Distributions of birds and plants in ecoregions: Implications for the conservation of a neotropical biodiversity hotspot

The delineation of unique areas in biodiversity is crucial for conservation planning. However, identification of distinct biotas is a challenging task. In this study, we use an objective analytical process to test if bird and plant species composition of three different forest formation in the Atlan...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Austral ecology 2018-11, Vol.43 (7), p.839-849
Hauptverfasser: Anjos, Luiz, Volpato, Graziele H., Lopes, Edson V., Willrich, Guilherme, Bochio, Gabriela M., Arakaki Lindsey, Barbara R., Simões, Nadson R., Mendonça, Luciana B., Boçon, Roberto, Carvalho, Joema, Lima, Marcos R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 849
container_issue 7
container_start_page 839
container_title Austral ecology
container_volume 43
creator Anjos, Luiz
Volpato, Graziele H.
Lopes, Edson V.
Willrich, Guilherme
Bochio, Gabriela M.
Arakaki Lindsey, Barbara R.
Simões, Nadson R.
Mendonça, Luciana B.
Boçon, Roberto
Carvalho, Joema
Lima, Marcos R.
description The delineation of unique areas in biodiversity is crucial for conservation planning. However, identification of distinct biotas is a challenging task. In this study, we use an objective analytical process to test if bird and plant species composition of three different forest formation in the Atlantic forest Biome is sufficiently distinct to merit the recognition of ecoregions. We also evaluated how current climatic and spatial factors shape the distribution of plants and birds. Sampling localities were selected in three forest types of southern Brazil: mixed rain forest (MF), seasonal semi‐deciduous forest (SF) and dense rain forest (DF). The point‐centred quarter method and point counts were used to sample plants and birds respectively. Multivariate analyses were used to evaluate species composition, while the Rank Occupancy Abundance Profile was used to determine the association of bird species with each forest type. We used variation partitioning to determine which factors, that is climatic, spatial or tree species abundance (in the case of birds) better explained the distribution of plants and birds. A total of 176 tree species and 270 bird species were recorded. The bird species composition was sufficiently distinct among the three forest types, but the plant species composition was only distinct between DF and MF. Moreover, 61% of bird species were associated with only one forest type. This high association and the different species composition suggest that these forest types are sufficiently distinct to merit the recognition of ecoregions. Plant distribution was mainly affected by climatic variables, while bird distribution was mainly influenced by forest type and less so by climatic variables. Our data suggest that all three forest types should be conserved, but conservation strategies are urgent in MF where only 0.39% of its original cover is under protection.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/aec.12626
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2122125808</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2122125808</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2976-ae2744704facda9962d97b8f33d104d238e1e8cb868cb5e452e203707b19d50e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsH_0HAk4dtk-xnvJVatVDwoueQTWZtynazJmm1_960K94chvkIz7yBF6FbSiY0xlSCmlBWsOIMjWiWsYRznp7_zVV-ia683xBCqoLTEfp-ND44U--CsZ3HtsG1cdpj2Wnct7ILHpsOg7IOPo7EA15u-9YoOfCNdTisAau4gNufXo8iEndgg7N9JNsoabXZg_MmHPDaBt_bcI0uGtl6uPntY_T-tHibvySr1-flfLZKFONlkUhgZZaVJGuk0pLzgmle1lWTppqSTLO0AgqVqqsilhyynAEjaUnKmnKdE0jH6G7Q7Z393IEPYmN3rotfCkZZzLwiVaTuB0o5672DRvTObKU7CErE0VgRjRUnYyM7Hdgv08Lhf1DMFvPh4gejQ3vZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2122125808</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distributions of birds and plants in ecoregions: Implications for the conservation of a neotropical biodiversity hotspot</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Anjos, Luiz ; Volpato, Graziele H. ; Lopes, Edson V. ; Willrich, Guilherme ; Bochio, Gabriela M. ; Arakaki Lindsey, Barbara R. ; Simões, Nadson R. ; Mendonça, Luciana B. ; Boçon, Roberto ; Carvalho, Joema ; Lima, Marcos R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Anjos, Luiz ; Volpato, Graziele H. ; Lopes, Edson V. ; Willrich, Guilherme ; Bochio, Gabriela M. ; Arakaki Lindsey, Barbara R. ; Simões, Nadson R. ; Mendonça, Luciana B. ; Boçon, Roberto ; Carvalho, Joema ; Lima, Marcos R.</creatorcontrib><description>The delineation of unique areas in biodiversity is crucial for conservation planning. However, identification of distinct biotas is a challenging task. In this study, we use an objective analytical process to test if bird and plant species composition of three different forest formation in the Atlantic forest Biome is sufficiently distinct to merit the recognition of ecoregions. We also evaluated how current climatic and spatial factors shape the distribution of plants and birds. Sampling localities were selected in three forest types of southern Brazil: mixed rain forest (MF), seasonal semi‐deciduous forest (SF) and dense rain forest (DF). The point‐centred quarter method and point counts were used to sample plants and birds respectively. Multivariate analyses were used to evaluate species composition, while the Rank Occupancy Abundance Profile was used to determine the association of bird species with each forest type. We used variation partitioning to determine which factors, that is climatic, spatial or tree species abundance (in the case of birds) better explained the distribution of plants and birds. A total of 176 tree species and 270 bird species were recorded. The bird species composition was sufficiently distinct among the three forest types, but the plant species composition was only distinct between DF and MF. Moreover, 61% of bird species were associated with only one forest type. This high association and the different species composition suggest that these forest types are sufficiently distinct to merit the recognition of ecoregions. Plant distribution was mainly affected by climatic variables, while bird distribution was mainly influenced by forest type and less so by climatic variables. Our data suggest that all three forest types should be conserved, but conservation strategies are urgent in MF where only 0.39% of its original cover is under protection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1442-9985</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1442-9993</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aec.12626</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Richmond: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Biodiversity ; Biodiversity hot spots ; biogeography ; Birds ; Brazilian Atlantic forest ; Climate change ; climate variables ; Composition ; Conservation ; Deciduous forests ; Flowers &amp; plants ; Forest conservation ; Forest management ; Forests ; Mathematical analysis ; Plant species ; Plants (botany) ; Rain ; Rainforests ; Recognition ; Species composition ; Trees ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Austral ecology, 2018-11, Vol.43 (7), p.839-849</ispartof><rights>2018 Ecological Society of Australia</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Ecological Society of Australia</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2976-ae2744704facda9962d97b8f33d104d238e1e8cb868cb5e452e203707b19d50e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2976-ae2744704facda9962d97b8f33d104d238e1e8cb868cb5e452e203707b19d50e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2167-5739 ; 0000-0002-4577-9033 ; 0000-0002-0671-0172 ; 0000-0002-6786-1345 ; 0000-0003-3231-6256 ; 0000-0002-8278-5141 ; 0000-0002-8680-2375 ; 0000-0002-6413-648X ; 0000-0002-5901-0911</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Faec.12626$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Faec.12626$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27931,27932,45581,45582</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anjos, Luiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volpato, Graziele H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, Edson V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willrich, Guilherme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bochio, Gabriela M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arakaki Lindsey, Barbara R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simões, Nadson R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendonça, Luciana B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boçon, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Joema</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, Marcos R.</creatorcontrib><title>Distributions of birds and plants in ecoregions: Implications for the conservation of a neotropical biodiversity hotspot</title><title>Austral ecology</title><description>The delineation of unique areas in biodiversity is crucial for conservation planning. However, identification of distinct biotas is a challenging task. In this study, we use an objective analytical process to test if bird and plant species composition of three different forest formation in the Atlantic forest Biome is sufficiently distinct to merit the recognition of ecoregions. We also evaluated how current climatic and spatial factors shape the distribution of plants and birds. Sampling localities were selected in three forest types of southern Brazil: mixed rain forest (MF), seasonal semi‐deciduous forest (SF) and dense rain forest (DF). The point‐centred quarter method and point counts were used to sample plants and birds respectively. Multivariate analyses were used to evaluate species composition, while the Rank Occupancy Abundance Profile was used to determine the association of bird species with each forest type. We used variation partitioning to determine which factors, that is climatic, spatial or tree species abundance (in the case of birds) better explained the distribution of plants and birds. A total of 176 tree species and 270 bird species were recorded. The bird species composition was sufficiently distinct among the three forest types, but the plant species composition was only distinct between DF and MF. Moreover, 61% of bird species were associated with only one forest type. This high association and the different species composition suggest that these forest types are sufficiently distinct to merit the recognition of ecoregions. Plant distribution was mainly affected by climatic variables, while bird distribution was mainly influenced by forest type and less so by climatic variables. Our data suggest that all three forest types should be conserved, but conservation strategies are urgent in MF where only 0.39% of its original cover is under protection.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biodiversity hot spots</subject><subject>biogeography</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Brazilian Atlantic forest</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>climate variables</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Deciduous forests</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>Forest conservation</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rainforests</subject><subject>Recognition</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1442-9985</issn><issn>1442-9993</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsH_0HAk4dtk-xnvJVatVDwoueQTWZtynazJmm1_960K94chvkIz7yBF6FbSiY0xlSCmlBWsOIMjWiWsYRznp7_zVV-ia683xBCqoLTEfp-ND44U--CsZ3HtsG1cdpj2Wnct7ILHpsOg7IOPo7EA15u-9YoOfCNdTisAau4gNufXo8iEndgg7N9JNsoabXZg_MmHPDaBt_bcI0uGtl6uPntY_T-tHibvySr1-flfLZKFONlkUhgZZaVJGuk0pLzgmle1lWTppqSTLO0AgqVqqsilhyynAEjaUnKmnKdE0jH6G7Q7Z393IEPYmN3rotfCkZZzLwiVaTuB0o5672DRvTObKU7CErE0VgRjRUnYyM7Hdgv08Lhf1DMFvPh4gejQ3vZ</recordid><startdate>201811</startdate><enddate>201811</enddate><creator>Anjos, Luiz</creator><creator>Volpato, Graziele H.</creator><creator>Lopes, Edson V.</creator><creator>Willrich, Guilherme</creator><creator>Bochio, Gabriela M.</creator><creator>Arakaki Lindsey, Barbara R.</creator><creator>Simões, Nadson R.</creator><creator>Mendonça, Luciana B.</creator><creator>Boçon, Roberto</creator><creator>Carvalho, Joema</creator><creator>Lima, Marcos R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2167-5739</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4577-9033</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0671-0172</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6786-1345</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3231-6256</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8278-5141</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8680-2375</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6413-648X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5901-0911</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201811</creationdate><title>Distributions of birds and plants in ecoregions: Implications for the conservation of a neotropical biodiversity hotspot</title><author>Anjos, Luiz ; Volpato, Graziele H. ; Lopes, Edson V. ; Willrich, Guilherme ; Bochio, Gabriela M. ; Arakaki Lindsey, Barbara R. ; Simões, Nadson R. ; Mendonça, Luciana B. ; Boçon, Roberto ; Carvalho, Joema ; Lima, Marcos R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2976-ae2744704facda9962d97b8f33d104d238e1e8cb868cb5e452e203707b19d50e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biodiversity hot spots</topic><topic>biogeography</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Brazilian Atlantic forest</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>climate variables</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Deciduous forests</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>Forest conservation</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rainforests</topic><topic>Recognition</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anjos, Luiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volpato, Graziele H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, Edson V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willrich, Guilherme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bochio, Gabriela M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arakaki Lindsey, Barbara R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simões, Nadson R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendonça, Luciana B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boçon, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Joema</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, Marcos R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Austral ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anjos, Luiz</au><au>Volpato, Graziele H.</au><au>Lopes, Edson V.</au><au>Willrich, Guilherme</au><au>Bochio, Gabriela M.</au><au>Arakaki Lindsey, Barbara R.</au><au>Simões, Nadson R.</au><au>Mendonça, Luciana B.</au><au>Boçon, Roberto</au><au>Carvalho, Joema</au><au>Lima, Marcos R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distributions of birds and plants in ecoregions: Implications for the conservation of a neotropical biodiversity hotspot</atitle><jtitle>Austral ecology</jtitle><date>2018-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>839</spage><epage>849</epage><pages>839-849</pages><issn>1442-9985</issn><eissn>1442-9993</eissn><abstract>The delineation of unique areas in biodiversity is crucial for conservation planning. However, identification of distinct biotas is a challenging task. In this study, we use an objective analytical process to test if bird and plant species composition of three different forest formation in the Atlantic forest Biome is sufficiently distinct to merit the recognition of ecoregions. We also evaluated how current climatic and spatial factors shape the distribution of plants and birds. Sampling localities were selected in three forest types of southern Brazil: mixed rain forest (MF), seasonal semi‐deciduous forest (SF) and dense rain forest (DF). The point‐centred quarter method and point counts were used to sample plants and birds respectively. Multivariate analyses were used to evaluate species composition, while the Rank Occupancy Abundance Profile was used to determine the association of bird species with each forest type. We used variation partitioning to determine which factors, that is climatic, spatial or tree species abundance (in the case of birds) better explained the distribution of plants and birds. A total of 176 tree species and 270 bird species were recorded. The bird species composition was sufficiently distinct among the three forest types, but the plant species composition was only distinct between DF and MF. Moreover, 61% of bird species were associated with only one forest type. This high association and the different species composition suggest that these forest types are sufficiently distinct to merit the recognition of ecoregions. Plant distribution was mainly affected by climatic variables, while bird distribution was mainly influenced by forest type and less so by climatic variables. Our data suggest that all three forest types should be conserved, but conservation strategies are urgent in MF where only 0.39% of its original cover is under protection.</abstract><cop>Richmond</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/aec.12626</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2167-5739</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4577-9033</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0671-0172</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6786-1345</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3231-6256</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8278-5141</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8680-2375</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6413-648X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5901-0911</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1442-9985
ispartof Austral ecology, 2018-11, Vol.43 (7), p.839-849
issn 1442-9985
1442-9993
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2122125808
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
subjects Abundance
Biodiversity
Biodiversity hot spots
biogeography
Birds
Brazilian Atlantic forest
Climate change
climate variables
Composition
Conservation
Deciduous forests
Flowers & plants
Forest conservation
Forest management
Forests
Mathematical analysis
Plant species
Plants (botany)
Rain
Rainforests
Recognition
Species composition
Trees
Wildlife conservation
title Distributions of birds and plants in ecoregions: Implications for the conservation of a neotropical biodiversity hotspot
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T14%3A16%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distributions%20of%20birds%20and%20plants%20in%20ecoregions:%20Implications%20for%20the%20conservation%20of%20a%20neotropical%20biodiversity%20hotspot&rft.jtitle=Austral%20ecology&rft.au=Anjos,%20Luiz&rft.date=2018-11&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=839&rft.epage=849&rft.pages=839-849&rft.issn=1442-9985&rft.eissn=1442-9993&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aec.12626&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2122125808%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2122125808&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true