Statistical significance testing, hypothetico-deductive method, and theory evaluation
Chow's endorsement of a limited role for null hypothesis significance testing is a needed corrective of research malpractice, but his decision to place this procedure in a hypothetico-deductive framework of Popperian cast is unwise. Various failures of this version of the hypothetico-deductive...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Behavioral and brain sciences 2000-04, Vol.23 (2), p.292-293 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 293 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 292 |
| container_title | The Behavioral and brain sciences |
| container_volume | 23 |
| creator | Haig, Brian D. |
| description | Chow's endorsement of a limited role for null hypothesis significance testing is a needed corrective of research malpractice, but his decision to place this procedure in a hypothetico-deductive framework of Popperian cast is unwise. Various failures of this version of the hypothetico-deductive method have negative implications for Chow's treatment of significance testing, meta-analysis, and theory evaluation. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0140525X00262444 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_212227957</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0140525X00262444</cupid><sourcerecordid>57310918</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-4e0b4446b07449c90a0ff19a0b47ad04e77e9a4a7e75ae050bc424d84190d1753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMFOAjEUbIwmIvoB3jaeWX3ttlt6VKJoQqIEiMZLU3bfwiJssdsl8veWQPRgPL2XNzNvJkPIJYVrClTejIByEEy8AbCUcc6PSIvyVMW0y8Qxae3geIefkrO6XgCA4EK1yGTkjS9rX2ZmGdXlrCqLsFYZRh7DtZp1ovl2bf0cA8XGOeZN5ssNRiv0c5t3IlPlUUCt20a4McsmfLPVOTkpzLLGi8Nsk8nD_bj3GA-e-0-920GcJYL5mCNMQ9R0CpJzlSkwUBRUmXCVJgeOUqIy3EiUwiAImGac8bzLqYKcSpG0ydX-79rZzyYE1gvbuCpYakYZY1IJGUh0T8qcrWuHhV67cmXcVlPQu_L0n_KCJt5rQjX49SMw7kOnMpFCp_2hvlPDhI9f3_VL4CcHD7OaujKf4W-S_12-AX8sgNM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212227957</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Statistical significance testing, hypothetico-deductive method, and theory evaluation</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><creator>Haig, Brian D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Haig, Brian D.</creatorcontrib><description>Chow's endorsement of a limited role for null hypothesis significance testing is a needed corrective of research malpractice, but his decision to place this procedure in a hypothetico-deductive framework of Popperian cast is unwise. Various failures of this version of the hypothetico-deductive method have negative implications for Chow's treatment of significance testing, meta-analysis, and theory evaluation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-525X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-1825</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X00262444</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BBSCDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Chow, Siu L ; Cognition & reasoning ; Continuing Commentary ; Hypotheses ; Psychological tests ; Siu L. Chow . Précis of Statistical significance: Rationale, validity, and utility. BBS 21:169–239 ; Social research ; Statistical analysis ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2000-04, Vol.23 (2), p.292-293</ispartof><rights>2000 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press, Publishing Division Apr 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-4e0b4446b07449c90a0ff19a0b47ad04e77e9a4a7e75ae050bc424d84190d1753</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0140525X00262444/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haig, Brian D.</creatorcontrib><title>Statistical significance testing, hypothetico-deductive method, and theory evaluation</title><title>The Behavioral and brain sciences</title><addtitle>Behav Brain Sci</addtitle><description>Chow's endorsement of a limited role for null hypothesis significance testing is a needed corrective of research malpractice, but his decision to place this procedure in a hypothetico-deductive framework of Popperian cast is unwise. Various failures of this version of the hypothetico-deductive method have negative implications for Chow's treatment of significance testing, meta-analysis, and theory evaluation.</description><subject>Chow, Siu L</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Continuing Commentary</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Psychological tests</subject><subject>Siu L. Chow . Précis of Statistical significance: Rationale, validity, and utility. BBS 21:169–239</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0140-525X</issn><issn>1469-1825</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UMFOAjEUbIwmIvoB3jaeWX3ttlt6VKJoQqIEiMZLU3bfwiJssdsl8veWQPRgPL2XNzNvJkPIJYVrClTejIByEEy8AbCUcc6PSIvyVMW0y8Qxae3geIefkrO6XgCA4EK1yGTkjS9rX2ZmGdXlrCqLsFYZRh7DtZp1ovl2bf0cA8XGOeZN5ssNRiv0c5t3IlPlUUCt20a4McsmfLPVOTkpzLLGi8Nsk8nD_bj3GA-e-0-920GcJYL5mCNMQ9R0CpJzlSkwUBRUmXCVJgeOUqIy3EiUwiAImGac8bzLqYKcSpG0ydX-79rZzyYE1gvbuCpYakYZY1IJGUh0T8qcrWuHhV67cmXcVlPQu_L0n_KCJt5rQjX49SMw7kOnMpFCp_2hvlPDhI9f3_VL4CcHD7OaujKf4W-S_12-AX8sgNM</recordid><startdate>20000401</startdate><enddate>20000401</enddate><creator>Haig, Brian D.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000401</creationdate><title>Statistical significance testing, hypothetico-deductive method, and theory evaluation</title><author>Haig, Brian D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-4e0b4446b07449c90a0ff19a0b47ad04e77e9a4a7e75ae050bc424d84190d1753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Chow, Siu L</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Continuing Commentary</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Psychological tests</topic><topic>Siu L. Chow . Précis of Statistical significance: Rationale, validity, and utility. BBS 21:169–239</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haig, Brian D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>The Behavioral and brain sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haig, Brian D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Statistical significance testing, hypothetico-deductive method, and theory evaluation</atitle><jtitle>The Behavioral and brain sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Behav Brain Sci</addtitle><date>2000-04-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>292</spage><epage>293</epage><pages>292-293</pages><issn>0140-525X</issn><eissn>1469-1825</eissn><coden>BBSCDH</coden><abstract>Chow's endorsement of a limited role for null hypothesis significance testing is a needed corrective of research malpractice, but his decision to place this procedure in a hypothetico-deductive framework of Popperian cast is unwise. Various failures of this version of the hypothetico-deductive method have negative implications for Chow's treatment of significance testing, meta-analysis, and theory evaluation.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0140525X00262444</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0140-525X |
| ispartof | The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2000-04, Vol.23 (2), p.292-293 |
| issn | 0140-525X 1469-1825 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_212227957 |
| source | Cambridge Journals Online |
| subjects | Chow, Siu L Cognition & reasoning Continuing Commentary Hypotheses Psychological tests Siu L. Chow . Précis of Statistical significance: Rationale, validity, and utility. BBS 21:169–239 Social research Statistical analysis Systematic review |
| title | Statistical significance testing, hypothetico-deductive method, and theory evaluation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T07%3A00%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Statistical%20significance%20testing,%20hypothetico-deductive%20method,%20and%20theory%20evaluation&rft.jtitle=The%20Behavioral%20and%20brain%20sciences&rft.au=Haig,%20Brian%20D.&rft.date=2000-04-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=292&rft.epage=293&rft.pages=292-293&rft.issn=0140-525X&rft.eissn=1469-1825&rft.coden=BBSCDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0140525X00262444&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57310918%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212227957&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0140525X00262444&rfr_iscdi=true |