Negotiating choice, deception and risk: teenagers’ perceptions of food safety

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the teenager perspectives of the meaning of food safety, and the implications of those meanings. Design/methodology/approach Five focus groups were conducted with students (aged 12–14) from Calgary, AB. Participants were asked what food safety means to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British food journal (1966) 2018-10, Vol.120 (12), p.2748-2761
Hauptverfasser: Elliott, Charlene, Ellison, Kirsten
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2761
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2748
container_title British food journal (1966)
container_volume 120
creator Elliott, Charlene
Ellison, Kirsten
description Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the teenager perspectives of the meaning of food safety, and the implications of those meanings. Design/methodology/approach Five focus groups were conducted with students (aged 12–14) from Calgary, AB. Participants were asked what food safety means to them and probed about their views on the relationship between food safety and packaged foods. Grounded theorizing informed the analysis. Findings Food safety was described as located within the system, located within the individual and located within the edible. Key to these teenagers’ understanding of food safety is the theme of food deception – a deception promulgated by food producers, manufacturers and advertisers who lack transparency about what they are actually selling. Teenagers draw attention to the risks associated with living in an industrialized food environment, and to the tension between safety and the industry-driven motive to sell. Originality/value Individuals start to make independent decisions around food preparation and consumption as teenagers; as present and future consumers, it is valuable to learn their perspectives and knowledge about food safety. More importantly, food safety is not only simply a health-related issue but also a semantic one. This study moves beyond the knowledge deficit approach characterizing most research on the topic. Instead, it probes the range of meanings associated with food safety and how they are worked out, revealing that the teenagers’ construction of food as “risk objects” reveals different links to harm than the food safety interventions typically directed to them.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/BFJ-05-2018-0277
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2122416895</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2122416895</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-3804dd356bca444e7eaf3c5b6b562d8ffc40a18253a164cb9800c1444d1795333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkLtOwzAUhi0EEqWwM1pixfQ4thOXDSrKRRVdQGKzHF9KShsHOx268Rq8Hk9ConZBYjr6db7_HOlD6JzCFaUgR7fTJwKCZEAlgawoDtCAFkIS3i0P0QAACgIFvB2jk5SWfeygAZo_u0VoK91W9QKb91AZd4mtM65pq1BjXVscq_RxjVvnar1wMf18fePGxT2RcPDYh2Bx0t6121N05PUqubP9HKLX6d3L5IHM5vePk5sZMYzSljAJ3Fom8tJozrkrnPbMiDIvRZ5Z6b3hoKnMBNM056YcSwBDO9LSYiwYY0N0sbvbxPC5calVy7CJdfdSZTTLOM1lxw0R7CgTQ0rRedXEaq3jVlFQvTbVaVMgVK9N9dq6ymhXcWsX9cr-1_gjmv0CDIxuNQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2122416895</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Negotiating choice, deception and risk: teenagers’ perceptions of food safety</title><source>Emerald Management Extra</source><creator>Elliott, Charlene ; Ellison, Kirsten</creator><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Charlene ; Ellison, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the teenager perspectives of the meaning of food safety, and the implications of those meanings. Design/methodology/approach Five focus groups were conducted with students (aged 12–14) from Calgary, AB. Participants were asked what food safety means to them and probed about their views on the relationship between food safety and packaged foods. Grounded theorizing informed the analysis. Findings Food safety was described as located within the system, located within the individual and located within the edible. Key to these teenagers’ understanding of food safety is the theme of food deception – a deception promulgated by food producers, manufacturers and advertisers who lack transparency about what they are actually selling. Teenagers draw attention to the risks associated with living in an industrialized food environment, and to the tension between safety and the industry-driven motive to sell. Originality/value Individuals start to make independent decisions around food preparation and consumption as teenagers; as present and future consumers, it is valuable to learn their perspectives and knowledge about food safety. More importantly, food safety is not only simply a health-related issue but also a semantic one. This study moves beyond the knowledge deficit approach characterizing most research on the topic. Instead, it probes the range of meanings associated with food safety and how they are worked out, revealing that the teenagers’ construction of food as “risk objects” reveals different links to harm than the food safety interventions typically directed to them.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-070X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-4108</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/BFJ-05-2018-0277</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Consumers ; Deception ; Food consumption ; Food industry ; Food packaging ; Food safety ; Knowledge ; Packaged food ; Perceptions ; Product recalls ; Public health ; Risk perception ; Safety ; Semantics ; Studies ; Teenagers ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>British food journal (1966), 2018-10, Vol.120 (12), p.2748-2761</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-3804dd356bca444e7eaf3c5b6b562d8ffc40a18253a164cb9800c1444d1795333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-3804dd356bca444e7eaf3c5b6b562d8ffc40a18253a164cb9800c1444d1795333</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2615-2144</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/BFJ-05-2018-0277/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,11635,27924,27925,52689</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Charlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellison, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><title>Negotiating choice, deception and risk: teenagers’ perceptions of food safety</title><title>British food journal (1966)</title><description>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the teenager perspectives of the meaning of food safety, and the implications of those meanings. Design/methodology/approach Five focus groups were conducted with students (aged 12–14) from Calgary, AB. Participants were asked what food safety means to them and probed about their views on the relationship between food safety and packaged foods. Grounded theorizing informed the analysis. Findings Food safety was described as located within the system, located within the individual and located within the edible. Key to these teenagers’ understanding of food safety is the theme of food deception – a deception promulgated by food producers, manufacturers and advertisers who lack transparency about what they are actually selling. Teenagers draw attention to the risks associated with living in an industrialized food environment, and to the tension between safety and the industry-driven motive to sell. Originality/value Individuals start to make independent decisions around food preparation and consumption as teenagers; as present and future consumers, it is valuable to learn their perspectives and knowledge about food safety. More importantly, food safety is not only simply a health-related issue but also a semantic one. This study moves beyond the knowledge deficit approach characterizing most research on the topic. Instead, it probes the range of meanings associated with food safety and how they are worked out, revealing that the teenagers’ construction of food as “risk objects” reveals different links to harm than the food safety interventions typically directed to them.</description><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Deception</subject><subject>Food consumption</subject><subject>Food industry</subject><subject>Food packaging</subject><subject>Food safety</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Packaged food</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Product recalls</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Risk perception</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>0007-070X</issn><issn>1758-4108</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptkLtOwzAUhi0EEqWwM1pixfQ4thOXDSrKRRVdQGKzHF9KShsHOx268Rq8Hk9ConZBYjr6db7_HOlD6JzCFaUgR7fTJwKCZEAlgawoDtCAFkIS3i0P0QAACgIFvB2jk5SWfeygAZo_u0VoK91W9QKb91AZd4mtM65pq1BjXVscq_RxjVvnar1wMf18fePGxT2RcPDYh2Bx0t6121N05PUqubP9HKLX6d3L5IHM5vePk5sZMYzSljAJ3Fom8tJozrkrnPbMiDIvRZ5Z6b3hoKnMBNM056YcSwBDO9LSYiwYY0N0sbvbxPC5calVy7CJdfdSZTTLOM1lxw0R7CgTQ0rRedXEaq3jVlFQvTbVaVMgVK9N9dq6ymhXcWsX9cr-1_gjmv0CDIxuNQ</recordid><startdate>20181019</startdate><enddate>20181019</enddate><creator>Elliott, Charlene</creator><creator>Ellison, Kirsten</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0Q</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2615-2144</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181019</creationdate><title>Negotiating choice, deception and risk: teenagers’ perceptions of food safety</title><author>Elliott, Charlene ; Ellison, Kirsten</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-3804dd356bca444e7eaf3c5b6b562d8ffc40a18253a164cb9800c1444d1795333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Deception</topic><topic>Food consumption</topic><topic>Food industry</topic><topic>Food packaging</topic><topic>Food safety</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Packaged food</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Product recalls</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Risk perception</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Charlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellison, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>European Business Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>British food journal (1966)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elliott, Charlene</au><au>Ellison, Kirsten</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Negotiating choice, deception and risk: teenagers’ perceptions of food safety</atitle><jtitle>British food journal (1966)</jtitle><date>2018-10-19</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2748</spage><epage>2761</epage><pages>2748-2761</pages><issn>0007-070X</issn><eissn>1758-4108</eissn><abstract>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the teenager perspectives of the meaning of food safety, and the implications of those meanings. Design/methodology/approach Five focus groups were conducted with students (aged 12–14) from Calgary, AB. Participants were asked what food safety means to them and probed about their views on the relationship between food safety and packaged foods. Grounded theorizing informed the analysis. Findings Food safety was described as located within the system, located within the individual and located within the edible. Key to these teenagers’ understanding of food safety is the theme of food deception – a deception promulgated by food producers, manufacturers and advertisers who lack transparency about what they are actually selling. Teenagers draw attention to the risks associated with living in an industrialized food environment, and to the tension between safety and the industry-driven motive to sell. Originality/value Individuals start to make independent decisions around food preparation and consumption as teenagers; as present and future consumers, it is valuable to learn their perspectives and knowledge about food safety. More importantly, food safety is not only simply a health-related issue but also a semantic one. This study moves beyond the knowledge deficit approach characterizing most research on the topic. Instead, it probes the range of meanings associated with food safety and how they are worked out, revealing that the teenagers’ construction of food as “risk objects” reveals different links to harm than the food safety interventions typically directed to them.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/BFJ-05-2018-0277</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2615-2144</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-070X
ispartof British food journal (1966), 2018-10, Vol.120 (12), p.2748-2761
issn 0007-070X
1758-4108
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2122416895
source Emerald Management Extra
subjects Consumers
Deception
Food consumption
Food industry
Food packaging
Food safety
Knowledge
Packaged food
Perceptions
Product recalls
Public health
Risk perception
Safety
Semantics
Studies
Teenagers
Young adults
title Negotiating choice, deception and risk: teenagers’ perceptions of food safety
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T09%3A08%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Negotiating%20choice,%20deception%20and%20risk:%20teenagers%E2%80%99%20perceptions%20of%20food%20safety&rft.jtitle=British%20food%20journal%20(1966)&rft.au=Elliott,%20Charlene&rft.date=2018-10-19&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2748&rft.epage=2761&rft.pages=2748-2761&rft.issn=0007-070X&rft.eissn=1758-4108&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/BFJ-05-2018-0277&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2122416895%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2122416895&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true