Health Care Capital Financing Agencies: The Intergovernmental Roles of Quasi-Government Authorities and the Impact on the Cost of Capital
During the decade 1983‐1992, approximately $1.4 trillion of municipal bonds were sold in 87,000 in separate issues, primarily to finance capital projects for education, electric power, transportation, health care, housing, and other public and private purpose activities. Approximately two‐thirds of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Public budgeting & finance 2000, Vol.20 (1), p.1-23 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 23 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Public budgeting & finance |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Gershberg, Alec Ian Grossman, Michael Goldman, Fred |
description | During the decade 1983‐1992, approximately $1.4 trillion of municipal bonds were sold in 87,000 in separate issues, primarily to finance capital projects for education, electric power, transportation, health care, housing, and other public and private purpose activities. Approximately two‐thirds of these financings were originated by financing authorities, quasi‐government agencies which are the creation of state legislature. Despite the growing role played by quasi‐public authorities in capital finance, their impacts have not been studied systematically. We first describe the issuers of tax‐exempt debt in the health sector and then derive measures for describing the mix of issuers between state and local levels, and between both government and quasi‐government sectors. We present abbreviated test results of the impact that different mixes have on the cost of capital. First, competition is good: using a Herfindahl index analysis we show that states with less concentrated issuers have a lower cost of capital than those with a more concentrated market, including state‐level finance monopolies. On the other hand, we cannot assert unequivocally that market deconcentration, in and of itself, should be a goal. For instance, there are economies of scale in the health care finance industry that allow larger (often state‐level) issuers to lower the cost of capital. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/0275-1100.00001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_212084211</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>55312511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3691-e94e7de80fa7880ce7aa0d9df3a9ef36043ed42f0b1b1af50e3f31fcc6a50b983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqWwZmuxD7XjPNmViLagipdALC03GbcpqV1sF-gn8Nc4DeqWWfihOWdGugidU3JJfQ1ImMYBpYRcEl_0APVoHJEgzmJyiHr77jE6sXbpiShJ4x76mYBo3AIXwoA_1rUTDR7VSqiyVnM8nIN_gL3CLwvAt8qBmetPMGoFqiWfdQMWa4mfNsLWwXjfw8ONW2hTOy9joSrsWn-1FqXDWu1-hbauVf-2nqIjKRoLZ393H72Obl6KSTB9GN8Ww2lQsiSnAeQRpBVkRIo0y0gJqRCkyivJRA6SJSRiUEWhJDM6o0LGBJhkVJZlImIyyzPWRxfd3LXRHxuwji_1xii_koc0JFkUUuqhQQeVRltrQPK1qVfCbDklvI2bt4HyNlC-i9sbUWd81Q1s_8P54_Vw1GlBp9XWwfdeE-adJynzztv9mBf55I5On8acsl8Y4ZGU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212084211</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Health Care Capital Financing Agencies: The Intergovernmental Roles of Quasi-Government Authorities and the Impact on the Cost of Capital</title><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Gershberg, Alec Ian ; Grossman, Michael ; Goldman, Fred</creator><creatorcontrib>Gershberg, Alec Ian ; Grossman, Michael ; Goldman, Fred</creatorcontrib><description>During the decade 1983‐1992, approximately $1.4 trillion of municipal bonds were sold in 87,000 in separate issues, primarily to finance capital projects for education, electric power, transportation, health care, housing, and other public and private purpose activities. Approximately two‐thirds of these financings were originated by financing authorities, quasi‐government agencies which are the creation of state legislature. Despite the growing role played by quasi‐public authorities in capital finance, their impacts have not been studied systematically. We first describe the issuers of tax‐exempt debt in the health sector and then derive measures for describing the mix of issuers between state and local levels, and between both government and quasi‐government sectors. We present abbreviated test results of the impact that different mixes have on the cost of capital. First, competition is good: using a Herfindahl index analysis we show that states with less concentrated issuers have a lower cost of capital than those with a more concentrated market, including state‐level finance monopolies. On the other hand, we cannot assert unequivocally that market deconcentration, in and of itself, should be a goal. For instance, there are economies of scale in the health care finance industry that allow larger (often state‐level) issuers to lower the cost of capital.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0275-1100</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-5850</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/0275-1100.00001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, USA and Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Inc</publisher><subject>Beneficiaries ; Bond issues ; Bond markets ; Capital costs ; Competition ; Electric power ; Government agencies ; Health care industry ; Health services ; Impact analysis ; Municipal bonds ; Public finance ; Studies ; Taxonomy</subject><ispartof>Public budgeting & finance, 2000, Vol.20 (1), p.1-23</ispartof><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Inc. Spring 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3691-e94e7de80fa7880ce7aa0d9df3a9ef36043ed42f0b1b1af50e3f31fcc6a50b983</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F0275-1100.00001$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F0275-1100.00001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27843,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gershberg, Alec Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grossman, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldman, Fred</creatorcontrib><title>Health Care Capital Financing Agencies: The Intergovernmental Roles of Quasi-Government Authorities and the Impact on the Cost of Capital</title><title>Public budgeting & finance</title><description>During the decade 1983‐1992, approximately $1.4 trillion of municipal bonds were sold in 87,000 in separate issues, primarily to finance capital projects for education, electric power, transportation, health care, housing, and other public and private purpose activities. Approximately two‐thirds of these financings were originated by financing authorities, quasi‐government agencies which are the creation of state legislature. Despite the growing role played by quasi‐public authorities in capital finance, their impacts have not been studied systematically. We first describe the issuers of tax‐exempt debt in the health sector and then derive measures for describing the mix of issuers between state and local levels, and between both government and quasi‐government sectors. We present abbreviated test results of the impact that different mixes have on the cost of capital. First, competition is good: using a Herfindahl index analysis we show that states with less concentrated issuers have a lower cost of capital than those with a more concentrated market, including state‐level finance monopolies. On the other hand, we cannot assert unequivocally that market deconcentration, in and of itself, should be a goal. For instance, there are economies of scale in the health care finance industry that allow larger (often state‐level) issuers to lower the cost of capital.</description><subject>Beneficiaries</subject><subject>Bond issues</subject><subject>Bond markets</subject><subject>Capital costs</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Electric power</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Health care industry</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Municipal bonds</subject><subject>Public finance</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><issn>0275-1100</issn><issn>1540-5850</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqWwZmuxD7XjPNmViLagipdALC03GbcpqV1sF-gn8Nc4DeqWWfihOWdGugidU3JJfQ1ImMYBpYRcEl_0APVoHJEgzmJyiHr77jE6sXbpiShJ4x76mYBo3AIXwoA_1rUTDR7VSqiyVnM8nIN_gL3CLwvAt8qBmetPMGoFqiWfdQMWa4mfNsLWwXjfw8ONW2hTOy9joSrsWn-1FqXDWu1-hbauVf-2nqIjKRoLZ393H72Obl6KSTB9GN8Ww2lQsiSnAeQRpBVkRIo0y0gJqRCkyivJRA6SJSRiUEWhJDM6o0LGBJhkVJZlImIyyzPWRxfd3LXRHxuwji_1xii_koc0JFkUUuqhQQeVRltrQPK1qVfCbDklvI2bt4HyNlC-i9sbUWd81Q1s_8P54_Vw1GlBp9XWwfdeE-adJynzztv9mBf55I5On8acsl8Y4ZGU</recordid><startdate>2000</startdate><enddate>2000</enddate><creator>Gershberg, Alec Ian</creator><creator>Grossman, Michael</creator><creator>Goldman, Fred</creator><general>Blackwell Publishers Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2000</creationdate><title>Health Care Capital Financing Agencies: The Intergovernmental Roles of Quasi-Government Authorities and the Impact on the Cost of Capital</title><author>Gershberg, Alec Ian ; Grossman, Michael ; Goldman, Fred</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3691-e94e7de80fa7880ce7aa0d9df3a9ef36043ed42f0b1b1af50e3f31fcc6a50b983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Beneficiaries</topic><topic>Bond issues</topic><topic>Bond markets</topic><topic>Capital costs</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Electric power</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Health care industry</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Municipal bonds</topic><topic>Public finance</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gershberg, Alec Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grossman, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldman, Fred</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Public budgeting & finance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gershberg, Alec Ian</au><au>Grossman, Michael</au><au>Goldman, Fred</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Health Care Capital Financing Agencies: The Intergovernmental Roles of Quasi-Government Authorities and the Impact on the Cost of Capital</atitle><jtitle>Public budgeting & finance</jtitle><date>2000</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>1-23</pages><issn>0275-1100</issn><eissn>1540-5850</eissn><abstract>During the decade 1983‐1992, approximately $1.4 trillion of municipal bonds were sold in 87,000 in separate issues, primarily to finance capital projects for education, electric power, transportation, health care, housing, and other public and private purpose activities. Approximately two‐thirds of these financings were originated by financing authorities, quasi‐government agencies which are the creation of state legislature. Despite the growing role played by quasi‐public authorities in capital finance, their impacts have not been studied systematically. We first describe the issuers of tax‐exempt debt in the health sector and then derive measures for describing the mix of issuers between state and local levels, and between both government and quasi‐government sectors. We present abbreviated test results of the impact that different mixes have on the cost of capital. First, competition is good: using a Herfindahl index analysis we show that states with less concentrated issuers have a lower cost of capital than those with a more concentrated market, including state‐level finance monopolies. On the other hand, we cannot assert unequivocally that market deconcentration, in and of itself, should be a goal. For instance, there are economies of scale in the health care finance industry that allow larger (often state‐level) issuers to lower the cost of capital.</abstract><cop>Boston, USA and Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishers Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/0275-1100.00001</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0275-1100 |
ispartof | Public budgeting & finance, 2000, Vol.20 (1), p.1-23 |
issn | 0275-1100 1540-5850 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_212084211 |
source | Political Science Complete; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Beneficiaries Bond issues Bond markets Capital costs Competition Electric power Government agencies Health care industry Health services Impact analysis Municipal bonds Public finance Studies Taxonomy |
title | Health Care Capital Financing Agencies: The Intergovernmental Roles of Quasi-Government Authorities and the Impact on the Cost of Capital |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T18%3A55%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Health%20Care%20Capital%20Financing%20Agencies:%20The%20Intergovernmental%20Roles%20of%20Quasi-Government%20Authorities%20and%20the%20Impact%20on%20the%20Cost%20of%20Capital&rft.jtitle=Public%20budgeting%20&%20finance&rft.au=Gershberg,%20Alec%20Ian&rft.date=2000&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=1-23&rft.issn=0275-1100&rft.eissn=1540-5850&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/0275-1100.00001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E55312511%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212084211&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |