction between the junction, airfoil, and tip flows. In the mid-span region of the airfoil, laminar separation with and without reattachment was present on the suction-side and pressure-side respectively. The pressure-side separation, which is located near the trailing-edge, leads to vortex shedding in the near-wake of the airfoil. The character of this shedding, however, is different between αg = 5° and 10°. Towards the airfoil root (at 25% span), this shedding is supressed by the turbulent junction flow. Towards the free-end of the airfoil (at 75% span), shedding is observed even in the absence of pressure-side laminar separation and may be attributed to the interaction between the spanwise tip flow and the suction-side separation bubble. The airfoil boundary layer in this region is also thinner compared to that at the mid-span point. Further towards the airfoil tip (at 90% span), the shedding still exists; however, its intensity and character are modified by the dominant vortex dynamics. In proximity to the airfoil tip, the velocity and turbulence are affected by both the primary and secondary vorticity for the highest angle of attack studied.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-1777</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2286</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2018.07.019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aerodynamics ; Angle of attack ; Boundary layer ; Boundary layers ; Fluid dynamics ; Fluid flow ; Horseshoe vortex ; Laminar separation ; Low aspect ratio ; Low aspect ratio airfoil ; Low Reynolds number flow ; Membrane separation ; Potential flow ; Pressure ; Ratio analysis ; Reynolds number ; Separation ; Strong interactions (field theory) ; Suction ; Tip vortex ; Turbulence ; Turbulent flow ; Velocity ; Vortex shedding ; Vortices ; Vorticity</subject><ispartof>Experimental thermal and fluid science, 2018-12, Vol.99, p.94-116</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Dec 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-b15f5687daae9fa6ecd7e379f314f0b66adaf0e50b59255e5a57b857a994dc3c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-b15f5687daae9fa6ecd7e379f314f0b66adaf0e50b59255e5a57b857a994dc3c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2018.07.019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Awasthi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreau, D.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doolan, C.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Flow structure of a low aspect ratio wall-mounted airfoil operating in a low Reynolds number flow</title><title>Experimental thermal and fluid science</title><description>•Flow-field across the span of a low aspect ratio wall-mounted airfoil was studied.•Laminar separation and transitional laminar separation were observed.•Mean and fluctuating velocity field varied across the span at lifting conditions.•Near-wake vortex shedding varies with spanwise location and angle of attack.•A region of spanwise shear with weak dependency on angle of attack was observed. Measurements on a wall-mounted NACA 0012 airfoil with an aspect ratio (AR) of 0.5 operating in the low Reynolds number (274,000, based on chord) regime were performed. Measurements included oil flow visualizations and velocity data obtained with a combination of pitot and hotwire probes. Three different geometric angles of attack (αg) equal to 0°, 5°, and 10° were considered and the effective angles of attack corresponding to these were quantified through measurements of the velocity vector in the potential flow around the airfoil. The flow around such a low AR airfoil is complex and can be three-dimensional across the span due to strong interaction between the junction, airfoil, and tip flows. In the mid-span region of the airfoil, laminar separation with and without reattachment was present on the suction-side and pressure-side respectively. The pressure-side separation, which is located near the trailing-edge, leads to vortex shedding in the near-wake of the airfoil. The character of this shedding, however, is different between αg = 5° and 10°. Towards the airfoil root (at 25% span), this shedding is supressed by the turbulent junction flow. Towards the free-end of the airfoil (at 75% span), shedding is observed even in the absence of pressure-side laminar separation and may be attributed to the interaction between the spanwise tip flow and the suction-side separation bubble. The airfoil boundary layer in this region is also thinner compared to that at the mid-span point. Further towards the airfoil tip (at 90% span), the shedding still exists; however, its intensity and character are modified by the dominant vortex dynamics. In proximity to the airfoil tip, the velocity and turbulence are affected by both the primary and secondary vorticity for the highest angle of attack studied.</description><subject>Aerodynamics</subject><subject>Angle of attack</subject><subject>Boundary layer</subject><subject>Boundary layers</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Horseshoe vortex</subject><subject>Laminar separation</subject><subject>Low aspect ratio</subject><subject>Low aspect ratio airfoil</subject><subject>Low Reynolds number flow</subject><subject>Membrane separation</subject><subject>Potential flow</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Ratio analysis</subject><subject>Reynolds number</subject><subject>Separation</subject><subject>Strong interactions (field theory)</subject><subject>Suction</subject><subject>Tip vortex</subject><subject>Turbulence</subject><subject>Turbulent flow</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Vortex shedding</subject><subject>Vortices</subject><subject>Vorticity</subject><issn>0894-1777</issn><issn>1879-2286</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEFLxDAQhYMouK7-h4BeW5O0aRrwIourwoIgeg5pOtGUtqlJ67r_3i67F2-eBt6894b5ELqhJKWEFrdNCj_D-Amhs-0UjUsZoWVKREqoPEELWgqZMFYWp2hBSpknVAhxji5ibAghJaNkgfS69VscxzCZcQqAvcUa7yUdBzAjDnp0Hm912yadn_oRaqxdsN612A-w3_Yf2PXH0Cvset_WEfdTV0HAdhYv0ZnVbYSr41yi9_XD2-op2bw8Pq_uN4nJKRuTinLLi1LUWoO0ugBTC8iEtBnNLamKQtfaEuCk4pJxDlxzUZVcaCnz2mQmW6LrQ-8Q_NcEcVSNn0I_n1SMMiZEnkkyu-4OLhN8jAGsGoLrdNgpStQeqmrUX6hqD1URoWaoc3x9iMP8ybeDoGYH9AZqF2Zcqvbuf0W_I-yLUw</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Awasthi, M.</creator><creator>Moreau, D.J.</creator><creator>Doolan, C.J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>Flow structure of a low aspect ratio wall-mounted airfoil operating in a low Reynolds number flow</title><author>Awasthi, M. ; Moreau, D.J. ; Doolan, C.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-b15f5687daae9fa6ecd7e379f314f0b66adaf0e50b59255e5a57b857a994dc3c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aerodynamics</topic><topic>Angle of attack</topic><topic>Boundary layer</topic><topic>Boundary layers</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Horseshoe vortex</topic><topic>Laminar separation</topic><topic>Low aspect ratio</topic><topic>Low aspect ratio airfoil</topic><topic>Low Reynolds number flow</topic><topic>Membrane separation</topic><topic>Potential flow</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Ratio analysis</topic><topic>Reynolds number</topic><topic>Separation</topic><topic>Strong interactions (field theory)</topic><topic>Suction</topic><topic>Tip vortex</topic><topic>Turbulence</topic><topic>Turbulent flow</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Vortex shedding</topic><topic>Vortices</topic><topic>Vorticity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Awasthi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreau, D.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doolan, C.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Experimental thermal and fluid science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Awasthi, M.</au><au>Moreau, D.J.</au><au>Doolan, C.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Flow structure of a low aspect ratio wall-mounted airfoil operating in a low Reynolds number flow</atitle><jtitle>Experimental thermal and fluid science</jtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>99</volume><spage>94</spage><epage>116</epage><pages>94-116</pages><issn>0894-1777</issn><eissn>1879-2286</eissn><abstract>•Flow-field across the span of a low aspect ratio wall-mounted airfoil was studied.•Laminar separation and transitional laminar separation were observed.•Mean and fluctuating velocity field varied across the span at lifting conditions.•Near-wake vortex shedding varies with spanwise location and angle of attack.•A region of spanwise shear with weak dependency on angle of attack was observed. Measurements on a wall-mounted NACA 0012 airfoil with an aspect ratio (AR) of 0.5 operating in the low Reynolds number (274,000, based on chord) regime were performed. Measurements included oil flow visualizations and velocity data obtained with a combination of pitot and hotwire probes. Three different geometric angles of attack (αg) equal to 0°, 5°, and 10° were considered and the effective angles of attack corresponding to these were quantified through measurements of the velocity vector in the potential flow around the airfoil. The flow around such a low AR airfoil is complex and can be three-dimensional across the span due to strong interaction between the junction, airfoil, and tip flows. In the mid-span region of the airfoil, laminar separation with and without reattachment was present on the suction-side and pressure-side respectively. The pressure-side separation, which is located near the trailing-edge, leads to vortex shedding in the near-wake of the airfoil. The character of this shedding, however, is different between αg = 5° and 10°. Towards the airfoil root (at 25% span), this shedding is supressed by the turbulent junction flow. Towards the free-end of the airfoil (at 75% span), shedding is observed even in the absence of pressure-side laminar separation and may be attributed to the interaction between the spanwise tip flow and the suction-side separation bubble. The airfoil boundary layer in this region is also thinner compared to that at the mid-span point. Further towards the airfoil tip (at 90% span), the shedding still exists; however, its intensity and character are modified by the dominant vortex dynamics. In proximity to the airfoil tip, the velocity and turbulence are affected by both the primary and secondary vorticity for the highest angle of attack studied.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2018.07.019</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0894-1777
ispartof Experimental thermal and fluid science, 2018-12, Vol.99, p.94-116
issn 0894-1777
1879-2286
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2122774390
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Aerodynamics
Angle of attack
Boundary layer
Boundary layers
Fluid dynamics
Fluid flow
Horseshoe vortex
Laminar separation
Low aspect ratio
Low aspect ratio airfoil
Low Reynolds number flow
Membrane separation
Potential flow
Pressure
Ratio analysis
Reynolds number
Separation
Strong interactions (field theory)
Suction
Tip vortex
Turbulence
Turbulent flow
Velocity
Vortex shedding
Vortices
Vorticity
title Flow structure of a low aspect ratio wall-mounted airfoil operating in a low Reynolds number flow
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T09%3A42%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Flow%20structure%20of%20a%20low%20aspect%20ratio%20wall-mounted%20airfoil%20operating%20in%20a%20low%20Reynolds%20number%20flow&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20thermal%20and%20fluid%20science&rft.au=Awasthi,%20M.&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=99&rft.spage=94&rft.epage=116&rft.pages=94-116&rft.issn=0894-1777&rft.eissn=1879-2286&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2018.07.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2122774390%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2122774390&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0894177718308148&rfr_iscdi=true