Instructor-led versus Video-led Exercise: A Comparison of Intensity in Obese Youth
Background: Exercise is a key component in treating childhood obesity. Group exercise sessions with a trained instructor are ideal, but most treatment programs cannot offer these often enough to meet physical activity guidelines. At-home options that provide a similar-intensity workout are needed. O...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of kinesiology and sports science 2018-07, Vol.6 (3), p.12 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 12 |
| container_title | International journal of kinesiology and sports science |
| container_volume | 6 |
| creator | Gier, Amanda Edwards, Nicholas M. Khoury, Philip R. Kirk, Shelley Kist, Christopher Siegel, Robert |
| description | Background: Exercise is a key component in treating childhood obesity. Group exercise sessions with a trained instructor are ideal, but most treatment programs cannot offer these often enough to meet physical activity guidelines. At-home options that provide a similar-intensity workout are needed. Objective: To determine if exercise videos are a feasible at-home option for obese youth to meet recommended physical activity guidelines for moderate-to-vigorous exercise. Methods: Obese youth attended a summer camp focused on weight management. Subjects wore accelerometers to assess physical activity levels at camp. During camp, all subjects completed four exercise activities: three separate exercise sessions led by exercise physiologists (EP), as well as an exercise video (EV). Each exercise session utilized a different format: high intensity interval training (HIIT), group games (GG) and yoga. The EV, created by the same EP, included aerobic exercise and yoga. Data was analyzed to determine intensity associated with each exercise session. Results: Data was obtained from 16 (50%) accelerometers (9 girls, 7 boys). There was no difference in sedentary (SED) minutes per hour between activities. HIIT and GG had more moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) than yoga (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.7575/aiac.ijkss.v.6n.3p.12 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2121412571</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2121412571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1261-72abd56cdd798560b7cddb297059cd44b64bb48a63c74b375e51421bd7b8f8a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1KAzEAhIMoWGofQQh43jX_2fVWStVCoSAqegpJNoupbbImu8W-vbX14GmGYZiBD4BrjErJJb_VXtvSrz9zLnelCCXtSkzOwIgQRIqaibfzf_4STHJeI4Sw4BhTPgJPi5D7NNg-pmLjGrhzKQ8ZvvrGxWMw_3bJ-uzu4BTO4rbTyecYYGzhIvQuZN_voQ9wZVx28D0O_ccVuGj1JrvJn47By_38efZYLFcPi9l0WVhMBC4k0abhwjaNrCsukJEHa0gtEa9tw5gRzBhWaUGtZIZK7jhmBJtGmqqtdEXH4Oa026X4Nbjcq3UcUjhcKoIJZphwiQ8tfmrZFHNOrlVd8lud9goj9UtQ_RJUR4Jqp0RQtFOY0B-VPGhe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2121412571</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Instructor-led versus Video-led Exercise: A Comparison of Intensity in Obese Youth</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gier, Amanda ; Edwards, Nicholas M. ; Khoury, Philip R. ; Kirk, Shelley ; Kist, Christopher ; Siegel, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Gier, Amanda ; Edwards, Nicholas M. ; Khoury, Philip R. ; Kirk, Shelley ; Kist, Christopher ; Siegel, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Exercise is a key component in treating childhood obesity. Group exercise sessions with a trained instructor are ideal, but most treatment programs cannot offer these often enough to meet physical activity guidelines. At-home options that provide a similar-intensity workout are needed. Objective: To determine if exercise videos are a feasible at-home option for obese youth to meet recommended physical activity guidelines for moderate-to-vigorous exercise. Methods: Obese youth attended a summer camp focused on weight management. Subjects wore accelerometers to assess physical activity levels at camp. During camp, all subjects completed four exercise activities: three separate exercise sessions led by exercise physiologists (EP), as well as an exercise video (EV). Each exercise session utilized a different format: high intensity interval training (HIIT), group games (GG) and yoga. The EV, created by the same EP, included aerobic exercise and yoga. Data was analyzed to determine intensity associated with each exercise session. Results: Data was obtained from 16 (50%) accelerometers (9 girls, 7 boys). There was no difference in sedentary (SED) minutes per hour between activities. HIIT and GG had more moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) than yoga (p<0.0001 and p=0.01) and EV (p<0.0001 and p=0.01). There was no difference in MVPA between HIIT and GG. Conclusions: Obese children exercised at higher intensities during instructor-led HIIT and GG exercise sessions than yoga or EV sessions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2202-946X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2202-946X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7575/aiac.ijkss.v.6n.3p.12</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Footscray: Australian International Academic Centre PTY. Ltd (AIAC)</publisher><subject>Accelerometers ; Children ; Data processing ; Exercise ; Girls ; Guidelines ; Obesity ; Physical activity ; Physical fitness ; Physical training ; Weight ; Yoga ; Youth</subject><ispartof>International journal of kinesiology and sports science, 2018-07, Vol.6 (3), p.12</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1261-72abd56cdd798560b7cddb297059cd44b64bb48a63c74b375e51421bd7b8f8a83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gier, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Nicholas M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khoury, Philip R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirk, Shelley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kist, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegel, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Instructor-led versus Video-led Exercise: A Comparison of Intensity in Obese Youth</title><title>International journal of kinesiology and sports science</title><description>Background: Exercise is a key component in treating childhood obesity. Group exercise sessions with a trained instructor are ideal, but most treatment programs cannot offer these often enough to meet physical activity guidelines. At-home options that provide a similar-intensity workout are needed. Objective: To determine if exercise videos are a feasible at-home option for obese youth to meet recommended physical activity guidelines for moderate-to-vigorous exercise. Methods: Obese youth attended a summer camp focused on weight management. Subjects wore accelerometers to assess physical activity levels at camp. During camp, all subjects completed four exercise activities: three separate exercise sessions led by exercise physiologists (EP), as well as an exercise video (EV). Each exercise session utilized a different format: high intensity interval training (HIIT), group games (GG) and yoga. The EV, created by the same EP, included aerobic exercise and yoga. Data was analyzed to determine intensity associated with each exercise session. Results: Data was obtained from 16 (50%) accelerometers (9 girls, 7 boys). There was no difference in sedentary (SED) minutes per hour between activities. HIIT and GG had more moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) than yoga (p<0.0001 and p=0.01) and EV (p<0.0001 and p=0.01). There was no difference in MVPA between HIIT and GG. Conclusions: Obese children exercised at higher intensities during instructor-led HIIT and GG exercise sessions than yoga or EV sessions.</description><subject>Accelerometers</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Girls</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Physical activity</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>Physical training</subject><subject>Weight</subject><subject>Yoga</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>2202-946X</issn><issn>2202-946X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkM1KAzEAhIMoWGofQQh43jX_2fVWStVCoSAqegpJNoupbbImu8W-vbX14GmGYZiBD4BrjErJJb_VXtvSrz9zLnelCCXtSkzOwIgQRIqaibfzf_4STHJeI4Sw4BhTPgJPi5D7NNg-pmLjGrhzKQ8ZvvrGxWMw_3bJ-uzu4BTO4rbTyecYYGzhIvQuZN_voQ9wZVx28D0O_ccVuGj1JrvJn47By_38efZYLFcPi9l0WVhMBC4k0abhwjaNrCsukJEHa0gtEa9tw5gRzBhWaUGtZIZK7jhmBJtGmqqtdEXH4Oa026X4Nbjcq3UcUjhcKoIJZphwiQ8tfmrZFHNOrlVd8lud9goj9UtQ_RJUR4Jqp0RQtFOY0B-VPGhe</recordid><startdate>20180731</startdate><enddate>20180731</enddate><creator>Gier, Amanda</creator><creator>Edwards, Nicholas M.</creator><creator>Khoury, Philip R.</creator><creator>Kirk, Shelley</creator><creator>Kist, Christopher</creator><creator>Siegel, Robert</creator><general>Australian International Academic Centre PTY. Ltd (AIAC)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AYAGU</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180731</creationdate><title>Instructor-led versus Video-led Exercise: A Comparison of Intensity in Obese Youth</title><author>Gier, Amanda ; Edwards, Nicholas M. ; Khoury, Philip R. ; Kirk, Shelley ; Kist, Christopher ; Siegel, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1261-72abd56cdd798560b7cddb297059cd44b64bb48a63c74b375e51421bd7b8f8a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Accelerometers</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Girls</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Physical activity</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>Physical training</topic><topic>Weight</topic><topic>Yoga</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gier, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Nicholas M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khoury, Philip R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirk, Shelley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kist, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegel, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Australia & New Zealand Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>International journal of kinesiology and sports science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gier, Amanda</au><au>Edwards, Nicholas M.</au><au>Khoury, Philip R.</au><au>Kirk, Shelley</au><au>Kist, Christopher</au><au>Siegel, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Instructor-led versus Video-led Exercise: A Comparison of Intensity in Obese Youth</atitle><jtitle>International journal of kinesiology and sports science</jtitle><date>2018-07-31</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>12</spage><pages>12-</pages><issn>2202-946X</issn><eissn>2202-946X</eissn><abstract>Background: Exercise is a key component in treating childhood obesity. Group exercise sessions with a trained instructor are ideal, but most treatment programs cannot offer these often enough to meet physical activity guidelines. At-home options that provide a similar-intensity workout are needed. Objective: To determine if exercise videos are a feasible at-home option for obese youth to meet recommended physical activity guidelines for moderate-to-vigorous exercise. Methods: Obese youth attended a summer camp focused on weight management. Subjects wore accelerometers to assess physical activity levels at camp. During camp, all subjects completed four exercise activities: three separate exercise sessions led by exercise physiologists (EP), as well as an exercise video (EV). Each exercise session utilized a different format: high intensity interval training (HIIT), group games (GG) and yoga. The EV, created by the same EP, included aerobic exercise and yoga. Data was analyzed to determine intensity associated with each exercise session. Results: Data was obtained from 16 (50%) accelerometers (9 girls, 7 boys). There was no difference in sedentary (SED) minutes per hour between activities. HIIT and GG had more moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) than yoga (p<0.0001 and p=0.01) and EV (p<0.0001 and p=0.01). There was no difference in MVPA between HIIT and GG. Conclusions: Obese children exercised at higher intensities during instructor-led HIIT and GG exercise sessions than yoga or EV sessions.</abstract><cop>Footscray</cop><pub>Australian International Academic Centre PTY. Ltd (AIAC)</pub><doi>10.7575/aiac.ijkss.v.6n.3p.12</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2202-946X |
| ispartof | International journal of kinesiology and sports science, 2018-07, Vol.6 (3), p.12 |
| issn | 2202-946X 2202-946X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2121412571 |
| source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Accelerometers Children Data processing Exercise Girls Guidelines Obesity Physical activity Physical fitness Physical training Weight Yoga Youth |
| title | Instructor-led versus Video-led Exercise: A Comparison of Intensity in Obese Youth |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T00%3A34%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Instructor-led%20versus%20Video-led%20Exercise:%20A%20Comparison%20of%20Intensity%20in%20Obese%20Youth&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20kinesiology%20and%20sports%20science&rft.au=Gier,%20Amanda&rft.date=2018-07-31&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=12&rft.pages=12-&rft.issn=2202-946X&rft.eissn=2202-946X&rft_id=info:doi/10.7575/aiac.ijkss.v.6n.3p.12&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2121412571%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2121412571&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |