Validity Evidence of an Electronic Portfolio for Preservice Teachers
This study applied Messick's unified, multifaceted concept of construct validity to an electronic portfolio system used in a teacher education program. The subjects included 128 preservice teachers who recently completed their final portfolio reviews and student teaching experiences. Four of Me...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Educational measurement, issues and practice issues and practice, 2008-03, Vol.27 (1), p.10-24 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 24 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 10 |
| container_title | Educational measurement, issues and practice |
| container_volume | 27 |
| creator | Yao, Yuankun Thomas, Matt Nickens, Nicole Downing, Joyce Anderson Burkett, Ruth S. Lamson, Sharon |
| description | This study applied Messick's unified, multifaceted concept of construct validity to an electronic portfolio system used in a teacher education program. The subjects included 128 preservice teachers who recently completed their final portfolio reviews and student teaching experiences. Four of Messick's six facets of validity were investigated for the portfolio in this study, along with a discussion of the remaining facets examined in two previous studies. The evidence provided support for the substantive and generalizability aspects of validity, and limited support for the content, structural, external, and consequential aspects of validity. It was suggested that the electronic portfolio may be used as one requirement for certification purposes, but may not be valid for the purpose of assessing teacher competencies. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1745-3992.2008.00111.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_212250247</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ788443</ericid><sourcerecordid>1470809601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3141-5f441266b90dc6e993a6eb3b28d9fc5c1e42dc7bdfcd562097138dca0c85b6553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkL1OwzAURi0EEqXwBgwRe4J_42RgQCWUQguVKHS0EscRDqEGOy3t2-MQ1Bkvtu73nWvpABAgGCF_LusIccpCkqY4whAmEYR-HG0PwGAfHIIB5ASF3eAYnDhX-xKLUz4AN695o0vd7oJso0u1kiowVZCvgqxRsrVmpWUwN7atTKNNUBkbzK1yym60by5ULt-UdafgqMobp87-7iF4uc0Wo7tw-jSejK6noSSIopBVlCIcx0UKSxmrNCV5rApS4KRMK8kkUhSXkhdlJUsWY5hyRJJS5lAmrIgZI0Nw0e_9tOZrrVwrarO2K_-lwAhjBjHlvpT0JWmNc1ZV4tPqj9zuBIKiUyZq0YkQnRnRKRO_ysTWo-c9qqyWeyy750lCKfHxVR9_60bt_r1WZLPJ3L88H_a8dq3a7vncvouYE87E8nEsnhcQPixnU0HJDzrOid4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212250247</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validity Evidence of an Electronic Portfolio for Preservice Teachers</title><source>Education Source</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Yao, Yuankun ; Thomas, Matt ; Nickens, Nicole ; Downing, Joyce Anderson ; Burkett, Ruth S. ; Lamson, Sharon</creator><creatorcontrib>Yao, Yuankun ; Thomas, Matt ; Nickens, Nicole ; Downing, Joyce Anderson ; Burkett, Ruth S. ; Lamson, Sharon</creatorcontrib><description>This study applied Messick's unified, multifaceted concept of construct validity to an electronic portfolio system used in a teacher education program. The subjects included 128 preservice teachers who recently completed their final portfolio reviews and student teaching experiences. Four of Messick's six facets of validity were investigated for the portfolio in this study, along with a discussion of the remaining facets examined in two previous studies. The evidence provided support for the substantive and generalizability aspects of validity, and limited support for the content, structural, external, and consequential aspects of validity. It was suggested that the electronic portfolio may be used as one requirement for certification purposes, but may not be valid for the purpose of assessing teacher competencies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0731-1745</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-3992</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3992.2008.00111.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Adult literacy ; Education portfolios ; electronic portfolio ; Evaluation Methods ; Learning ; Portfolio Assessment ; Portfolios (Background Materials) ; Preservice Teacher Education ; Preservice Teachers ; Student Teacher Evaluation ; Student Teaching ; Teacher Certification ; Teacher Competencies ; Teacher education ; Teacher Education Programs ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Educational measurement, issues and practice, 2008-03, Vol.27 (1), p.10-24</ispartof><rights>2008 by the National Council on Measurement in Education</rights><rights>Copyright National Council on Measurement in Education Spring 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3141-5f441266b90dc6e993a6eb3b28d9fc5c1e42dc7bdfcd562097138dca0c85b6553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3141-5f441266b90dc6e993a6eb3b28d9fc5c1e42dc7bdfcd562097138dca0c85b6553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1745-3992.2008.00111.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1745-3992.2008.00111.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ788443$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yao, Yuankun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Matt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nickens, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Downing, Joyce Anderson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burkett, Ruth S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamson, Sharon</creatorcontrib><title>Validity Evidence of an Electronic Portfolio for Preservice Teachers</title><title>Educational measurement, issues and practice</title><description>This study applied Messick's unified, multifaceted concept of construct validity to an electronic portfolio system used in a teacher education program. The subjects included 128 preservice teachers who recently completed their final portfolio reviews and student teaching experiences. Four of Messick's six facets of validity were investigated for the portfolio in this study, along with a discussion of the remaining facets examined in two previous studies. The evidence provided support for the substantive and generalizability aspects of validity, and limited support for the content, structural, external, and consequential aspects of validity. It was suggested that the electronic portfolio may be used as one requirement for certification purposes, but may not be valid for the purpose of assessing teacher competencies.</description><subject>Adult literacy</subject><subject>Education portfolios</subject><subject>electronic portfolio</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Portfolio Assessment</subject><subject>Portfolios (Background Materials)</subject><subject>Preservice Teacher Education</subject><subject>Preservice Teachers</subject><subject>Student Teacher Evaluation</subject><subject>Student Teaching</subject><subject>Teacher Certification</subject><subject>Teacher Competencies</subject><subject>Teacher education</subject><subject>Teacher Education Programs</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0731-1745</issn><issn>1745-3992</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkL1OwzAURi0EEqXwBgwRe4J_42RgQCWUQguVKHS0EscRDqEGOy3t2-MQ1Bkvtu73nWvpABAgGCF_LusIccpCkqY4whAmEYR-HG0PwGAfHIIB5ASF3eAYnDhX-xKLUz4AN695o0vd7oJso0u1kiowVZCvgqxRsrVmpWUwN7atTKNNUBkbzK1yym60by5ULt-UdafgqMobp87-7iF4uc0Wo7tw-jSejK6noSSIopBVlCIcx0UKSxmrNCV5rApS4KRMK8kkUhSXkhdlJUsWY5hyRJJS5lAmrIgZI0Nw0e_9tOZrrVwrarO2K_-lwAhjBjHlvpT0JWmNc1ZV4tPqj9zuBIKiUyZq0YkQnRnRKRO_ysTWo-c9qqyWeyy750lCKfHxVR9_60bt_r1WZLPJ3L88H_a8dq3a7vncvouYE87E8nEsnhcQPixnU0HJDzrOid4</recordid><startdate>200803</startdate><enddate>200803</enddate><creator>Yao, Yuankun</creator><creator>Thomas, Matt</creator><creator>Nickens, Nicole</creator><creator>Downing, Joyce Anderson</creator><creator>Burkett, Ruth S.</creator><creator>Lamson, Sharon</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200803</creationdate><title>Validity Evidence of an Electronic Portfolio for Preservice Teachers</title><author>Yao, Yuankun ; Thomas, Matt ; Nickens, Nicole ; Downing, Joyce Anderson ; Burkett, Ruth S. ; Lamson, Sharon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3141-5f441266b90dc6e993a6eb3b28d9fc5c1e42dc7bdfcd562097138dca0c85b6553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult literacy</topic><topic>Education portfolios</topic><topic>electronic portfolio</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Portfolio Assessment</topic><topic>Portfolios (Background Materials)</topic><topic>Preservice Teacher Education</topic><topic>Preservice Teachers</topic><topic>Student Teacher Evaluation</topic><topic>Student Teaching</topic><topic>Teacher Certification</topic><topic>Teacher Competencies</topic><topic>Teacher education</topic><topic>Teacher Education Programs</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yao, Yuankun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Matt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nickens, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Downing, Joyce Anderson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burkett, Ruth S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamson, Sharon</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Educational measurement, issues and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yao, Yuankun</au><au>Thomas, Matt</au><au>Nickens, Nicole</au><au>Downing, Joyce Anderson</au><au>Burkett, Ruth S.</au><au>Lamson, Sharon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ788443</ericid><atitle>Validity Evidence of an Electronic Portfolio for Preservice Teachers</atitle><jtitle>Educational measurement, issues and practice</jtitle><date>2008-03</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>10</spage><epage>24</epage><pages>10-24</pages><issn>0731-1745</issn><eissn>1745-3992</eissn><abstract>This study applied Messick's unified, multifaceted concept of construct validity to an electronic portfolio system used in a teacher education program. The subjects included 128 preservice teachers who recently completed their final portfolio reviews and student teaching experiences. Four of Messick's six facets of validity were investigated for the portfolio in this study, along with a discussion of the remaining facets examined in two previous studies. The evidence provided support for the substantive and generalizability aspects of validity, and limited support for the content, structural, external, and consequential aspects of validity. It was suggested that the electronic portfolio may be used as one requirement for certification purposes, but may not be valid for the purpose of assessing teacher competencies.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1745-3992.2008.00111.x</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0731-1745 |
| ispartof | Educational measurement, issues and practice, 2008-03, Vol.27 (1), p.10-24 |
| issn | 0731-1745 1745-3992 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_212250247 |
| source | Education Source; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Adult literacy Education portfolios electronic portfolio Evaluation Methods Learning Portfolio Assessment Portfolios (Background Materials) Preservice Teacher Education Preservice Teachers Student Teacher Evaluation Student Teaching Teacher Certification Teacher Competencies Teacher education Teacher Education Programs Validity |
| title | Validity Evidence of an Electronic Portfolio for Preservice Teachers |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T04%3A23%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity%20Evidence%20of%20an%20Electronic%20Portfolio%20for%20Preservice%20Teachers&rft.jtitle=Educational%20measurement,%20issues%20and%20practice&rft.au=Yao,%20Yuankun&rft.date=2008-03&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=10&rft.epage=24&rft.pages=10-24&rft.issn=0731-1745&rft.eissn=1745-3992&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2008.00111.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1470809601%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212250247&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ788443&rfr_iscdi=true |