Better theories are needed to distinguish perception from cognition
Pylyshyn argues that many of the methods used to study perception are too coarse to detect the distinction between perceptual and cognitive processing. We suggest that the reason for this is that the theories used to guide research in perception are at fault. More powerful theories – for instance, c...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Behavioral and brain sciences 1999-06, Vol.22 (3), p.374-375 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 375 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 374 |
| container_title | The Behavioral and brain sciences |
| container_volume | 22 |
| creator | Dawson, Michael R. W. Piercey, C. Darren |
| description | Pylyshyn argues that many of the methods used to study
perception are too coarse to detect the distinction between perceptual
and cognitive processing. We suggest that the reason for this is that
the theories used to guide research in perception are at fault. More
powerful theories – for instance, computer simulations –
will be required to identify where perception ends and where cognition
begins. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0140525X99312024 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_212224584</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0140525X99312024</cupid><sourcerecordid>45818522</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-2b516203dc953da44b2015177200222b2cfa4a6ddf9e0cc12df6ca204f46cc1c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMoWKs_wNui59XMJNl0j1q1FYpSVOgtpEm23Wp31yQF_ffu0iKC9DQ85nvzhkfIOdAroCCvXyhwKlDM8pwBUuQHpAc8y1MYoDgkvW6ddvtjchLCilIquMh7ZHjrYnQ-iUtX-9KFRHuXVM5ZZ5NYJ7YMsawWmzIsk8Z545pY1lVS-HqdmHpRlZ08JUeF_gjubDf75O3h_nU4TifPo8fhzSQ1jGFMcS4gQ8qsyQWzmvM5UhAgJVKKiHM0heY6s7bIHTUG0BaZ0Uh5wbNWGtYnF9u7ja8_Ny5Etao3vmojFUJ7gYsBb6HLfRAMpATBQbKWgi1lfB2Cd4VqfLnW_lsBVV2h6l-hrSfdetpO3NevQft3lUkmhcpGU5Xd5ePZbPqkoOXZLkOv5760C_fnlb0pP9lQhco</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1877154173</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Better theories are needed to distinguish perception from cognition</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Dawson, Michael R. W. ; Piercey, C. Darren</creator><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Michael R. W. ; Piercey, C. Darren</creatorcontrib><description>Pylyshyn argues that many of the methods used to study
perception are too coarse to detect the distinction between perceptual
and cognitive processing. We suggest that the reason for this is that
the theories used to guide research in perception are at fault. More
powerful theories – for instance, computer simulations –
will be required to identify where perception ends and where cognition
begins.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-525X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-1825</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X99312024</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BBSCDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Eyes & eyesight ; Neurology ; Open Peer Commentary ; Pylyshyn: Vision and cognition ; Sensory perception ; Theory</subject><ispartof>The Behavioral and brain sciences, 1999-06, Vol.22 (3), p.374-375</ispartof><rights>1999 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press, Publishing Division Jun 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0140525X99312024/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27869,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Michael R. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piercey, C. Darren</creatorcontrib><title>Better theories are needed to distinguish perception from cognition</title><title>The Behavioral and brain sciences</title><addtitle>Behav Brain Sci</addtitle><description>Pylyshyn argues that many of the methods used to study
perception are too coarse to detect the distinction between perceptual
and cognitive processing. We suggest that the reason for this is that
the theories used to guide research in perception are at fault. More
powerful theories – for instance, computer simulations –
will be required to identify where perception ends and where cognition
begins.</description><subject>Eyes & eyesight</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Open Peer Commentary</subject><subject>Pylyshyn: Vision and cognition</subject><subject>Sensory perception</subject><subject>Theory</subject><issn>0140-525X</issn><issn>1469-1825</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMoWKs_wNui59XMJNl0j1q1FYpSVOgtpEm23Wp31yQF_ffu0iKC9DQ85nvzhkfIOdAroCCvXyhwKlDM8pwBUuQHpAc8y1MYoDgkvW6ddvtjchLCilIquMh7ZHjrYnQ-iUtX-9KFRHuXVM5ZZ5NYJ7YMsawWmzIsk8Z545pY1lVS-HqdmHpRlZ08JUeF_gjubDf75O3h_nU4TifPo8fhzSQ1jGFMcS4gQ8qsyQWzmvM5UhAgJVKKiHM0heY6s7bIHTUG0BaZ0Uh5wbNWGtYnF9u7ja8_Ny5Etao3vmojFUJ7gYsBb6HLfRAMpATBQbKWgi1lfB2Cd4VqfLnW_lsBVV2h6l-hrSfdetpO3NevQft3lUkmhcpGU5Xd5ePZbPqkoOXZLkOv5760C_fnlb0pP9lQhco</recordid><startdate>19990601</startdate><enddate>19990601</enddate><creator>Dawson, Michael R. W.</creator><creator>Piercey, C. Darren</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HJHVS</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990601</creationdate><title>Better theories are needed to distinguish perception from cognition</title><author>Dawson, Michael R. W. ; Piercey, C. Darren</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-2b516203dc953da44b2015177200222b2cfa4a6ddf9e0cc12df6ca204f46cc1c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Eyes & eyesight</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Open Peer Commentary</topic><topic>Pylyshyn: Vision and cognition</topic><topic>Sensory perception</topic><topic>Theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Michael R. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piercey, C. Darren</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 19</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>The Behavioral and brain sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dawson, Michael R. W.</au><au>Piercey, C. Darren</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Better theories are needed to distinguish perception from cognition</atitle><jtitle>The Behavioral and brain sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Behav Brain Sci</addtitle><date>1999-06-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>374</spage><epage>375</epage><pages>374-375</pages><issn>0140-525X</issn><eissn>1469-1825</eissn><coden>BBSCDH</coden><abstract>Pylyshyn argues that many of the methods used to study
perception are too coarse to detect the distinction between perceptual
and cognitive processing. We suggest that the reason for this is that
the theories used to guide research in perception are at fault. More
powerful theories – for instance, computer simulations –
will be required to identify where perception ends and where cognition
begins.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0140525X99312024</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0140-525X |
| ispartof | The Behavioral and brain sciences, 1999-06, Vol.22 (3), p.374-375 |
| issn | 0140-525X 1469-1825 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_212224584 |
| source | Periodicals Index Online; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | Eyes & eyesight Neurology Open Peer Commentary Pylyshyn: Vision and cognition Sensory perception Theory |
| title | Better theories are needed to distinguish perception from cognition |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T20%3A52%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Better%20theories%20are%20needed%20to%20distinguish%20perception%20from%20cognition&rft.jtitle=The%20Behavioral%20and%20brain%20sciences&rft.au=Dawson,%20Michael%20R.%20W.&rft.date=1999-06-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=374&rft.epage=375&rft.pages=374-375&rft.issn=0140-525X&rft.eissn=1469-1825&rft.coden=BBSCDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0140525X99312024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E45818522%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1877154173&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0140525X99312024&rfr_iscdi=true |