Comparison of Antibacterial Efficacy Chlorohexidine Gluconate and Saudi Myrrh Mouthwashes in the Oral Cavity
Myrrh have been traded in the Middle East and North Africa for 5,000 years, Myrrh is an Oleo-gum resin, phytotoxically safe raw material obtained from the stem of various species of the genus Commiphora, in recent years it has been used in pharmaceuticals, food industries. Chlorhexidine gluconate mo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Oriental journal of chemistry 2016, Vol.32 (5), p.2605-2610 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2610 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 2605 |
| container_title | Oriental journal of chemistry |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Sambawa, Zainah Alkahtani, Fawzia Aleanizy, Fadilah ALqahtani, Fulwah |
| description | Myrrh have been traded in the Middle East and North Africa for 5,000 years, Myrrh is an Oleo-gum resin, phytotoxically safe raw material obtained from the stem of various species of the genus Commiphora, in recent years it has been used in pharmaceuticals, food industries. Chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash is preferably prescribed by dentist as an effective mouthwash. Aim of the study to investigate the antibacterial effect of myrrh aqueous mouthwash (homemade) solution against some selected microbial flora and comparison of the activity with that of commercial chlorohexidine gluconate mouthwash by participation of 9 female volunteers. Antimicrobial activity of Myrrh was investigated and compared with 0.2% chlorohexidine gluconate mouthwash using agar diffusion method. Escherichia coli 25922, Salmonella 25566, Klebsiella pneumonia 13883, Pseudomonas 27853, Proteus, Staphylococcus aureus 25923, Bacillus, Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans were used in this study and adjusted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). The results revealed that Myrrh produced antimicrobial activity against oral flora and other species of microorganisms which was to some extent comparable with that of Chlorohexidine gluconate. Microbial load detection showed that home-made myrrh mouthwash aqueous solution is an effective as clinically proved mouthwash. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.13005/ojc/320532 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2121682894</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2121682894</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-3839a218ed586b5a5a0f12515b7d378bb0cd5c6bc24673f2873ec2e2d03fb7263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEFLwzAcxYMoOOZOfoGAR6km_yxtehxlTmFjBxW8lSRNaEbXzCRV--0tznd5l8d7vB9Ct5Q8UEYIf_QH_ciAcAYXaAbAaMYJKy_RjJQFyQiQj2u0iPFAJpVLllM-Q13ljycZXPQ99hav-uSU1MkEJzu8ttZpqUdctZ0PvjU_rnG9wZtu0L6XyWDZN_hVDo3DuzGEFu_8kNpvGVsTsetxag3eh6mpkl8ujTfoysoumsW_z9H70_qtes62-81LtdpmGkqRMiZYKYEK03CRKy65JJYCp1wVDSuEUkQ3XOdKwzIvmAVRMKPBQEOYVQXkbI7uzr2n4D8HE1N98EPop8kaKNBcgJj-z9H9OaWDjzEYW5-CO8ow1pTUf0TriWh9Jsp-AU-waVk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2121682894</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Antibacterial Efficacy Chlorohexidine Gluconate and Saudi Myrrh Mouthwashes in the Oral Cavity</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Sambawa, Zainah ; Alkahtani, Fawzia ; Aleanizy, Fadilah ; ALqahtani, Fulwah</creator><creatorcontrib>Sambawa, Zainah ; Alkahtani, Fawzia ; Aleanizy, Fadilah ; ALqahtani, Fulwah</creatorcontrib><description>Myrrh have been traded in the Middle East and North Africa for 5,000 years, Myrrh is an Oleo-gum resin, phytotoxically safe raw material obtained from the stem of various species of the genus Commiphora, in recent years it has been used in pharmaceuticals, food industries. Chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash is preferably prescribed by dentist as an effective mouthwash. Aim of the study to investigate the antibacterial effect of myrrh aqueous mouthwash (homemade) solution against some selected microbial flora and comparison of the activity with that of commercial chlorohexidine gluconate mouthwash by participation of 9 female volunteers. Antimicrobial activity of Myrrh was investigated and compared with 0.2% chlorohexidine gluconate mouthwash using agar diffusion method. Escherichia coli 25922, Salmonella 25566, Klebsiella pneumonia 13883, Pseudomonas 27853, Proteus, Staphylococcus aureus 25923, Bacillus, Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans were used in this study and adjusted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). The results revealed that Myrrh produced antimicrobial activity against oral flora and other species of microorganisms which was to some extent comparable with that of Chlorohexidine gluconate. Microbial load detection showed that home-made myrrh mouthwash aqueous solution is an effective as clinically proved mouthwash.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0970-020X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2231-5039</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.13005/ojc/320532</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bhopal: Oriental Scientific Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Antiinfectives and antibacterials ; Antimicrobial agents ; Chlorhexidine ; Dentistry ; E coli ; Klebsiella ; Microorganisms ; Mouthwashes ; Oral hygiene ; Salmonella ; Streptococcus infections ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Oriental journal of chemistry, 2016, Vol.32 (5), p.2605-2610</ispartof><rights>2016. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-3839a218ed586b5a5a0f12515b7d378bb0cd5c6bc24673f2873ec2e2d03fb7263</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4014,27914,27915,27916</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sambawa, Zainah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alkahtani, Fawzia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aleanizy, Fadilah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALqahtani, Fulwah</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Antibacterial Efficacy Chlorohexidine Gluconate and Saudi Myrrh Mouthwashes in the Oral Cavity</title><title>Oriental journal of chemistry</title><description>Myrrh have been traded in the Middle East and North Africa for 5,000 years, Myrrh is an Oleo-gum resin, phytotoxically safe raw material obtained from the stem of various species of the genus Commiphora, in recent years it has been used in pharmaceuticals, food industries. Chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash is preferably prescribed by dentist as an effective mouthwash. Aim of the study to investigate the antibacterial effect of myrrh aqueous mouthwash (homemade) solution against some selected microbial flora and comparison of the activity with that of commercial chlorohexidine gluconate mouthwash by participation of 9 female volunteers. Antimicrobial activity of Myrrh was investigated and compared with 0.2% chlorohexidine gluconate mouthwash using agar diffusion method. Escherichia coli 25922, Salmonella 25566, Klebsiella pneumonia 13883, Pseudomonas 27853, Proteus, Staphylococcus aureus 25923, Bacillus, Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans were used in this study and adjusted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). The results revealed that Myrrh produced antimicrobial activity against oral flora and other species of microorganisms which was to some extent comparable with that of Chlorohexidine gluconate. Microbial load detection showed that home-made myrrh mouthwash aqueous solution is an effective as clinically proved mouthwash.</description><subject>Antiinfectives and antibacterials</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Chlorhexidine</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Klebsiella</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Mouthwashes</subject><subject>Oral hygiene</subject><subject>Salmonella</subject><subject>Streptococcus infections</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0970-020X</issn><issn>2231-5039</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNotkEFLwzAcxYMoOOZOfoGAR6km_yxtehxlTmFjBxW8lSRNaEbXzCRV--0tznd5l8d7vB9Ct5Q8UEYIf_QH_ciAcAYXaAbAaMYJKy_RjJQFyQiQj2u0iPFAJpVLllM-Q13ljycZXPQ99hav-uSU1MkEJzu8ttZpqUdctZ0PvjU_rnG9wZtu0L6XyWDZN_hVDo3DuzGEFu_8kNpvGVsTsetxag3eh6mpkl8ujTfoysoumsW_z9H70_qtes62-81LtdpmGkqRMiZYKYEK03CRKy65JJYCp1wVDSuEUkQ3XOdKwzIvmAVRMKPBQEOYVQXkbI7uzr2n4D8HE1N98EPop8kaKNBcgJj-z9H9OaWDjzEYW5-CO8ow1pTUf0TriWh9Jsp-AU-waVk</recordid><startdate>2016</startdate><enddate>2016</enddate><creator>Sambawa, Zainah</creator><creator>Alkahtani, Fawzia</creator><creator>Aleanizy, Fadilah</creator><creator>ALqahtani, Fulwah</creator><general>Oriental Scientific Publishing Company</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2016</creationdate><title>Comparison of Antibacterial Efficacy Chlorohexidine Gluconate and Saudi Myrrh Mouthwashes in the Oral Cavity</title><author>Sambawa, Zainah ; Alkahtani, Fawzia ; Aleanizy, Fadilah ; ALqahtani, Fulwah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-3839a218ed586b5a5a0f12515b7d378bb0cd5c6bc24673f2873ec2e2d03fb7263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Antiinfectives and antibacterials</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Chlorhexidine</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Klebsiella</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Mouthwashes</topic><topic>Oral hygiene</topic><topic>Salmonella</topic><topic>Streptococcus infections</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sambawa, Zainah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alkahtani, Fawzia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aleanizy, Fadilah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALqahtani, Fulwah</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Oriental journal of chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sambawa, Zainah</au><au>Alkahtani, Fawzia</au><au>Aleanizy, Fadilah</au><au>ALqahtani, Fulwah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Antibacterial Efficacy Chlorohexidine Gluconate and Saudi Myrrh Mouthwashes in the Oral Cavity</atitle><jtitle>Oriental journal of chemistry</jtitle><date>2016</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2605</spage><epage>2610</epage><pages>2605-2610</pages><issn>0970-020X</issn><eissn>2231-5039</eissn><abstract>Myrrh have been traded in the Middle East and North Africa for 5,000 years, Myrrh is an Oleo-gum resin, phytotoxically safe raw material obtained from the stem of various species of the genus Commiphora, in recent years it has been used in pharmaceuticals, food industries. Chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash is preferably prescribed by dentist as an effective mouthwash. Aim of the study to investigate the antibacterial effect of myrrh aqueous mouthwash (homemade) solution against some selected microbial flora and comparison of the activity with that of commercial chlorohexidine gluconate mouthwash by participation of 9 female volunteers. Antimicrobial activity of Myrrh was investigated and compared with 0.2% chlorohexidine gluconate mouthwash using agar diffusion method. Escherichia coli 25922, Salmonella 25566, Klebsiella pneumonia 13883, Pseudomonas 27853, Proteus, Staphylococcus aureus 25923, Bacillus, Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans were used in this study and adjusted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). The results revealed that Myrrh produced antimicrobial activity against oral flora and other species of microorganisms which was to some extent comparable with that of Chlorohexidine gluconate. Microbial load detection showed that home-made myrrh mouthwash aqueous solution is an effective as clinically proved mouthwash.</abstract><cop>Bhopal</cop><pub>Oriental Scientific Publishing Company</pub><doi>10.13005/ojc/320532</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0970-020X |
| ispartof | Oriental journal of chemistry, 2016, Vol.32 (5), p.2605-2610 |
| issn | 0970-020X 2231-5039 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2121682894 |
| source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Antiinfectives and antibacterials Antimicrobial agents Chlorhexidine Dentistry E coli Klebsiella Microorganisms Mouthwashes Oral hygiene Salmonella Streptococcus infections Studies |
| title | Comparison of Antibacterial Efficacy Chlorohexidine Gluconate and Saudi Myrrh Mouthwashes in the Oral Cavity |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T20%3A39%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Antibacterial%20Efficacy%20Chlorohexidine%20Gluconate%20and%20Saudi%20Myrrh%20Mouthwashes%20in%20the%20Oral%20Cavity&rft.jtitle=Oriental%20journal%20of%20chemistry&rft.au=Sambawa,%20Zainah&rft.date=2016&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2605&rft.epage=2610&rft.pages=2605-2610&rft.issn=0970-020X&rft.eissn=2231-5039&rft_id=info:doi/10.13005/ojc/320532&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2121682894%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2121682894&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |