Using the Child and Adolescent Service Intensity Instrument (CASII) as an Outcome Measure

Background: The reliability and validity of the Child and Adolescent Service Intensity Instrument (CASII) as a tool to help determine needed level of care for children with behavioral health needs has previously been established. Objective: To determine the utility of the CASII as an outcome measure...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical outcomes management 2018-04, Vol.25 (4)
Hauptverfasser: Henderson, Lorrie, Wasser, Catherine, Wasser, Thomas E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page
container_title Journal of clinical outcomes management
container_volume 25
creator Henderson, Lorrie
Wasser, Catherine
Wasser, Thomas E
description Background: The reliability and validity of the Child and Adolescent Service Intensity Instrument (CASII) as a tool to help determine needed level of care for children with behavioral health needs has previously been established. Objective: To determine the utility of the CASII as an outcome measure. Methods: A sample consisting of all clients (n = 8465) admitted to service at an outpatient behavioral health facility from 2013 through 2016 were studied. CASII was administered at admission and discharge and ratings were compared with paired t-tests within demographic and diagnosis groups. Results: Mean CASII composite ratings decreased between admission and discharge in the entire cohort as well as within gender, age group, and multiple diagnosis groups tested. Conclusion: CASII was useful as an outcome measure in our relatively low to moderate acuity population.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2120900864</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2120900864</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p98t-b9e4861f7b43cbc0813cca487e4e07cee560a7adb54b3c3dca34ebd9eb8b49453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjUtLw0AUhQdRsFb_w4AbXQRueieZmWUIPgKVLloXrso8bm1KOqmZieC_N0VX54PDd84Fm-UaVZYjlpcTg9RZWSBes5sYDwAgQcGMfbzHNnzytCde79vOcxM8r3zfUXQUEl_T8N064k1IFGKbfiaKaRiP5_KhrtZN88hNnDS-GpPrj8TfyMRxoFt2tTNdpLv_nLPN89Omfs2Wq5emrpbZSauUWU1ClflOWoHOOlA5OmeEkiQIpCMqSjDSeFsIiw69MyjIek1WWaFFgXN2_zd7GvqvkWLaHvpxCNPjdpEvQAOoUuAviBNO6g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2120900864</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using the Child and Adolescent Service Intensity Instrument (CASII) as an Outcome Measure</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Henderson, Lorrie ; Wasser, Catherine ; Wasser, Thomas E</creator><creatorcontrib>Henderson, Lorrie ; Wasser, Catherine ; Wasser, Thomas E</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The reliability and validity of the Child and Adolescent Service Intensity Instrument (CASII) as a tool to help determine needed level of care for children with behavioral health needs has previously been established. Objective: To determine the utility of the CASII as an outcome measure. Methods: A sample consisting of all clients (n = 8465) admitted to service at an outpatient behavioral health facility from 2013 through 2016 were studied. CASII was administered at admission and discharge and ratings were compared with paired t-tests within demographic and diagnosis groups. Results: Mean CASII composite ratings decreased between admission and discharge in the entire cohort as well as within gender, age group, and multiple diagnosis groups tested. Conclusion: CASII was useful as an outcome measure in our relatively low to moderate acuity population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1079-6533</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-1336</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Wayne: Turner White Communications Inc</publisher><subject>Child psychology ; Clinical outcomes ; Studies ; Teenagers ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical outcomes management, 2018-04, Vol.25 (4)</ispartof><rights>Copyright Turner White Communications Inc. Apr 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Henderson, Lorrie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasser, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasser, Thomas E</creatorcontrib><title>Using the Child and Adolescent Service Intensity Instrument (CASII) as an Outcome Measure</title><title>Journal of clinical outcomes management</title><description>Background: The reliability and validity of the Child and Adolescent Service Intensity Instrument (CASII) as a tool to help determine needed level of care for children with behavioral health needs has previously been established. Objective: To determine the utility of the CASII as an outcome measure. Methods: A sample consisting of all clients (n = 8465) admitted to service at an outpatient behavioral health facility from 2013 through 2016 were studied. CASII was administered at admission and discharge and ratings were compared with paired t-tests within demographic and diagnosis groups. Results: Mean CASII composite ratings decreased between admission and discharge in the entire cohort as well as within gender, age group, and multiple diagnosis groups tested. Conclusion: CASII was useful as an outcome measure in our relatively low to moderate acuity population.</description><subject>Child psychology</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1079-6533</issn><issn>1938-1336</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotjUtLw0AUhQdRsFb_w4AbXQRueieZmWUIPgKVLloXrso8bm1KOqmZieC_N0VX54PDd84Fm-UaVZYjlpcTg9RZWSBes5sYDwAgQcGMfbzHNnzytCde79vOcxM8r3zfUXQUEl_T8N064k1IFGKbfiaKaRiP5_KhrtZN88hNnDS-GpPrj8TfyMRxoFt2tTNdpLv_nLPN89Omfs2Wq5emrpbZSauUWU1ClflOWoHOOlA5OmeEkiQIpCMqSjDSeFsIiw69MyjIek1WWaFFgXN2_zd7GvqvkWLaHvpxCNPjdpEvQAOoUuAviBNO6g</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Henderson, Lorrie</creator><creator>Wasser, Catherine</creator><creator>Wasser, Thomas E</creator><general>Turner White Communications Inc</general><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Using the Child and Adolescent Service Intensity Instrument (CASII) as an Outcome Measure</title><author>Henderson, Lorrie ; Wasser, Catherine ; Wasser, Thomas E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p98t-b9e4861f7b43cbc0813cca487e4e07cee560a7adb54b3c3dca34ebd9eb8b49453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Child psychology</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Henderson, Lorrie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasser, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasser, Thomas E</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical outcomes management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Henderson, Lorrie</au><au>Wasser, Catherine</au><au>Wasser, Thomas E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using the Child and Adolescent Service Intensity Instrument (CASII) as an Outcome Measure</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical outcomes management</jtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><issn>1079-6533</issn><eissn>1938-1336</eissn><abstract>Background: The reliability and validity of the Child and Adolescent Service Intensity Instrument (CASII) as a tool to help determine needed level of care for children with behavioral health needs has previously been established. Objective: To determine the utility of the CASII as an outcome measure. Methods: A sample consisting of all clients (n = 8465) admitted to service at an outpatient behavioral health facility from 2013 through 2016 were studied. CASII was administered at admission and discharge and ratings were compared with paired t-tests within demographic and diagnosis groups. Results: Mean CASII composite ratings decreased between admission and discharge in the entire cohort as well as within gender, age group, and multiple diagnosis groups tested. Conclusion: CASII was useful as an outcome measure in our relatively low to moderate acuity population.</abstract><cop>Wayne</cop><pub>Turner White Communications Inc</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1079-6533
ispartof Journal of clinical outcomes management, 2018-04, Vol.25 (4)
issn 1079-6533
1938-1336
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2120900864
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Child psychology
Clinical outcomes
Studies
Teenagers
Validity
title Using the Child and Adolescent Service Intensity Instrument (CASII) as an Outcome Measure
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T20%3A35%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20the%20Child%20and%20Adolescent%20Service%20Intensity%20Instrument%20(CASII)%20as%20an%20Outcome%20Measure&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20outcomes%20management&rft.au=Henderson,%20Lorrie&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.issn=1079-6533&rft.eissn=1938-1336&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2120900864%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2120900864&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true